Conference Session

Computers in Education 11 - Modulus 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patriel Stapleton, University of Florida; Jeremiah Blanchard

 education: Moves towards theory and the  enhancement of pedagogic practice,” Higher Education, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 477–501, Jun.  2003, doi: 10.1023/A:1023967026413. [6]  S. Appana, “A Review of Benefits and Limitations of Online Learning in the Context of the  Student, the Instructor and the Tenured Faculty,” International Journal on E‐Learning, vol.  7, no. 1, pp. 5–22, Jan. 2008. [7]  “Honorlock Online Test Proctor On Your Schedule | Honorlock Online Proctoring,” May 07,  2019. https://honorlock.com/students/ (accessed Jan. 28, 2022). [8]  C. Rogers, “Faculty perceptions about e‐cheating during online testing,” Journal of  Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 22, pp. 206–212, Dec. 2006.   [9]  M. Lilley, J. Meere, and T

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 2: Enhancing Energy-Related Education with Student Design Projects

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reg Pecen, Sam Houston State University; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Ulan Dakeev

through a conventional grid, the PV charging station saved $2,858 peryear [13].Researchers at Dublin Institute of Technology investigated performance of a campus PV basedEV charging station in a high temperature climate. They measured solar resource and EV energyconsumption with locational, mechanical, and electrical constraints and used that data to designan EV charging station comprised of 10.5 kW PV array with a 9.6 kWh Lithium-ion batterystorage [14-15]. Rasin et al. developed a DC bus in a bidirectional storage management methodto enhance the EV charging station’s structure, size, and reduce the operational cost [16].Esfandyari et al.’s work describes how the inclusion of a battery as part of the overall designwould enhance the level of

Conference Session

WIED: Analysis, Challenges, Success, and Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Serendipity Gunawardena, The Ohio State University; Krista Kecskemety, The Ohio State University

Paper ID #37980Gender Differences in First-Year Engineering: PeerConnections in the time of COVID-19Serendipity S Gunawardena Sery is an undergraduate researcher. She recently completed her B.S. in Computer Science Engineering from Ohio State University, where she completed a research distinction on first-year students' peer connections during COVID-19. Her research interests include women in engineering, first-year engineering, and peer support in engineering programs.Krista Kecskemety Krista Kecskemety is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University and

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 4- COVID and Virtual Learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Juan Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Angelina Rivera, Colorado School of Mines

things, but they kind of like, better result.” stop you.” Table 2: Example quotes from student essays displaying changes in self-efficacyThe pre and post quotes above describe how students view their self-confidence in engineering,including their social skills. In addition, Table 2 clearly describes some of the external impactsstudents experience that influence their self-efficacy. For example, college professors and facultyassist in providing different mindsets and perspectives that help shape student’s opinions andknowledge, as seen in Participant 26’s quote above. Staff provide advice and teach lessons that

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 1)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut; angad chadha, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Katrin Girgis, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Amal Khan, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Michelle Ortiz, New Jersey Institute of Technology

engineers:exemplary education activities and programs,” NAE, Washington DC. 68 pp. 2016[3] J. L. Hess, G. Fore, “A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions.”Sci. Eng. Ethics. (24) pp. 551-583. 2018.[4] W. Birmingham, V. DiStasi, G. Welton, “Learning Style, Student Motivation, And ActiveLearning.” in Proceedings of the 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, USA,June 14-17, 2009, pp.14.841.1 - 14.841.9. Available: https://peer.asee.org/5706.[5] S. R. Butler, Kay C. Dee, “Active Learning Requires Learning - Not Just Activity.” inProceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 23-26,2013, pp.23.138.1 - 23.138.9. Available: https://peer.asee.org/19152.[6] W.C. Carpenter

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Assorted Topics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghu Echempati, Kettering University

calculations areinternally converted to the initially chosen Units, which in our case is the SI Units. Bucklinganalysis is presented later in this paper.Impact force calculations: √2𝑔ℎ 𝑎= 𝑡If the car is dropped from 6” (0.5 ft) above the stand: √2∗32.2∗0.5 𝑎= = 64 ft/s^2 ≈ 2 g; this estimates a time pulse of 0.08s 0.08Using 𝐹 = 𝑚𝑎 40 ton coach 1 2000 lbf 𝑚= ∗ ∗ 2 (stand only supports one side) 2 load bearing beams per stand 1 ton 1 slug ∗ = 621 slug

