least two reasons.The Problem of CaricatureThe first point that I want to make is that a quick look at the “three dominant branches ofethical theory” is almost always a caricature. The typical reading list includes primary orsecondary source material from Aristotle for virtue ethics, Jeremy Bentham or J. S. Millfor utilitarianism, and Immanuel Kant for deontology. However, these thinkers are quitecomplex in their thinking, with the result that what is able to be summarized in one ortwo classes is almost certainly misleading. In addition, it is difficult to understand themotivations of such historically removed philosophers, with the result that one oftentakes their views to be ridiculous and easily dismissed. For instance, Aristotleinfamously
Used to Load BridgeNewA 1000lb Q-Test tensile/compression machine was adapted for use in the bridge testing. Thebottom grip is removed and a support structure put in its place. This structure has a span of 22inches to accommodate the 24 inch long bridge. The upper grip is replaced with a welded steelU- shape. On the bottom of the U are openings for insertion of the steel rod(s). The machine isthen put into compression mode at a constant speed. The software controlling the machine isTestworks 3 from MTS. The loading is much smoother than before and the bridge top staysparallel to the ground. Since using this new method, the students are happier with the testingprocedure. More ‘A’ grades have resulted than with the old tester. The new tester is
criteria to solve problems without to solve problems, but not without some problems, but the solution (s) contains to solve problems; solutions provided are any errors. minor errors and/or omissions. significant errors and/or omissions with totally inconsistent with the design respect to design parameters. criteria.Perform design/analysis of Provides ample evidence of Provides adequate evidence of Provides some evidence of application of Provides little or no evidence ofbeams for
the classes taught by the aforementionedfaculty are small size, seldom exceeding 35 students per class. The lecture format dominates theseen. Students listen, take notes, and are allowed to ask questions at the end of the lecture orduring office hours. There seem to be less interest (by most of the faculty interviewed) in theprocess by which the course content is delivered during the lecture period, and more of a concernwhether the rate of delivery would allow the instructor to finish the course on time. The viewsexpressed by the faculty and the impression(s) arrived at by the author, leads one to believe thatit is highly unlikely that new more effective teaching-learning strategies would be deployed anytime soon, unless drastic measures are
. during300,000 BC-250 BC. Section 3, on the other hand, is an exposition of mathematical ingenuityto perform computation during pre-computer era, i.e., during 200 BC till the birth of anelectronic digital computer during early twentieth century. Section 4, on the other hand,presents the impact of ever increasing power of computing on the computing scenario since theappearance of the first digital computer during 1940’s. Section 5 comprises conclusions.2. Computing Scenario During Pre-historic Era (300,000 BC – 250 BC)Universe is a gigantic errorless never-stoppable parallel computer with infinite precisionBefore 15 trillion BC, the universal errorfree computer boots up with a Big Bang. Since thenthe computing in nature/universe is going on continuously
Johnson R.T. “Pedagogies of engagement:Classroom-based practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, pp. 87-101, 2005.2. Mehta, Y. “Innovative techniques to teach civil engineering materials laboratory,” Proceedings of the 2004ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June, 2004.3. O'Neill, R., Geiger, C., Csavina, K., Orndoff, C. “Making statics dynamic!” Combining lecture andlagoratory into an interdisciplinary, problem-based, active learning environment”. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, June, 2007.4. Estes, A., Welch, R., and Ressler, S. Teaching lessons learned: The ExCEED Teaching Model. Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education Practice, Volume 131, No. 4, pp. pp. 218-221
Exchange Quarterly, 7(2), 257-261 [6] Martens, R., Bastiaens, T. and Kirschner, P.A. (2007), New Learning Design in Distance Education: The impact on student perception and motivation, Distance Education, 28(1), 81–93 [7] Méndez, E., Casadesús, M. and de Ciurana, Q. (2006) Gironacel ®: a virtual tool for learning quality management, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(3), 313–324 [8] Ong, S.K. and Mannan.M.A. (2004), Virtual Reality Simulations and Animations in a Web-Based Interactive Manufacturing Engineering Module, Computers and Education, 43(4), 361-382 [9] Ramasundaram, V., Grunwald, S., Mangeot, A., Comerford N.B. and Bliss, C.M. (2005), Development of
