the level signals sent to the controller and displayed onthe front panel (see Figure 6) reflect the actual levels (in inches) in the tanks. The flow ratequantity generated by the controller was converted into a voltage signal that allows the pump toproduce the desired flow. The coefficients of the digital controller are entered into an AUTOCONTROL module (see the block diagram in Figure 7) in a LabVIEW virtual instrumentprovided by the instructor. Level Sensors Laptop with the LabVIEW Controller Control
average retention rate of 5%. At the bottom of the chart, the "practice by doing" and "teachothers/immediate use" methods achieve an average retention rate of 75% and 90%, respectively.The Mobile Studio improves the knowledge retention rate by instant experience of theory andexperimentation of the theory.The experience of "learning by doing" of Mobile Studio also makes possible to practice experientialleaning, a process by which students reflect on what they learned and, from the reflection, newlearning emerges4. Starting from the abstract concept of theory and model presented, studentsdevelop experiments gain concrete experience of the theory by the measurement and observation ofthe experiment. Analysis of the result and discussion with other
documents, mailing lists, and electronic data interchange forms from vendors andcustomers, social security numbers, and credit card numbers6,16,17,18,19. These critical data andinformation reported in the literature provide and initial understanding to the question addressedin this research.Research Methodology: Focus GroupThis section discusses the methodology used in this research, namely a focus group discussion,and demonstrates its appropriateness for addressing the research questions. The value of thismethodology lies not only in the individual responses of the participants but also in thediscussions that arise among the respondents that reflect a shared, social understanding of aparticular topic. Additionally the opportunity exists for
relationship between engineering measurement and 2 7 engineering design and theory. I feel that as the result of the REU program, I now have considerable __ 7 „hands-on‟ experience in engineering.****A five-point scale from Strongly Agree (5) to Strongly Disagree (1) was used. This table reflects the number whochecked a 5 or 4. Page 13.1242.8**Questionnaires for the “Before” measurement were completed on the afternoon of the First Day on campus,following an orientation session. “After” questionnaires were completed on the Final Day, after all REU activitieswere completed
Percentage Technical Report Schedule Adherence Progress Memos Figure 8. Individual Student Performance Distribution for Project Assessment InstrumentsThis is not unexpected since the technical report includes all aspects of the project and teammembers have only developed subsystems. There is correlation between the length and detail ofthe task exposition in the technical report and team members’ involvement in designing the task.Students report the tasks they design more thoroughly than those designed by other groupmembers.Peer and self-assessment was added to the project to measure individual project contributionsand introduce reflective practices to the assessment process.10 The most
sophomores who left engineering found that the most important reasoncited for women and second most important for men was that the “reason for choosingthe major was found inappropriate”. In other words, a significant number of studentswere not retained because they no longer felt engineering offered interesting work ormany job opportunities. Thus, retention of engineering students may be improved byplacing the freshman and sophomore curriculum more in the context of true engineeringwhere they can see these opportunities. Efforts across the nation to enhance theengineering experience in freshmen courses by adding design and/or project basedcomponents are a reflection of this effort.11, 12 Assessment has shown that introducingdesign and project based
. Page 13.1269.5From Primary Causes to Root CauseThe previous section illustrated many of the operational features that characterize today’shigh-tech industry. It is a worldwide phenomenon. Although laws and governmentinfluence vary considerably, the trends are truly global. Educational responses andsolutions must therefore also be set in the context of international competitiveness 4.Following the reasoning process of Figure 1, the much-simplified trace-back sequence is:Why has the structure of industry changed so much? It reflects an evolutionary process that pays off in earnings and market growth. Specialization on core competencies allows fast technology development.Why specialize? Advanced technology requires massive
curriculum was based on three principal criteria: Page 13.377.5* The “highly competitive salary” paid to an assistant professor is $600 per month.The curriculum must be relevant. The coursework should be consistent with infrastructuredevelopment practices and priorities in Afghanistan, and it must reflect the knowledge and skillsrequired of officers in the Afghan National Army.The curriculum must be accreditable, based on western standards. The NMAA Superintendentand Dean have expressed their strong desire that the academy have accredited degree programsas soon as possible. Because of political, financial, and structural issues between the
