Conference Session

Technical Session M4C

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest; Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati; Gibin Raju, University of Cincinnati; Niall Seery, Technological University of the Shannon

Tagged Topics

Workshops

. Policy Pract., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 281–300, 2012, doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2012.665354.[3] D. Canty, N. Seery, E. Hartell, and A. Doyle, “Integrating Peer Assessment in Technology Education through Adaptive Comparative Judgment,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320299812[4] S. R. Bartholomew, G. J. Strimel, and E. Yoshikawa, “Using adaptive comparative judgment for student formative feedback and learning during a middle school design project,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 363–385, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10798-018-9442-7.[5] G. J. Strimel, S. R. Bartholomew, S. Purzer, L. Zhang, and E. Yoshikawa Ruesch, “Informing engineering design through adaptive

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest; Gibin Raju, University of Cincinnati; Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati; Niall Seery, Technological University of the Shannon

Tagged Topics

Works In Progress

., judging) student work on these two tasks. Participation in actual ACJ panelswill enable judges to gain a “feel” for what this assessment technique entails and how it couldbe used to enhance first-year engineering students learning experiences. At the end of theFYEE conference, results from the panels will be available for those who are interested.AcknowledgementThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF#2020785). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] G. J. Strimel, S. R. Bartholomew, S. Purzer, L. Zhang, and E. Yoshikawa Ruesch, “Informing

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Rui Li, New York University; Jack Bringardner, New York University Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Works In Progress

quantitative scores ofare helpful for identifying leadership while individual comments are beneficial for identifyingpotential conflicts. Based on the feedback from CATME, the instructor could apply a variety ofinterventions to prevent further development of conflicts. The inventions include one-on-onevirtual or in-person meetings, group meetings, redistributing of team tasks, and shifting groupactivity to a more agreeable time slot.References[1] S. Akbar, E. Gehringer, and Z. Hu, “Poster: Improving formation of student teams: A clustering approach,” in IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion (ICSE-Companion), 2018: IEEE, pp. 147-148.[2] A. Rezvani, R. Barrett, and P. Khosravi, “Investigating the

Conference Session

Technical Session M5A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Katrina L Carlson, Michigan Technological University; Akua B. Oppong-Anane, Montana Technological University; Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University; Amanda Marie Singer, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

.​ Table 1. Systems Engineering Coding Results Michigan Montana Code Code Description Tech Tech Total Example Student Quotes “Working to improve whatever S Systems 46.6% 27.8% 39.4% systems they are working with.” “Design and prototype computing CD Modeling & Design 44.9% 19.5% 33.3% systems.” Project/operations/system “Someone who acts as an overseer M s management skills 17.3% 41.7% 25.9% to a project

Conference Session

Technical Session M5B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Juan David Ortega, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University / Universidad EAFIT

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

development was studied using the Tuckman model, first popularized in the 1960's forworkplace teams and later updated [5], [6]. This model consists of four stages: Forming,Storming, Norming and Performing. Tuckman demonstrated that team members tend to act asindividuals during the first two stages, and then realize that, as contributors to a team, morecould be accomplished with the team than individually. This realization leads team memberperformance toward the Norming and Performing stages. A summary of each of the stagesand their key characteristics is given in Table 1 below [1], [5]–[7]. This table was adaptedfrom a prior study using similar methods with introductory engineering transfer student teams:Table 1: Team Development Stages and Key

Conference Session

Technical Session T1B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Hannah Nolte, The Pennsylvania State University; Elizabeth Marie Starkey, Pennsylvania State University; Christopher McComb, Carnegie mellon University; Nicolas F Soria Zurita, The Pennsylvania State University & Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Full Papers

needed to wait for students to log into the online class before starting the practice.Author 3 noted that being able to move the time of the mediation to better fit in the coursematerial for the day was advantageous. Additionally, Author 3 noticed that different classsections had different preferences. For example, Author 3’s morning class section liked havingthe practice early during class (e.g., at the beginning), while the afternoon class section liked thepractices later in the class session, especially on Friday (e.g., at the end of class). Lastly, it is ofnote that Author 2 thought a five-minute practice might be too long for an online course,especially when done daily, but the same duration worked well for the in-person course,according to

