Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Nelson, Texas A&M University; Brent Donham, Texas A&M University - Commerce

Job with a Huge Skills Gap: Cyber Security," Forbes Media LLC, March 2017. [Online]. Available: Forbes.com.[3] S. Snitkin, "IT-OT Cybersecurity Convergence," 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.arcweb.com/blog/it-ot-cybersecurity-convergence.[4] J. Manyika and et. al., "Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things," McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey and Company, June 2015.[5] M. Montgomery and S. F. Ravich, "Opinion: The Cybersecurity Risk to Our Water Supply is Real. We Need to Prepare.," Washington Post, 3 January 2022.[6] Texas A&M University-Commerce, Human Subject Protection, Policy 15.99.01.R1, 2019.[7] K. Zurkus, "How Can Industry Leaders and Academic Help Improve Cybersecurity Education?," Available online

Conference Session

ERM: Teamwork makes the dream work!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aparajita Jaiswal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Kaushali Patel, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Devang Patel, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Alejandra Magana, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

and R. Munoz-Luna, “Scrum Methodology in Higher Education: Innovation in Teaching, Learning and Assessment.,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1– 18, 2017.[9] A. Jaiswal, T. Karabiyik, P. Thomas, and A. J. Magana, “Characterizing Team Orientations and Academic Performance in Cooperative Project-Based Learning Environments,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11090520.[10] S. A. Wheelan, B. Davidson, and F. Tilin, “Group development across time: Reality or illusion?,” Small Group Res., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 223–245, 2003.[11] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, “Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory,” J. Excell. Univ

Conference Session

ERM: Student Professional Development: Professional Skills and Moving Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caitlin Wylie, University of Virginia; Natalie Evans, University of Virginia; Jamie Jirout, University of Virginia; Jessica Scoville, University of Virginia; Elizabeth Opila, University of Virginia

. 116, no. 1, pp. 75–98, 1994, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75.[2] J. J. Jirout, V. E. Vitiello, and S. K. Zumbrunn, “Curiosity in schools,” in The new science of curiosity, Hauppauge, NY, US: Nova Science Publishers, 2018, pp. 243–265.[3] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[4] D. A. Sabatini, “Teaching and research synergism: The undergraduate research experience,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 23, pp. 98–102, 1997, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052- 3928(1997)123:3(98).[5] D. Lopatto, “Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings,” Cell Biol

Conference Session

ERM: Let's Continue the Conversation about Tests! Part 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine Kenyon; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; William Bridges, Clemson University

survey included items from the Math Anxiety Ratings Scale(MARS-30) to measure levels of student math test anxiety. Students were also given a surveyabout their future-oriented motivation in their FYE course that uses a 7-point Likert scale to as-sess factors including students’ perceptions, connectedness, value, clarity, and alignment of theirfuture(s). These two survey data sets were combined to allow the simultaneous exploration ofboth their perceptions of Calculus exams and perceptions of the future.After collecting and cleaning the data on students’ perception of Calculus exams, we performedan Exploratory Factor Analysis. We found that students see the purpose of Calculus exams infour ways: with a future oriented purpose, with a performance

Conference Session

Utilizing Technology to Train Chemical Engineering Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Burns, University of Michigan; Valerie Johnson, University of Michigan; Kaylee Smith, University of Michigan

Canvas quizz:Quiz_A1 1 = Point value per question:Basic concepts covered::Understanding units # Question Answer Another answer Another answer Another answer Another answer 1 Slugs are units of ___. mass 2 kg/(m*s^2) are units of ___. pressure normal stress shear stress 3 ___ has units of kg/(m*s^2). pressure normal stress shear stress

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Student Success Boot Camps, Summer Bridge Programs, and Living Learning Communities

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Noe Vargas Hernandez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Arturo Fuentes, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

study.REFERENCES[1] US News, 2022, "U.S. News Education Rankings Colleges," [Online]. Available: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings [Accessed Feb. 13, 2022].[2] IDEO, 2022, “What is Design Thinking?” [Online]. Available: https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/what-is-design-thinking [Accessed Feb. 13,2022].[3] Vargas Hernandez, N., Fuentes, A., & Crown, S. (2018, October). Effectively Transforming Students through First Year Engineering Student Experiences. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5

