. Hakuta, Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racialdynamics in colleges and universities. (pp. 126-169). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.3 George, Y. S., Neale, D. S., & Van Horne, V. (2001a). In pursuit of a diverse sciencetechnology, engineering, and mathematics workforce: Recommended research priorities to enhance participation byunderrepresented minorities. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.4 Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science,Engineering and Technology (CAWSMET). (September, 2000). Land of plenty: Diversity in America’s competitiveedge in science, engineering and technology. Available at www.nsf.gov/of/cawsmet.5 Grant Proposal Guide, NSF
,” ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, February 2006.21 Martin, R., and Delatte, N. J. (2001). “Another Look at the Hartford Civic Center Coliseum Collapse,” J. Perf. Const. Fac., ASCE, 15(1).22 Lichtenstein, A.G. (1993) “The Silver Bridge Collapse Recounted,” ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, November 1993.23 Solava, S. and Delatte, N. J. (2003). “Lessons from the Failure of the Teton Dam,” Forensic Engineering: Proceedings of the Third Congress, pp. 168 – 177, Bosela, Paul A., Delatte, Norbert J., and Rens, Kevin L., Editors, ASCE, October 19 – 21, 2003.24 Storey, C. and Delatte, N. J. (2003). “Lessons from the Collapse of the Schoharie Creek Bridge
. S. Bjorklund and N. Fortenberry, “Measuring Student and Faculty Engagement in Engineering Education”, CASEE Report, National Academy of Engineering, 2005. 2. L. Lattuca, P. Terenzini, and J. Volkwein, “Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC 2000”, Pennsylvania State University, 2006. 3. B. Olds, B. Moskal and R. Miller, “Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches, and Future Collaborationa”, Journal of Engineering Education, V. 94, No.1, 2005. 4. 2003-04 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET, Baltimore, MD 2002. 5. S. Bjorklund, J. Parente, and D. Sathianathan, “Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback on Gains in Student Skills”, Journal of Engineering
Advisor Views Project Team Development and OrganizationAs noted for the Tibetian project, the Tufts student chapter of EWB is strongly controlled bystudents who assume the leadership role in project development, design, implementation andfunding. This project had an expansive team of 30 students involved in its development andorganization. Advisors are kept abreast of the team efforts but by no means are team leader andcoordinator. This could be problematic since it requires a strong student leader(s) to keep theteam focused and on schedule. As the travel date got closer, many of the final details, thoughcompleted, were rushed. Therefore, better time management and project schedule is required.Another area of concern was communication with
internet will return a number of university programs that teach spacecraft designwith a variety of approaches: some focus on hands-on hardware experimentation; some aremulti-semester efforts, and some involve academic study of a spacecraft design. The Universityof Colorado’s program falls into the latter. With the growing interest in teaching systemsengineering as part of the engineering curriculum, teaching spacecraft design provides a richopportunity to stress systems engineering approaches to problem solving within a definedcontext.Within the University of Colorado’s Aerospace Engineering curriculum, ASEN 4148/5148Spacecraft Design has been taught as a one semester class since the 1980’s. The class originatedwith encouragement from industry
need equal opportunities to grow and develop asprofessionals. The authors write that adjuncts, (S)hould be integrated into the college community and recognized as increasingly important players in the teaching and learning process in the interest of providing quality instruction to the growing number of full and part-time students who will sit in their classrooms, in the interest of appreciating the investment value of the part-time faculty, and ultimately in the interest of establishing and maintaining the college’s reputation for teaching excellence.3The sheer number of classes covered by adjuncts makes a powerful argument that responsiblecolleges should invest in their teaching lives.The department chairs in the
methods. N Reversible S No Field Magnetic Field Figure 1: Magnetic Field Aligns Particles in MR FluidShape Memory AlloyShape Memory Alloy (SMA) materials are metallic alloys that have the special property of beingable to return to a pre-determined, or “trained,” shape from a deformed state when the material isheated above its transformation temperature. A number of alloy types are known to exhibit theShape Memory Effect (SME), or the ability to revert to a trained shape when heated
