colleges). Overall, the university providesservices to mostly middle/low-income student, many of whom must work to pay theirbills. Thus, we recognize that the University and the College are well-positioned to bemajor contributors to increase in the diversity of the nation’s STEM workforce – acritical requirement for America is to continue in its role as the world leader inaddressing the technological challenges and transformations that lie ahead. 9Collaborating College 1/2 10Collaborating College 2/2 11In 2016, the College of Engineering and Computer Science was awarded a Title IIIHispanic Serving
Expectations: Perspectives of Underrepresented Computer Science Doctoral Students Vidushi Ojha1 , Raul E. Platero1 , and Beleicia B. Bullock2 1 Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2 Department of Computer Science, Stanford University {vojha3, platero2}@illinois.edu, beleicia@cs.stanford.edu1 IntroductionIn the field of computer science (CS), institutions are failing to produce enough computing grad-uates to fulfill predicted market demand. Not only is this the case at the undergraduate level [1],but also at the doctoral level, where educational institutions are unable to hire as many
sample is from Wave 3 of the study.To measure the extent to which participants perceived how their personal identity alignswith their selected STEM major, a shortened scale of the Science Career Identity wasused. Participants answered 11 items on a scale of 1 to 5, such as “I have a strongsense of belonging to the community of scientists.” A composite score was thencreated by averaging the items. This scale historically has a high internal consistencyfor both undergradautes and graduate students.Next, an explicit Gender Identity scale, adapted from Luhtanen and Crocker’s self-esteem subscale, was used to measure the extent to which participants identified withtheir gender. Each of the four items were rated on a scale of 1 to 5 and were
. Longitudinal analysis of nationwide singleand multi-institutional data shows the positive relationship between learning outcomes and adiverse student population. One of the most influential studies was done by Gurin et al. [1] wherestudent survey data was reviewed from two longitudinal databases: Michigan Student Survey(MSS) and Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP). The MSS dataset consisted of1,582 students who were admitted to the University of Michigan in 1990, and the CIRP datasetcontained 11,383 students who entered college in 1985 from a total of 184 four-year institutions.According to them, educational outcomes can be categorized as learning outcomes anddemocracy outcomes. Learning outcomes include active thinking, intellectual
health disordersand decreased physiological health is well known [1-3], evidence-based practices of supportsystems specifically for minoritized graduate students to reduce the effects of climates ofintimidation are not common. Indeed, researchers have found that minoritized students “wouldbenefit if colleges and universities attempted to deconstruct climates of intimidation [4].” In a comprehensive study of Latinx graduate students in STEM at a Hispanic Servinginstitution found that “Faculty mentors played a greater role in their success compared to theirnon-Latino peers. In addition, Latinos/as were also more likely to use support services on campusthan their non-Latino/a peers” [5]. The same researchers also found that it was of
alsoshed light onto the troubles and triumphs that international and immigrant teachingprofessionals in the higher education landscape may face. It is hoped that the presentation is useful for administrators as they think about supportingatypical cases to strengthen their infrastructure, since afterall, innovation happens most amongthose pushing boundaries whilst facing challenges.pg. 18References:[1] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, andmixed methods approaches. Sage publications.[2] Matusovich, H. M., Murzi, H., Gray, D., Chambers, B., & James, M. (2020, January). AnAutoethnography: Outcomes from Faculty Engagement in Course Development in a Large First-Year Engineering Program. ASEE
. Graduate students are often faced with a wide variety of academic,professional, and personal challenges across their academic journeys that can impact theirpersistence in their graduate programs. These challenges are often exacerbated when racializedaspects of identity are introduced/considered/threatened. Black graduate students in engineeringdeal with additional scrutiny, such as microaggressions, racism, and other racialized experiencesthroughout their journey. This results in a wide variety of psychological and behavioralresponses unique to this group, such as feelings of powerlessness, invisibility, loss of integrity,pressure to represent one’s group [1], anger, escapism, withdrawal frustration and avoidance [2].In their study of graduate
transitioned from in-personprogramming to online instruction in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers selectedthe qualitative approach of virtual ethnography to detail the experiences of four practitioners asthey planned and implemented virtual educational programming. Each of the four practitionerswork as staff members in the University of Cincinnati College of Engineering and AppliedScience. The University of Cincinnati is a historically white tier 1 research institution in theMidwest. The reflections of the practitioners were documented as they transitioned programsintended for face-to-face engagement to virtual programming for faculty, staff, middle school,high school, and college students. Programming was designed for populations that
