engineering curricula is important for the education of well-qualified engineers. While all accredited engineering programs are required to provide a majorcapstone design experience, the integration of design throughout the curriculum is oftenchallenging. The departments of biomedical engineering and industrial engineering at WesternNew England College have developed a design experience completed as a requirement in seniorengineering laboratory courses. The design project experience is in addition to the capstonedesign courses. This experience was used to demonstrate students’ ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams, design a system within realistic constraints, and understand the impact ofdesign solutions in a societal context.IntroductionA
the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. Dr. Hsieh received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX. Page 12.395.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Conceptual Design Environment for Automated Assembly Line – FrameworkAbstractAutomated systems play an important role in our daily life and our national economy. Educatingstudents about how to design automated assembly systems is very important. However,education in this area most often takes place in senior design courses. This may be because ofthe multi-disciplinary
inserts are an integral part of machining operations. In the continual search for costeffectiveness in manufacturing we turn our focus to an attempt to reduce tooling cost byimproving the life of cutting inserts. There has been continued research conducted to increasecutter tool life with various applications of cutting fluids, speed and feed rates, and the use ofcoated cutters. One newer approach, cryogenic processing, has been promoted as an effectivemethod of extending the useful life of different cutting tools used in the manufacturing process.This research area provides an excellent opportunity to apply real life research into capstonedesign projects. The purpose of the project was to investigate the feasibility of the claim inconjunction
are fairly involved requiring budgets of up to$40,000 4) while some projects require graduate students as an integral part of the designteam 5). One common theme in most of these projects is that the courses are designed forsenior students enrolled mainly in engineering and other disciplines 6 - 9). While theseprojects are multidisciplinary, synchronization of course syllabi across the disciplineswas not made.In the above context, the Interdisciplinary Design Studies (IDS) project undertaken atRobert Morris University (RMU) in the spring of 2006 was a unique experiment by virtueof two features: Firstly, because the course was offered for mainly junior (along withsome sophomore) students and not for senior or graduate students as is usually
/verification,manufacturability analysis, and the manufacturing design of the product. This course has beencontinuously updated to offer the latest tools, software, and teaching and evaluation techniques.Students are assigned to teams based on their learning style, technical and academic background,and schedule. Students must complete an industry-supported project. In this course, students areevaluated both individually through performance on homework, quizzes, and exams; and also asteam members on the basis of a design and prototype review, final report, presentation, peerevaluation, and comments by a panel of experts. Course assessment is based upon a variety ofsurveys and feedback mechanisms. This paper describes several of this year’s projects
results of assessment documentation and offer suggestions forcontinuous quality improvement.IntroductionTraditional methods of instruction may not be very resourceful in service learningcourses pertaining to engineering disciplines. Student learning styles are completelydifferent and instructors have to accommodate new and different learning strategies(Schmeck, 1988). The instructor responsible for Senior Design Capstone course ischarged with the responsibility of creating an active learning environment. Theinstructor may have to utilize some innovative modern technology to design developand present interactive lecture demonstrations (Sokoloff & Thornton, 1997). Hereinthe instructors should utilize Silberman’s guide. He offers several
offers a perspective of how Penn State University-Altoona College, anundergraduate institution in Pennsylvania is taking steps to integrate ISA education into its four-year electromechanical engineering technology program. The college realizes that it is highlyimportant for its engineering students to be knowledgeable about information systems securitysince engineers are now expected to have at least a basic understanding of current threats, theconstant change in the nature of those threats, how these threats affect product development,personal safety, employee productivity, and organizational expenses.IntroductionThe specific intent of an information systems security education curriculum should be to trainprofessionals who are able to analyze