enterprise students, graduate students, andfaculty and staff from the early 1990s has been replaced with an agreement that offers realincentives to inventors: Michigan Tech in short order choose either to claim rights to subjecttechnology or to release it entirely to the inventor. If it claims the rights, it will finance theattempt to secure patent protection, and if the successful technology generates royalty income,Michigan Tech will recover its costs and then share the proceeds with the inventor(s). MichiganTechnological University now has one of the highest percentages of undergraduate studentsnamed on invention disclosures in the nation (20 students in the last three years)16: FY05: 50 disclosures, 18% had undergraduates on them
. http://www.nae.edu/nae/awardscom.nsf/JMAN-7A4L7N?OpenDocument 4. National Instruments, Austin, Texas: National Instruments Corporation, 2000. 5. Angelo,T.A. and Cross, K.P. Classroom Assessment Techniques. 2nd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1993 pp. 154-8. 6. Blackboard Academic Suite. Blackboard Inc., 2008. 7. Chapman, S. J. Essentials of MATLAB Programming. 1st ed. Ontario: Thompson Publishing, 2005. 8. Schwartz, T.L. and Dunkin, B.M. "Facilitating Interdisciplinary Hands-on Learning using LabVIEW," International Journal of Engineering Education 16 (2000) 218-227. 9. Elshorbagy, A. and Schonwetter , D.J. "Engineer Morphing: Bridging the Gap Between Classroom Teaching an the Engineering Profession
students in science and mathematics. The NSF GK-12 program offers a uniqueopportunity to address this need.National Science Foundation (NSF) has established a GK-12 program that provides fellowshipsand education pedagogy to graduate students in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics) fields. The fellows serve as a resource to teachers, and help to increase students’interest in STEM. The plan is for the partnership between the fellow and teacher remains activefor 1 to 2 year/s. NSF has granted funds to SUNRISE project at GMU to initiate partnershipswith unsatisfactory-performing schools in 3 school divisions in the Washington Metropolitanarea. Eight schools are participating in the SUNRISE project; seven elementary schools and
Wakefield, J.K., Implementing a Service LearningEngineering Project in East Africa, presented at the Gulf Southwest Regional Meeting of A.S.E.E., South PadreIsland, TX, March 2007. In CD based Proceedings (no page numbers). Page 13.1330.164 Jordan, W., Parker, H., Eppink, J., Hemmen, S., McGhee, R., and Eberhardt, M., Building Bridges for a BetterFuture: “Bridging the Gap”, presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Scientific Affiliation, Edinburgh,U.K., August 2007. Page 13.1330.17
automated systems for use as a learning tool and reference.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by a National Science Foundation grant no. 0238269. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Hsieh, S. "Automated Manufacturing System Integration Education: Current Status and Future Directions," Proceedings of 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, June 12-15, 2005, Portland, OR.2. Schank, R.C. and Abelson, RP. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goal and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.3. Abelson, R.P. (1981). Psychological status of the script
government entities.Cone points out that universities are focal points of learning communities that form thefoundations of entrepreneurship, especially with respect to technology. She also citedPeter Drucker’s observation in the 1980’s that there was a need for more knowledge to doentrepreneurship and that it was time to develop the “principles, the practice and thediscipline.”Economists view the supply of entrepreneurship as subject to the same forces as otherresource behavior. That is, it depends upon the perceived benefits and opportunity costsof the decision to pursue the entrepreneurial path. For example, the explosion ofentrepreneurship in India and China can be traced to expanded awareness and lowering ofobstacles to initiating new
the lab instructor verify that every student team collected all necessary data.The printouts are then included in the lab reports, making these reports more informative,looking more professional, and easier to grade. Students are required to upload some of their datafiles on the server to be used in post-lab analysis and homework assignments, linking labexperience to theoretical learning in the course.Finally, the students obtain hands-on experience with the software, which is widely used inindustry for control and data acquisition, thus they get a competitive edge in job hunting.10. References 1. M. Duarte, B. P. Butz, S. M. Miller An Intelligent Universal Virtual Laboratory (UVL) IEEE Transactions on Education, volume 51 number 1
catastrophic or simply costly due to pump inefficiencies whenoperated outside of its intended operating range. Therefore, undergraduate mechanical engineersshould be well trained in this design or selection process through analytical and experimentalmethods learned in engineering science and experimental course work, respectively.In this light, to gain an understanding of the operation of the centrifugal pump4, first consider theenergy transfer of a pump by applying the steady state form of the energy equation as follows: Ç V2 Ç V2 Q% - W% s ? m% outlet Èh - - gz Ù / m% inlet Èh - - gz Ù (1) É 2 Ú
