example, a paper last year provided results ofstudents’ attitudes towards ethics issues11. Sixteen questions from the paper (Table 1) were putinto the CPS software and 35 students were surveyed following a discussion of the Enron Page 12.1018.7scandal and its effects on the energy business. Using the responders, I was able to obtainresponses to the 16 questions in five or six minutes and the software provided me with a report of Table 1: Questions for Results Reported in Figure 4 1. It is important for me to receive some formal ethics training during my college career 2. It is important for engineers to be aware they may encouter ethical conflicts
of the inherentlyphilosophical character of engineering, philosophy may actually function as a means to greaterengineering self-understanding. This paper argues that academic programmes could usefullyinclude a module on ‘Philosophy in Engineering’ in the undergraduate engineering curriculum toprovide that enhanced self-understanding, and in turn to relate that understanding to the greatercommunity and contribute therefore to engineers being more accountable to society. The methodused in this paper to characterize engineering is based on the direct use of the activities thatcorrespond to the five classical branches of Philosophy – namely Epistemology, Metaphysics,Ethics, Logic, and Aesthetics. The paper also briefly considers Post-modernism
disciplines ofengineering, but furthermore, to have a balanced education in both technical and non-technicalskills and attributes. “These days, engineering is typically practiced in teams with severalengineers from different disciplines who work with contractors, business people, and sales andmarketing personnel” (Hsu, 2004, p.54). Therefore, in order to get hired, and later on be able tohave a successful long term career engineers need to be trained on human behavior skills so thatthey are able to talk, interact, and work with people from different backgrounds; be worldly; beleaders if the situation calls for it; be ethical; and know how to effectively conduct themselves atprofessional environments. This need for a more broad-based engineering
AC 2007-1706: ASSESSING REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT THINKING INUNDERGRADUATE MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMSMichael Cama, Illinois Institute of TechnologyDaniel Ferguson, Illinois Institute of TechnologyMargaret Huyck, Illinois Institute of Technology Page 12.272.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Assessing Reflective Judgment Thinking in Undergraduate Multidisciplinary TeamsAbstract – Our University has a project-based interprofessional learning program (IPRO)designed to improve competencies in project management, teamwork, communications,and ethics among the undergraduate students. An emerging goal is to increase the level of“reflective judgment
AC 2007-783: FINDINGS FROM WORKSHOPS ON FAILURE CASE STUDIES INTHE CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS CURRICULUMNorb Delatte, Cleveland State UniversityPaul Bosela, Cleveland State UniversityKevin Rens, University of Colorado-DenverKenneth Carper, Washington State UniversityKevin Sutterer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Page 12.745.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Findings from Workshops on Failure Case Studies in the Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics CurriculumAbstract The study of engineering failures can offer students valuable insights into associatedtechnical, ethical, and professional issues
students, and evaluate whether an engineering design courseeffectively promotes the program and Criterion 3 outcomes. The ABET Criterion 3outcomes were formally defined based on theory, empirical evidence, Criterion 3, and thegoals of the engineering program. Previous study reported the detailed process of scaleconstruction and validation 3. The following eight subscales were included: social-responsibility, design process, awareness of ethical issues, teamwork, lifelong learning,oral skills, written skills, and communication competence. For each individual item,students recorded their responses on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., 1=strongly disagree to5=strongly agree). The students also took a questionnaire with eighteen demographicquestions
two semester period. Each course is team-taught by professorsin all the engineering departments consisting of Civil, Chemical, Electrical and Mechanical.Depending on the type of projects selected, student teams could be interdisciplinary, or disciplinespecific. The capstone design courses are used to assess eight of the eleven ABET a-k outcomesconsisting of the ability to: design a system, function on multi-disciplinary teams, adhere toprofessional and ethical responsibilities, communicate, understand global and local impact ofengineering solutions on society, engage in lifelong learning, have knowledge of contemporaryissues, and use modern engineering tools for engineering practice. Students’ abilities in theseoutcomes are quantitatively
