Dr. Niall Seery is the Director of the Technology Education Research Group (TERG) American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 WIP: Adaptive Comparative Judgement as a Potential Tool for Assessing First-Year Engineering Design Projects Clodagh Reid1, Sheryl A. Sorby2, Gibin Raju2, Niall Seery1 1 Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, Technological University of the Shannon 2 Department of Engineering Education, University of CincinnatiAbstractDesign projects are an important part of many first-year engineering programs. The desire toemploy holistic assessment strategies to student work with open
courseIntroductionThis Work-in-Progress paper describes the application and outcomes of using contract grading ina second semester engineering seminar. A brief history of contract grading is provided, as well aspossible advantages of this grading system. This paper focuses on 1) the structure of contractgrading used in a first-year engineering seminar, 2) aspects of metacognitive learning inresubmitting assignments to meet the contract requirements, 3) student survey feedback, and 4)challenges and lessons learned from first-time implementation.BackgroundContract grading has a long history; it is not a new concept. Though there are numerouspublications from the late twentieth century (1970s–1990s), articles date back to the 1920s [1]. Inthe last fifteen years
solution for increasing nextgeneration experts (NGE) in engineering and computing careers [1]–[4]. Montana StateUniversity’s (MSU) open access mission is to educate the sons and daughters of its state’scitizens. In accordance with this mission, the Norm Asbjornson College of Engineering(NACOE) has preserved their practice of a single application and acceptance process forprograms in the college. Upon acceptance to MSU a student may declare any program in theNACOE regardless of their academic readiness. Both MSU and the NACOE recognize manycommunities in Montana have limited access to advanced coursework (e.g.: calculus, physics,computer science, etc.) anticipated for first year engineering or computing students. Open accessinvites first year
% of CoEstudents identified as at-risk (on warning, probation, or return from suspension). This work inprogress (WIP) paper describes the program and reports on an evaluation of the first year of theprogram. Program directors have determined that it has had success in helping students return togood standing, with recommendations for academic support services geared towardsundergraduate engineering majors.Introduction and BackgroundAttrition has long been a major concern in engineering education [1]-[2], with much researchconducted to better understand factors impacting retention and persistence [2]-[3]. Student GPAis continually cited as a factor for attrition: at-risk students, it has been found, may havedifficulties returning to good
semester, it is often difficult to prioritize personal time and space for thinking about andreflecting on new academic experiences. Yet this is a critical phase for students to build afoundation from their first-year courses and capitalize on opportunities to discover and practicehow to succeed in engineering.Reflection in engineering education has been underutilized and is often neglected. However,recent growth in reflective activities for engineering courses [1] has led to improvedunderstanding of pedagogical approaches utilized in reflective practices [2]. Reflectionencourages students to make meaning of their learning experiences and to consider future actionsthat are grounded in those experiences. Like other skills, one must practice
: Incorporating Patent Review into First-Year Student Design Projects to Support Ideation, Concept Selection, and CommercializationCampbell University requires every engineering student to take a rigorous 3-credit semester-length design course, typically in their second semester of study. Student teams of 3-5 pursue adesign problem of their selection from problem finding through prototyping and the presentationof prototypes and the results of testing to engineers from local industry. Integration of patentreview into the course presented the opportunity to enhance design instruction and projectoutcomes by providing students with 1) an additional source of potentially relevant mechanismsand design inspiration, 2
coping.Before delving into the authors’ views regarding the value of enduring pedagogical andoperational shifts that have resulted from teaching in a Covid environment, it is important toexplore some key trends identified in recent literature. The shift to emergency remote teaching inthe Spring of 2020 spawned a flurry of self-study, casual, collegial conversations, andconsultations with teaching and learning support staff by engineering faculty around the country.In [1], it was found that throughout the second half of the Spring 2020 semester, participation inactivities to assess and redesign teaching pedagogies, modalities, and assessments was high andsustained. Despite this increased energy around pedagogical conversation, self-study, andredesign
, have some level of control over their learning [1]. Empowerment is rooted in Deci and Ryan’s self- determination theory [2] [3] [4] [5]. Specifically, motivation is thought to lie on a continuum of autonomy, ranging from completely autonomous (either intrinsic or extrinsic) to controlled. Either autonomous or controlled motivation is sufficient to initiate an activity, but autonomous motivation is required to maintain it. Therefore, factors that can increase autonomous motivation are beneficial within the academic environment. According to the theory of self-determination, autonomous motivation can be fostered when the following 3 basic psychological needs are met: autonomy (sense of control), competence (how much success one
University (WVU) is a cohort-based integrated Engineering Bridge Program designed for non-calculus ready first-yearengineering students. During COVID times, AcES encountered challenges in recruitingunderrepresented students. We realized that the recruitment method needed to be modified toattract them. After applying new recruitment methods for 3 weeks, AcES participants werediversified, resulting in 30% female, 20% underrepresented minorities, 30% low-income, and20% first-generation in the cohort. Our research aims to (1) analyze AcES enrollment data beforeand after applying the new recruitment strategy, (2) conduct surveys to understand theeffectiveness of different recruitment methods in diversifying the cohort, and (3) devise a plan toimprove
