research paper is to explore advantages and disadvantages of conducting anengineering experience for blind and low vision (BLV) participants in a virtual/onlineenvironment. This experience was designed to expose BLV high school students to engineeringcontent and enhance their spatial ability. Spatial ability is an intelligence generally defined as theability to generate, retain, retrieve, and transform well-structured visual images [1] and isparticularly important to fields of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). A varietyof spatial ability constructs have been identified, a few of which include mental rotation, spatialorientation, and spatial visualization [2], [3]. This paper refers to spatial ability as aquantification of
engineering education and careers.Introduction & BackgroundThe growth of the American Indian and Alaska Native population (commonly designated“AI/AN” by demographers1) over the past ten years alone should designate this demographic as afocus of education research. About 29% of AI/AN persons are under the age of 18, as comparedto 21.9% of the total U.S. population [1]. It should therefore be no surprise that, collectively, theAI/AN population is amongst the fastest expanding demographics in the United States, with acombined population of 9.7 million identifying as AI/AN alone or in combination with anotherrace2 on the 2020 U.S. Census [2]; this accounts for 2.9% of the total U.S. population, andrepresents an 86.5% change from 2010. The magnitude
. The university cancelledaccess to most campus laboratories and brought a halt to all experimental research conducted inthese facilities. Moreover, a significant number of undergraduate students lost their internshipsfor Summer 2020. With these two substantial changes, CTRI created the Summer UndergraduateResearch Experience (SURE) program. CTRI contacted a donor who donated a funding for asingle undergraduate research project (pre-COVID) and asked to make changes in the fundingprocess to benefit multiple students. With the adaptation approved by the donor, the researchcenter asked the faculty to submit proposals for undergraduate research projects that theresearchers can conduct at their homes.The proposals requested projects to employ 1 – 4
thorough this fundingapplication. She is working closely with learning module and curriculum development to verifyinvasive species identification and management information. Jacob Brandon is a Graduatestudent in Agricultural Sciences, working on the curriculum development and preliminarydissemination into high school classrooms across the state. b. ObjectiveThere are over 1100 programs teaching classes in AFNR in public and private schools in Texas,and the expedited dissemination of knowledge and skills across the state would have animmediate impact. To provide the program proposed successfully, this funded work adhered tothe following objectives:Table 1: Objectives of Biosecurity Curriculum Objective 1 Develop a TEKS-aligned and USDA
identity trajectory theory, which consists of threeinterlocking strands—institutional (i.e., programs, practices, procedures, etc.), networking (i.e.,social networks, faculty interactions, etc.), and intellectual (i.e., field of study, learningprogression, career trajectories, etc.). We used analysis of narratives to draw out key themesrelated to how institutional resources and students’ networks facilitate their access to WILexperiences. Analysis also highlighted how WILs affect students’ identity development asengineers during undergraduate education, including their career intentions upon graduation. Weidentified five big ideas that were expressed by the students to address the research questions.These ideas include: 1) Institutional structures
, lessabsenteeism, and better attitudes towards school [1].” The second reason that multidisciplinarycollaboration is important, is that it simulates the working environment of a real company.According to Qattawi, Alafaghani, Ablat, and Jaman on the capstone course that they initiated,“The capstone course is a one-semester course (16-weeks) aimed to prepare the engineeringstudents with the required design skills in an environment that simulates the real-world problemwhile offering mentoring and feedback [2].” Multidisciplinary collaboration can offer anopportunity to work on real-world problems before getting out into the real-world. Thesimulation of the working environment can also help with communication skills since somestudents get little practice on
learning environment,specifically making connections with professors and peers. Here, we focus on how studentsadapted to online education and their perceptions of the teaching and learning activitiesemployed in online courses. In particular, we report on student experiences pertaining to: (1)office hours, (2) synchronous online lectures, and (3) asynchronous recorded lectures.2 - Theoretical frameworkThis study is grounded in Weidman's socialization model. Weidman posed a process model thatasserts a student's engagement with their learning environment leads to various degrees ofintegration into the existing culture. To elaborate, he writes, "there is a pervasive consensus onnorms and expectation for students in higher education that is driven by