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Xinyu Zhang, West Virginia University; Lizzie Santiago, West Virginia University; Stefanie Paige Hines, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Works In Progress

future recruitment efforts to attract engineering students with a diverse background,particularly the underrepresented populations. This paper reported progress of the first objective.Introduction/BackgroundThe importance of diversity in the U. S. engineering workforce has been recognized. Lack ofworkforce diversity in engineering fields has been related to the poor recruitment and retentionof educationally disadvantaged students or underrepresented groups in engineering [1]. Researchhas identified factors preventing those students from pursuing and completing a STEM degreeand strategies to increase diversity in STEM programs such as summer camps/bridge programs,pipeline programs, pre-college programs, targeted programs, and integrated approach

Conference Session

Technical Session S2B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Stephany Coffman-Wolph, Ohio Northern University; John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Topics

Workshops

Clue.References[1] S. Coffman-Wolph and K. Gray, “Computer coding scavenger hunt using quick response codes (resource exchange),” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, 2020.

Conference Session

Technical Session S1C

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Peter J. Shull, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona Campus

Tagged Topics

Workshops

ideal for both 1) first year (success) classes and 2) facultyteaching any discipline related class.Faculty who desire to provide student with methods to improve performance in their class will findthese LC—HI methods both effective and efficient. From a faculty perspective they are intuitive,very easy to implement, require little time to introduce, create opportunity for studentaccountability, will not detract from time on topical material, and a high percentage of studentswill use them.References[1] W. C. Leuwerke, S. Robbins, R. Sawyer and M. Hovland, Predicting engineering major status from mathematics achievement and interest congruence, Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 2004, pp. 135–149.[2] B. F. French, J. C. Immekus and W

Conference Session

Technical Session T1B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Amanda Marie Singer, Michigan Technological University; Katrina L Carlson, Michigan Technological University; Akua B. Oppong-Anane, Montana Technological University; Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University; Sarah Tan, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Full Papers

process an engineer. and testing out my prototypes” Prior K-12 exposure to “I chose my college major because I took a Experiences engineering and other circuits class when I was in high school, and I STEM topics. Prior STEM was very interested in it, so I knew I wanted to do courses taken during high something in the electrical field… Enjoyed this school; participation in type of work in FIRST robotics.” STEM extracurriculars. Outcome Expected outcomes of “I wanted a degree that utilizes STEM courses Expectation choosing to major in and has high job placement.” s

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Elizabeth A. Powell, Tennessee Technological University; Harry T Ingle Jr., Tennessee Technological University; Kumar Yelamarthi, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Topics

Works In Progress

-13/ALL_MAJORS/X/X/home/ (accessed May 27, 2022).[9] S. B. Robbins, I-S Oh, H. Le, and C. Button, Christopher, “Intervention effects on collegeperformance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors:Integrated meta-analytic path analyses,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 94, no. 5, pp.1163-1184, 2009, DOI: 10.1037/a0015738.[10] C. Cairncross, T. VanDeGrift, S. Jones, Sharon, and L. Chelton, “Best practices for advisingat-risk first-year engineering students, 7th First Year Engineering Experience Conference,August 3-4, Roanoke, VA, 2015,https://pilotscholars.up.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=egr_facpubs[11] W. R. Habley, “Key concepts in academic advising. In Summer Institute on

Conference Session

Technical Session T1A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Susan L. Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University; Jon Sticklen, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

development, and well-being," American psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, p. 68, 2000, doi: https://doi.apa.org/doi/ 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68. [6] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and M. T. Knott, "An examination of the relationships between expectancies, values, achievement, and career intentions for freshman engineering students," presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, 2010, 2010. [7] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. New York: Freeman, 1997. [8] M. V. Covington, Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Nada Veskovic, Lehigh Carbon Community College