Human Needs: Expanding the Scope of Engineering Senior DesignAbstractThe culminating design experience in engineering curricula is usually intended to provide aframework within which the emerging engineer can draw upon an acquired base of knowledge inhis or her discipline to solve an open ended problem in that discipline or in a multidisciplinarycontext requiring contributions from that discipline. In this paper, we show how the culminatingdesign experience can be framed so as to expand the scope of its contribution in the education ofengineering students. We describe a pedagogical framework within which educational outcomesassociated with multidisciplinary activity, legal, ethical, and professional responsibilities, and
professional, collectively prescribe the necessary depth and breadth ofknowledge, skills, and attitudes required of an individual aspiring to enter the practice of civilengineering at the professional level in the 21st Century. Central to achieving the BOK is theuniversity-level education and those who teach the BOK are critical to this education. The tenprofessional outcomes which include leadership, teamwork, communication, history andheritage, professional and ethical responsibility, and life-long learning, can present challengesto some programs since they fall outside the traditional teaching roles of faculty. Colleges anduniversities will need to adjust their programs to educate and train faculty to teach the BOK.The authors draw on their
InstrumentsAssessment instruments have been developed for three of the four performance areas; only thesolution assets area has not been addressed at this time. Assessment exercises are derived toaddress critical factors within the performance area. For example, for the personal capacityperformance area, one assessment exercise addresses students’ initiative and self-growth (whilealso addressing the ABET outcome of lifelong learning): a self-growth paper. A second exerciseaddresses problem solving and professionalism (while also addressing the ABET ethics andprofessionalism outcome: a professional practices paper. The available assessment exercises aresummarized in Table 1.Table 1: Summary of Capstone Design Course Assessments AvailablePerformance Assessment
based on theory, empirical evidence, Criterion 3, and the goals ofthe engineering program. The following eight subscales were included: social-responsibility, design process, awareness of ethical issues, teamwork, lifelong learning,oral skills, written skills, and communication competence. For each subscale, studentsrecord their responses on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., 1=strongly disagree to 5=stronglyagree). The higher the score is, the more the EPICS students agree that the specificengineering design course effectively promotes the program and ABET Criterion 3outcomes related to their professional skills. The students also took a questionnaire witheighteen demographic questions (gender, race, etc.) along with the survey. Items werereviewed
core class for non-engineers at Boise State University, I focus on helping studentsunderstand the impact of engineering decisions on their individual and communal lives. I attemptto de-mystify engineering design, but also try to explain the engineer’s over-reliance onconvergent thinking, and the dissonance response of engineers to project opposition (denying,marginalizing, or baffling the opposition through intentionally turgid language and the appeal to“special” expertise). We discuss Habermas and Discourse Ethics, and as one of the principalassignments, I have them attend and report on the public hearing required to enable federalfunding for some local engineering project. The Idaho Department of Transportation, and theAda County Highway
, Title, and Media Format for Each Unit in Tech 198 Unit Title of Unit Media Format 1 Nature of Science and Technology Multimedia CDs 2 History of Technology Web-based 3 Technology and Work Multimedia CDs 4 Technology and Gender Issues Multimedia CDs 5 Technology Transfer and Cultural Issues Lecture/Activity 6 Quality of Life Lecture/Activity 7 Ethics Lecture/ActivityAll the instructors teaching this course use the CD and web-based learning materials in
, where he is also Director of the Minor in Environmental Studies. He received his Ph.D. from U.C. Berkeley and has also been a faculty member at Ohio State University.Thomas Ruehr, California Polytechnic State University Tom Ruehr is a professor in the Earth and Soil Science Department at Cal Poly State University in San Luis Obispo. He has a Ph. D. from Colorado State University. He has received the University Distinguished Teacher award, served the U.S. Department of Agriculture as national co-chairman of the committee for Agricultural Ethics and Public Policy Curriculum Development, and helped lead the U. S. Agency for International Development world conference on Agricultural Systems
12programs. Leadership in Organizations/ Applications of Leadership was listed in 9 programs.Development of Leadership Skills and Observation/Participation in a Leadership Settingwere listed in 9 programs. An ethics course was required by 7 programs. A Leadership Project,Personal Leadership/Goal Setting, and Communications in Leadership were listed in 4programs. The remaining themes were listed in 3 or less programsDevelopment of the Engineering Leadership MinorFor all of the previously stated reasons, ISELP was evaluated to improve its deficiencies. Inputwas solicited from alumni in leadership positions in local and international companies,employers of students, the department advisory board and other university staff and programs.For example