AC 2007-1390: COMMUNITY COLLEGE - INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP TODEVELOP AN AUTOMATED TRAINING PLATFORMMarilyn Barger, University of South Florida MARILYN BARGER is the Executive Director of FL-ATE, the Florida Regional Center for Manufacturing Education funded by NSF and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa Florida. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College, and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of South Florida. She has over 20 years of experience in developing curriculum in engineering and engineering technology for elementary, middle, high school and post secondary institutions. She is a registered professional
design tradeoffs, such as the realization that having a greater load-bearing capability will result in a higher cost due to the larger amount of materials required,which would thereby lower the cost criterion score. The traditional Tower of Straws activity istypically introduced, designed, constructed, and finished within a single class period. This shortamount of time is insufficient for students on a team to thoroughly perform many of the aspectsof engineering design being emphasized in our curriculum, such as the examination of alternatesolutions, performing an analysis to decide upon the best solution, and providing documentationof the specifications of their chosen design. This is the case in the first of the two times theTower activity is
interpretation of the net currentJ = j d 2 Ω is then an easy exercise, as is the interpretation of the MCNP F1 tally |nˆ · j| d 2 Ω d 2 r. The angular flux ψ(r, Ω) ˆ can be presented as the magnitude of the angular current, and in thisregard it can be interpreted as rate of flow across a surface that is perpendicular to Ω. ˆ But thereis no value in emphasizing this. It confuses flux with flow across a surface, a connection thathas little utility. The scalar flux φ = 4π ψ d 2 Ω is introduced as a definition, as is the net currentJ, and the point that neither can be generally computed from the other is made. In other words,once direction information is integrated away, the connection between current-like and flux-likequantities is broken. The
AC 2007-2402: FALL SPACE DAY – AN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH ANDPROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM MODELCindy Mahler, The Boeing Company CINDY MAHLER is an International Space Station systems integration engineer at the Boeing Company in Houston, Texas. She is the founder of Purdue Fall Space Day and has a vision for creating a National Organization to expand Fall Space Day not only geographically but also to use the model to reach out to students in other subject areas. While working at United Space Alliance in spaceflight training, Cindy was awarded a Silver Snoopy, the highest award given by Astronauts to less than 1% of the workforce, for the successful integration of the U.S. and Russian
&U Greater Expectations project and the Clarkson Common Experience.In an earlier white paper on liberal education in engineering,5 Steneck, et al, considered threetypical curriculum delivery models and recommended the integration of all three models. TheCommon Experience curriculum incorporates each of these models in its implementation.Traditional Humanities and Social Science Courses: Courses addressing the various studentlearning outcomes in six areas of knowledge are predominantly from the humanities and socialsciences disciplines. However, these courses must address specific learning outcomes in one ormore of the knowledge areas, so the concept of humanities and social science courses, per se, isno longer relevant to the curriculum
•MET 445 - Machine Design •MET 456 – Capstone I Figure 2. MET Areas of Expertise and Related Courses (Current Curriculum)Mechanical Engineering Technology Core CompetenciesTo further define the required skill set of MET graduates from our program, core competenciessupporting our mission, outcomes, and objectives, as well as constituent requirements weredeveloped and documented. The core competencies related to engineering fundamentalsappropriate to the needs of Mechanical Engineering Technology are:1. Demonstrate proficiency in mathematics – including analytic geometry, differentiation, integration, and differential equations.2. Demonstrate an understanding of engineering
pace of technological innovation, and thespecialized requirements of programs such as the Infinity Project and PLTW haverequired a change in the basic education of a technology education professional.In an effort to begin to address these challenges the Department of Technological Studiesof The College of New Jersey has begun to reshape both the make-up of its faculty andthe focus of its curriculum. During the past year, two senior members have retired and thedepartment has hired two new faculty to fill these openings. The retiring faculty bothheld doctorates in education with a focus on industrial arts – one of the new facultymembers has a doctorate in aerospace engineering and the other has a doctorate inelectrical engineering. These two new
AC 2007-241: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MEASURES OFCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH A STRUCTURED WORKSHOPCURRICULUMMaura Borrego, Virginia Tech MAURA BORREGO is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and 2005 Rigorous Research in Engineering Education evaluator. Dr. Borrego holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Her current research interests center around interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering and engineering education, including studies of the collaborative relationships between engineers and education researchers. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study interdisciplinarity in engineering