questions: 1) How do students’ perceptionsof assessment structure in second-year Mechanics of Materials courses influence overall courseperformance? and 2) How do these perceptions influence students’ identities as engineers? Toanswer these questions, we interviewed and qualitatively analyzed semi-structured interviewswith nine undergraduate engineering students who had been enrolled in a Mechanics of Materialscourse within the past two years across three different universities. Findings from this pilotanalysis reveal that the relationship among participant perceptions of performance on courseassessments, sense of belonging, and identity formation is complex and nuanced. Whileparticipants garnered a sense of belonging in ways not directly
, or evaluating.I. IntroductionIn this era of fast changing technologies and interdisciplinary work culture, engineers need tobe well equipped with a wide variety of skills that will enable them to be creative, effectivecommunicators, proficient at performing analytical tasks, and lifelong learners. Along theselines, ABET defined student outcome 7 as “an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge asneeded, using appropriate learning strategies” [1]. Self-reflection is one such appropriatelearning strategy wherein individuals assess their own knowledge, skills, and learningprocesses. Self-reflection provides opportunities to recognize areas for improvement in one’sown learning, to consider ways to pursue improvement, and to monitor one’s
“pipeline” [1]. Although the need to build thescience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) “pipeline” is well documented, the U.S. hasstruggled in graduating the required professionals to support the STEM workforce demand [1].To effectively address the shortage, there is an emergent need to evaluate how high schoolstudents prepare, discover, and navigate their pathway to the engineering pipeline, and thebeliefs, individuals or experiences that support or dismantle their progress. Research indicatesthat career choice is often influenced by intrinsic factors such as students’ prior experience;social support; self-efficacy and outcome expectation. Specifically, students’ career choice maybe cultivated by the exposure to subject matter; the
systems at thedistrict level. GOAL administrators coordinate the distribution of the materials with the district,who were responsible for allocating the kits to teachers and students. In total, 3000 kits weredistributed through two years of implementation from 2020-2021. GOAL staff were also able tocoordinate with the one district for virtual culminating events that included a final designcompetition with the dragsters.A secondary implementation method of the GOAL kits is by distributing directly to cooperatingteachers. One example pathway for this is through course 1 of the undergraduate education effortstarted in Fall 2021. This K-12 teacher community was built on previous existing relationships.Since 2011, a number of partner schools have been
www.slayte.comHow Turkish Am I?: A 2nd-Generation Turkish-American Woman’s Identity Navigation Through Mechanical Engineering Education (Diversity) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIn the completion of my first conference paper, I would like to extend my deepest gratitude tothose listed below: 1. Dr. Jennifer DeBoer for your support and belief in me as a researcher and for being the first person in my undergraduate studies to give me an opportunity to grow as an engineer and as a researcher. 2. My twin sister, Damla, for your unconditional support and for inspiring me to always challenge myself. 3. The DeBoer Lab group (specifically Moses, Casey, Nafissa, Nrupaja and Dhinesh) for supporting my work. 4
end up working in the embedded systems area might not become adept enoughin C, but the students that do follow this track are typically in electrical and computerengineering, and in each of these majors several courses have developed over the last fewyears in which more exposure to embedded systems occurs.The Case for PythonThe rise of the Python [1] programming language in software development and data sciencehas been rapid and ubiquitous, so much so, that in 2019 Python ranked as the topAnalytics/Data Science Software [2]. In early 2022 Python tutorials were the most searched onthe internet, over 10% more frequently than the second most searched language tutorials forJava [3].Given the advantages of Python over Matlab [4], not least of
. Halkiyo has been teaching different Civil Engineering courses at Bule Hora University, Ethiopia, where he also served as a department head and conducted various research and community projects. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comEnhancing the Equity and Inclusivity of Engineering Education for Diverse Learners through an Innovative Instructional Design, Delivery, and Evaluation: International Students in FocusAbstractIn the United States, 64.9% of all engineering master’s and 59.0% of all engineering doctoraldegrees are awarded to international students [1]. These international students bring significantcultural and
