79Sample Questions Submitted by Participating Planning Grant PIs Category Sample Question Center Design and Does NSF prefer to fund ERCs that serve the needs of existing Vision industries, or those that can serve as a platform to develop science and engineering for future technologies (or to push existing industry in new directions that they do not have the scientific knowledge base to move into at this point)? Research How do you best determine whether a given ERC thrust is timely or competitive? Workforce Do we need to think about doing research in
Paper ID #37072A Sequence of Laboratories for Beginning Statics ClassesJim Sizemore (Professor) Jim graduated from Washington State University with a B.S. and Stanford with a Ph.D. in engineering. He worked in the semiconductor industry for many years on a wide variety of projects such as ion-implantation, oxidation, diffusion, metal- semiconductor contacts, device physics, CCDs, LEDs, electronic noise, high voltage devices, radiation-hardened devices, thermal management, statistical analysis of yield, statistical process control, plasma process, IC materials adhesion and fracture, software, etc. He turned to
institutions should supportbased on the existing problem [5].The existing gap between academia and industry has enormous impacts on reducing the chanceof employment for engineering graduates [6]. Many scholars discuss the importance of thedesign skills industry and state that universities should pay more attention to capstone designprojects in their curriculum [7]. Capstone design projects give students the chance to work onreal-world projects, strengthening and linking the information gained during their studies topractical concepts [8].This paper aims to determine the most demanded skills of a graduate in electrical and computerengineering by identifying the curriculum needs based on the skills required by professionalengineers with at least ten
Paper ID #37818Defining Engineering Education Research: The ElevatorPitchJeffrey Wayne Paul I am a Engineering Education Research PhD student with a passion for life-long learning. My current research is focused on how we can develop pedagogical content knowledge in instructors using nudge theoryRenato Alan Bezerra RodriguesNikita Dawe PhD Candidate, Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering and Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education, University of TorontoSherry-ann Ram (Ms) Graduate Student at the University of TorontoNicholas James RuparMandeep Raj PandeyRobyn Paul (PhD Student
socioeconomic groups. [23] has given an example ofBlack lesbian engineering students whose reality cannot be adequately understood by discreteconversations on race, gender, and sexual orientation into three separate different groups. Weshould in designing both research and practice explicitly focus on the intersectionality ofmultiple marginalized identities. The minoritized students in this study who embody intersectional marginalized identitiesface systematic oppression of classism, racism, and sexism. These inequitable experiences shapethe decision-making of a minoritized student to enroll, persist or drop out from the engineeringeducation ecosystem. Those students have to divert resources (cognitive, emotional, time) innavigating engineering
(b) improving graduate student technical and professional competencies as wellas preparation for a career at the high priority convergent research topic targeted by thetraineeship. Using a cohort-sequential design with retrospective and concurrent comparisongroups, the evaluation includes both formative and summative activities reflective of bestpractices per Patton [8], Kundin [9], Schwandt [10], as well as Hendricks, Plantz, and Pritchard[11]. These activities and mixed-methods data, collected across multiple stakeholders, fostercontinuous program improvement during the project timeline, establish an evidence base forsuccesses and lessons learned, and generate best practice resources.3.1. Transferable skills courseThe 15-week Transferable
) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Engaging undergraduate researchers: Contextualizing beliefs and identities about smartness in engineeringIntroductionUndergraduate research is considered a high-impact practice (Zydney et al., 2002). It providesstudents with the opportunity to improve their critical thinking and personal communicationskills and offers the opportunity to build mentoring relationships with faculty, increasing thelikelihood of graduate school attendance (Zydney et al., 2002). Additionally, researchers haveshown that participating in undergraduate research can build confidence (Reisel et al., 2015) andenhance the undergraduate