literature and training is very general and reflects theexperience of generations past. As a result, the issues of outsourcing and globaloperations with fast-changing technologies have yet to receive the attention their currentrole demands.Methodology to analyze technical risk managementThe topics covered in this paper are the outcomes of a three-year iterative development ofindustry-based short training courses. Sixteen courses have been delivered to participantsfrom the five major companies who are members of the Arizona JACMET consortium.Over 200 participants have been involved. Most held senior-level positions. They havebeen project managers or candidate chief engineers but there have also been enough withsupply chain interests to demonstrate
, business andcomputer science. In the K-12 settings, they again find positive evidence of effectiveness inmiddle- and high-school mathematics, physics and chemistry, as well as in reading throughoutprimary and secondary education. The authors attribute these results to three factors: Increaseduse of formative assessment for feedback, which stimulates student reflections on their learning;building conceptual understanding using contrasts, both similar and different, and discussion;and motivating students to adopt mastery of learning as a goal, while avoiding theembarrassment of poor performance. Page 13.297.3More recently, Fies and Marshall11
students need to be successful in mycourse? Will they need to organize large amounts of information, summarize information,use rote memory techniques, or prepare for essay exams? Page 13.968.7Application of the Theory:Assisting students in developing study strategies which fit the type of testing (or otherforms of assessment) used in the course and which reflect the amount and nature of theinformation that must be learned will go a long way to promoting academic success.Question #7 - Learning Strategies: What types of learning strategies do my studentsneed? Will they need to collaborate with others in small or large groups? Will studentsneed to listen
acquiring skills and attitudes which promoteintellectual and personal growth. In the process, students become effective professionals andmature decision makers in a way that is uniquely theirs. This is a different way to considerand do advising.If faculty advisors could reflect for a moment on what academic skill sets the quintessentialstudent would possess upon graduation, most would picture a mature decision maker who hasthe capacity to apply the knowledge he/she gained in classes to solve problems, benefithumankind and expand the knowledge base in their chosen field. Utilizing a developmentaladvising model has the potential to produce the same scenario in the area of life skills.Effective Teaching Methods Set the Stage for Developmental
[sic] and discussion ...”Some students had negative comments to make, such as “I did not like the style of solving problems. I can’t see everything I’m going to need right off the bat.” “The “5 steps” half the homework time was wasted Roadmap and discussion rather than learning to problem sole [sic] . . . ”A student, in response to the question “What, if anything, would you change about this course?Please explain.”, stated “Difficult to understand certain problem solving methods [sic].”Despite the presence of negative comments, we wish to remark that the positive and negativeanswers reported above accurately reflect the proportion of positive vs. negative comments weobtained. Therefore, we conclude that the use of a
to judging their overall successes, as well as validating program continuations. Asindividual initiatives mature and researchers reflect upon their university/school district modelsand accomplishments, analyses of long-term program effects are expected to surface in theliterature.The TEAMS (Tomorrow’s Engineers… creAte. iMagine. Succeed.) Program2 is one such K-12engineering initiative that has been underway for nine years — long enough to permit analysis ofsignificant patterns of impact on graduate student participants. Evaluation of the TEAMSProgram includes the effects of the K-12 engineering program on graduate student development(their evolving attitudes and skills), as well as the long-term residual impact on students’ post-graduation
happened during SAGE and reflects onwhat must be improved upon.IntroductionThe underrepresentation of minority students in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (hereafter STEM) has been an enduring crisis in U.S. education. Decrying suchinequity, efforts increased from the late 1960’s and early 1970’s to educate and train minoritystudents in the technical fields. To that end, one would be hard pressed to find a higher educationinstitution that had not developed some sort of program to support minority students’ STEMparticipation1. Though the rate at which students seek to study STEM is increasingly comparableby race/ethnicity, the rate of students graduating with STEM degrees is still disparate2 3 4. Thechallenge remains to continue and