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Peer Mentoring/Learning, Teaching Assistants, and Career Mentorship

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald Harichandran, University of New Haven; Nadiye Erdil, University of New Haven; Stephanie Gillespie, University of New Haven

Paper ID #37524College-Wide First Year and Career Mentorship ProgramsRonald S Harichandran (Dean) Ron Harichandran has served as the Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven since August 2011. During his tenure as dean he has let curricular and programmatic innovations to develop technical communication skills and an entrepreneurial mindset in all engineering and computer science undergraduate students. He also leads the First-Year and Career Mentorship programs in the college.Nadiye O. Erdil (Associate Professor)Stephanie Gillespie Stephanie Gillespie is the Associate

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 3, Nature and Environment)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Davis Chacon-Hurtado; Sandra Sirota, University of Connecticut; Shareen Hertel, University of Connecticut

Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/a- real-world-approach-to-introducing-sustainability-in-civil-engineering-capstone-designCatalano, G. D. (2014). Engineering Ethics: Peace, Justice, and the Earth, Second Edition. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society, 8(2), 1–85. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00589ED2V01Y201408ETS022Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305Chacón-Hurtado, D., K. Kaserounian, S. Hertel, J. Mellor, J. Barry, S. Tulasi, (2022) "Engineering for Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a Human Rights-Based Approach to Engineering

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Lance White, Texas A&M University; Sara Amani, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Larry Powell, Texas A&M University; Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University; Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University; Robert Lightfoot, Texas A&M University; Rachelle Pedersen, Texas A&M University; John Moore, Texas A&M University

future in which participants are asked to watch the film on their own if they hadn’t beenTable 1: Prominent themes and associated participant discussion quotes for each Session (S) Duration S1 0:00–19:13 S2 19:14–40:04 S3 40:05–1:05:55 S4 1:05:56–1:32:10 Prominent • Hostile environment • Power dynamics in • Cycle of problems • Bullying Themes • Student faculty relationships the workplace • Not accepted in discipline • Educated does not mean and power dynamics • Lack of support for • Significant evidence of women not be- inclusive

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach

, A. M. Lui, and S. M. Martinelli, “A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education,” Med. Educ., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 585–597, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13272.[6] J. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, “The flipped classroom: A survey of the research,” 2013, pp. 23–1200.[7] L. Sun, “Work in Progress: Gamified Learning in Graphical Communications During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Virtual Conference, Jul. 2021.[8] H. Shon and L. Smith, “A Review of Poll Everywhere Audience Response System,” J. Technol. Hum. Serv., vol. 29, pp. 236–245, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1080/15228835.2011.616475.[9] B. J. Beatty, Z. Merchant, and M. Albert, “Analysis of Student Use of Video in a Flipped Classroom

Conference Session

Research Frameworks for Identity and Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ingrid Scheel, Oregon State University; Gail Verdi, Kean University; Lara Letaw, Oregon State University

capability [2]Enhancing human capability (criterion 5) is the goal of all preceding criteria [14]. Theapplication of the Engineering for Social Justice criteria in this framework consists of lecture andsupplemental materials that emphasize the existence of engineering within a larger humancontext. The writing-to-learn and InclusiveMag techniques described above are adapted toexplicitly include Engineering for Social Justice criteria. The cognitive styles activities frameteaming across difference(s) as both increasing opportunity and reducing risk. Similarly, theprocess log prompts identify structural conditions by encouraging contextualization ofengineering problems throughout the course.MethodsThe two essential elements in inclusive teaching

Conference Session

Computers in Education 7 - Modulus 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Afrin Naz, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Gay Stewart, West Virginia University