achieve similargoals as presented in this paper.Appropriate Taxonomies for AssessmentTo assess the effectiveness of an engineering course for non-engineers with the EDP requiresadopting a broader context of taxonomies than traditionally may be employed. A commonapproach is to utilize the work done by Benjamin Bloom’s 1950’s education committee. Thecommittee established a set of taxonomies in three learning domains: cognitive, affective andpsychomotor. The domains have been identified as, “arguably one of the most influentialeducation monographs of the past half century 4.” The taxonomies are a language that isproposed to describe the progressive development of an individual in each domain and aredefined as follows 5: • Cognitive: of
presentation on that subject. 3. Each student’s own (“modest”) image processing research project. – As late in the course as the sequence involved allows, each student selects and upon approval for appropriateness conducts an actual image processing project (normally, MATLAB Image Processing Toolbox-based) to test and/or compare the image processing effectiveness of some desired imaging processing algorithm(s). Again, each project’s results are written and presented to the class.The extra requirement for graduate credit for graduate student enrollees is related to thepresentations. While the expectations for the first presentation are about the same for all enrolledstudents, the second project (research literature) has a slightly higher
Peer Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 1999, pp. 40-43.3. Leah M. Akins and Ellena E. Reda, “Implementation of an Integrated Project for the Electrical Engineering Technology Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, Fall 1998, pp. 38-43.4. Glen, C Gerhard, “Teaching Design with Behavior Modification Techniques in a Pseudocorporate Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 42, No. 4, November 1999, pp. 255-260.5. Peter, J. Shull, “Collaborative Learning and Peer Assessment to Enhance Student Performance,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 22, No. 1, Spring 2005, pp. 10-15.6. Malgorzata, S. Zywno, “Using Collaborative Learning and Peer Assessment
fourchoices of membrane, varied in pore size and the tubing diameter (which are the sameparameters that the students will select from for their hemodialysis system design), and a rangeof flow rates for the blood and dialysate. The simulation provides practice for the actual designproject. From the simulation, the students should have a good idea of how these parametersaffect the efficiency of the dialysis, and they need to balance this with the major design factor,which is cost.A traditional membrane separation process has a fluid with component(s) that need to beremoved, and a membrane that can selectively remove those components, which pass through toa carrier fluid. In the design challenge, the students are given 0.5-L of simulated unfiltered
AC 2008-1023: THE WSU MODEL FOR ENGINEERING MATHEMATICSEDUCATION: A MULTIYEAR ASSESSMENT AND EXPANSION TOCOLLABORATING INSTITUTIONSNathan Klingbeil, Wright State University Nathan W. Klingbeil is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Robert J. Kegerreis Distinguished Professor of Teaching at Wright State University. He is the lead PI for WSU's National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education. He is the recipient of numerous awards for his work in engineering education, including the CASE Ohio Professor of the Year Award (2005) and the ASEE North Central Section Outstanding Teacher Award (2004).Kuldip Rattan, Wright State University Kuldip S. Rattan is a Professor in the
, “Looking Back: Lessons Learned from Ten Years of Training Teaching Assistants,” Proceedings, 1997 Annual ASEE Conference, ASEE, June 1997.3. T.M. Baber, D. Briedis, and R.M. Worden, “Teaching and Mentoring Training Programs at Michigan State University,” Chem. Engr. Education, 38(4), 250–253 (2004).4. S. Marikunte, F. Harackiewicz, J. Nicklow, and L. Chevalier, “Benefits and Challenges of Training Teaching Assistants,” Proceedings, 2006 Annual ASEE Conference, ASEE, June 2006.5. P.M. Norris and S.C. Palmer, “Effectiveness of the Woodruff School Doctoral Teaching Intern Program,” J. Engr. Education, 87(3), 223–226 (1998).6. M.J. Pavelich & R.A. Streveler, “An Active Learning, Student-Centered Approach to Training
semester surveys, students from both institutions wereenthusiastic about this idea and expressed no hesitation to travel to the other campus or a neutrallocation halfway in between. To alleviate scheduling problems, the joint meeting(s) will be heldin the evening. Previous experience in other classes shows that when the students have thisopportunity to interact informally, it facilitates interactions during videoconferencing classesthroughout the semester.Finally, changes to the NCSU curriculum will be implemented to provide better background toNCSU students, which will greatly ease the disparity between the two institutions. Page