support team projects. • Selecting appropriate tools. • Learning to use tools effectively. • Assessment and reflection.2. OSS ToolsOSS tools can support specific team activities. However, teams usually perform a variety ofactivities, which could benefit from different tools. Teams can approach this situation in twoways. First, they can use a tool that provides multiple functions, and try to adapt it to multipleactivities. Second, they can use multiple tools, and try to make the tools work well together. Thefollowing sections describe some specific functions and tools, and then ways of combining them.2.1. Version ControlTeam members need reliable access to the most current version of a document, and they mayalso need access to
. B A C DFigure 7 Simulations designed for virtual exploration of signal reflection and distortion effects.Using the drag and drop option on simulations A and C in Figure 7, a student is able to movethe car around a parking lot and see how the different reflections from surrounding buildingsaffect the signal shape, phases, and amplitudes. S/he can choose between one or two pulsesignals and vary signal frequency, pulse duration, and delay between pulses. Simulations Band D help the student understand the Huggens-Fresnel principle and the impact of variousparameters on the structure of Fresnel’s zones, as well as what sources of secondary
reference curriculum for graduateeducation in SwE4. A fresh look at a graduate reference curriculum is in order considering thereliance of the world economy on the quality of senior SwE professionals.The iSSEc (integrated Software and Systems Engineering curriculum) project is iterativelydeveloping a graduate SwE reference curriculum (GSwERC) that reflects new understandings inhow to build software, how software engineering depends on systems engineering, and howsoftware engineering education is influenced by individual application domains, such astelecommunications and defense systems. At this point, at least three curriculum iterations areplanned – GSwERC v0.25, GSwERC v0.5, and GSwERC v1.0. The first iteration is completeand the second is being
energy was alsodiscussed. The participants dedicated some time to reflect upon and discuss feelings(negative and positive) that people may have about conserving electrical energy.Conservation often takes willpower, the development of new habits and lifestyle changes.Following the fundamentals of both AC and DC electricity, the course moved to thestorage and distribution of electricity. This concept is important with respect toalternative energy. Both photovoltaic (solar power) and wind turbines can generateelectricity, with the generated electricity used directly or stored by charging batteries.Several systems can be implemented, depending on the application. Therefore, a basicunderstanding of how electricity is distributed from the power plant
(IC) chip package to theprinted circuit board (PCB). A segment of such an interconnect topology can be assembled as asimulation model using Ansoft HFSS and simulated to get a feel for a variety of parameterswhich govern the transformations of an electric signal propagating via such structure. Inparticular, once the architecture shown in Figure 1 is drawn, students can attempt the followingsets of simulations: Generate and plot S-parameters at the frequencies of interest – learn to read S-parameter tables to determine the point of rapid increase of signal attenuation and discern frequency regions with high reflection loss; Run an animation of an electric field propagation along the interconnect structure
. This procedure establishes thevalidity of the instrument. Consequently, the first step in creating this tinkering and technicalself-efficacy instrument was to survey experts in the field of engineering. The experts consistedof a volunteer sample of engineering faculty, students, and practicing engineers, who aremembers of ASEE. There were a total of 101 respondents (71 members of ASEE, 24 engineeringstudents in a design course at a large university located in the southwest, and 6 engineeringfaculty at the same institution). The gender composition of the ASEE experts is unknown butthere were two females in the ASU faculty group and four female engineering students. It isreasonable to expect that the gender composition of the ASEE group reflects
% 5%teams that functioned as part of thecurriculum, compared with 24% for non-minorities. This likely reflects transportationissues for urban minority students that limitthe students’ ability to participate inextracurricular clubs, as well as the tendencyin even highly integrated schools for the after- Public School 70%school clubs to self-segregate in ways that donot occur in class. We are analyzing casestudies of integrated schools that are successful in encouraging minority FLL participation to Figure 12a--FLL Curricular Integration for Minorities (2006
want companies to think we were turning out inferiorengineers.” He did not want me to reflect a negative light on the Department and risk losing their research Page 13.1125.4grants from companies like Dow Chemical or DuPont.Because I didn’t know any better, I believed him. I never told a soul what he said to me for about tenyears. My Mom still doesn’t know. I remember spending a good hour or two sitting on this hill every daycrying and praying to God to get me out of this prison of a program. It was a very humbling time of mylife.I must say that if it were not for my faith in God, I would have succumbed to a deep depression and