Conference Session

LEES 7: Experiments in Experiential and Project-Based Learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi Cao; Jennifer Case, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jingshen Wu; Bingzhuo Liang

. Nendaz and A. Tekian, “Assessment in Problem-Based Learning Medical Schools: A Literature Review,” Teach. Learn. Med., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 232–243, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM110408.[7] J. Baggini, “What professionalism means for teachers today.,” Educ. Rev., vol. 18, no. 2, 2005.[8] R. L. Blake, M. C. Hosokawa, and S. L. Riley, “Student Performances on Step 1 and Step 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Following Implementation of a Problem-based Learning Curriculum:,” Acad. Med., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 66–70, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1097/00001888- 200001000-00017.[9] D. Gijbels, F. Dochy, P. Van den Bossche, and M. Segers, “Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis From the Angle of Assessment

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Fluids, Heat Transfer

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Drenth, US Air Force Academy; George Sidebotham, The Cooper Union; Phillip Cornwell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Ioan Feier, US Air Force Academy

= � � 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑The results from the shakedown test are shown in Figure 9, along with a plot of the prediction ofinviscid theory (Bernoulli’s equation) which is not developed here formally. The result is that thevelocity of the exit jet is the same as what would be obtained from an object dropped in free fallfrom a height h. The main experimental result here is obtained from mass principles only. 6 5 Inviscid Theory Vexit = (2gH)0.5 4 Exit Velocity (m/s) 3 Experimental Data 2

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Assorted Topics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; Daniel Barb; George Roskovich, Florida Atlantic University

desired by students. 8. References[1] D. Raviv, “Visual Explanations of First Order Differential Equations,” in 16th LACCEIInternational Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology, 2018.[2] T. Goldfinch, A. L. Carew, and T.J. McCarthy, “Improving Learning in EngineeringMechanics: The Significance of Understanding Causes of Poor Performance,” in Proceedings ofthe AAEE Conference, 2008.[3] S. Baker and L. Talley, “The Relationship of Visualization Skills to Achievement inFreshman Chemistry,” in Journal of Chemistry Education, 1972.[4] J. Velazquez-Iturbide, I. Hernan-Losada, and M. Paredes-Velasco, “Evaluating the Effectof Program Visualization on Student Motivation,” in IEEE Transactions on Education, 2017.[5] R

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Matthew Lamparter, Bucknell University

, and detailed fabrication files on theDAMNED project with interested faculty members. Please contact us using the information inthe title block of the article. This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. EEC-2022271. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Citations[1] J. E. Froyd, P. C. Wankat, and K. A. Smith, “Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 100, pp. 1344–1360, 2012.[2] C. R. Mann and M. Press, “A Study of Engineering Education,” Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Boston

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandro H Espera Jr, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; Nicole Pitterson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

of Participant, Gender of Participant b. Predictors: (Constant), Number of courses taken (students) or taught (faculty), Type of Participant, Gender of Participant c. Predictors: (Constant), Type of Participant, Gender of Participant d. Predictors: (Constant), Type of Participant e. Dependent Variable: Total score in the concept test out of 20The ANOVA results of the four models created from the auto linear regression using a backwardalgorithm showed that although Models 2 and 3 were significant at p<0.05, Model 4 wassignificant at p<0.001, and it has an F-statistic>4, which is twice the Model 3’s. Thus, Model 4performed best among the

Conference Session

Computers in Education 8 - Video Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jianyu Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Jim Kuo; Pearl Chen, California State University, Los Angeles; John Bachman, California State University, Los Angeles

ensure the accessibility and functionality of the video modules. Theproject team plans to carry over the learned experiences and skill set to simplify the video designand development process in the future.AcknowledgementThis work is sponsored by CSU STEM-NET program.References 1. Kim, J. (2021). 11 Takeaways from the 2021 CHLOE Report. Inside Higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/learning-innovation/11-takeaways-2021-chloe- report 2. Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., Cruz, B., and Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review, Review of Educational Research, 91(2): 204–236. 3. Månsson, J., Löfgreen, J., and Warfvinge P. (2017