Tagged Topics

Works In Progress

?” and “What isyour experience with the student leader’s help?” Their responses indicated one hundred percentpositive feedback to the introduction of conceptual questions and a student leader to the class.References[1] Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness, “Fall 2021 Facts & Figures,” lccc.edu.https://portal%2Dna.campusm.exlibrisgroup.com/assets/LehighCarbonCommunityCollege/LehighCarbonCommunityCollege/CS-Assets/Intranet/Institutional-Research/Fall-2021-Fact-Book-Intranet.pdf (accessed: July 14, 2022).[2] R. Ajjawi, M. Dracup, N. Zacharias, S. Bennett, and D. Boud, “Persisting students’explanations of and emotional responses to academic failure,” Higher Education Research &Development, vol. 39:2, pp. 185-199, 2020.[3] V

Conference Session

Technical Session T1A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Jessica Martin, Baylor University; Jana Roste, Baylor University; Austin T. Smith, Baylor University; Shane Michael Meyer, Baylor University; Emma G Cartisano, Baylor University; Emily Sandvall, Baylor University; Andrea Pouso Morales, Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Full Papers

a growing number of STEM roles.Marginalized populations are disproportionately absent from these fields, which NationalScience Foundation (NSF) has sought to address through the funding of programs aimed atimproving STEM students’ success [1]-[2]. Thus, Baylor University created the Engineering andComputer Science (ECS) Scholars Program—a NSF-funded program to support the success ofhigh achieving, low income (HALI) STEM students. Because student success literatureoverwhelmingly evidences the positive relationship between involvement and success [3]-[4],this study explored how HALI STEM students in the ECS Scholars Program perceive andexperience involvement and success as related to their most salient identities.Guiding Research Question(s

Conference Session

Technical Session S2A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Topics

Workshops

which is part of the curriculum. Students work in 4–6-member heterogeneous groupsproviding a comfortable environment to ask questions and learn. SCLC further strengthens thelearning community built in the SSBP.Monthly Socials: To strengthen the learning community, 3 to 4 monthly socials throughout eachsemester will allow students to interact with invited professionals and upperclassmen in aninformal setting. Each monthly social will revolve around a theme and speaker(s), for example,reducing stress during midterms and finals, time management, setting high expectations,undergraduate research, international experiences, community engagement, etc.Progress Reports: Progress reports help students monitor their academic performance throughoutthe

Conference Session

Technical Session M5C

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Surupa Shaw, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

motivation,thought, and prove to be a potentially important learning tool. They underlined the role of technology as acontributor to variety, challenge, means of interaction, generation of artifacts, physical and intellectualaccessibility of information. J. Hawkins et al. [2] however pointed out the need of presenting scientific enquiryin a way that the students learn to develop questions and problems, recognize their own ideas and knowledge-states, learn to explore the consequences of alternative ideas, and juxtapose and try out interactions of this newinformation with their own beliefs. S. Bell [3] suggested the application-based projects as a targeted tool thatis guided by an inquiry question that drives the research and allows students to apply

Conference Session

Technical Session T1B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Jenahvive K. Morgan, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

-To-Face,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1-16, Dec. 2014.[7] J.K. Morgan, R. Solhmirzaei, and H. Salehi, “Improving Team Performance in First-YearEngineering Students” 126th ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Tampa, Florida, June 15-192019.[8] J.K. Morgan, “Examination of the Development of Grit in First-Year Engineering Students”10th FYEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Glassboro, New Jersey, July 24-26 2018.[9] A. L. Duckworth, C. Peterson, M. D. Matthews, and D. R. Kelly, “Grit: Perseverance andPassion for Long-Term Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp.1087-1101, 2007.[10] E. S. Elliott and C. S. Dweck, “Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol

Conference Session

Technical Session M5A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Sean P Brophy, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); John H Cole, Purdue University; Srinivas Mohan Dustker, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); William C. Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Full Papers

Paper ID #36361Full Paper: First-Year Computing Course with Multiple ComputingEnvironments - Integrating Excel, Python and MATLABDr. Sean P Brophy, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Sean Brophy is a learning scientist, computer scientist and mechanical engineer with expertise in developing and research effective learning environments. His research centers on developing engineering students’ expertise to adapt to new problem solving contexts.Dr. John H Cole, Purdue University John H. Cole (S’10–M’12) received the B.S.E.E. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Andrew Assadollahi, P.E., Christian Brothers University; Mardarius Liddell Thomas, Christian Brothers University

