AC 2007-1110: A PRACTITIONER ? FACULTY COLLABORATION INTEACHING CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGNWaddah Akili, Iowa State University Waddah Akili has been in the academic arena for over 35 years. He has held academic positions at Drexel University, Philadelphia, Penna (66-69), at King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (69-87), and at The University of Qatar, Doha, Qatar (87-00). Professor Akili’s major field is geotechnical engineering and materials. His research work & experience include: characterization of arid and semi arid soils, piled foundation, pavement design & materials, and concrete durability. His interests also include: contemporary issues of engineering
strategies employed by higher educationinstitutions in recruiting and retaining minorities in engineering education. Some of thestrategies reviewed include early exposure of students to engineering topics, advising, studentparticipation in student competitions, teaching tools, recruiting packages, and scholarships.IntroductionA college education is an important career move for any young individual whose desires to livethe American dream. Such a move, while academic, on the whole has helped provide afoundation for establishing a successful life. While the importance of a college education ispreached to young adults, colleges and universities must be one step ahead of their recruitmentplan to acquire young minds by increasing and retaining student
students are most likely to drop out of the system if they becomedisengaged with the learning process. It is the responsibility and challenge of the first yearlecturer not only to teach them the subject matter but also to motivate students, to instill inthem a love of the subject, to confirm in the students’ minds that the choice they made is theright one, to provide opportunities to cement their learning and also to ensure, at every step ofthe way, that students are assisted to make the transition from secondary to tertiary studies.Freshmen and sophomore engineering classes at RMIT University have traditionally beenvery large, due to the existence of a common first and second year for a total of six programs.Enrollment in a single class has been
short explanation is listed below: • Robust programs: The computer science program becomes more robust because there is a wider audience for electives. Computer engineering students tend to be academically strong as a group and incorporating these academically able students into a computer science course creates competition and a new perspective. Also computer engineering becomes more robust because computer science courses are designed and structured with computer engineering students in mind. • Elective choices: Computer engineering has a crowded curriculum without much room for electives in our University's version of the curriculum. The computer science program, on the other hand, has several
soeffectively. Teachers often have difficulty introducing new technology and new curriculum andfind they struggle managing their time and student questions efficiently[13]. Research also showsthat without proper training and development, teachers may perceive such curriculum andchanges negatively which, in turn, affects how they teach[14]. The implementation of thisengineering unit faces similar challenges. The teachers recruited to teach this curriculum in theBoston Public schools are mostly math, science, and technology teachers. These teachers dohave strong math and science backgrounds; however, most of them, including the technologyteachers, do not have any formal training in engineering. With this in mind, the research teamcreated a professional
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering Education • “Church groups, minority political interest groups, community development agencies, tribal councils, minority professional organizations, minority chamber of commerce, community centers, sports organizations, or minority alumni chapters—should be tapped. • Jargon-free information programs developed to explain admissions, the college experience, the time commitment their children will have to make, and the importance of a college degree will ease [parents] minds. • When speaking with parents, recruiters should recognize that the content
to “enter” a narrower portalthat will show on the screen only those stages to be taught. Additionally, since the pilot, fewfaculty (even the developers) seem to have actually used all of the material in the lesson they areteaching. Along with our new project team, we intend to explore more carefully the ways to dowhat Michael Davis has suggested: insert into an existing course an “ethics moment” that arisesorganically from the design, practice, or research issues at hand. 36 Davis teaches a workshop tohelp faculty develop their own ethics moment; with that goal in mind we plan to develop withour engineering partners a series of discrete problems or writing assignments specific toindividual disciplines: environmental, industrial, electrical
AENG 35% 32%Figure 10: Distribution of the four categories of problems are distributed in Book 18 and Book 2.205.1 Categories of Textbook Problems Page 12.840.17Students typically decide to pursue mechanical engineering because they they like to build thingsand to create things mechanical. We suspect that learning to perform mathematical calculationson computer is usually not a motivating factor. With this in mind, we have created a scheme forclassifying textbook problems.5.1.1 Category NCE: Problems with No obvious Connection to Engineering. There is a largeclass of textbook problems