, experimental design can be taught through literaturediscussions, and lecture material can be presented using experimental results from recentliterature. Crafting open-ended homework assignments and projects allows students to designtheir own experiments, enabling them to practice these skills, which are critical for graduate orindustrial R&D. Optimization and decision-making in the presence of competing variables isanother key R&D challenge. Instructors can use open-ended active learning problems to allowstudents to debate the best decision for a problem in groups, showing students that there are oftenmultiple competing priorities and several correct approaches. In addition, instructors canintroduce students to risk assessment methodologies
Arral Mariah Arral is a 4th year Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. Her Ph.D. advisor is Dr. Kathryn Whitehead, and her thesis research focuses on lipid nanoparticle-mediated messenger RNA (mRNA) delivery. Mariah obtained her Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of New Hampshire and did her Honors thesis with Dr. Jeffrey Halpern studying electrochemical biosensors. She has received multiple awards including the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (GRFP). Mariah is an openly disabled scientist and has a passion for creating equitable access to education for everyone. During her undergraduate studies, she developed an
Paper ID #37614Summer Bridge Programming for Incoming First-YearStudents at Three Public Urban Research UniversitiesMiriam Howland Cummings (Graduate Research Assistant) Miriam is a PhD candidate in Education Research and Evaluation Methods at the University of Colorado Denver (CU Denver) and a graduate research assistant on an NSF S-STEM grant in CU Denver's College of Engineering, Design, and Computing.Maryam Darbeheshti (Faculty) Dr. Maryam Darbeheshti is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Denver. Her research interests are in multiphase fluid flow, and Engineering
to analyze the interaction students hadwhile working in the team, to understand better their cognitive design process when faced withother lenses of expertise and developing best practices to design such challenges in the classroom.Future studies will aim to understand the interdisciplinary design process to understand theeffectiveness of student´s contribution as interdisciplinary work, and its connection to sustainabledesign traits. Furthermore, the researchers will aim to understand how to apply suchinterdisciplinary experiences into other experiences of the majors both within specific courses andbetween majors.References[1] E. J. Power y J. Handley, «A best-practice model for integrating interdisciplinarity into the higher education
Understanding the Situated Workplace Practices and Habits of Engineers Using Agile EthnographyIntroductionThis methods paper describes the application of and insights gained from using aspects of anemerging methodology, agile ethnography, to study engineers working in practice. Research hassuggested that there is a misalignment between what is taught in engineering school and thetypes of work that engineers do in practice [1]. Little is known about the types of engineeringwork that are conducted in practice [2], [3]. In order to best prepare engineering graduates tomeet the demands of the engineering workforce, students should be taught the types ofknowledge and problem-solving strategies that are commonly used by practicing
appliance industry for two years. Kelley is also a Graduate Facilitator with the Center for Socially Engaged Design and a Graduate Academic Liaison with the Ginsberg Center for Community Service and Learning.Shanna Daly Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. In her work, she characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum, develops empirically-based tools to support design best practices, and studies the impact of front- end design tools on design success
, most do experience a degree of professionalisolation from other teachers within their content areas; and most have heavy preparatoryworkloads as they teach multiple subjects and grade levels. The diversity of rural teachers’situations contraindicates a one-size-fits-all approach to professional development [16].Nevertheless, Goos, Dole, and Geiger’s assertion that “professional development needs to occurin school-based contexts [9]” is not easily practicable for frontier and remote teachers, especiallyprofessional development focused on specific content areas. While the ITS-RET removed ruralteachers from their local contexts for an intensive on-site program, the research identifiedprofessional development outcomes that continued to impact
Industrial, and Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. His research is focused on system level design optimization and integration of disciplinary analyses. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comInter-Disciplinary Senior Design Projects with Industry Partnership – A Pilot Study 1. Project DescriptionThree inter-disciplinary senior design engineering projects were undertaken over the course of twosemesters (Fall 2020 and Spring 2021) at the Kennesaw State University. At the beginning of Fall2020 semester, a call was sent to all senior engineering students to enroll in a newly designed