results fromthe statistical analyses suggest that coupling peer discussion with PRS use can enhance students’ability to actively construct knowledge in class.References1. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. .Washington, DC:National Academy Press.2. Wulf, W. A., & Fisher, G M. C (2002). A makeover for engineering education. Issues in Science andTechnology. Online, http://www.nap.edu/issues/18.3/p_wulf.html.3 . Ebert-May, D., Brewer, C., Allred, S. (1997). Innovation in Large Lectures: Teaching for Active Learning.BioScience, 47(9), pp. 601-607.4. Kennedy, G. E.; Cutts, Q. I.(2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their
analysis software for K-college" proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and exhibition, session 2320, 2000.6. Rogers, C. and Portsmore, M., "Data acquisition in the dorm room: teaching experimentation techniques using LEGO materials" proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and exhibition, session 2366, 2001.7. Brockman, J., Batill, S., Renaud, J., Kantor, J., Kirkner, D., Kogge, P., and Stevenson, R., "Development of a multidisciplinary engineering design laboratory at the University of Notre Dame" proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and exhibition, 1996.8. Levien, K.L. and Rochefort, W.E. "Lessons with LEGO - engaging students in chemical engineering course" proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and
.: University of Missouri – Rolla "Preparing for the First ABET Accreditation Visit under Criteria 2000," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 1999. 4. Pintar, A. J., B. M. Aller, T. N. Rogers, K. H. Schulz, D. R. Shonnard: Michigan Technological University" Developing an Assessment Plan to Meet ABET EC2000," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 1999. 5. Miller, R. L.: Colorado School of Mines "Reflections on Outcomes Assessment and the ABET Accreditation Process," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 2002. 6. Bailey, M.; R. B. Floersheim, and S. J. Ressler “Course Assessment Plan: A Tool for Integrated Curriculum Management,” J. Eng. Edu., vol. 84, p. 425, October
, Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, No. 1, 2003, pp. 73. L. J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, J. McGourty, The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education - 1- Vol. 94, No. 1, 20054. K. D. Stephan, A Survey of Ethics-Related Instruction in U.S. Engineering Programs, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 3, 1999, pp. 4595. L. Shuman, et. al., Can Our Students Recognize and Resolve Ethical Dilemmas?, (CD) Proceedings, 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.6. B. S. Bloom, el al, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook, 1: Cognitive Domain, New York
courses. I will provide more handouts and stressmore on this aspect in IE 417 in the future.7- ConclusionThere are many extraneous obstacles in teaching OR courses. These include both the timelimitation on covering various important topics as well as the inadequate mathematicsbackground of many students. It is important to efficiently use the resources available to teachOR concepts and improve analytical and communication skills. This is best achieved throughreport writing. “Report to a Manager” is used as a tool to enhance learning important ORconcepts as well as encouraging students to critically think about the solution outputs from ORsoftwares. This implemented pedagogy has proved to be effective.Bibliography[1] Parisay, S., "Multimedia and
Annual Conference. Figure 3. Peer evaluation form. Page 12.1537.13 Sophomore Clinic I Team Experience Survey Please print your name and the code number below on the sheet that is being circulated. Your responses will be reported in statistical form only and you will not be identified. The following statements concern your experience as a team member on the Crane Project in Sophomore Clinic during the Fall of 2006. Mark the response that best reflects your experience.1. My team worked together to DEFINE its project goal(s). Strongly agree
, December, 2005 http://www.ugs.com/products/teamcenter/docs/Aberdeen_- _Global_Product_Design_Benchmark_Report_05-12-30.pdf6. http://www.global-engineering-excellence.org7. Jones, R.C., 2005, International S&T Initiatives for African Development, WFEO Committee on Capacity Building Report to the National Academies, 2005. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/guirr/1Jones.ppt#256,1,INTERNATIONAL S&T INITIATIVES FOR AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT8. Final Report, Engineering for the Americas Symposium: Capacity Building for Job Creation and Hemispheric Competitiveness, Lima, Peru, 29 November – 2 December 2005. http://www.oest.oas.org/engineering/espanol/documentos/Informe_Final_ENG.pdf
. Crawford, “Engineering entrepreneurship: An example of a paradigm shift in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2002, pp. 185-195.4 Lumsdaine, E., “A multidisciplinary approach to teaching invention and entrepreneuring.” Symposium conducted at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2003.5 Fredholm, S., J. Krejcarek, S. Krumholz, and D. Linquist, “Designing an engineering entrepreneurship curriculum for Olin College.” Symposium conducted at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2003.6 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering the