, mentorship, and encouragement—that they sodesperately need and so richly deserve.References1. Ressler, S. J., C. H. Conley, and R. Gash, “Designing a Civil Engineering Program for the National MilitaryAcademy of Afghanistan,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, June 2008. Page 13.705.112. “Announcements - Afghan Merit Scholars at Ohio University,” accessed athttp://www.afghanequalityalliances.net/index.php?module=cms&action=page&id=gen12Srv35Nme0_84, January14, 2007. Page 13.705.12
satisfyenvironmental concerns, while promoting efficiency and innovation. Additionally, the authorsillustrate how case study discussions are used to help students understand the opportunitiescreated when implementing eco-friendly business practicesReferences1. Hughes, R., Ginnett, R, Curphy, G. (2002). Leadership: Enhancing The Lessons Of Experience. McGraw-Hill, New York.2. Caminiti, S. (2007). Adapting To Globalization. Fortune Magazine, Vol 156 (11), p. 110.3. Sirignano, J. ((2005). Is There A Green Movement In The Air. Fortune Magazine, Vol. 152 (12), pp. 152-163.4. Lumsdaine, E., Lumsdaine, M., Shelnutt, J. (1999). Creative Problem Solving and Engineering Design. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York.5. Cohen, A. (2007). Sustaining The Future. Fortune
A464/A280 > 0.05Achieve “purity goal #2” $350 DsRed2 with A561/A280 > 0.6 EGFP with A488/A280 > 1.0 Page 13.316.10 Flavodoxin with A464/A280 > 0.10Appendix CFinal exam question on enzyme kinetics – negative control:The following data were recorded during a test of kinetics of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction at49.6 ºC. The enzyme concentration was 1.6 g/L. S [mmol/mL] 0.1 0.033 0.01 0.0067 0.005 V [mmol/(mL*min)] 5.13 3.70 1.89 1.43
Force, Computing Curricula 2001, Computer Science, December 2001. http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final/index.htm3. Schneider, S., “Developing an Introductory Software Programming Course for Engineering Students”, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2005.4. Loendorf, W., Brzoska, M., Koh, M., Rodriguez, E., “Implementing a Software Engineergin Technology Program within the Context of Experienced-Based Learning”, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2004.5. William Stallings, “Operating Systems: Internals and Design Principles”, Fifth Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.6. Gary Nutt, “Operating System Projects using Windows NT”, Addison
Network (PSN) and associateddata/voice channels over simulated leased lines (e.g. T1’s), they will learn how the real-worldPSN and its components invariably affect network speed and integrity between two distant Page 13.363.9locations. They will learn programming of routers for end-to-end connectivity of LANs andWANs over a PSN. They will learn the basic mechanisms of programming the routers viaAccess Control Lists for permitting or denying certain type of network traffic.NDPL-161: Routing AlgorithmsThe students will learn different types of routing algorithms. They will start with static routingmechanism. They will be exposed to CISCO and non
. 2005.3. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeed in the 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 7, 1997 – 1998.4. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’s Press.5. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.6. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.7. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as
(Eds.), The algebracolloquium. (Vol. 2, p. 53-67). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.2. Pelavin, S., & Kane, M. (1998). Minority participation in higher education. Washington DC: U.S. Department ofEducation.3. Pearson, Greg (2004), Technically Speaking: Why all Americans Need to Know More about Technology,Washington DC: National Academy Press.4. CORD (1999). Teaching mathematics contextually. Retrieved April 10, 2007 fromhttp://www.cord.org/uploadedfiles/Teaching_Math_Contextually.pdf5. CORD (1999). Teaching science contextually. Retrieved April 10, 2007 fromhttp://www.cord.org/uploadedfiles/Teaching_Science_Contextually.pdf6. Crawford, M.L. (2001). Teaching contextually: Research, rationale, and techniques for improving
the National Science Foundation Industry/UniversityCooperative Research Centers Program grant number IIP-0733386.References1. Needy, K., L., Ingalls, R. G., Mason, S., Hunsaker, B., Norman, B. A., Gokhan, N. M., Cornejo, M., “Design for Supply Chain – A Collaborative Research Project Between Institutions and Between Centers,” submitted to Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 2008.2. Gökhan, N. M., “Development of a Simultaneous Design for Supply Chain Process for the Optimization of the Product Design and Supply Chain Configuration Problem,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, December 2007.3. Ingalls, R.G., B.L. Foote and A. Krishnamoorthy. “Reducing the Bullwhip Effect in