perceptions of their learning experiences in this onlinecourse. The survey analysis and results are reported in this paper. Three questions are aboutpossible negative impact on students’ availability during the class time or on their timecommitment, or about possible technical difficulty for taking lessons online. Followed are 15Likert-scale questions on the use of tools, instructional materials, and hands-on learningactivities. We found that 1) there is no statistically significant difference between the studentperformance in the online section and that in the face-to-face sections, 2) among three surveyedchallenges, students’ time commitment to this online course was most negatively impacted bypandemic-related situations, and 3) student feedbacks
engineering students be taught in their college programs? This is aquestion raised by many, and which can lead to spirited debates. To provide some guidance,ABET provides some general guidance from professional engineering societies through theirrequired “Student Outcomes” [1]. To be educated to be a practicing engineer, students mustlearn the technical details of subjects important in their discipline. But ABET also recognizesthe need for students to learn non-technical subjects, as graduates should be able to so suchthings as include non-technical components such as cultural factors in their designs, and makeengineering judgements based on societal contexts. Various authors have also discussed theimportance of bringing more non-technical subjects
presented at a design show open to the public at the end of the second semester.Historically, the purpose of the show was three-fold: 1) provide an opportunity for students tohighlight their work to the broader community, 2) demonstrate students’ ability to communicatewith a range of audiences (ABET Criterion 3, Student Outcome 3), and 3) demonstrate how theirdesigned system meets the requirements of their customer (verification of requirements).Due to COVID limitations on group gatherings, this show could not be held in person in 2020 or2021; however, the purposes of the show still needed to be met. Therefore, the design show wasreimagined in 2021 to require each team to virtually present a short video of their work andbriefly answer audience
demand data and desired peakreduction (power capacity). The program is designed for educational purposes but can also havepractical use in sizing ESSs.* E-mail address: jelio@asu.edu (J. Elio).1. Introduction Reducing electricity demand is commonly seen as one of the most promising solutions tomitigating global climate change [1]. This is for good reason, since electricity productionconstituted 25% of greenhouse gas emissions in 2019, totaling nearly 1,625 million metric tonsof carbon dioxide in the United States [2]. When electricity consumers run consistently, powergeneration plants can run consistently which leads to their highest efficiency and lowest carbonemissions. To explain, baseload power generation plants typically operate
Scripts® simulations thatcontain background information, solution steps, examples and exercises with interactive tasks,and Simulink Simscape® files:Module 1. Node Analysis: Use the node-voltage method to solve a circuit that containingresistors and independent and dependent current sources and voltage sources.Module 2. Mesh Analysis: Use the mesh-current method to solve a circuit for an arbitrarynetwork containing resistors and independent and dependent voltage and current sourcesModule 3. Operational Amplifier Circuits: Analyze inverting, non-inverting, summing, anddifferencing operational amplifier circuits in the time domain.Module 4. RC and RL circuits: Determine the natural and step response of both RL and RCcircuits. Analyze circuits with
,fabricate, and test various systems of the Formula SAE race car. Formula SAE is a platform thatcalls for a strong engineering knowledge and skill set. Seniors and those participating ascapstone students are expected to transfer learned content and skills from different engineeringclasses and use it to design required parts or systems that fulfill the efforts to create a racevehicle [1]. Mostly mechanical and electrical engineering content is needed for vehicle creation. In the Fall semester, students in Formula SAE study the scope of upcoming competitions.Students then choose or are assigned to one of the following vehicle systems: powertrain,suspension, chassis, or electrical. Once assigned to specific systems, students study what
for students to successfully navigate their college advisingexperience [20,21]. The advising SLOs were developed by a faculty committee charged by ourprimary faculty governance body and cover academic and career outcomes across the entirecurriculum. The first year advising SLOs span three areas: (i) design a curricular plan, (ii)prepare a future plan, and (iii) assess your learning strategies. These outcomes are summarizedin Table 1.This work in progress paper describes the pilot structure of the first-year advising program andthe planned assessment process.Methods/Project ApproachSix tenured faculty advisors were selected to advise all first-year students (approximately 100students) across our eight major programs. These experienced advisors
academic and career paths. Teaching introductory programming languagescan be a challenging task especially if students are from many different engineering disciplines[1]. Only a few students find learning programming easy and indeed it is hard for instructors toteach fundamental programming languages [2]. Students at times may not become excited aboutprogramming languages [2]. From the teaching team’s perspective, instructors focus more onteaching programming language instead of teaching the application of the programming [3].Students may not find programming courses intuitive, related to real life, or hard to engage withthe course material.During the pandemic period, the traditional face-to-face communication between students wasdisrupted