(National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering) and the National Science FoundationCSEMS and S-STEM program. In addition to the scholarships, academic workshops help thestudents with time management, academics (how to learn), resources, and other challenges;especially those faced by lower division students and transfer students. The students in each ofthese programs meet at least six times per semester. The students are encouraged, beginning intheir freshman year, to go to career fairs, to consider internships, and to consider writing aproposal for a research award. For these activities, the students need a good resume.1, 2, 3 Theresume needed for an internship or research position is more demanding than the resume used inhigh school to
generationsserve to motivate students in problem solving? Would caring and concern be engendered? Howwould an environmental theme support skills in graphics, professional interaction, andeconomics analysis?Preparing our Students for Global CareersDowney 4et al., have identified the need to prepare our students for global careers. We felt thatthe environmental emphasis would give us an opportunity to introduce the topics of globalstewardship, environmental ethics, engineering codes and the environment, the possibilities ofworking on international teams, intercultural communication and international problem-solving.Russel C. Jones and Bethany S. Oberst have identified the need for reform in engineeringeducation in the Arab world and all parts of the world
the results of an informal in-class experiment to see whether educatorshave a valid reason to worry.BackgroundABET 2000’s emphasis on communication skills,4 especially vital in the era of the globaleconomy with burgeoning virtual collaboration among colleagues on distant continents, and theprevalence of email in the engineering workplace, means that engineering graduates have agreater need than ever for effective written communication skills.5 Any emailmiscommunication can be costly in terms of job advancement, time, productivity, andestablishing rapport with unseen recipients. Page 12.800.2Unfortunately, miscommunication appears to be an all
First questionnaire (Q1) Delphi Panel of Experts Q1 sent out by 7/05/06 (between 16-20) Open ended questions about each Responses received by 7/15/06 Selected U.S. scholars from identified research themes 70's and 90's generation evaluate data Project Second questionnaire (Q2) Directors Q2 sent out by 8/07/06 Structured questions based on Responses received by 8/17
disquiet5,6concerning skills and knowledge of engineeringgraduates from Australian universities. The trend towards softer skills can be gauged throughjob advertisements7,8for professional engineers. Since the 1970’s the demand for engineeringskills has undergone a major paradigm shift from one requiring high technical competence toone requiring social and environmental awareness, good oral and written communication aswell as teamwork skills. It is understood that the nature of engineering practice is a multi-disciplinary one. It is world-wise and its context is people.The Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council identified5 the changinglandscape of engineering practice. The forces responsible for the change were: 1. Global Integration. The
). “Using history and sociology to teach engineering ethics,” IEEE Technology and Society, 20(4), pp. 13-20.Martin, M., and Schinzinger, R. (1996). Ethics in Engineering, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.McCuddy, M.K. and D. Tougaw (2005a), “Learning Challenges in Contemporary Society: Fostering Understanding of the Ethical Implications of Advancing Technologies,” presented at the Educational Innovation in Economics and Business 2005 Annual Conference.McCuddy, M.K. and D. Tougaw (2005b), “The Ethical Imperatives of Technological Development: Insights Gained by Using the Individual Human Being as an Analogy for Societies,” Proceedings of the Global Conference on Business and Economics.Nichols, S. P. (1999), “Designing engineers
offer incentives to keep them in the BrazosValley. It is the intent of E4 to have two businesses transition out of the incubator and bereplaced with two new start-up ventures each semester. These start-up ventures provide a focusof interdisciplinary activities through the partnership formed between academia and the privatesector. A reasonable ownership in the new companies will be realized both by the Universityand the private sector partner(s) involved commiserate with resources provided. Through aformal agreement process, team members choosing not to be directly involved in the incubatorprocess, will have the opportunity to participate in the ownership of the new venture throughdirect financial contribution or in-kind commitment.Technology
, we decided to introduce students to commonly followed steps in science andengineering research (Kumar, 2005) and engage them in exploratory project activities.Table 1. Example topics and sponsors of summer camp projects 2004 2005 2006Composite Skateboard Design, Vacuum and Applications, U. Biofuel Production, S. PryorR. Pieri, Mechanical Engineering Bergurhause, Chemistry and D. Wiesenborn, Agricultural and Biosystems EngineeringProduction of Hydrogen Gas Operations Research: Science Water Quality Monitoring andfrom Electrolysis, W. Lin, Civil of Making Decisions, D
). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.8 Gee, J. P. (2001, 10-13 December). The new capitalism: What’s new? Paper presented at the Productive learning atwork, New South Wales, Australia.9 Gee, J. P., Allen, A.-R., & Clinton, K. (2001). Language, Class and Identity: Teenagers Fashioning ThemselvesThrough Language. Linguistics and Education, 12(2), 175-194.10 Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.11 Turns, J., & Lappenbusch, S. (2006, June 18-21). Tracing Student Development During Construction ofEngineering Portfolios. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.12
engineering classroom. Additionally, the inherent goal Page 12.1036.9orientation of different types of courses (e.g., content area or design) needs to be fullyinvestigated in a classroom environment. The subject of motivation in undergraduateengineering programs is ripe for investigation, and will be the subject of subsequentresearch by the authors.References[1] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, "Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-based Practices," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 87-101, 2005.[2] C. Ames, "Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation," Journal of Educational Psychology
organization. We decided tohave interested youth join college students directly within the game courses and work alongsideeach other. If we could demonstrate that this approach would engage the participants, then wecould offer a template for a relatively cheap way to provide an outreach program. Moreover, wecould show how academic groups could partner with local community organizations using games.2.3 The Outreach ProgramOur outreach program found college student volunteers who mentored with apprentices (alsocalled interns). TLW gathered a list of prospective apprentices, screened by the courseinstructor(s). While the college student groups coalesced early in the semester, the instructorcalled for mentors and matched apprentices to them. The
Workshop.Description available at http://www.asce.org/exceed/.10 Center for Teaching Excellence, United States Military Academy. Available athttp://www.dean.usma.edu/centers/cte/11 Bowman, Bruce A. and Farr, John V. (2000) “Embedding Leadership in Civil EngineeringEducation.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice., ASCE,126 (1), 16-20.12 Meyer, K., Morris, M., Estes, A., and Ressler, S. “How to Kill Two Birds with One Stone—Assigning Grades and Assessing Program Goals at the Same Time.” Proceedings of the 2005American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. June 2005.13 Welch, R., Estes, A. and Winget, D. “Assessment of Squishier Outcomes: Open-EndedProblem Solving through Client-Based Projects.” Proceedings of the
the Classroom, 1999, The Free Press, New York, New York.4. Feisel, L.D. and G.D. Peterson, “A Colloquy on Learning Objectives for Engineering EducationLaboratories,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference andExposition, 2002, ASEE, San Diego.5. Florman, S. C., The Existential Pleasures of Engineering, 2nd Edition, 1976, St. Martin’s Press, New York,New York.6. Petrosky, H., To Engineer Is Human : The Role of Failure in Successful Design, 1st Vintage BooksEdition, 1992.7. Karp, W. and L. Lapham, Buried Alive: Essays on Our Endangered Republic, Franklin Square PressJanuary, 2003.8. Becker, Ernest, Beyond Alienation: A Philosophy of Education for the Crisis of Democracy, GeorgeBraziller, Inc., 1967.9
skills that have been acquired in their pursuit of a Bachelor ofScience Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University,Calumet.The paper examines in detail the previous research and development schemes that were used increating the structure(s), housing of the electronics and propulsion systems of typical remotelyoperated vehicles. The paper focuses on the advantages and benefits achieved in the currentdesign of the Internet Controlled Underwater Vehicle.The paper elaborates on the electronics used in the control and communication between the enduser and the vehicle. Furthermore, details of the of the propulsion system, control system, andthe necessary communication protocols are furnished.I. IntroductionThe
experience many of the common traits of industrial problems1 therebyproviding the learners both technical and non-technical skills that are needed to succeed inindustry.Bibliography1. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., Lee, C. B., April 2006. Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators. Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2), 139 – 151.2. Hillier, F. S., Lieberman, G. L., 2005. Introduction to Operations Research, Eighth Edition. McGraw Hill, Boston, Massachusetts.3. Castrogiovanni, A., Sforza, P. M., 1997. A Genetic Algorithm Model for High Heat Flux Boiling. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 15, 193 – 201.4. Wang, W., Zmeureanu, R., Rivard, H., 2005. Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green