activities for grades 6-12. She has extensive knowledge in Common Core State Standards, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards, and Literacy. Renee is founder of Get Lit Mathematics which infuses current events and culturally relevant pedagogy to teach math con- cepts. http://www.getlitmath.com The School District of Oconee County recognized Renee for excellence in teaching as the Code Academy Teacher of Year in 2013. While a teacher in South Carolina, Renee fa- cilitated district level workshops on literacy and comprehension in mathematics, historical connections to mathematics, and effective middle grades math and Algebra 1 practices. She is dedicated outreach and advocacy. Additionally, she served as
Methodology• Overview of qualitative research and why it is important to utilize in the study of women’s STEM careers• Description of the research participants/sample• How the qualitative research was conducted, including an overview of the interview questions• Study limitationsFindings• 4 findings will be presented with the evidence that supports the findingsRecommendations• We will present recommendations based on the 4 findingsReferences are included.Introduction Introduction to Research Study • The STEM workforce drives innovative capacity and global competitiveness [1] • Intersectional gender diversity has been shown to increase innovation [2] [3] • Women comprise 47% of the workforce but only 27% of the
. 2011 to Oct. 2014, she served as a division director in theEngineering Directorate at the National Science Foundation (NSF). She was responsible for a $135Mbudget in support of interdisciplinary research centers, research translation, innovations in engineeringeducation, special initiatives in support of military veterans, broadening participation in engineering, andworkforce development programs. Her initial appointment at NSF was in 1999 to 2001, when she servedas a program director in the Engineering Research Centers program and represented the EngineeringDirectorate on several NSF-wide committees. Before entering academia, Dr. Maldonado was a member oftechnical staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories for 5 1/2 years working on optical fiber
. 7The purpose of this research is to develop a student‐focused mentoring program that can engage women in science and engineering at the University of Dayton, to help aid retention and engagement of these women. 7 Literature Review: Peer Mentors Other studies have researched impact of mentoring programs with success building a community, increasing retention rates Three main benefits of mentoring: 1) Student participation and perceptions 2) Student retention 3) Student ambassador development
et al. (2012), lecturers are concerned about a lack ofinclusion by tenure-track and tenured faculty members.3.The growth of the lecturer population calls for respectful adaptation and theinclusion of lecturers by offering opportunities similar to those of tenure-trackand tenured faculty (Kezar, 2012; Hahn & Heeren, 2016; Rideau, 2019;Sherick et al., 2020).4.Conversations with lecturers at the College of Engineering also indicated aneed. They call for the understanding of roles, responsibilities, and uniquecontributions of existing and new faculty members within the higher educationcommunity.1. To address this need, we would like to share one organizational support structure that is currently being instituted to support lecturers
;T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Bi- ological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) social competence in engineering education and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biological and Agricultural Engineering students. She is also a Member of the Engineering Education Faculty, Insti- tute for Engineering Education and Innovation, Food Science Graduate Faculty, and Multidisciplinary Engineering Graduate Faculty groups at Texas A&M University. American c
injustice in the U.S.IntroductionEngineering colleges and departments have been historically quiet in regard to racial and socialjustice issues, existing in the status quo, and often perpetuating a materialistic and militaristicculture rooted deeply in the history of engineering as a trade and subsequently a profession[1].Engineers are often less concerned with social issues, and rarely reflective of how their social andcultural identity impacts society and world, including engineers in academe. However, there hasbeen a shift recently in the socially and politically charged climate of the United States, particularlywithin the past decade where racially charged protests and protests against police brutality havebecome increasingly common and at the