AC 2007-1288: DECISIONS ABOUT TEACHING: WHAT FACTORS DOENGINEERING FACULTY CONSIDER?Yi-Min Huang, University of Washington YI-MIN HUANG is a Research Scientist for the Scholarship on Teaching element of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). She holds a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from Washington State University.Jessica Yellin, University of Washington JESSICA M. H. YELLIN is a Research Scientist for the Scholarship on Teaching element of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). She holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington with dissertation research on structural vibration and damping of acoustic
into his triad of performancecategories: the cognitive, affective and psychomotor domain. The relation between the ProgramOutcomes and these domains has been explored in depth in the engineering education literature6,8, 19 . However, it is commonly overlooked that Bloom’s and Tyler’s theories are firmly rooted inthe tradition of behaviorist psychology and as such are based on further fundamentalassumptions in this field, which at that time exhibited quite strong epistemological andontological views. For six decades behaviorist thinking dominated the field of with the totalityof its claims to virtually eclipse the consideration of internal states of the mind from the scientificdiscussion. These concepts equally shaped the thinking in
AC 2007-2504: INTRODUCING MICROFLUIDICS TO ELECTRICALENGINEERS: AN INTEGRATED PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING EXPERIENCEIan Papautsky, University of Cincinnati IAN PAPAUTSKY received his Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of Utah in 1999. He is currently a tenured Associate Professor of in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. His research and teaching interests include application of MEMS and microfluidics to biology and medicine.Ali Asgar Bhagat, University of Cincinnati ALI ASGAR S. BHAGAT received his M.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2006, and is currently pursuing his Ph.D. His research interests include
learnimportant fundamental subjects in a well structured yet open minded and supportiveenvironment.Many high schools offer courses in engineering. Due to a lack of pre-requisite classes, thesecourses are usually introductory in nature and do not offer opportunities for students to studyvector and calculus based engineering mechanics1. The course coverage in GESN is the same asthat offered in a freshman or sophomore university level statics class, making it unique for a highschool curriculum. Exposing high school students to engineering before they apply to a collegeor university is beneficial since the rigorous course load of a university program makes itdifficult to complete an intended major without adding an extra year (or more) to the requiredtime.2
AC 2007-2925: CREATIVITY AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: BRINGINGENTREPRENEURSHIP INTO ENGINEERING DESIGN CLASSESLarry Richards, University of Virginia Page 12.422.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Creativity and New Product Development: Bringing Entrepreneurship into Engineering Design ClassesAbstractWe have taught a course on Creativity and New Product Development since 1995. It isunique in its attention to all aspects of the product development process, including thepersonal and interpersonal issues in product development, as well as the technical ones.Our focus is not just on studying product development, but on actually DOING it
” solving everyday problems in a systematic method. Certainlythese can be valuable experiences for children. However, they don’t allow the child to explore indepth or make connections between math and science concepts which are an integral part of anengineer’s view of the world.A third approach, the “Drive into Engineering” model, puts the teachers and the students in themiddle of the engineering activity. The teachers have created the moment and then both groupsare immersed in it. For Douglas L. Jamerson Elementary School this represents a “hands-on,minds-on” approach that fosters the development of methods and activities aimed at theintegration of mathematics and science concepts we are expected to teach imbedded inengineering concepts and
AC 2007-350: THE USE OF ELLUMINATE DISTANCE-LEARNING SOFTWAREIN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONJohn Crofton, Murray State University Dr. Crofton earned his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Physics and his B.E.E. in Electrical Engineering from Auburn University. Before coming to Murray State University in 1994, Dr. Crofton was a Senior Engineer at the Westinghouse Science and Technology Center in Pittsburgh. Dr. Crofton’s research work has focused on ohmic and Schottky contacts to compound semiconductors such as SiC and GaN. Additionally, Dr. Crofton is interested in applications of solid state UV sources for water purification.James Rogers, Murray State University Jamie Rogers is an assistant professor in the