; but engineering will only contribute to success if it is able to continue toadapt to new trends and provide education … to arm [graduates] with the tools needed for theworld it will be, not as it is today.”4Strategies and ChallengesEngineering educators are well aware of the need to provide students with an education thatextends well beyond the fundamentals and design-oriented, practical embodiments of thestudents’ particular area of specialization. Indeed, the new ABET criteria clearly articulate that“engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain … (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical
Education will assist in assessing the impact of thisproject. Case studies require students to synthesize the facts and engineering principles they havelearned, and combine them with their broader education in the arts, humanities, and sciences.These intellectual merits have been demonstrated so far with the students who have developedcase studies under the proof-of-concept phase of this work. Case studies tie together technicalaspects, ethical issues, and procedural issues, and require students to undertake higher orderthinking in order to synthesize the relevant concepts. The case study products of this researchwill help civil engineering educators improve their teaching of specific technical topics withinthe discipline. In addition, the
, students beginusing typical software packages such as MATLAB and HTML. Also, the issue of ethics ispresented for the first time to the EE students. The culmination of this course is the completionof a robotic bug and competing against fellow students for best design and performance3.The second design course, EE 200, further builds on the project-based mission. During thiscourse, students learn to construct circuits using the departmental print circuit board prototypefacilities. Circuit simulation with PSPICE software is also presented for this first time. Thetopics of ethics, MATLAB, and technical writing are continued from the previous course. Thisdesign course has been designed as a co-requisite for the first circuits and networks
12.705.4unique characteristics required to be a successful team member. Co-op students often havesimultaneous responsibilities over various areas of the facility requiring the student to both workas a member of a team while serving as team leader in another area.Based on this wide range of exposure and the innovative freedom of this cooperative educationprogram, students are presented the opportunity to practice ethical decision-making. Whether itis the student taking responsibility for a decision, or taking the initiative to investigate a solutionto a problem the student is expected to act ethically. As a result, ethics moves from an abstracttheory discussed in the classroom to a real-world experience. As a result of this exposure toethical issues
. However, it is still easy to obtain market information for each product and then estimate a market if the two different products were combined into one product.CPR 4, Product Design Specification: A Project Design Specification (PDS) is a documentshould reflect the common knowledge of the team about the project. The students make use oftheir preliminary research to develop environmental, performance, and technology specificationsfor their projects.CPR 5, Social Impact Statement: This CPR requires the students to reflect on their proposedproject and write a social impact document using the IEEE Code of Ethics as the rubric. For thisassignment the students write one or two pages about the impact of their project on society.CPR 6, Project
analytical and experimental studies that incorporate statistical, computer, and other appropriate techniques. (b), (e), (k), (m), (o)4. The ability to communicate effectively for presentation and persuasion using oral, written, and electronic media. (g), (p), (q)5. The ability to organize, lead, coordinate, and participate in industrial engineering and multi-disciplinary teams. (d), (l), (n)6. An appreciation of the humanities, social sciences, and contemporary issues for the general education of the individual and as resources for engineering studies and professional behavior. (h), (j)7. An appreciation of the ethical and professional responsibilities of Industrial Engineers and the benefits of a
English natively or extremely fluentlyconverged at KNU from higher-education institutions in Canada, the United States, France, andthe Netherlands to offer eight separate courses in computer science, business ethics, chemical Page 12.1165.3literature review, introduction to psychology, international marketing, meteorology, philosophy,and technical communication (“Practical English”).Practical English was based on a preexisting, junior-level technical writing course required of allengineering and computer science undergraduates at Mississippi State University, an Americanpartner university of KNU. Practical English was a three-hour course (like GE
