, that was that was beyond acceptable…” • XXX “Once I was in a high-level pitch meeting (the only woman in the room), and asked if I could present early, stating I had to leave at 5:45 pm in order to pick up my son from daycare. They did not accommodate me, and I quietly left the room at 5:45. The next day I was chastised for leaving. It was bad enough my kids spent long hours with strangers, so this event triggered me to evaluate my work-life balance. I resigned a few weeks later…”As mentioned previously 17 of the 22 had children and 14 of 17 mothers discussedstruggles integrating work and family.The entire quotes are:BBB “I got a bad review my first year, (as an engineering
Paper ID #35548Creating and Sustaining Inclusive Learning Communities in EngineeringDr. Melissa M. Bilec, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Melissa Bilec is the William Kepler Whiteford Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Co-director of the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation. Her research focuses on the sustainable built environment. She is committed to exploring how the built environment can be an integral part of climate change solutions. She views the world and her research using a systems-level approach, and she is an expert in life cycle assessment. Using this view, she integrates critical built
the faculty prioritized ensuring that our students have “anability to…create a collaborative and inclusive environment” upon graduation. Our approach tointroducing DEI pedagogy was to focus on a first-year course, Grand Challenges in Engineering(GCE), and a second-year course, Engineering Mechanics: Statics (Statics). GCE is the firstfoundational design course in the program, where ABET Student Outcomes (SOs) 2-6 areintroduced. This was a natural fit for introducing DEI concepts, since they tie well with SOs 3(effective communication) and 5 (function effectively on a team). While Statics is a less obviouschoice to integrate DEI instruction, it was an opportunity to explore innovative ways toemphasize the importance of DEI in engineering in a
curriculum basedon its potential to be supportive of learning for all students. PBL is an educational designapproach which guides learners to “conduct research, integrate theory and practice and applyknowledge and skills to develop a viable solution to a defined problem” [29]. PBL has beenshown to increase long term knowledge retention, the motivation of learners and their ability tosolve authentic problems [30]. More specifically, PBL has been shown to be effective in helpingthe persistence of underrepresented students in STEM. For example, in a case study of at-riskfemale students in a physics classroom, the use of a PBL curriculum was shown to have positiveeffects on both student collaboration and self-efficacy [31]. An additional exploratory
included if empathy development was amajor component examined or considered in the research. Many that integrated empathy did notdirectly explore its growth or development, it was more of a component considered or as part ofthe curriculum rather than the goal of the research. For example, McDonald and Pan (2020)presented feedback from graduate students on ethical considerations for artificial intelligence[49]. While this work elicited insight into prompting consideration of bias and fairness, fosteringempathy was more of an indirect outcome than the phenomena of focus. Alternatively studiesconducted in other countries were excluded since the interpretation and assessment of empathymay vary by culture depending on the societal norms and preferences
groups, andparticipate in conferences and seminars—which is generally seen as good advising practices. 13 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE • The findings reveal the importance of creating engineering faculty development programming designed to improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practices used to promote the STEM identity of women undergraduates • Engineering programs must consider how to integrate the BSSI model postulated by Collins (2018) in their curriculum as it proved to be a useful tool for organizing and communicating ideas about STEM identity
improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practices used to promote the STEM identity of women undergraduates • Engineering programs must consider how to integrate the BSSI model postulated by Collins (2018) in their curriculum as it proved to be a useful tool for organizing and communicating ideas about STEM identity, its intersection with gender and racial/ethnic identity, and asset‐based thinkingThe findings reveal the importance of creating engineering faculty development programmingdesigned to improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practicesused to promote the STEM identity of women students—this study indicated there is
to:CLICK1. Develop and direct bold large-scale initiatives that engage College of Engineering(CoE) (~300) faculty, (~240) staff, and (~6,000) students, and build literacy around,diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts CLICK2. Establish new programs based on promising practices that complement existingprograms CLICK3. Develop, design, implement, and evaluate professional, career, and skillsdevelopment trainings, workshops, and other activities that increase interactionsamong students, staff, and faculty to improve climate – one example is thedevelopment of an equity minded syllabi for faculty CLICK4. Support faculty in the integration of DEI principles in their teaching, research, andservice
inclusion into engineeringcourses. Specifically, the third author works to integrate content concerning folks withdisabilities and teaches an upper-division course on design for disability. In dynamics, the thirdauthor incorporates modified versions of this content and helps emphasize the ways in whichengineering solutions can contribute to equity and access. In addition, the fourth author hasexperience with issues of engineering and social justice and teaches an upper division class onengineering design theory and social justice. Similarly, the fourth author works to incorporatesociotechnical topics into all their courses, including engineering statics. We note ourpositionality because the topics we teach likely influenced student responses to the
and Engineering endorse cultural ableism? • As we transition back into an in-person space, what are your thoughts, comments, or concerns for fall quarter 2021?One recurring theme throughout these Town halls was ableism. Many faculty, staff, and students hadobserved that the transition to a virtual teaching modality had highlighted for them a number of issuesof accessibility that were either improved or worsened in a virtual classroom setting. Ableism in STEMwas discussed in depth, specifically ways in which community attitudes and norms perpetuate ableismand what elements of curriculum and university infrastructure could be challenged to make STEM spacesmore inclusive. Many faculty were providing more thorough material online for their
and feminist education frameworks established by Paulo Freire [12]and bell hooks [33], Donna Riley introduced the concept of liberative pedagogy to engineeringeducation through her thermodynamics course at Smith College [14]. Liberative pedagogy takesa student-centered approach that empowers students to question authority and challengeoppression, which is critical to “prepare effective [engineering] professionalswho have an added critical awareness of the systems in which they work, as well as theability and desire to act to change those systems” [14, p. 143]. To reform her traditionalthermodynamics course, Riley related students’ lived experiences to the curriculum, madestudents authorities in the classroom by giving them teaching roles
lead teacher and mathematics curriculum coordinator for the Tri County Technical College’s Upward Bound program. Renee also is an experienced virtual educator and has taught undergraduate statistics courses online. Renee holds a B.S. Industrial Engineering and M.A.T in Middle Grades Mathematics Education from Clemson University. She is currently pursuing a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction at Purdue.Dr. Carol S Stwalley P.E., Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Carol S. Stwalley, PE joined the Minority Engineering Program team in the fall of 2007 as Recruitment and Retention Analyst. She earned her Bachelor of Science in Agriculture and Biological Engineering (ABE), MSABE, and PhD ABE from Purdue
; and Curriculum and Teaching. He also serves in multiple service capacities locally, institutionally, nationally, and internationally—including faculty mentoring programs; community organizations; ad-hoc reviewing for the National Science Foundation, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Amer- ican Educational Research Journal, The Urban Review (among others); and an invited member of the National Council for Teachers of Mathematics Research Committee and the American Educational Re- search Journal editorial board. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Increasing Academic Success for Historically Minoritized Graduate Students
program that includes credit-bearing courses in chemistry,math, and engineering fundamentals; along with professional, social, and academicprogramming to support the transition from high school to college. Hypatia andGalileo are Integrated Living and Learning Communities for first year women and menin engineering, respectively. CEED also provides peer mentoring and an academicrecovery program called Jump Start to serve students with diverse academic needs.In addition to major initiatives and other K12 and undergraduate programming andoutreach, two CEED graduate programs focus on mentoring for first year graduatestudents. The New Horizon Graduate Scholars are nominated by their departmentsand this program is focused on providing professional