Harris, T.R., Bransford, J.D. & Brophy, S.P. (2002). Roles for learning sciences and learning technologies in biomedical engineering education: A review of recent advances. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 4, 29-48.2 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.3 Cordray, D.S., Pion, G.M., Harris, A. & Norris, P. (2003). The value of the VaNTH Engineering Center. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, May/June, pp. 47-54.4 Cordray, D.S., Harris, T.R. & Gilbert, J. (2007). “What Works” in Engineering Education? A Meta-analysis of VaNTH
student at Colorado School of Mines, pursuing degrees in engineering physics and electrical engineering. He has been programming in industry for seven years and wrote the InkSurvey software. Page 12.1552.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Using InkSurvey: A Free Web-Based Tool for Open-Ended Questioning to Promote Active Learning and Real-Time Formative Assessment of Tablet PC-Equipped Engineering StudentsAbstractVast amounts of educational and psychological research support the efficacy of both activelearning and frequent real-time formative
AC 2007-2247: OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT AS A SITE OF INTEGRATION: ABETMEETS THE COUNCIL OF WRITING PROGRAM ADMINISTRATORSMarie Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie Paretti is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC).Lisa McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC).Diana George, Virginia Tech Diana George is a Professor of English at Virginia Tech, where she directs the First-Year Writing Program.kelly belanger, Virginia Tech Kelly Belanger is an Associate
including an“array of ideas” into the work that she does, to be undermined by the competitive, individualisticnature of the curriculum. Towards the end of her sophomore year, she described her experiencesin her pre-engineering classes: “It just seemed like there was just a different frame of mind and the whole ‘me succeeding,’ like ‘me, me, me,’ and really not wanting to help people, and I didn’t understand that, because I really, if I know something, I’m gonna help you figure it out, and I would hope that if I didn’t know something, it would be the same way.”Asked where this different frame of mind comes from, Bryn said
focuses on the soft skills ofthe graduating engineer, and one that strengthens technical ECE skills that are not easilyoutsourced and are in fact hard to find. The proposed changes are based on numerousreports and studies that have examined the issue of outsourcing. These proposed changesare already taking place at many US institutions. While it is not expected that the numberof ECE professional would go back to the peak levels of 1987, it is crucial that ECEcurricula respond to outsourcing by graduating creative engineers that aremultidisciplinary team leaders, knowledge generators, system level designers, and thatare globally aware, business minded, and strong in the fundamentals.References[1] http://www.itpaa.org/modules.php?name=News&file
innovative systems to integrate teachingand research. Upon its completion, this lab will become a benchmark for integration ofteaching and research in civil engineering. Page 12.524.3Functional Components of the Structural and Construction LaboratoryThe lab is planned and designed while having the following strategic goal in mind: “Toprovide students and local/regional engineering/building/construction industry withsuperior technology and world-class testing and research capability.” It contains threemodules. Module 1 has the MTS facility, versatile structural testing facility, and scaledbridge testing and monitoring systems. The second module has the
performancegoals.ConclusionsEach experiment designed with a single goal in mind. The experiments addressed dataacquisition, sensors and actuators, plant modeling and system identification, disturbancerejection, command following, and tracking for electro-mechanical plants. The developedlaboratory was successful to improve the students understanding and provide them with essentialskills needed to be a successful engineer in industry. Students prefer learning by hands-on Page 12.688.8experience and the feedback from them has been very positive. More funding is available for thelaboratory development and maintenance due to the fact that the course is used by
. Proposed MethodBecause introductory courses affect student retention and success significantly, it is paramount todevelop and implement new and novel teaching techniques that capture student interest, keeptheir attention, and ensure their active participation in the learning process. With this in mind, amulti-week collaborative project model has been developed to engage students from twodifferent universities, one with freshman engineering (Texas A&M University – Kingsville,TAMUK) and the other with engineering technology (Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi,TAMUCC), classes. The purpose of this project model is to create cooperative tasks amongstudents from different classes and universities in an effort to emphasize team and