Nachtmann, H. N. (1999). A Comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152.19 Chira, C., Chira, O, & Roche, T. (2005). Multi-agent support for distributed engineering design. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 3533, 155-164.20 Cross, N., Christiaans, H., Dorst, K. (eds.) (1996). Analysing Design Activity. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.21 Bransford, J., Brown, A. & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, and experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.22 Dwarakanath, S. and Blessing, L. ‘Ingredients of the Design Process: A comparison between Group
predominantlylanguage, history, and social science majors had resulted in the development of four generalizedattitude groups, loosely identified by responses provided in their initial entry surveys: the firstgroup was composed of students who had come to the conclusion that engineering was next toimpossible to understand, much less excel in. These students were discouraged by difficultiesthey had experienced and intimidated by the prospects of another semester of engineeringinstruction. The second group was typically composed of students who had been forced to takethe mechanical engineering sequence and, regardless of their previous performance, had made uptheir minds that engineering was irrelevant, both to their academic interests and to their futurecareers
AC 2007-1599: ONE-MINUTE ENGINEER, NTH GENERATION: EXPANSION TOA SMALL PRIVATE UNIVERSITYJohn-David Yoder, Ohio Northern University JOHN-DAVID YODER is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at ONU. His Doctorate is from the University of Notre Dame. Research interests include education, controls, robotics, and information processing. Prior to teaching, he ran a small consulting and R&D company and served as proposal engineering supervisor for GROB Systems, Inc.Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly Jaeger, PhD is a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a selected group of full-time faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern
experimental characterization of multiphase flow phenomena. Page 12.895.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Innovative Fluid Mechanics Experiments for Modern Mechanical Engineering ProgramAbstract One of the primary objectives of the Petroleum Institute (PI) is to prepare futuremechanical engineers to assume successful career paths in the Oil and Gas industry.With this in mind, a state of the art core measurement laboratory represents an importantfacility for teaching use within a Mechanical Engineering Program. Such a facility hasbeen developed at the PI, and is utilized at undergraduate level
knowledge yields from the common lecture14. Yet, the suggested avenues, and many othersstill only address a passive lower-order thinking and learning style15. Greater understanding andsatisfaction comes of a learning style called active learning, which is necessary for the student totruly learn the material16. This learning style engages the minds of the students and allows themto not just passively regurgitate what they have heard in some bygone lecture but to activelythink about what they are doing using any number of different techniques17.The active learning methods used in design engineering courses such as IDE 20, IDE 105, andIDE 401 adhere to these requirements by letting the student dissect safe, common products andtoys during the reverse
Computer Engineering problem realistic?In struggling with exactly how to make a problem complex, we decided that an assignmentshould be loosely specified, so as not to suggest a particular solution methodology. To make thelearning event more realistic in an engineering context, we decided to introduce the notion ofdifferent design teams competing for the distinction of creating the “best product.”3. Trial 1:With this approach in mind, we return our attention to enhancing the Computer Engineeringcourse. This section describes a trial implementation of the inquire arousal approach that startedmid-way through a semester. (a) (b) Figure 1. (a) Syntax defining a maze, given to students as a possible input example that
AC 2007-1866: EXPLICIT DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERING SKILLS ANDCHARACTERISTICS IN THE FRESHMAN YEARJoseph Schimmels, Marquette University Dr. Schimmels is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Marquette University. In 1981, he obtained a BS degree in mechanical engineering from Marquette University. He worked as a reservoir engineer at Exxon Production Research Company in Houston, TX from 1981 to 1987. He then obtained MS and PhD degrees in mechanical engineering from Northwestern University in 1988 and 1991, respectively. In 2003, Dr. Schimmels was awarded the Lafferty Endowed Professorship in Engineering Pedagogy at Marquette. Since then he has been working toward
period of time has elapsed? 3) what are the areas that studentshave the most difficulty learning? With similar purposes in mind our team has evaluated theliterature to determine what instruments exist that are intended to measure engineering designknowledge and how these instruments have been used in other engineering schools. After ourextensive review, we concluded that available instruments were not as comprehensive as we hadhoped. Accordingly, we have teamed up with learning specialists and embarked on thedevelopment of a new instrument. This paper documents this effort.In the paper, first we provide a summary of our investigation on the availability of knowledgeassessment tools on design, and then provide details on the development of the