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Solnosky, Pennsylvania State University; Moses Ling, Pennsylvania State University

study skills and/orstudents struggling to adapt the correct learning technique(s) best associated for a certain topic. Masteringthe content in ordered sequence is particularly critical as students in AE are a non-controlled enrollmentstatus, that is, students with lower than 3.0 GPA may enter the major. Anecdotal evidence indicates thatstudents at lower GPA levels have greater difficulties with these challenging courses. In many instances,the difficulties can be attributed to underdeveloped learning skills and their cognitive processing abilities.Failure to successfully complete these courses unwittingly results in setbacks, such as, on-time entrance tomajor and academic progress in subsequence major courses for a significant number of

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Demos and Interactives

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aminul Islam Khan, Washington State University; Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University; Mohammad Hossan, University of Central Oklahoma; David Thiessen, Washington State University; Bernard Van Wie, Washington State University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University

Paper ID #37442Design, Fabrication, and Testing of Next Generation DesktopLearning Modules for Chemical and Mechanical EngineeringEducationAminul Islam Khan (Mr.) Aminul Islam Khan Received his B.S. and M. S. from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology where he also served as a Lecturer and Assistant Professor. Currently, Khan is a Ph.D. candidate at Washington State University. He has been involved in multidisciplinary research including hands-on learning for STEM education, transport modeling in micro/nanoscale devices, and various inverse techniques including Bayesian inference, Monte Carlo

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Elif Kongar, Fairfield University; John Drazan, Fairfield University; Isaac Macwan, Fairfield University; Michael Zabinski

EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition.[3] Fabien, Brian and Vereen, Keona. Implementing a Freshman Engineering Design Experience at theUniversity of Washington. 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances, HEAd’17,Valencia, 2017.[4] J. Kellar, W. Hovey, M. Langerman, S. Howard, L. Simonson, L. Kjerengtroen, L. Sttler, H.Heilhecker, L. Ameson-Meyer, and S. Kellogg, A problem-based learning approach for freshmanengineering, in 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Feb. 2000.[5] H. Lei, F. Ganjeizadeh, D. Nordmeyer, and J. Phung, Student learning trends in a freshman-levelintroductory engineering course, in 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON),April 2017, pp. 152–156.[6] L. A. Meadows, R. Fowler, and

Conference Session

Centering Black Experiences in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fantasi Nicole, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

Instruction, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 265–289, Oct. 2017, doi:10.1080/07370008.2017.1355211.[3] V. Borum and E. Walker, “What Makes the Difference? Black Women’s Undergraduateand Graduate Experiences in Mathematics,” The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 81, no. 4, pp.366–378, 2012, doi: 10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.4.0366.[4] M. S. Ross, B. M. Capobianco, and A. Godwin, “REPOSITIONING RACE, GENDER,AND ROLE IDENTITY FORMATION FOR BLACK WOMEN IN ENGINEERING,” JWomen Minor Scien Eng, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 37–52, 2017, doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017016424.[5] S. J. Robinson, “Spoke tokenism : Black women talking back about graduate schoolexperiences,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 155–181, 2012, doi:10.1080/13613324.2011.645567

Conference Session

PCEE Technical Session 8: Engineering Design in Elementary School

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole Batrouny, Tufts University

and piloting of thisAccessible Playground Design unit. I am deeply grateful to the participating students for sharingtheir time and ideas with us. This study was supported by the NSF ITEST program (#1657218).References[1] N. Cross, Design Thinking. New York: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing Plc, 2011.[2] C. M. Cunningham and G. J. Kelly, “Framing engineering practices in elementary school classrooms,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 295–307, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www-ijee-ie.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/latestissues/Vol33- 1B/03_ijee3372ns.pdf[3] S. Selcen Guzey and M. Aranda, “Student Participation in Engineering Practices and Discourse: An Exploratory Case Study

Conference Session

We Love our MOMs (Mechanics of Materials)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reihaneh Jamshidi, University of Hartford

illustrate and explainsome of the complex and important mechanics principles and concepts, and facilitate buildingtechnical skills. Students also provided feedback on how to enhance the assignments for thefuture.References[1] N. R. Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press, 2000.[2] M. Tajvidi and N. Fang, "Application of computer simulation and animation (CSA) in teaching and learning engineering mechanics," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26-221.[3] W. Reffeor, "Using FEA as a Pedagogical Tool for Teaching Machine Component Design," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June, 2018, pp. 24-27.[4] S. Navaee and J. Kang