). Computational thinking: Leadership toolkit. (1st ed.). Retrieved from http://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/471.11CTLeadershiptToolkit-SP-vF pdf[3] Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016). Expanding computer science education in schools: Understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 235- 254.[4] Code.org Advocacy. (n.d.). https://advocacy.code.org/[5] Gallup. (n.d.). Pioneering results in the blueprint of U.S. K-12 computer science education. http://csedu.gallup.com/home.aspx[6] Google for Education. (n.d.). Computer science learning: Closing the gap. Rural and small-town school districts. http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/computer-science-learning-closing-the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elan Hope, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Derrick Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Anitra Alexander; Alexis Briggs; Laila Allam, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

adaptive strengths in the persistence of Black men in engineering graduate programs,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 56, pp. 39–74, 2019. https://doi.org/gd32fn[7] B. A. Burt, K. L. Williams and W. A. Smith, “Into the storm: ecological and sociological impediments to Black males’ persistence in engineering graduate programs,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 55, pp. 965–1006, 2018. https://doi.org/gd32d6[8] D. R. Williams, J. A. Lawrence, B. A. Davis, and C. Vu, “Understanding how discrimination can affect health,” Health Services Research, Advance Online Publication, 2019, doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13222.[9] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Layton, R. A., Long, M. W., Ohland, and M

Conference Session

ERM: Design!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Jalal, University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa

academic successin the course or their contribution to their team’s project. Goal orientation represents anintegrated pattern of beliefs that leads to different approaches and behaviour in relation toachievement-type activities (Ames, 1992). Learning goal orientation refers to two classes of goalthat individuals pursue in the domain of intellectual achievement: performance goals (in whichindividuals aim to gain favourable judgement over their abilities) and learning goals (in whichindividuals aim to improve their abilities) (C. S. Dweck & Leggett, 1988). Individuals with aperformance goal orientation view effort and achievement as an indication of ability while thosewith a learning goal orientation view effort and achievement as an indication

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Manning, Clemson University; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Marisa Orr, Clemson University; Catherine Brawner; Rebecca Brent; Michael Tidwell, Clemson University

Choice, Dropout, and Labor Outcomes,” Ph.D. dissertation, Econ Dept., University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 2020.[4] H. Al Yagoub, H. Ebrahiminejad, and M. Ohland, “Work in Progress - The GPA Trajectories of Engineering Students,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33570. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33570.[5] J. P. Salazar-Fernandez, M. Sepúlveda, and J. Munoz-Gama, “Describing Educational Trajectories of Engineering Students in Individual High-Failure Rate Courses that Lead to Late Dropout,” p. 10.[6] B. Berhane, S. Secules, and F. Onuma, “Learning while Black: Identity Formation and Experience for Five Black Men who Transferred into Engineering

Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trevion Henderson, University of Michigan

Paper ID #37232Research Paper: Development and Validation of aDepoliticization in Engineering ScaleTrevion S Henderson (Assistant Professor) Trevion Henderson is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and STEM Education at Tufts University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Research Paper: Development and Validation of a Depoliticization in Engineering ScaleAbstractThe ideology of depoliticization in engineering refers to the pervasive belief that engineeringwork is technical

Conference Session

ERM: Conceptualizations of Engineering and Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julianna Gesun, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julia Rizzo, University of New Hampshire

substantial impacton society at large as these students will engage in an engineering workforce where their work directlyinfluences the thriving of society at large.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Dr. Brad Kinsey, Dr. Michael Loui, Dr. Michael Briggs, and Dr. KarenGraham for helpful discussions, insights, and/or feedback on drafts of this paper. This material is basedupon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant OIA-#1757371. This work is alsosupported by a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Engineering Fellowship (EEC-#2127509).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Athena Lin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. G. P. Berdanier, “Genre maps as a method to visualize engineering writing and argumentation patterns,” J Eng Educ, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 377–393, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20281.[2] M. Borrego, “Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 91–102, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x.[3] S. Dart, S. Trad, and K. Blackmore, “Navigating the path from technical engineering to engineering education research: A conceptual model of the transition

Conference Session

Instrumentation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Asad Yousuf, Savannah State University; Christopher Stronen, Savannah State University

ultrasonic sensor is responsible for triggering the output of the soundwave with a pulse. The action of sending the sound wave is called a chirp. To start measurement,this Trigger pin must receive a pulse of 5V for at least 10 us. The sensor will then output 8 cyclesof 40 kHz sound bursts. When the sensor detects that the wave has come back with itsmicrophone, it will set its Echo pin to HIGH, and keep it HIGH in proportion to the distancedetected.[5]The width of the echo signal can be converted to distance in cm using the following formulas:Speed of Sound = 340 m/s = 34000 cm/s1s/34000 cm = 29 us/1cmTime of Echo Pulse in us/29 us/1cm/2 = Distance in cmOr, Time of Echo Pulse/58 = Distance in cm Below is the code used to initialize the entrance gate