there exists research within the literature ofengineering education that provides well-defined definitions of EER for the EER community,there are confounding factors that make it difficult to share these concepts with non-EERengineers. First, it is unlikely we can use social science terms such as epistemology, ontologyand even theoretical framework [1] due to our non-EER colleagues' lack of use, and thereforeunderstanding, of these terms. Second, the use of social science terms, even familiar ones such as“qualitative” research, can be dismissed, as they are considered by some engineers to be “soft” or1 There is some debate on this term - is EER a discipline, community, or field [20]? This conversation began in theUS over a decade ago and may
from conclusive due to pandemic impacts, they give us confidence that these changeshelped students and faculty weather the pandemic storm and provide us with innovations that wecan harness in a more normal environment.IntroductionProject-based learning [1] and cooperative problem-based learning [2] have long been preferredpedagogies of engagement in engineering curricula worldwide. They solidify interest inengineering, build knowledge, and provide opportunities for students to engage in self-motivatedlearning. All of these have been shown to improve educational outcomes substantially[3], [4].This paper will focus on first-year design courses. The recent literature has a number of reports ofadaptations in such courses [5]–[11]. A few of these
and build excellent senior capstone projects even in thetime of physical isolation assuming that inexpensive rapid prototyping machines are available andappropriate pedagogical tools are implemented.1. Introduction Senior capstone projects are crucial components of most engineering curricula. They areoften used for assessing many student learning outcomes (SLOs) for accreditation purposes,recruiting of new students, and retaining the current students. These projects represent hands-onstudent-team efforts in engineering design and often require substantial laboratory andmanufacturing support using well-equipped machine shops and qualified staff. This workcompares three senior design project sets from three consecutive years (pre
cases by December 2019 due to a new virus in the cityof Wuhan, in the province of Hubei, in China 1 , considerably far removed from the continentalUnited States (US). Very little was then known about SARS-Cov-2 or COVID-19, especially tomany at the large U. S. research university in this study. The semester had reached its mid-point,Spring Break, when the World Health Organization (WHO) officially began using the globalpandemic terminology 2 . The virus had high transmission, hospitalization 3 , and mortality rates 1,4 .The carriers of the virus could be pre-symptomatic 2 or asymptomatic 4 among the manythen-unknowns of COVID-19 leading to many concerns about community transmission 5 . Tominimize transmission and overwhelming hospital resources
ecosystem model. She is also a Co-PI on an NSF S-STEM grant called ENGAGE which is working to make a more robust transfer pathway for local Community college students. Dr. Thompson is a Co-PI on an NSF ADVANCE grant called KIND with other universities within the CSU. She is a co-advisor to Engineers without Borders, Critical Global Engagement, and oSTEM at Cal Poly. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: Gamification of education: Using Bartle’s Taxonomy for inclusive educational practicesAbstractAccording to an online source [1] in 2021 “the average player plays video games for five hours aday
benefits easily explain the reason behind the growing incorporation ofglobal elements to engineering education in institutions around the world. However, the numberof study abroad students from the engineering field still lag that of other disciplines, such asbusiness, and liberal arts. As shown in Figure 1, in the United States, only 4% of all study abroadstudents in 2019/2020 are engineering students, whereas business and management studentsmake up 21% of the numbers (Institute of International Education, 2020). There are considerablereasons for this: academic rigor, administration hurdles, the need for separate bilateralagreements with each partner institution, the loss of institutional knowledge when a faculty oradministrator leaves the
students. Efforts to broaden participation in engineering haveachieved modest progress as students, especially those from historically marginalized groups,lack structured support towards academic success [1]. First-year, team-based design coursespresent a unique opportunity to foster inclusion through active, collaborative learningexperiences [2, 3].Undergraduate teaching assistants (UGTAs) often play an important role in building communitywithin first-year courses. UGTAs promote student engagement, serve as peer mentors, andimprove students’ perception of a course. Through their work, UGTAs build their own technicalskills, practice effective communication, and gain leadership experience [4-6]. UGTAs oftenreceive training on technical knowledge