Tagged Topics

Works In Progress

student selectsappropriate courses for their degree program and optimizing their roadmap towards graduation.References[1] Hasenwinkel, J. and Mack, S. (2021) “Holistic, Wrap-Around, Advising Model to Support Student Success and Professional Development” AIChE Annual Meeting, November, 2021.[2] Assadollahi, A. “Using Proactive Advising in a First-Year Introductory Engineering Course“ ASEE First Year Engineering Experience Conference, East Lansing, MI 2020.

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Erica J Marti, University of Nevada - Las Vegas

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Works In Progress

; Zurhellen, H. S. (1978). Student attitudes toward the grade contract. Improving College and University Teaching, 26(4), 239-242.[7] Frank, T., & Scharff, L. L. (2013). Learning contracts in undergraduate courses: Impacts on student behaviors and academic performance. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 36-53.[8] Hiller, T. B., & Hietapelto, A. B. (2001). Contract grading: Encouraging commitment to the learning process through voice in the evaluation process. Journal of Management Education, 25(6), 660-684.[9] Inoue, A. B. (2019). Labor-based grading contracts: Building equity and inclusion in the compassionate writing classroom. WAC Clearinghouse.[10] Carillo, E. C. (2021). The

Conference Session

Technical Session M5C

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Kelly Salyards P.E., Bucknell University; Benjamin B Wheatley, Bucknell University; Katsuyuki Wakabayashi, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

for sustaining and continually improving thiscourse. Factors to consider include: transitions for coordination team, future course themes andcomplementary campus partners, ongoing data collection (pre- and post- student surveys, facultyinput, etc.), and a regular assessment period.References [1] Vigeant, M., Velegol, S., Baish, J., Kozick, R., Zaccone, R., and Ziemian, R. (2003), Restructure Exploring Engineering at Bucknell University. Presented at 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, TN. [2] Vigeant, M., & Marosi, K., and Ziemian, R. (2007), Evaluating the seminar model for first year engineering education, Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference &

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Jennifer I Clark, Montana State University - Bozeman; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Works In Progress

: Perspectives on the ecology of human development, P. Moen, G. H. Elder Jr., and K. Lüscher, Eds. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1995, pp. 619–647.[16] U. Bronfenbrenner, “The bioecological model from a life course perspective: Reflections of a participant observer,” in Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development, P. Moen, G. H. Elder Jr., and K. Lüscher, Eds. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1995, pp. 599–618.[17] M. Ashley, K. M. Cooper, J. M. Cala, and S. E. Brownell, “Building better bridges into stem: A synthesis of 25 years of literature on stem summer bridge programs,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-05-0085.[18

Conference Session

Technical Session M5B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Michael Cross, Norwich University; David M. Feinauer P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Roger J Marino P.E., Drexel University; James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Johanna P Casale, Drexel University

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

Teaching Practices during a Covid Environment," in Middle Atlantic ASEE Section Spring 2021 Conference, 2021.[4] C. M. Wigal, "Teaching the Design Process in a HyFlex Environment," Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, vol. 21, no. 10, 09/30 2021, doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v21i10.4637.[5] U. J. T. Garcia, K. Pakala, S. Schauer, D. Bairaktarova, and B. Chittoori, "Evaluating STEM Course Re-Design Strategies in Light of COVID-19," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[6] R. J. Marino, M. Cross, D. M. Feinauer, J. R. McCusker, and J. P. Casale, "Including Multi-Disciplinary Project Awareness in First Year Introduction to Engineering Courses," in 2021 First-Year

Conference Session

Technical Session M5C

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

William C. Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Srinivas Mohan Dustker, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Full Papers

Not recommend recommend Figure 1. Learning Community EvaluationThe LC has attracted more diverse students. The Women in Engineering and the MinorityEngineering Programs use it as part of their recruiting because of the success they have seenwithin the populations they serve. The LC has consistently drawn higher percentages of femalestudents [15] remaining at or above 40%’s female. Figure 2 shows the last two years comparedto the overall college demographics. The LC aligns with much of the research on diversity withits design in context of human, community and environment needs, strong mentoring, leadershipopportunities and authentic design. Prior studies have shown