andpublic health preparedness7. Also located in the city is a university that is considered to be oneof the leaders in nanotechnology research.To address these needs, this institution is developing an interdisciplinary undergraduatebiotechnology program. The new curriculum will provide students with a breadth of knowledgeand skills across a variety of scientific and technological disciplines. The program requiresstudents to enroll in classes that will provide them with a strong foundation in biology,chemistry, and information technology and computer science. The program also offers abioprocessing and bioinformatics track. These two tracks, in addition to enhancing employmentopportunities in the biotechnology industry, will also expose life science
cases integrate ethics and procedural/professional issues into thecourses. The broader impacts of the proposed activity will be the implementation of a set of fullydeveloped case studies for civil engineering education. Based on survey returns from theparticipants selected for the pilot workshop, each of the 60 faculty can expect to directlyinfluence an average of 3.2 courses and 215 students in the two years following workshopattendance. Thus, the broader impact will be approximately 190 courses and 13,000 studentsacross the U.S. Furthermore, students will participate in this program developing case studies Page 12.276.2under the
engineering material into their teaching. Most indicated that they havechanged or plan to change their curriculum to incorporate the engineering concepts they learnedand the majority will use the engineering design challenge in their curriculum.Introduction and BackgroundAn increasing and significant number of business, academic, and political leaders, professionalassociations and coalitions continue to express their growing concern that our nation’s deficiencyin K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education is approachinga crisis level. Their numbers represent all areas of the engineering, technology, science,mathematics, business and political communities. A sampling presents an overview of currentsentiment.The American
apprenticeship by Merkel and Baker6 (2002). Duringthis process the mentor takes an active role in training and developing the next generation ofengineers, technologists, and scientists. This adds a further dimension to the typical advisor roleof academic guidance, career direction, moral support, and encouragement. The advisor nowbecomes a research manager and mentor as well.In many cases, this trend has led to the integration of undergraduate research directly into theacademic curriculum. After graduation many of the students will be involved in the application,dissemination, and creation of knowledge, or in other words research. As a result it becomes anatural extension of the classical inquiry oriented curriculum to include aspects of research
AC 2007-2062: DISTINGUISHING THE ART FROM THE SCIENCE OFTEACHING WITHIN RESEARCH-BASED CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENTWendy James, Oklahoma State University Wendy James is a PhD student in the College of Education at Oklahoma State University. Currently she has a fellowship promoting collaboration between the College of Education and OSU's Electrical and Computer Engineering department on an NSF funded curriculum reform project called Engineering Students for the 21st Century. She has her M.S. in Teaching, Learning, and Leadership from OSU, and her B.B.S. in Mathematics Education from Hardin-Simmons University in Abilene, Texas. She has taught math and math education classes at both the high
239 100% 136 100% 18 100% 40 100% 433 100% Page 12.505.5The entrepreneurial program was integrated with the Entrepreneurial LearningCommunity (ELC), a four-year program that embraces entering freshmen with an interestin entrepreneurship in addition to their chosen academic degree objective. These studentslive together in a residence hall located near the ----Center for Entrepreneurship, enjoyextra access to entrepreneurship-related activities and speakers, and share courses withinthe entrepreneurial program. Initially, there was a high participation of managementstudents within the Entrepreneurial Certificate
IEEE Computer Society andACM Joint Task Force on Computing Curriculum – Computer Engineering (CCCE) havedefined the computer engineering body of knowledge10.Industrial Engineering Body of KnowledgeCan industrial engineers agree on a Body of Knowledge or at least on outcomes that distinguishindustrial engineering (IE) from other engineering disciplines? The ABET program criteria2 forindustrial engineering state only that “The program must demonstrate that graduates have the ability to design, develop, implement, and improve integrated systems that include people, materials, information, equipment, and energy. The program must include in-depth instruction to accomplish the integration of systems using appropriate analytical