AC 2007-1541: USING PHENOMENOGRAPHY TO INVESTIGATE DIFFERENTWAYS OF EXPERIENCING SUSTAINABLE DESIGNLlewellyn Mann, University of Queensland LLEWELLYN MANN is a PhD student in the School of Engineering at the University of Queensland and a member of the Catalyst Research Centre for Society and Technology. He has a Bachelor of Engineering (Mechanical & Space) and a Bachelor of Science (Physics) from UQ, as well as a Graduate Certificate of Education (Higher Education). Major research interests include; Engineering Education, Sustainability, Teaching and Learning, Engineering Design, Technology and Society.Gloria Dall'Alba, University of Queensland GLORIA DALL'ALBA teaches and
a necessity for the today’sundergraduate mechanical engineering programs. At Grand Valley State University (GVSU), westrive to keep our curriculum up to date, reflecting the demands of industry. We have thereforebegun the process of integrating the use of FEA tools throughout the curriculum, instead ofdelaying it until the senior year either for senior design or elective courses. This paper describesthe introduction of FEA to students in the first course of Statics and Solid Mechanics. The firstpriority of this course is to build the foundation for Mechanics. The challenge therefore was todetermine the content without compromising the priority. Keeping this in mind, 1-D Barelements and 2-D Truss elements are introduced in the course. These
for actuallyimplementing “kit” aircraft into existing aerospace engineering curricula. In a humble spirit,the purpose of this document is to provide a few of these guideposts.Course ObjectivesIt has been important from the outset that a laboratory course involving aircraft constructionbe more than one that merely turning students into “kit builders,” though that may certainly beone of the outcomes. The official course objectives of Aero 572, “Aircraft Manufacturingand Fabrication,” were specifically developed with this in mind. The course is offered twoquarters of every academic year, and the specific objectives as taken from the study guide arelisted and discussed below.13 The course objectives are to provide a hands-on demonstration and
AC 2007-537: DEVELOPMENT OF A MANUFACTURING PROCESSES COURSEFOR A BSE PROGRAM: SIGHTS, SOUNDS, SMELLS, AND STUDENT LEARNINGDavid Farrow, University of Tennessee-Martin David Farrow is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at the University of Tennessee at Martin. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Arlington in 1989, 1990, and 1995, respectively. Dr. Farrow has taught courses including solid modeling, mechanical vibrations, automatic controls, automated production systems, instrumentation and experimental methods, and now manufacturing processes at the University of Tennessee at Martin for five years
AC 2007-1995: ENHANCING LIFELONG LEARNING AND COMMUNICATIONABILITIES THROUGH A UNIQUE SERIES OF PROJECTS INTHERMODYNAMICSMargaret Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology MARGARET BAILEY, registered professional engineer, is the Kate Gleason Chair and Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at RIT. She earned her BSE at Pennsylvania State University in 1988 and her Ph.D. at University of Colorado at Boulder in 1998. She conducts research with students using advanced thermodynamic analyses and neural network modeling applied to various, energy-intensive, complex mechanical systems. Dr. Bailey serves in numerous leadership roles within her college, including Executive Director of RIT’s Women
. Trick (1996). “Mallard ™: Asynchronous Learning In Two Engineering Courses,” Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. pp. 1023 - 1026 vol.3.13. NEEDS Digital Library for Electrical Engineering, http://www.needs.org14. MERLOT (Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching), http://www.merlot.org15. M. Suzanne Donovan, John D. Bransford, and James W. Pellegrino, eds. (1999). How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.16. Bransford , John D., Ann Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, eds. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.17. Atkinson, R. (2003). “Transitioning From Studying Examples to Solving
/interest in Engineering Education.• It gives me an opportunity to learn about best practices in other institutions It offers a forum for me to fraternize with people who share my passion for education and learning• Networking with like-minded faculty colleagues• To be informed about the current trends in engineering curriculum development. To learn about the new effective teaching techniques in engineering. To remain updated about the awards, fellowships, summer internships etc. available to students and faculty. General Benefits• To receive copies of PRISM to allow me to keep (somewhat) abreast of developments in Eng.• ASEE is the professional organization that represents the educational aspects of our collective