Conference Session

Technical Session S2C

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

William C. Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Workshops

Agenda topics Minutes • Introduction to the workshop, agenda and format 5 • Overview of Community-Engaged Learning 15 o Key characteristics and essential elements • Successful models 10 o Which fits my own course • Getting started, what are the first steps 10 o How would I start in my own course(s) • Community partners 10 o Finding partners o Reciprocal partnerships • Reflection 10 o Models to use

Conference Session

Technical Session M5A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

John Cole, The University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Full Papers

included everything from the previous phase along with the following: a. The sub-problem you selected to discuss, from Phase 2. This will be different for each group member, and will be graded individually. Go into enough detail so that I will understand your pseudocode and diagrams, below. This will typically require a paragraph or more. b. The platform(s) on which your part runs. c. Finally, you must complete the following for your sub-problem only: (Your document must have these parts in this order.) Pseudocode and flowcharts that are entirely linear, without branching or looping, are probably too simplistic to meet requirements ii and iii

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Madison Jeffrey, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Mark Mills, UM, Center for Academic Innovation

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Works In Progress

swayed by characteristics andperceptions of students, instructors must approach the practice with a complete understanding ofwhat those ratings reflect. Establishing best practices for peer assessment in how it is conducted,determining the subject matter, and how it is reviewed is integral to the growth of small learningpractices and its positive impacts on the student experience.References[1] M. Donia, T. O’Neill, & S. Brutus. (2018). The longitudinal effects of peer feedback in the development and transfer of student teamwork skills. In Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 87-98.[2] C. Brooks & J. Ammons. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Stephany Coffman-Wolph, Ohio Northern University; John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Works In Progress

. Slater, “Who Gets to Die of Dysentery? Ideology, Geography, and The Oregon Trail,” Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 4, Winter 2017, pp. 374-395.[3] B. Bigelow, “On the Road to Cultural Bias: A Critique of The Oregon Trail CD-ROM,” Language Arts, vol. 74, no. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 84-93.[4] S. Coffman-Wolph and J. K. Estell, “Playing in the Sandbox: Developing Entrepreneurial Mindset Communication Skills in Introductory Programming Students,” in Proc. 2022 ASEE North Central Sect. Conf., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Mar. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/39256[5] J. K. Estell and D. Reeping, “Providing Authentic Experiences in the First Year: Designing Educational Software in Support of Service Learning

Conference Session

Technical Session T1A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Christopher John Brigham, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Afsaneh Ghanavati, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

About Leaving,” Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997.[7] P. A. Daempfle, “Analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, and engineering majors,” U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 2002.[8] K. Reid, and D. Reeping. "A classification scheme for “introduction to engineering” courses: defining first-year courses based on descriptions, outcomes, and assessment." 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 24-24. 2014.[9] J. Sticklen, D. Briedis, C.E. Vergara, M. Urban-Lurain, R. S. DeGraaf, L. Paquette, R. Heckman, N. Buch, and T. F. Wolff. "Engaging Early Engineering Students (EEES): A Fourth Year Report from an NSF STEP Project." 2013 ASEE Annual

Conference Session

Technical Session M5B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Heath Aren Schluterman, University of Arkansas; Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Brandon Crisel; Candace Auburn Rainwater, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

that as instructors, we are also still adjusting to a newnormal. Our hope is to continue to adapt to the students’ needs while helping them understandwhat is required to be a good sophomore engineering student.References[1] Park, J. J., Park, M., Jackson, K., & Vanhoy, G. (2020). Remote Engineering Education under COVID-19 Pandemic Environment. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 5(1), 160-166.[2] Grodotzki, J., Upadhya, S., & Tekkaya, A. E. (2021). Engineering education amid a global pandemic. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 3, 100058.[3] A. Hamad, A. P. Rehmat, G. Panther and H. A. Diefes-Dux, "Challenges and Successes of Engineering Instructors