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sampson Addo, University of the District of Columbia; Pawan Tyagi, University of the District of Columbia; Eva Mutunga, University of the District of Columbia

Technology and Research (CAM-STAR).References[1] White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities.). Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://www.ed.gov/edblogs/whhbcu/one-hundred-and-five-historically-black- colleges-and-universities/ [Accessed November 2, 2021][2] S. D. Lee, and D. Jang, “Support for Innovation in Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Exploring Associations with Disposition Toward Change, Empowerment, and Organizational Trust.” Journal of Black Studies, 43(8), 912-935. doi:10.1177/0021934712463236, 2012[3] J. Humphreys, HBCUs Make America Strong: The Positive Economic Impact of Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC

Conference Session

LEES 2: Stories of Intersectionality and Institutional Marginalization

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Siaumau, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Yumi Aguilar, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Jane Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lynne Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Emily Flores, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lauren Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

is essential inunderstanding the experiences of marginalized peoples [27] particularly when understandingvicarious trauma from hate crimes or experiencing microaggression related to a social identitythat, “may arouse immediate or delayed PTSD and related symptoms in the experiencing personif the experienced event(s) serves as a catalyst for recalling previous personal memories oridentity-group histories of extreme threat” [28]. This means that engineering students,particularly those with marginalized identities, are experiencing distress and, potentially, traumathat needs to be considered when conducting engineering education research.Utilizing Intersectional & Trauma-Informed Lenses to Build Better MethodologiesAs noted above, when

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Virginia Davis, Auburn University; Joni Lakin, The University of Alabama; Daniela Marghitu, Auburn University; Edward Davis, Auburn University

Engineering Education, Human Computer Interaction International Conference, and International Academy, Research, and Industry Association) in USA, Canada, England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Romania. Her work was also presented by co-authors at conferences in Brazil, Taiwan and S. Korea. Among Dr. Marghitu's honors and awards are the following: 2011 AccessComputing Capacity Building Award, the 2012 Auburn University Access award, the 2012 Society for Design and Process Science Outstanding Achievement Award, the 2013 Microsoft Fuse Research award, the 2015 DO-IT Trailblazer award, the 2017 International Academy, Research, and Industry Association Fellowship, the 2017 Society for Design and Process Science

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Marschke, University at Albany-SUNY; Holden Diethorn; James Davis; Andrew Wang

pandemic, and that such knowledge offered employment resiliency during theCOVID-19 recession beyond any resiliency associated with greater remote work capability and educational attainment.References [1] E. Barth, J. C. Davis, R. B. Freeman, and A. J. Wang, “The effects of scientists and engineers on productivity and earnings at the establishment where they work,” in U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy. University of Chicago Press, 2018, pp. 167–191. [2] S. Mongey, L. Pilossoph, and A. Weinberg, “Which workers bear the burden of social dis- tancing?” Journal of Economic Inequality, vol. 19, pp. 509–526, 2021. [3] L. Montenovo, X. Jian, F. L. Rojas, I. M. Schmutte, K. Simon, B. Weinberg, and C. Wing, “Determinants of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Wittich; Shannon Bartelt-Hunt, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

reconnaissance and performance assessment of rural infrastructure for 2018 natural hazards. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities (ASCE), 34(4): 04020054. * = REU Student. [7] Mousavi, M.S., Feng, Y., McCann, J., and Eun, J. (2021) In situ characterization of municipal solid waste using membrane interface probe (MIP) and hydraulic profiling tool (HPT) in an active and closed landfill. Infrastructure, MDPI 6(3), 33. * = REU Student.[8] Rageh, A., Linzell, D., Lopez, S.*, and Eftekhar Azam, S. (2020). Robust Output Only Health Monitoring of Steel Railway Bridges: Analysis of Applicability of Different Sensors. Handbook of Research on Engineering Innovations and Technology Management in Organizations. IGI Global

Conference Session

Technology Integration in Manufacturing Curriculum

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Salil Bapat, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Ajay Malshe, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Project: IntroductionWeek 3 Project: topic identificationWeek 4 Project: Topic literature reviewWeek 5 Project: Project statement and task-timeline planningWeek 6 Project: Design and MaterialsWeek 7 Project: Mid-semester project report submissionWeek 8 Project: Materials and process(s), evaluation of reports for feedbackWeek 9 Project: Fabrication and testingWeek 10 Project: Fabrication and testingWeek 11 Project: Fabrication and testingWeek 12 Project: Fabrication and testingWeek 13 Project: Improvisation and optimizationWeek 14 Project: Writing Report (ppt) writingWeek 15 Project: Final ppt report

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Huh? What Did You Say? What Does That Mean?