can be described with these concepts in mind rathereasily. In the absence of accurate information and a breadth of understanding of the profession,students, parents and educators explore websites for reasons to engage or disengage. This contentminimizes and diminishes electrical engineering to knowledge about amps and volts, reinforcesstereotypes, and represents a missed opportunity to inform and engage readers.CollegeBoard.comThe College Board website is a large repository of information on colleges, careers, collegemajors, financial aid and standardized testing. The users are typically students, parents andeducators across a wide spectrum of interests. Under the link to electrical engineering there is asection developed to help students
AC 2007-640: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ABROAD PROGRAMS INGERMANY – EXPERIENCES AND LESSONS LEARNEDRaghu Echempati, Kettering University RAGHU ECHEMPATI is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University (formerly GMI Engineering & Management Institute). He has over 20 years of teaching, research and consulting experience. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of Mechanics, Machine design, and CAE (including metal forming simulation and Design of Machines and Mechanisms). He is very active in the Study Abroad Programs at Kettering University. He is a member of ASME, ASEE, and SAE, and a Fellow of the ASME.Butsch Michael, FH-Konstanz, Germany MICHAEL BUTSCH
Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind-Set,” Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (2), 2005, pp. 233-243.(4) Creed, C., E. Suuberg, and G. Crawford, “Engineering Entrepreneurship: An Example of A Paradigm Shift,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91 (2), 2002, pp. 185-195.(5) Standish-Kuon, T. and M. Price, “Introducing Engineering and Science Students to Entrepreneurship: Page 12.632.14 Models and Influential Factors at Six American Universities,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91 (1), 2002, pp. 33-39.(6) Johnson, M., “Engineering Entrepreneurship: Does Entrepreneurship Have a Role in Engineering Education?,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation
AC 2007-2278: SECONDARY STUDENTS' BELIEFS ABOUT THEIR INTERESTSIN NANOSCALE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERINGKelly Hutchinson, Purdue UniversityShawn Stevens, University of MichiganNamsoo Shin Hong, University of MichiganMolly Yunker, University of MichiganCesar Delgado, University of MichiganWilliam Fornes, Purdue UniversityGeorge Bodner, Purdue UniversityNick Giordano, Purdue UniversityJoseph Krajcik, University of Michigan Page 12.1258.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Secondary Students’ Beliefs about their Interests in Nanoscale Science and EngineeringAbstractResearch has shown that increasing students’ interests in science
AC 2007-271: EXPLORING ACADEMIC FACTORS AFFECTING ENGINEERINGGRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH PROFICIENCYScott Rogers, Georgia Institute of Technology Ph.D. Candidate in Environmental Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology (GT-EnvE) in Atlanta, Georgia. Served on the GT AEES Dialogue for Academic Excellence Committee (DAEC) as Assessment Subcommittee Chair from August 2004 to June 2005, Committee Chair from June 2005 to August 2006, and Past Committee Chair from August 2006 to present.Recep Goktas, Georgia Institute of Technology Ph.D. Candidate in GT-EnvE. Served on DAEC as Committee Secretary from August 2005 to August 2006.Ulas Tezel, Georgia Institute of Technology Ph.D
: Involve engineering in K-12 lessons that map to state standards for math and science. Further, states should follow the lead of Massachusetts and enact state standards for engineering 4. Use/Improve K-12 Teachers: Engage more K-12 teachers in outreach efforts and curriculum writing, and increase teacher salaries to attract the best technological minds to teaching 5. Make Engineers “Cool”: Outreach to urban schools and females more aggressively, and create more mentors and role models to attract these constituencies 6. Partnerships: Create better incentives for all groups to engage in K-12 outreach (especially higher education and industry)2According to Dougless, Iverson and Kaylendurg there is no magical list
briefintroduction to the objectives of the activity, 2) conducting the activity and 3) discussing how toimplement the activity in their individual classrooms. Four activates were chosen for the Institutediscussed in the paper, with math and science teachers in mind: Forces and Math, Pendulums andGraphing, Water Rocket Design and Analysis, and Yogurt Cup Speakers. The workshopactivities were taught as ‘engineering’ activities and were not aimed specifically at math orscience teachers. The activities are briefly described below; full lesson plans are included asAppendices A-D, respectively.Forces and Math. The ‘Forces and Math’9 activity explores loads and reaction forces. Inaddition, the activity can be used to practice graphing experimental data, and/or to