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 4: Bring Your Own Experiment (BYOE)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eliza Banu, University of Georgia; Dominik May

., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308.[5] Faulconer, E. K., & Gruss, A. B. (2018). A review to weigh the pros and cons of online, remote, and distance science laboratory experiences. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2).[6] Lindsay, E., Liu, D., Murray, S., & Lowe, D. (2007). Remote laboratories in engineering education: Trends in students' perceptions. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education[7] Zubía, J. G., & Alves, G. R. (Eds.). (2012). Using remote labs in education: two little ducks in remote experimentation (Vol. 8

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu, The University of Texas at San Antonio

beyond: The messenger is the medium," Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 19, no. 4, 2018.[8] L. d. C. El Debs, M. Shaurette, W. Hynes, H. J. Kwon, B. Hutzel, and D. Barbarash, "Cross College Faculty Collaboration for the development of a new major in Design and Construction Integration," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[9] P. Golding, S. A. Starks, R. V. Gonzalez, M. R. Kendall, D. G. Novick, and C. H. Joslyn, "Leadership in Engineering Innovation and Entrepreneurship," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[10] Y. Hatipkarasulu, V. B. Canizaro, and J. D. Murphy, "Multi-disciplinary Integration for design and construction freshman

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Technical Session 7: Cybersecurity and Computing

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org; Angelica Thompson; Leigh Ann DeLyser; Eric Snow; Luronne Vaval; Stephanie Wortel-London

equity throughout the computer science education ecosystem,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 64, pp. 23–35, 2021. [2] F. H. Norris, M. J. Friedman, P. J. Watson, C. M. Byrne, E. Diaz, and K. Kaniasty, “60,000 disaster victims speak: Part i. an empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981–2001,” Psychiatry: Interpersonal and biological processes, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 207–239, 2002. [3] F. H. Norris, M. J. Friedman, and P. J. Watson, “60,000 disaster victims speak: Part ii. sum- mary and implications of the disaster mental health research,” Psychiatry: Interpersonal and biological processes, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 240–260, 2002. [4] T. A. DeVaney, S. C. Carr, and D. D. Allen, “Impact of hurricane katrina on the educational

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: DEI, Flipped Classrooms

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Randall Manteufel, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Amir Karimi, The University of Texas at San Antonio

Tutors to Cheat onEngineering Exams”, in Proceedings of ASEE Gulf Southwest Section Annual Conference, Albuquerque,NM, 2020.[8] A. Karimi and R.D. Manteufel, “An Experiment with Flipped Classroom Concepts in aThermodynamics Course”, in Proceedings of ASEE Gulf Southwest Section Annual Conference, Austin,TX, 2019.[9] R. F. Ramos, “Addressing Muddy Points Early in the Semester Increases Student Learning in aBioinstrumentation Laboratory Course”, in Proceedings of 2015 ASEE Annual Conference, 2015.[10] S.J. Krause and S. Hoyt, “Enhancing Instruction by Uncovering Instructor Blind Spots fromMuddiest Point Reflections in Introductory Materials Classes”, in Proceedings of 2020 ASEE AnnualConference, 2020.

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 2: Instructional/Learning Resources and Pedagogies

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

stavros kalafatis, Texas A&M University; Kevin Nowka, Texas A&M University; John Lusher, Texas A&M University

students’ self-reported motivation and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8, 176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00860-44. Dhawan S (2020) Online learning: a panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. J EducTechnol Syst 49(1):5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395209340185. Fatani TH (2020) Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during theCOVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ 20(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-26. Kubelick, K, Gleason, R, Rains, J., Capstone During COVID-19: Medical DeviceDevelopment at Home to Solve Global Health Problems. Biomedical Engineering Education,Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2021 ( 2020) pp. 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-020-00035-87

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Khosro Shirvani, State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale; Marjaneh Issapour, State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale; Conor Ricchetti, State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale

. Should one or more of these systems produce an error, theentire turbine system will shut itself down and prevent further rotation until the maintenance teamhas corrected the error (s).Once the participants familiarized themselves with how the systems were linked, they completedtroubleshooting exercises. The turbine generated error codes during these exercises and displayedthem through the SCADA system. The participants would identify the error code to determinewhich portion of the turbine produced the error. They would then examine the physical systemsand troubleshoot the connections until they identified the precise issue. The participants completedthese exercises by utilizing multimeters and looking for visual and audio cues from the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Student Success Boot Camps, Summer Bridge Programs, and Living Learning Communities

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yang Yang, Kansas State University; Amy Betz, Kansas State University; Craig Spencer

.    References:1. Moreno, S. E., Muller, C., Asera, R., Wyatt, L., & Epperson, J. (1999). Supporting minoritymathematics achievement: The Emerging Scholars Program at The University of Texas atAustin. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(1), 53-66.2. Budny, D. (1992). Mathematics bridge program. Proceedings of Frontiers in EducationTwenty-Second Annual Conference.3. Cancado, L., Reisel, J, & Walker, C. (2018). Impacts of a summer bridge program inengineering on student retention and graduation. Journal of STEM Education, 19(2), 26-31.4. Gleason, J., Boykin, K., Johnson, P., Bowen, L., Raju, D., & Slappey, C. (2010). Integratedengineering math-based summer bridge program for student retention. Advances in

Conference Session

How Communities and Systems Influence Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dustyn Roberts, University of Pennsylvania; Robert Carpick, University of Pennsylvania; Igor Bargatin, University of Pennsylvania

, 2020. https://www.fastcompany.com/90515678/science-explains- why-unconscious-bias-training-wont-reduce-workplace-racism-heres-what-will (accessed May 31, 2021).[11] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and M. M. Camacho, “Beyond pipeline and pathways: Ecosystem metrics,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 32–56, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20250.

Conference Session

Understanding Inclusivity and Equity in STEM Contexts: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyrine Jamella Pangan, Tufts University; Chelsea Andrews, Tufts University

-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaBrodwin, E., & St. Fleur, N. (2021, February 19). FDA issues alert on ‘limitations’ of pulseoximeters, without explicit mention of racial bias. STAT News.https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/19/fda-issues-alert-on-limitations-of-pulse-oximeters-without-explicit-mention-of-racial-bi/Buolamwini, J., & Raji, I. D. (2019). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publiclynaming biased performance results of commercial AI products. In Proceedings of the 2019Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society.Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, &Human Values, 39(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305Claussen, S

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eugene Mahmoud, Mt. San Antonio College; Carolyn Robinson, Mt. San Antonio Community College; Brandon Saller, Mt San Antonio College

National Science Foundation (NSF) Solicitationunder award number 2000568 in accordance with the NSF Advanced Technical Educationprogram.References 1. S. Malcolm and M. Feder, “Multiple STEM Pathways” in Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016, pp. 21-57. 2. ‘Institutional Self Evaluation Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation, Mt. San Antonio College, Walnut, 201

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joel Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio

beunderstood.The engineering “rules” are not implicit nor isolated instances [14-16], they are legitimized andmade explicit through engineering education research which sets the parameters regardingwhat kind of engineering narrative matters. While there is a broad range of research thataddresses Latino/a/x students, the current approaches are devoid of the insider perspectivesand methodologies created by Latino/a/s individuals. This serves to further marginalizehistorically underrepresented students from engineering as hierarchical classifications placevalue on what kinds of knowledge are deemed worthy and which are not. This type ofengineering and research gatekeeping could potentially erase students of color different ways ofknowing and meaning-making

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yan Tang, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Haiyan Bai, University of Central Florida; Richard Catrambone, Georgia Institute of Technology

is the question." Routledge, 2009.[8] J. Sweller, P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga. Cognitive Load Theory. Explorations in the learningsciences, instructional systems and performance technologies: Vol. 1., 2011.[9] Tang, Yan, Haiyan Bai, and Richard Catrambone. "Applying Deliberate Practice toFacilitate Schema Acquisition in Learning Introductory Mechanics." In 2021 ASEE Virtual AnnualConference Content Access. 2021.[10] Ericsson, K. Anders. "The influence of experience and deliberate practice on thedevelopment of superior expert performance." The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expertperformance 38, no. 685-705 (2006): 2-2.[11] Ericsson, K. Anders, Ralf T. Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Römer. "The role of deliberatepractice in the