. Ecological transitions, or changes in roles or settings throughout life, are at the heart of this approach. This framework considers both individual settings and relationships with different levels of external settings regardless of whether an individual is a direct actor in the system. Namely, four levels of systems undergird the ecological framework: 1) microsystems (settings and relationships experienced directly by the individual, e.g., families, academic programs, research groups, and peer groups), 2) mesosystems (interactions between various settings in which the individual is an active participant, e.g., research group‐academic program interactions), 3) exosystems (settings in which the individual does not actively
communication education. These initiatives would also improve the experiences and education of all students, including underrepresented students. This article contributes to discussions about the definition and usage of student resistance as a framework for education research.IntroductionThe numbers of international students attending US institutions have increased drastically overthe past several decades for multiple reasons: the students are motivated by the quality andreputation of the schools and job opportunities in the US, and the schools are interested ininternational students as quality future workers to the country and because international studentsoften pay high tuition that many domestic students are unable to pay [1
faculty representation. [1, p. 473-474]The college-wide faculty search we describe included interventions developed and implementedby the University of Colorado Boulder over the past five years [2] combined with additionalpractices known to support inclusive faculty searches. Key guidance was gleaned from theProvost’s Office [3] and publicly available information from the University of CaliforniaBerkeley College of Engineering Advancing Faculty Diversity Initiative [4-6], Emory University[7], and the Association of Public and Land Grant Universities [8].One common recruitment practice designed to create a more welcoming environment forhistorically marginalized and underrepresented faculty is the use of cluster hires [7, 8]. Based onNational
share how they are learning to provide feedback that empowersstudents to connect to existing literature in an authentic manner while validating their livedexperiences. We situate these vignettes within relevant literature to problematize the nature ofliterature reviews in STEM education. Vignette#1 (SB, Third-year Phd Student): I’ve thought about this quite a bit. Am I not doing enough work to find the literature? Does what I’m seeking even exist? What will my advisors and peers think about me if I am unable to find literature that supports my claims? Why isn’t my lived experience enough to support my claims? How is it ok for me to interview a peer and justifiably put their experiences in my work but not be allowed to personally speak to what I
between the conferring of science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) bachelor’s degrees to minoritized groups at four-yearpredominantly White institutions (PWIs) and the number of STEM faculty that representminoritized groups [1], [2]. The Morrill Act of 1862 established engineering as a major atinstitutions currently known as PWIs. From the very conception of the engineering collegiateculture in 1862, minoritized groups have been ostracized and unwelcomed. Engineering as amajor was not created with Communities of Color in mind. Studies have shown that a diverseengineering faculty contributes to improving access and success of diverse students [3].Considering this, it is important to address the effects of the lack of minority
participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the academy and industry; 2) discipline-based education research in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields. She uses her scholarship to challenge the perceptions of who belong in computing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Need for Change: How Interview Preparation and the Hiring Process in Computing Can Be Made More EquitableAbstractMedia and literature frequently describe the need to increase the number of workers in computingto meet growing demands and
further study.Keywords: Undergraduate, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, EngineeringIntroductionIn an effort to address this issue of persistence for undergraduate students majoring inengineering and taking general chemistry, typically one of the pre-requisite courses taken duringthe first two-years on campus, we have developed a career-forward laboratory curriculum that isdesigned to support persistence. A career-forward curriculum targets the long-term goal ofpersistence—the personal capacity of students to continue towards an academic goal—byframing experiences with the content, context and specific skills of working in the target careerfield. Created as an extension of an earlier reform of the recitation component of chemistrycourses [1], this
Education, 2022 Increasing Minority Student Applications to STEM Graduate Programs: Lessons Learned and Outlook for a New ProgramGood afternoon, and thank you for joining us today as we discuss our lessons learnedand outlook for a new program developed to increase underrepresented minoritystudent applications to STEM graduate programs, called A Step to the Doctorate. (Tothe reviewers: The final version of this PowerPoint would/will include photos fromthe program; participants signed a photo waiver.) 1 ▪ Who We Are