that individuals are self-reflective, and evaluate their decisions throughouttheir course of action; therefore, behavior is premeditated and is guided by intentions 3. Aperson’s decision upon a course of action is interrelated to his or her emotions, biological events,cognition, and environmental events. Self-efficacy influences behavior through fivemechanisms. A person’s level of self-efficacy determines his or her: a) goals; b) persistence inthe face of obstacles 1; c) strategies to attain goals; d) emotional responses; and e) selection ofenvironments 3.Self-efficacy theory proposes six sources for an individual’s self-efficacy beliefs. These sourcesare: 1) a person’s successes and failures (mastery experiences); 2) a person’s ability to
program. It is important to note that the intent ofCapstone Design program is to reflect the technical excellence and expertise of thedepartment while providing a variety of project types and challenges for the students. TheIndustry Partner program and projects are an important component of program but are notintended to be the sole source of the projects for student consideration.Capstone Design Projects Course ObjectivesThe senior design projects are developed with the support of local industry, interestedfaculty, student organizations, and interested students. The projects reflect the academicintegrity and excellence of the Mechanical Engineering department. A committed facultyand Industrial Advisory Board are instrumental in this process.It
annotations without support. In addition,this paper uses the answers to these questions to comment on the educational significance ofwriting effective annotations.IntroductionBecause research tells us that “experience alone is a poor teacher,” [1] the engineering educationcommunity is exploring activities that can support the student’s making meaning (and learning)from their experiences. Recently, much attention has been devoted to having students constructportfolios—collections of artifacts, possibly annotated, put together to tell a story and/or supporta set of claims. Such portfolios can provide students with an opportunity to reflect on theirexperiences, share their experiences with others, and see experiences as a building block forfuture
. Reflect on the results and the process.Minor modifications and adjustments are made regarding the activities associated with some ofthose steps. Instructionally, PowerPoint presentations are used during the lectures to cover eachtopic and case studies and/or short in-class exercises are employed to illustrate how the ideaspresented can be used in a practical context. Then, the teams are asked to apply what they havelearned in class to their product development project. To make sure that feedback can be given to Page 13.1152.7the students in a timely fashion, progress reports are requested at key milestones and/or meetingsare held between the
outcomes can be divided into “engineering” skillsand “professional” skills, with professional skills including not only communication, butteamwork, ethics, professionalism, engineering solutions in a global and societal context,lifelong learning, and a knowledge of contemporary issues.2 ABET prioritized these professionalskills as relatively equal in importance to those of technical competence in its Criteria forAccrediting Programs, and in doing so, made it possible for engineering programs to not onlyrecognize the importance of professional skills, but to teach them to their students. ABET’sdecision to formalize this priority reflects what industry has been emphasizing in its recruitingand advising for many years. Companies such as IBM and
, but without the option (as in the traditional courses) ofchanging the mechanical design to simplify the software control. Performance evaluation couldnow include consideration of differences between the simulated robot and the physical robot in areal environment. Because each student had a local copy of the simulator, initial developmentand testing could take place off-line; when ready, the student could then test the same controlleron the physical robot. In principle, the simulator would be an accurate reflection of the real-world environment. Discrepancies could lead students to develop more robust controlalgorithms, and/or feed back to the instructors in order to improve the simulator itself. Studentscould work completely according to
between collective r esponsibility cpf"vjg"hcewnv{"ogodgtÓu"fguktg"vq" maximize his/her autonomy; ‚ The tension between collective r esponsibility and faculty collegiality0ÑThe challenges inherent in the curricular change process often lead to conversations that defaultto issues of content. This is understandable because it reflects faculty interest and expertise in Page 13.906.4general and their point of frustration in terms of student performance. It also demonstrates theirmental models and ladders of inference44 as well as the curse of knowledge45 Î all of theautomatic and largely invisible patterns of thinking in which experts