) QualificationsBased on the above it is obvious that the quality of the ASEM EM BoK depends greatly upon thequalifications of the EM faculty and industry experts. The ASEM EM BoK had a rating systemto qualify the reviewers. Requirements are similar to those used for accreditation and Promotionand Tenure decisions.Criteria include the following: - PhD in the subject field - Professor or at least Associate Professor level - Tenure Status - Refereed articles in field - Text(s) in the field - Funded research in the field - Practical experience at the executive levelOverall ratings were excellent and will be published in a journal article on this topic.Future Plans to Use EM BoKThere a number of other activities that is based on the approved
andmanagement.Bibliography1. The 3rd Generation Partnership Project, http://www.3gpp.org/specs/specs.htm.2. R. M. Ford and C. S. Coulston, Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers – Theory, Concept, and Practice, McGraw Hill, 2005.3. 3G TS 25.201 V3.1.0, Physical Layer – General Description, Release 1999, Jun. 2000.4. 3G TS 25.211 V3.5.0, Physical Channels and Mapping of Transport Channels onto Physical Channels (FDD), Release 1999, Dec. 2000.5. 3G TS 25.212 V3.5.0, Multiplexing and Channel Coding (FDD), Release 1999, Dec. 2000.6. 3G TS 25.213 V3.4.0, Spreading and Modulation (FDD), Release 1999, Dec. 2000.7. 3G TS 25.214 V3.5.0, Physical Layer Procedures (FDD), Release 1999, Dec. 2000
, Pete Sergi, Katie Iozzia and others at MoogAerospace for their generous gift. And without their support, this project would not have beenpossible.References 1. K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering. S.l. : Prentice Hall, 2001. 2. S. Bennett,.A History of Control Engineering (1800 to 1930). s.l. : Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1986. 3. J. Fiene and G. Niemeyer, “ Toward Switching Motor Control,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics ,Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 27-34, Februuary 2006. 4. E. Lee and J. Park, “ Bang-Bang Impact Control Using Hybrid Impedance/Time-Delay Control,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 8, no 2, pp. 272-277, June 2003 5. L. R. Young and J. L
. In the summer of 2002, she had an internship in the company Gamesa Aeronautica, section Moasa Montajes, Spain where she worked in product distributed environment at manufacturing of aircraft wings and nacelles. After graduating with a Master of Science (M. S.) degree, in area of Industrial Engineering, specialization in Production Systems in 2006, M.S. Jovanovic subsequently continued to work towards her Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree at Purdue University, department of Mechanical Engineering Technology. She is currently working as a Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant in Product Lifecycle Management Center of Excellence Laboratory at Purdue University. As a graduate student
organizationsdescribed herein.Bibliography1. McGrath, E., “Efforts to Promote Engineering in K-12 Schools in New Jersey: A Case Study of Recent Professional Development, Capacity –Building, Awareness-Building and Policy Initiatives, National Academy of Engineering, 2007.2. Hotaling, L., McGrath, E., McKay, M., Cunningham, C., Lachappelle, C., Lowes, S., “Engineering Our Future NJ,” in Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, June 24-27, 2007. Available: http://www.asee.org/acPapers/AC%202007Full1349.pdf3. BUILD IT Project. Stevens Institute of Technology. (2007). [Online]. Available: www.stevens.edu/ciese/buildit4. PISA Project. Stevens Institute of Technology. (2007). [Online]. Available: www.stevens.edu
Sciences. (S)he is positioned to perceivethe engineering problem as one of delivering technological services to humans, through socialinstitutions, creatively. Creativity is necessary with the service itself, with its technologicalbasis, and with its social realization.Foundational OutcomesIn order to recognize the importance of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Humanities and SocialSciences in the education of future civil engineers, in BOK2 outcomes were consolidated,rearranged and two new outcomes, one for Humanities and one for Social Sciences have beenincluded. There is considerable freedom for educators to determine how these outcomes may befulfilled through contributions from various academic departments and disciplines. This freedompermits
). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Appendix Table 2-333. 2. The Business Roundtable. 2006. “Innovation and U.S. Competitiveness: Addressing the Talent Gap. Public Opinion Research.” January 12. Available at: http://www.businessroundtable.org/pdf/20060112Two-pager.pdf4. Savage, E.N. A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education: A Historical Perspective. Journal of Technology Studies, v28 n2 pp98-100 Sum-Fall 20025. Sorby, S. & Oberto, L. “A Program Combining Engineering and Teacher Certification”. Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, November 6-9, 2002.6. Johnson, T. “A New Engineering Degree Program for Secondary School Teachers”. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE
problem as described above, students were expected to implement theintegrated design method, in which quantitative evaluation of initial solutions should inform anddirect subsequent design development(s). Quantitative evaluation of the environmentalperformance of the design schemes was based on the results of rigorous (and simplified)engineering methods. Calculations of both the passive heating and passive cooling systems wererequired. Figure 2 shows the calculation procedure to design the passive solar heating systems.Figure 3 shows the calculation procedure to design the natural ventilation systems.4.3 Design Development LoopIn this phase, each group developed its own conceptual design in the light of a simultaneousevaluation of its
. 1999 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering: Education to Serve the World, 1999.12. Rowe, C.J. and A. Mahadevan-Jansen, Module-based Freshman Engineering Course Development. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering Education Reaches New Heights, 2004.13. Katehi, L.P.B., et al., Preeminence in First-Year Engineering Programs. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering Education Reaches New Heights, 2004.14. Hirsch, P.L., S.J. Bird, and M. D’Avila, Enriching the Research Experience for Undergraduates (REUs) in Biomedical Engineering. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Staying in Tune with Engineering Education, 2003.15. Okudan, G.E., S. Mohammed, and M
to act on. 30 N o . o f S tu d e n ts The post responses looking at ranks 1 & 2 show 25 a 43% increase in disagreement with the 20 question. This indicates that the students underwent a change in perception and felt that 15 something could be done to act upon global 10 warming. 5
especially if a project is outside the advisor’s technical expertise. • Evaluate technical progress and professional behavior of team members. • Provide analysis and associated grading to the course coordinator. • While it is the responsibility of the advisor to provide technical advice and suggestions, it is not his/her responsibility to make decisions for the team, provide answers to problems that a team is expected to solve, or tell a team when they have done enough work.Mentor(s) • Provide biomedical clinical and/or technical advice to a senior design team. • Provide an opportunity for teams to gain experience in a clinical or laboratory setting. • Commit to the project for nine (9) months. • Commit to
layout. The established B-24 bomber facility was assembling anairplane a day, and there was felt a need to increase production to 25 bombers a day. Sorensen,using his 35 years of experience in designing and building manufacturing plants was able toenvision how the plant should be structured after an overnight thinking spree on the day he andEdsel Ford visited the old bomber manufacturing facility. The proposed macro-flow of the plantwas created by Sorensen on a piece of paper, and was accepted and signed by Edsel Ford.Eventually, the US Government funded the two-hundred million dollar manufacturing plant fromwhich 8,800 B-24’s rolled off the assembly line in six years with over 34 thousand employeesworking at its peak employment level of what
Design Figure 4: Project Organization for Product Innovation in the Bison Microventure Innovation TeamUp-to-the-Minute: As this paper is being written, the Microventure team is expanding. Afterthe first month of working to the prototype-development tasking, it became apparent thatadditional skill sets are needed. Three new engineering students and two microbiology majorswere added to the Team in January. Two of the new engineering students have assumed theassignment for testing, and the other is partnering in the process design task. The student(s) frombiological sciences support the material, coating and testing groups by providing moreknowledgeable input on such matters as bone growth mechanisms and
the front and Page 13.865.7back end for the team managing the run. Each production run consists of the followingactivities: • Lab (factory) set-up: The afternoon and evening before the production run, the management team takes charge of the lab/s needed for their production run. They reconfigure the lab (as allowed) including moving workstations and selected equipment. They set up all equipment, tooling and processes per their production plan as well as the inventory control system per their materials management plan. The quality control system they designed is set up including measurement and data