AC 2007-2238: DEVELOPMENT OF ONLINE HANDS-ON EXPERIMENTS FORHYBRID VECTOR STATICS COURSESKyu-Jung Kim, California State Polytechnic University-PomonaAmir Rezaei, California State Polytechnic University-PomonaAngela Shih, California State Polytechnic University-PomonaMariappan Jawaharlal, California State Polytechnic University-PomonaMichael Shelton, California State Polytechnic University Page 12.538.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007Development of Online Hands-on Experiments for Hybrid Vector StaticsCourseAbstract Student attrition has been a problem for many engineering programs across the nationsuch that a significant number of students drop
classroomdemonstrations are most effective when coupled with the requirement of having the studentspredict the answer in advance of observing the demonstration(11).Our apparatus for experiments in statics is dubbed the “VectorSmith.” In addition to the threeroles of laboratory experiences described above, we believe that these laboratory experiencesshould provide students an alternative look at a particular problem. With this in mind, the fiveexperiments we developed are classic problems presented in virtually all statics textbooks. Thisallows students with different learning styles a better opportunity to grasp the concept that theproblem is conveying.Yoder et al.(12) proposed the following guidelines for hands-on laboratory experiences forteaching engineering
AC 2007-1425: DEMONSTRATING NEURAL FUNCTION THROUGH BOTHHANDS-ON AND COMPUTER-SIMULATED LABORATORY MODULESJennifer Kang Derwent, Illinois Institute of Technology Page 12.445.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Demonstrating Neural Function through Both Hands-on and Computer Simulated Laboratory ModulesAbstractThe Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT)focuses on three areas of study: Cell and Tissue Engineering, Neural Engineering and MedicalImaging. Within the Neural Engineering curriculum, students take a core class called “BME 445Quantitative Neural Function”. The major objective of this class
AC 2007-345: MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEMS USING ANALOG ANDDIGITAL PHASE-LEAD CONTROLLERSJianxin Tang, Alfred University Jianxin Tang, Professor of Electrical Engineering, Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802. Education: • Ph.D. The University of Connecticut, Electrical Engineering, 9/84-9/89; • M.S. The University of Bridgeport, Electrical Engineering, 1/83-5/84; • B.S. Guangxi University (China), Electrical Engineering, 9/72-7/76. Areas of Specialization and Research Interests: • Power system generation scheduling • Digital Signal Processing. • Control and communication systems
, there are too many so called professionals, who rely blindlyon test data with no or very little understanding of basic principals of engineering. Figure 3: “Dog bone” sample in the tester. Page 12.1166.6Theoretical calculations will sink deeper into the minds when people see the end result. AT308,Inc. delivers exactly what is needed: learning by validation of the theoretical side of the course.There is another way to learn. The Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering in Needham,Massachusetts offers a different approach to engineering education. Guizzo reverses the “theoryfirst, practice later” model and gets students
important goals of this course, in addition to recognizing thatethical issues pervade engineering – to be open-minded yet critical in our approach to ethicalproblem solving.In addition to the pedagogical value of Star Trek, I like using it because it is fun. Even though asa boy I was fascinated and impressed with the imagery and sets of the original series, today itappears primitive and campy. That combined with the acting style of William Shatner make fora lot of laughs. All of the series include moments of humor and good-natured teasing.Course StructureThe course meets once a week for a 75-minute period. The basic weekly pattern is to view acomplete episode of Star Trek every other week, with the alternating classes for discussions thatbuild upon
AC 2007-1207: TEACHING STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING USING LEGOPROGRAMMABLE BRICKSEric Wang, University of Nevada-Reno ERIC L. WANG is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno. Dr. Wang has won numerous awards including the Tibbitts Distinguished Teaching Award, UNR's most prestigious teaching award. In addition to his pedagogical activities, Dr. Wang conducts research on sports equipment, biomechanics, robotics, and intelligent materials.Jeffrey LaCombe, University of Nevada-Reno JEFFREY C. LACOMBE is an Assistant Professor of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno. In addition to his education-oriented research