MichiganIntroductionPeer assessments are commonly found across classrooms that have a focus on small-grouplearning and, occasionally, are used to influence the grade a student receives in the course. Thepractice of using peer assessment is common because of its use in assessing an individual’ssuccess and performance [1-3]. When peer assessment is used as a tool to determine theacademic efforts of a student, it is important to understand the implicit processes that impactsuch decisions [4]. This paper is concerned with identifying trends in peer assessments that arerelated to the race and gender of the rater and ratee involved.Others have studied this question with mixed results concerning the potential role bias may playin impacting ratings and how bias can
and Technical Drawing TechniquesIntroductionThis Work in Progress Paper discusses the importance of freehand sketching and technicaldrawing skills for students studying computer aided drawing. Freehand sketching involvesdrawing without any measuring instruments and is accomplished using only pencil and paper.Technical drawing uses drafting equipment including T-squares, drawing triangles, and acompass. Freehand sketching has been shown to be important because it connects students’ handmovements and their mental thinking ability. Freehand sketching is also a quick and easy methodof communicating ideas via graphics. Freehand sketching has been shown to be helpful inproviding quality design solutions [1]. With the
andtheir ability to learn AutoCAD after already learning MicroStation. A second survey wasadministered to former students (second through fourth-year students) to gain their perspectivesas well.Constituency SurveysThe first survey was administered to students who took CE 111 in the Fall of 2021. Table 1summarizes the data from the fourteen responses and Table 2 summarizes comments collected. Table 1. Results from Survey One (Students Enrolled in CE 111 in Fall 2021). Survey Item Results Very Prepared: 0% Well Prepared: 29% “Preparation provided by CE 111
Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Work in Progress: Success and Retention Strategies for STEM Gatekeeper Courses in a Community CollegeIntroductionStudents encounter many challenges in their first year, including adjusting to the collegeenvironment and taking demanding courses. These challenges manifest in poor retention rates.Recent statistics at our institution show that the one-year retention of full-time first-time enteringstudents is 57% [1]. The likelihood of students quitting a major or dropping out of college issignificantly increased when they fail a course [2]. This project is being developed to addresshigh course failure rates by tackling some of the obstacles to success that students face.The
is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engi- neering Experience Conference. He is affiliated withthe Transportation Engineering program in the NYU Civil and Urban Engineering Department. He is the advisor for NYU student chapter of the Institute for Transportation Engineers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Work-In-Progress: Using CATME in Team Development of One-Semester- Long Open-Ended First-Year Engineering Student Design Projects Rui Li1, Jack Bringardner1 1 Tandon School of
multiplegenerations about a significant historical event: the beginning of Westward Expansion. Initiallydeveloped for use in a text-only environment, this simulation was designed to present studentswith active learning experiences involving those migrating along the Trail [1]. The game allowsa player to outfit a wagon and then lead a small party on a 2000-mile trek while being cautiouswith supplies, keeping a good travel pace, and learning how to cross a river. While thiseducationally-focused game has achieved near cult-like status, it has also generated complaintsconcerning the lack of representation of those outside of the provided white male protagonistavatar [2]. Although the most common complaint involves the stereotypical portrayal of NativeAmericans
Workshop: Introduction to Adaptive Comparative Judgement: A Holistic Assessment tool for Design Problems Clodagh Reid1, Sheryl A. Sorby2, Gibin Raju2, Niall Seery1 1 Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, Technological University of the Shannon 2 Department of Engineering Education, University of CincinnatiAbstractThis workshop is an interactive session where participants will experience an excitingapproach for holistically assessing design problems, Adaptive Comparative Judgement(ACJ). ACJ is an adaptive software tool that can be used by students and faculty to assessstudents’ work holistically and reliably. This tool can be used to reduce the grading
selecting the rubber duck that“quacks” to them. The scavenger hunt gets the students out from behind their computers,introduces the students to an industry practice, and opens the door to future assignments ondebugging techniques. The scavenger hunt covers a wide variety of topics, including (1)mathematical expressions, (2) mod operator, (3) integer math, (4) switch statements, (5) ifstatements, (6) increment/decrement, (7) for loops, (8) while loops, and (9) do-while loops.Typically, the scavenger hunt beings in the classroom. The instructor ensures all teams havestarted the scavenger hunt and then “disappears” to the final location. The scavenger hunt couldtake students on a journey of their college/university to become more familiar with
developed or implemented on a larger scale.Electronics ModuleThis electronics module is presented as phase 2 of integrative rapid prototyping hands-onmodules delivered during the lab portion of a first-year engineering course. Products containingelectrical components have increased exponentially and will likely continue this trend [1]. Ourfirst-year students need these skills to not only keep up with this trend, but also to safely andeffectively incorporate electronics into their prototypes. This module also contributes to theinnovative active learning concept to promote deeper learning [2]. By creating a hands-onimmersive experience, it allows students to make connections between engineering concepts thatcan later be applied to future novel and
Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary re- search focus is on exploring K-16 students’ engagement and learning of engineering and science concepts by creating innovative instructional resources and conducting quasi-experimental research studies in and out of classroom environments. Dr. Menekse is the recipient of the 2014 William Elgin Wickenden Award by the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Menekse also received three Seed-for-Success Awards (in 2017, 2018, and 2019) from Purdue University’s Excellence in Research Awards programs in recognition of obtaining three external grants of $1 million or more during each year. His research has been generously