AC 2008-114: COOPERATIVE METHODOLOGY FOR SUCCESSFULINTEGRATION OF UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE RESEARCHPROJECTSJames Klein, University of Idaho James M. Klein received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Oklahoma Christian University in 2005. He is currently working towards his M.S. degree in electrical engineering at the University of Idaho. His research interests include power electronics, energy storage, and electric drives.Herbert Hess, University of Idaho Herbert L. Hess (S'89-M'92-SM'02) received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in 1993. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
lowpass filter 1 1with a frequency response given by H (ω ) = where ω1 = and RC = 75µS in 1 + jω / ω1 RCNorth America5. In order to design a digital de-emphasis filter, we can pre-warp the frequency ω and use the bilinear z-transform as follows6: ω pp = tan 1 where f s is the sampling rate in 2 fs ω pp − 1 ω ppHz, a1 = , and b0 = b1 = . The difference equation for the filter is then given by ω pp + 1 ω pp + 1 y
Higher Attended test(%) 58% 53% attendance, 5% Average visualization exercise 4% higher Passed visualization exercise 38% 34% More passed, 4%Conclusions and possible future studiesMost data show an improvement in the experimental group and better results inregards of assessments such as student´s work and tests. We analyzed data qualitativelyand not quantitatively, for this reason we consider no need of statistical analysis per se.The statistical analysis is not the aim of this study, the main aim of this study is tointroduce a new teaching strategy for part
that 12 more students passed DC Electricity this time, than would have under the formatof the previous two offerings. Even if only one more student succeeds each time because of thein-class circuits, it is worth the effort to this professor.Bibliography 1. Anderson-Rowland, M.R., “Understanding Freshman Engineering Student Retention through a Survey,” Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI, June 1997. 2. Milks, A.., “Modifying the Learning Environment to Improve Student Retention,” Proceedings of the 2002American Society for Engineering Education Conference& Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 2002. 3. Mehta, S. I., “An attention Quiz: A Low-Tech, High-Yielding Teaching Tip
programmed to perform such “intelligent” taskssuch as following a path, avoiding obstacles, seeking and retrieving objects, and communicatingwith other robots. Several ideas from the fields of behavior control architectures, computervision, and robot navigation are presented and applied where appropriate. Robots designed,built, and programmed by students participate in a competition at the end of the course.The course is divided into two sections: one on microcontrollers and the other on robotics. In thefirst section students work with Microchip Technology, Inc.'s PIC18F452 microcontroller and aninexpensive trainer called the QwikFlash2 that contains the microcontroller wired up to severalswitches, LEDs, a potentiometer, a liquid crystal display
Their Role in the Six Sigma Methodology, Quality Progress 32(9): 100- 103. 11. Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton. The Balanced Scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996. 12. Blakeslee, J.A. “Implementing the Six Sigma Solution.” Quality Progress, vol. 32, no. 7, July 1999, pp. 77- 85. Page 13.215.13
well. These departments include Civil Engineering (CE), ConstructionManagement (CM), Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), Industrial and ManufacturingEngineering (IME), and Mechanical Engineering (ME). Based on investigations conducted withfaculty teaching courses where codes and standards are or could be mentioned as well as somedepartment chairs, the following results graphically presented were obtained. These figuresshows the level of students’ exposure to codes and standards on a scale of zero through 10, zerobeing little or no exposure and 10 being maximum exposure. Figure 3, 4, and 5 show the level ofstudent s’ exposure to codes and standards during the freshmen seminar, field-specific courses,and senior projects respectively
, S., “The Digital Classification of Ancient Near Eastern Cuneiform Data,” available online at: http://www.english.bham.ac.uk/staff/tom/research/cuneiform/tuscany/index.htm, accessed 2008.9. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2007-2008 Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, Baltimore, MD, 2007.10. Sherman, B., McCue, L.S., Bi, P., and Milgram, J., “Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic deck motion limit Page 13.1066.7 systems,” Conference Paper No. PRADS2007-20290, 10th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, Houston, Texas, October, 2007.