AC 2007-1818: BRINGING NEW TOPICS INTO THE INDUSTRIALENGINEERING (IE) CURRICULUMTerri Lynch-Caris, Kettering UniversityBen Redekop, Kettering University Ben Redekop, Ph.D., is Associate Professor of Social Science in the Department of Liberal Studies. He teaches courses in the history of science, humanities, philosophy (including ethics), and leadership. He has published books and articles on a variety of related topics. He is interested in raising environmental awareness and fostering a sense citizenship among students at Kettering. He is currently working on a history of common sense philosophy, and a book on leadership and ethics
explicitlyalso introduce students to EVEN as an academic major. Two additional objectives werespecified: instill a sense of ethics and commitment to service, and develop writing skills.Writing skills were developed through a series of 4 writing assignments, each of which wentthrough mandatory revision process based on instructor and an “Online Writing Lab” critique.Guest speakers (about 6) were practicing EVENs (many former students in the program), 1current upper level student. Students read 2 to 3 significant books related to EVEN (such asSilent Spring), which were the subject of in-class discussions and writing assignments. Finally,ethics was covered as a significant topic. In 2004, students wrote essays (~half page) on “WhyEnvironmental Engineering
same view was emphasized in arecent study by the National Academy of Engineering on the required attributes of an engineerfor the year 2020. Besides technical excellence, the attributes include creativity, communicationskills, leadership abilities, integrity, flexibility, and a commitment to lifelong learning2.In this paper, we describe the strategy that the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering andTechnology at Brigham Young University (BYU) is taking to meet these challenges. Thestrategy involves five key areas of focus: 1) Technical Excellence with a systems emphasis, 2)Leadership, 3) Character Development (including ethics), 4) Global Awareness and 5)Innovation that address the attributes needed for success in a changing global environment
input energy to run the vehicle as far, fast, and straight as possible. Student teams first designed their prototypes using the Working Model software and later built and test them for the competition. • Engineering problem solving; about one-third of the course schedule was spent on solving real-world engineering problems in different sub-disciplines of mechanical engineering through case-studies; including: systems of units, unit conversions, forces in structures, stress and strain, fluidic systems, thermal systems, motion, power transmission, design of machines. • Soft-skills in engineering; each faculty member introduced ethical and contemporary issues related to their sub-discipline as part of their
features to promoteactive learning, including (1) hands-on activities and demonstrations, (2) the integrated use ofwireless laptops through an in-house developed web-based learning tool to promotemetacognition and assessment of student learning, and (3) a capstone ethics project wherestudents complete a risk assessment of the impact of nanotechnology on society. Additionally,this course will focus on synthesizing fundamental concepts in science and engineering towardsapplications in nanotechnology. The other new sophomore course, Material and Energy Balancesin Nanotechnology (ChE 214), is a ChE specific laboratory-based course, emphasizing how thefundamental skills students have just learned couple to nanotechnology. For ChE students, theapproach
processes, d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives, e. an ability to function effectively on teams, f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems, g. an ability to communicate effectively, h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning, i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities, j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, and k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.As part of the accreditation process, programs must demonstrate that their graduates possessthese skills and
, modeling, evaluation, iteration) to satisfy project requirements for thermal or mechanical systems. C-3. Can work within realistic constraints, (such as economical, environmental, Page 12.464.3 social, political, manufacturability, health and safety, ethical, and sustainability) in realizing systems. C-4. Can build prototypes that meet design specifications.Each PC appears in various courses. For example, the faculty identified that theperformance criterion “C-1” would be achieved if the corresponding activities in Mech314, Mech 414 and Mech 417 are successful. We have a total of 38 such
; VII. Assume ethical leadership roles that contribute to the success of their organization or community; and VIII. Advance in the profession.The MET outcomes defined for MET graduates states that “The MET program seeks to producegraduates with a good foundation in engineering fundamentals as well as one strong inapplications, design, problem recognition and resolution, project management, communication,and professional and ethical responsibility. MET graduates will:8 1. Fundamentals: Demonstrate math, basic science and engineering science skills necessary for proficiency in MET careers. (contributes to abet criteria a, b, f) 2. Applications: Demonstrate an ability to integrate basic theoretical, experimental