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; Cristina Torres-Machi; Qin Lv, University of Colorado Boulder

), appropriate given Likert-type data that may notbe normally distributed.The average student ratings for the four primary survey factors are summarized in Table 3.Students had the strongest agreement with factor #4, related to their confidence in different skillsand abilities (6.27 ~ agree). Responses to this factor did differ among students with differentresponses to the computing attitude question (see Table 4 below; sig. 0.024 in KW test), wherestudents who wish there were more courses offered on CS and data analysis rated their abilitylower.Table 3. Average student survey responses across the multiple items in each construct on a 7-point scale (1 strongly disagree to 7 strongly agree) Survey Factor Example survey item(s

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division: Developing Lab and Research Skills for BioE/BME Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Ankeny, Northwestern University; Amy Adkins, Northwestern University; David O'Neill, Northwestern University

doreflect on standards-based grading and incorporate their reflections into the next iteration of theassignment. More specifically, 11 were aware of the course learning objectives based on coursestandards. Most students reviewed the standards-based grading rubric while completing thedeliverables for both Module 1 (12) and Module 2 (13). Twelve students reviewed the standardsafter receiving instructional team feedback and grade and twelve students used their performanceon Module 1’s deliverables to guide Module 2’s submission.We uncovered a disconnect between SBG reflections and students’ perceived utility with exampreparation. Fifty-seven percent used the standards to study for the final and 54% said that thestandards rubric guided their study

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 1: Online or Remote Teaching and Curricular Developments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Mohamed Zaghloul; Amr Hassan, University of Pittsburgh

, problem-based learning, and collaborative learning.Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul was born in Cairo, Egypt, in 1987. He received his B.E. degree in Electronics and Electrical Communications Engineering in 2009, and his M.Sc. degree in Engineering Physics in 2012, both from the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. In 2019, he received a Ph.D. from the Electrical and Computer Engineering department of the University of Pittsburgh, in developing optical fiber sensors for monitoring harsh environments. Since 2019, he has been appointed as an Assistant Professor in the same department of the same school. Zaghloul is a recipient of multiple research and teaching awards; he currently holds the John C

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga; Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University

, doi: 10.5942/jawwa.2016.108.0099.[7] E. Bingham and G. E. Gibson, “Infrastructure Project Scope Definition Using Project Definition Rating Index,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 33, no. 2, p. 04016037, 2017, doi: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000483.[8] J. Sindhu, K. Choi, S. Lavy, Z. K. Rybkowski, B. F. Bigelow, and W. Li, “Effects of Front-End Planning under Fast-Tracked Project Delivery Systems for Industrial Projects,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 163–178, 2017, doi: 10.1080/15578771.2017.1280100.[9] M. Elzomor, V. Ferrer, P. Pradhananga, and R. Rahat, “Assessing the Pedagogical Needs to Couple Front-end Planning Tools with Sustainable Infrastructure Projects,” 2021, doi: 10.18260

Conference Session

Remediation and Curricular Changes to Improve Student Learning and Outcomes

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandie Han; Boyan Kostadinov, New York City College of Technology; Janet Liou-Mark, New York City College of Technology; Johann Thiel, New York City College of Technology

Paper ID #37007Curricular and Strategic Changes in mathematics to EnhanceInstitutional STEM EducationSandie Han Sandie Han is a Professor of Mathematics at New York City College of Technology, the City University of New York. She has extensive experience in program design and administration, including serving as the mathematics department chair for six years, PI on the U.S. Department of Education MSEIP grant and Co-PI on the NSF S-STEM grant. Her research area is number theory and mathematics education. Her work on Self-Regulated Learning and Mathematics Self-Efficacy won the CUNY Chancellor’s Award for