,the current exercises will continue to start with synthetic workload analysis, but will include someintermediary simulation-based workload analysis and simulation design, with the final project asis today. Student course evaluation feedback and surveys will be used as metrics for how effectivethis new pedagogical method is in terms of improving learning outcomes. This new idea will beintroduced to the summer 2022 class and re-tested in summer 2023, and measured results presentedin future follow up analysis.Ideally the summer 2022 class would be unmodified and surveys taken as a baseline with the newexercises integrated in 2023 for a clear A/B comparison. While this is perhaps the best approachfrom a pedagogical research viewpoint, the authors
impactedhuman rights and capabilities (e.g. life, bodily health, bodily integrity, the development andexpression of senses, imagination and thought, emotional health, practical reason, affiliation,relationships with others, play, and control over one’s environment).Our approach in this paper is also informed by design-based research [34-38]. In design-basedresearch (DBR), scholars are striving to model how the design of a learning environment isconsequential for the forms of participation and engagement that emerge in that setting (e.g.design conjectures) [38]. Additionally DBR scholars seek to build claims about how those formsof participation and engagement lead to particular outcomes (e.g. theoretical conjectures) [38].To state this more
researching SMART assessment, a modified mastery learning pedagogy for problem based courses. He created and co-teaches a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Differing Impact of a New Assessment Framework on Student Success – The Effect of Socioeconomic FactorsAbstractIn 2016, Michigan State University developed a new model of classroom education andassessment in their Mechanics of
Paper ID #38080The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Student Performanceand Persistence in an Aerospace Engineering CurriculumKathryn Anne Wingate (Instructor) Assistant teaching professor in the Aerospace Engineering department at University of Colorado BoulderAaron W. Johnson (Assistant Professor) Aaron W. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. He believes in a strong connection between engineering education research and practice, and his research leverages his experience
dissertation focus. In addition, eachfellow was asked to design a framework so that the scholars developed strong researchmentoring skills and increased their sense of belonging in their engineering discipline (identitydevelopment) and their scholar cohort (comradery within the cohort).Mentorship web for fellows on the research university campus and technical/communitycollege locationsSince these graduate students could come from any computing or engineering program withinthe research university, they had a wide range of undergraduate degrees. The grant leadershipteam was therefore needed to incorporate training related to communities of practice,engineering identity and cohort building. During the first year, the fellows had routine meetingswith the
engineering educators and socialscientists are needed to assess climates of DEI effectively.Need for Collaboration in Assessing DEI in EngineeringA report commissioned by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation titled “Assessing the Landscape forDiversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts in U.S. STEM Graduate Education” calls thesecollaborations research-practice partnerships. This systematic review of 228 recently publishedresearch manuscripts identifies these partnerships as necessary to address the skill gap strikingDEI innovation in engineering education. “The people designing programs and change initiativesare often STEM community insiders, but the people best equipped with knowledge about thedynamics of inequality and power are often outside of STEM” [10
Paper ID #37519Work in Progress: Personalizing Engineering Ethics throughthe Individual Stories of Engineers and People ImpactedAngela R Bielefeldt (Professor) Angela Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She is also the Director for the Engineering Plus program, which is in the process of being renamed to Integrated Design Engineering. Bielefeldt also serves as the co-director for the Engineering Education and AI-Augmented Learning Integrated Research Theme (IRT) at CU. She has been a faculty
to ask and insights for mentors to shareto enhance circle discussions. Friendly competition and team building are implemented through at-shirt design competition and a GradTrack Trophy, discussed below. Taken together, theseelements promote relationship building and a deeper understanding of what is needed to prepareand be successful in graduate school. GradTrack mentoring circles are a family and a team.Monthly AssignmentsMonthly assignments consist of students making an “About Me” introductory poster, updatingtheir Resume/CV, drafting their Statement of Purpose, applying to summer research or graduateprograms, developing their introductory elevator pitch for campus visits, drafting questions toask faculty and graduate students, and a team