, and how?” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2007. http://www.asee.org/acPapers/AC%202007Full1771.pdf4. R. Brent, R. Felder, and S. Rajala, “Preparing new faculty members to be successful: A no-brainer and yet a radical concept,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2007. http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=101435. R. Rice, M. Sorcenelli, and A. Austin, Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation, Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education, 2000.6. R. Reis, Tomorrow’s professor: preparing for careers in science and engineering, Wiley-IEEE Press, 1997.7. P. Wankat, The effective, efficient professor: Teaching scholarship and service, Allyn & Bacon, 2001
, AC 2007-227.10. “Web-based forums for student learning through teaching using course projects andhomework”, S. Crown and A. Fuentes, AC 2007-2888: Page 13.854.911. “Enhancing Student Learning - Students "Teaching"”, C. McIntyre, ASEE AnnualConference Proceedings, 1999 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: EngineeringEducation to Serve the World, 1999, pp2191-2198.12. “Learning-Through-Teaching, a collaborative learning strategy”, Shih, Chiang;Chandra, Namas; Hollis, Patrick Source; ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE2004 Annual Conference and Exposition, "Engineering Education Research: NewHeights", 2004, pp 8965-8974.13. “Introductory
sequence for Engineering Technology students ispresented in the paper. It is hoped that specializing in this technology of micro world will be ofimmense advantage to technology students in securing exciting jobs in all levels of MEMSmanufacturing industries. Developing new programs and curriculum will provide themicrosystems industry with a flexible set of educational resources and a core of trained humanpower while increasing the general public’s awareness. This will also facilitate in the futurecreation of standardized curriculum, educational programs and industry validated certification.Bibliography1. Hane Kazuhiro, “ Latest ternd of Optical MEMS. General remarks,” Optronics, ISSN: 0286-9659, VOL. NO288;Page. 50-52 (2005).2. X. Wang, B. Li, S
. The objective is to offer opportunities for students to get better experiencesand enrich their formation.4.9 Civil Engineering Internship Project – It is a partnership of COPEC with ConstructionCompanies of the region to provide proper internships for civil engineering students. It is offeredto students of 4th and 5th years of civil engineering programs of any engineering school of the Page 13.1230.6region. The student is hired as assistant and s/he has the opportunity to experiment all the phasesof a construction site from the blue prints to the final touches of the building [5].4.10 Cultural Immersion4.10.1 In BrazilIt is a project that
Figure 11. Prototype of Completed Project Page 13.758.11VI. ConclusionNowadays, cell phones are one the most popular wireless devices with numerous capabilities,and the concept of using a cell phone to alert owners of security breaches to their vehicles hasbeen used in similar projects in the past. However, the results of this project verified that thesame goal can be accomplished by employing a timer module to provide the equivalent functionsof the more expensive and complex systems that require extensive computer programmingcode(s) and/or hardware to operate properly. Furthermore, production cost and effectiveness ofthis idea were the major parameters of this project, and the timer module proved to
the mentors, bring total agreement in principle from us, but please note that this is being written at 9:30pm on a Saturday. We take pride in being able to be at least this well organized, without dragging people to unnecessary meetings.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support by NSF of the Georgia Tech FAST programunder the CSEMS initiative.Bibliography1 Komerath, N.M., Smith, M.J., “Mentoring Students to Technology Careers”. ASEE AnnualConference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, June 2004.2 Bramblett, S., “College of Engineering Retention Data- Special Request”. Georgia Institute ofTechnology, Registrar’s Office of Institutional Research and Planning. Nov. 19993 Anon, “Graduation Analysis: First-Time
team-based major design project was assigned (see Workshops for Week 1 in Table A1). In assigningcourse grades, there are two benchmarks that must be met to earn a non-F grade. The first is a60% or better individual grade on the team design project, and the second is earning 60% ormore of the available points for computer programming efforts. Additionally, an EngE2984course grade of C- or better is needed to meet the pre-requisite to continue to the nextengineering course(s); this is true for all freshman program courses. The main reason for offering this five-credit course is to move GE transfer students intotheir degree-granting departments as quickly as possible, so changing the course to a summeroffering was an obvious outcome from
. During the first three clue hunts, each team member had the chance to be a leader for thefirst time. Upon completion of the solution report, each team member including the leaderassessed the leader’s strengths and weakness without necessarily knowing what exactlyconstitutes a good leader. This served as a learning experience where each student decided whats/he wanted to see from a leader or what s/he should work on as a leader. For the last three cluehunts, each student was required to serve as leader one more time, but this time a more formalleadership assessment was performed. Various leadership skills were stated on a form and eachstatement was rated with a 5 point scale. The leader was given the completed forms, whichincluded a self