Learning Assistance Program at NJIT. She is active, and a former Board Member, in the Hispanic Association for Higher Education (HAHE) and has presented at previous ASEE meetings. Page 12.1409.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 AC 2007-378: The Doctoral Pathway, an Institutional Journey of DevelopmentGSD, MIND, WIE, INTDRonald Kane and Clarisa Gonzalez-LenahanThe history of one institution’s transformation from a regional specialized institution to a leadingresearch university can be a model for others in times of limited state resources to supportgraduate education
. Crawley, E. F. The CDIO Syllabus: A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education, MIT CDIO Report #1, 2001. Available at http://www.cdio.org31. Gronlund, N.E. (2000). How to Write and Use Instructional Objectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.32. Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New Page 12.1340.15 York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.33. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N.R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books34. Baxter Magolda, M. B
-the arttechnology knowledge, in comparison with company engineers who may have graduated five toten years before. This new information from classes provides a way of thinking outside the boxand allows fresh minds to suggest new ideas [1].Also, there can be some synergy between the classes, the internship and the research project asshown in Figure 1. First the student gets a strong background in classes. During the graduateinternship, the student gets a deeper background and foundation on the topic. Additionally s/helearns the constraints, limitations and other issues that must be addressed within the industrialenvironment that might be overlooked in academics. Next, the student takes this industrialrelevance and applies it to future classes
AC 2007-971: A THOROUGH HANDS-ON PROCESS TO IMPLEMENT A RFIDSYSTEMBen Zoghi, Texas A&M University Dr. Ben Zoghi is currently a Professor and Director of RFID/Sensor Lab in the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Department at Texas A&M University. He has served the department as Industrial Distribution Program Coordinator, Executive Director of Thomas and Joan Read Center and Associate Department Head for Research since he joined Texas A&M in 1987. His research activities include RFID/Sensors and engineering leadership development. Dr. Zoghi is a senior member fo IEEE, meber of ASEE, TAP, TBP. He has over 100 educational and research publications.Ryan Beasely, TAMU
dominated by nanotechnology, bioengineering, andother promising but potentially problematic technologies (in his 2006 Liberal Education DivisionDistinguished Lecture “The Unleashed Human Mind: Liberating Education for the 21stCentury”18).We chose the learning outcomes and formal title (“Engineering Professional Development 690:Social and Ethical Impacts of Technology—Literature and Discussion”) with an eye toward ourexperiences with the pilot course, the mission of our department within our College ofEngineering, and the ABET “professional skills” criteria. The five learning outcomes wedesigned for students were • Outcome 1: Articulate connections among engineering, ethics, community, history, social change, and politics by actively
interest in higher education pedagogy. He was Professor of Communications at Kettering University prior to joining the faculty at Michigan Tech. While at Kettering, he received the Distinguished Teaching Award and the Charles L. Tutt, Jr. Innovative Teaching Award. He has published extensively in the area of pedagogical design, innovation, and experimentation. Page 12.1078.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 MOM in Action1. IntroductionThe application of mechanics of materials continues to grow beyond aerospace, civil and mechan-ical engineering where it
AC 2007-1392: UNDERSTANDING GRADUATE SCHOOLStacy Eisenman, University of MarylandGeorge List, North Carolina State University Page 12.1514.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 UNDERSTANDING GRADUATE SCHOOLAbstractGraduate school is a significantly different world from undergraduate study. It is alsodrastically different from the “real world.” One of the main complexities associated withbeing a graduate student is understanding and meeting expectations. These include yourpersonal expectations, expectations of your advisor, other faculty, your department, theschool, other students and future employers. This paper provides a students perspectiveon being in
AC 2007-1495: EFFECTS OF THE TEAM-BASED APPROACH ON INDIVIDUALLEARNINGJason Pitts, Oklahoma State UniversityPatrick Teague, Oklahoma State UniversityAlan Cheville, Oklahoma State UniversityCharles Bunting, Oklahoma State UniversitySohum Sohoni, Oklahoma State University Page 12.588.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Effects of the Team-Based Approach on Individual Learning1.IntroductionThis study is a part of the ES21C project at Oklahoma State University. The goal of ES21C is toprepare OSU electrical engineering students to meet the challenges of engineering in the 21stcentury. The proposal for the ES21C project gives the following summary