. Sairi, N. Zizi, and F. Khalid. “The importance of cybersecurity education in school.” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(5), 378-382.6. A. Igonor, R. L. Forbes, and J. McCombs, “Cybersecurity Education: The Quest to Building Bridge Skills.” ISSA Journal, 17(18), 18-26, 2019.7. T. Lowe, and C. Rackley. “Cybersecurity education employing experiential learning.” KSU Proceedings on Cybersecurity Education, Research and Practice, 5, 2018.8. J. Ricci, F. Breitinger, and I. Baggili. “Survey results on adults and cybersecurity education.” Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 231-249.9. W. A. Hill Jr, M. Fanuel, X. Yuan, J. Zhang, & S. Sajad (2020). “A survey of serious games for cybersecurity
with TAs’ actual teaching practices. They suggested gathering evidence onmulti-faceted aspects of the effectiveness of a TA TPD program using frameworks like theKirkpatrick four level evaluation framework.Conceptual Framework for GTA TPD Evaluation and Research by Reeves et al. [24] In another discussion of GTA TPD Evaluation in Biology, Reeves et al. [24] furtherhighlighted the lack of empirical evidence on best ways to prepare GTAs for their teaching roles.Citing the vast differences between TPD designs across institutions (e.g., duration 2 -100 hoursper semester), they claimed a need for knowledge in TPD design that can support cross-institutional implementations. Hence, they proposed a framework that divides GTA TPDoutcomes under
autoethnographic, ethnographic, and qualitative interview projects on a wide- range of topics, has taught research methods at the introductory, advanced, and graduate levels, and has trained research assistants in diverse forms of data collection and analysis.Robert L. Nagel © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student competency, autonomy, and relatedness in a practice-oriented engineering program: An application of self-determination theoryAbstractFor engineering students, how might three basic needs—competency, autonomy, andrelatedness—promote intrinsic motivation among students? In this
2019. Paper ID# 25474.[4] S. Rivera-Jiménez, D. Alford, and L. Virguez. “Fostering a Chemical Engineering Mind-set: Chemical Process Design Professional Development Workshops for Early Undergraduate Students.” Proceedings of the 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. June 2019. Paper ID# 26147.[5] L.J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, J. McGourty, “The ABET ‘Professional Skills’- Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp. 41-55, January 2005.[6] J. Yoritomo, N. Turnipseed, S.L. Cooper, C.M. Elliott, J.R. Gallagher, J.S. Popovics, P. Prior, and J.L. Zilles, “Examining engineering instructions at a large research university through the lens
PEER Guide focused on navigating the ASEEconference is designed to reinforce identity and recognition, enhance the flow of information,offer credentials, and influence individuals with decision-making power.Overall, the responses have signaled positive experiences and increased engagement with EERwhile participating in the RIEF VCoP. The VCoP has been an external support structure formentees to learn about common EER practices within a community of other engineeringeducation researchers while developing relational resources.The virtual format allowed for flexibility and accessibility, but it was a challenge for usscheduling a time when all or most participants could join the sessions. One major factor thatmay have negatively influenced
transformative learning among our studentsbased on this model. One of these interventions was the opportunity to participate in a programcalled Communities of Practice (CoPs) for credit in our courses. In the first set of resultspublished, we found a statistically-significant correlation between participation in CoPs andprogress along the transformative learning process as defined by Mezirow. Based on support inthe literature for the CoPs to not only support transformative learning but also to potentiallyincrease engagement and sense of efficacy particularly among underrepresented students, wefocused the next stage in our research on investigating the impact of Communities of Practicefor our underrepresented student populations, specifically
Paper ID #37768Revising the Requirements of a Cross-Departmental Project-Centric Undergraduate Engineering Program and Launchinga new Sustainability and Climate-themed TrackRea Lavi Rea Lavi is Lecturer and a Curriculum Designer with the NEET undergraduate program in the School of Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. He received his Ph.D. from the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. His research interests in STEM higher education involve the fostering and assessment of thinking skills involved in complex problem