introduced in the beginning of some lectures.The students commented that the quizzes provided direction by highlighting key concepts andcritical vocabulary. Quizzes also led to more engaging discussions in the classroom.ConclusionsThere is a clear need to convey the necessity for multidisciplinary education early in theengineering curriculum, so that students do not wait until their senior year to take courses inbiology. A good BioMEMS textbook that integrates fundamentals with applications would betremendously helpful to addressing the challenge of teaching the multidisciplinary topic ofbiomedical microsystems to engineers. Overall, the results of this three-year pilot program are
also the solution tothe social challenges confronting us on local and global scales.BS Engineers - Birds in Gilded CagesThe plight of engineers with BS degrees is viewed as enviable by most other college graduates.As engineers we know it is an earned situation. BS engineers command high salaries vis-a-vistheir counterparts in other majors. The engineering curriculum is usually more extensive andmore intensive than other curricula, and the BS engineer provides an immediate and valuableservice to their employer. Graduates in most other disciplines are aware that furthering theircareers, to their own and their employers benefits, will require that they go on to a professionalor graduate school of some sort. Only engineers are thrust into the
AC 2007-2446: ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AMONG ENGINEERINGUNDERGRADUATES: SEVEN YEARS OF RESEARCH BY THE E^3 TEAMCynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli is Managing Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching North and Associate Research Scientist of Engineering Education at the University of Michigan (U-M). She joined U-M in April 2003 after serving as Founding Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, Richard L. Terrell Professor of Excellence in Teaching, and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli earned a B.S.E.E. degree (1988), an M.S.E. degree (1989), and a Ph.D. degree (1993) in Electrical
(EAS120) the group of disciplinesrepresented in the development phase included chemistry, biology, and relevant engineeringfields. This new course was developed to balance the requirement to incorporate relevant newcontent into the curriculum with the need to limit curriculum overload. This course wasdesigned to satisfy these constraints by integrating the relevant biological science materials intoan existing chemistry course. Since the new content represented about forty percent as muchmaterial as was included in the existing course, some of the existing content needed to beremoved. An additional constraint was then to make sure that content needed to prepare studentsfor follow-up courses was retained. This could be accomplished in two ways
’ desire to engage more in an active learning environment was expected;however, their desires to integrate the topics and provide a contextual application wereunexpected. To meet this challenge, a set of three lessons was designed with interactiveexercises and discussions, integrated across the TDLC skills, and scheduled early in the semesterto provide an opportunity for use by the student teams in the course projects. The new TDLClessons were included in the fall 2005 semester curriculum. A full course survey wasadministered following the third lesson. The students were asked four questions related to theTDLC lessons: 1. Were we effective in integrating the four skills: Teamwork, Communication, Diversity, and Leadership across the lessons
instructional technologies, integrating research in classroom, thermal stresses, computational mechanics, and mechanics of nonhomogeneous nanolayers. Page 12.869.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 INCORPORATING A RESEARCH PROBLEM IN A NUMERICAL METHODS COURSE FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERSAbstract This paper presents an example of incorporating a research problem in a course -Numerical Methods for Mechanical Engineers. In bascule bridges, the fulcrum is assembled byshrink-fitting a trunnion into a hub. In one case, the trunnion cooled in a dry-ice/alcohol mixturefor
at partner university HVI Lecture / lab (virtual) Lab Intensive internship at partner university Page 12.1250.6 HSI Lecture / lab (simulation) Lab Intensive internship at partner universityDesigning an innovative curriculum for nanotechnology in engineering technology is a complextask and requires a high level of integration. The students, the faculty, collaborating labs andparticipating institutions, must all work
AC 2007-922: WEB-BASED DESIGN AND ANALYSIS PROJECTS FOR A JUNIORLEVEL INTEGRATED CIRCUITS COURSEDavid Braun, California Polytechnic State University David Braun is a Professor in the Electrical Engineering Department at Cal Poly in San Luis Obispo. He worked at Philips Research Labs in Eindhoven, the Netherlands from 1992 to 1996, after completing the Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at U.C. Santa Barbara. Please see www.ee.calpoly.edu/~dbraun/ for information about his courses, teaching interests, and research. Page 12.1599.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Web Based Design