,www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-centered-design.html.[3] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction —Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems. ISO 9241-210:2019, ISO, 2019,www.iso.org/standard/77520.html.[4] Allen, T. E., & Chen, D. (2018, June), Patient Centered Design in Undergraduate BiomedicalEngineering Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah.10.18260/1-2--30860[5] Guilford, W. H., & Keeley, M., & Helmke, B. P., & Allen, T. E. (2019, June), Work in Progress: AClinical Immersion Program for Broad Curricular Impact Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33581[6] Kadlowec
, pp. 32-38, 2003.[6] T. A. Nocera, A. Ortiz-Rosario, A. Shermadou and D. A. Delaine, "How Do Biomedical Engineering Graduates Differ from Other Engineers? Bridging the Gap Between BME and Industry: a Case Study," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[7] C. P. Rivera, A. Haung-Saad, C. Wang and A. A. Wang, "Preparing early career biomedical undergraduates through investigations of stakeholder needs: A qualitative analysis," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020.[8] S. Higbee and S. Miller, "Work in Progress: Vertical Integration of Engineering Design in an Under-graduate BME Curriculum," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[9] J. Xue, T. Wu, Y. Dai and Y. Xia, "Electrospinning and
ofindividual scores (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05). On average the mean of team scores was 18±3%higher than the mean of individual scores, resulting in a learning gain of 36±8%.Student perceptions of the testing environmentThe Intervention group spanned three different semester offerings of the course in 2017 (n=64students), 2018 (n=65), and 2019 (n=70). Figure 1 shows responses to three Likert-stylequestions about student perceptions of the collaborative testing activity broken down by semesterand summed for the total Intervention group. 78% of students agreed or strongly agreed thatdiscussion of the test with a team helped improve their scores, whereas 5% disagreed or stronglydisagreed, and 18% were not sure. 74% of students agreed or strongly agreed
standards in problem solving and written communication while retaining high student favor.References[1] Saterbak, A., & Volz, T. “Implementing Calibrated Peer Review To Enhance TechnicalCritiquing Skills In A Bioengineering Laboratory Paper”, 2008 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2008, pp. 13.708.1-13.708.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2—3128[2] Feldman, J. Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schoolsand classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin, a SAGE Company, 2019.[3] Smeding, Darnon, C., Souchal, C., Toczek-Capelle, M.-C., & Butera, F. Reducing the Socio-Economic Status Achievement Gap at University by Promoting Mastery-Oriented Assessment,”PLOS One, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. e71678–e71678
. Kadlowec, T. Merrill, S. Sood, J. Greene Ryan, A. Attaluri, and R. Hirsh, “Clinical Immersion and Team-based Design: Into a Third Year,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, June 24-28, 2017, Columbus, Ohio. [Online]. Available: ASEE PEER, Doi: 10.18260/1-2—28040.[7] W. H. Guilford, M. Keeley, B. P. Helmke, and T. E. Allen. "Work in Progress: A Clinical Immersion Program for Broad Curricular Impact," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15, 2019, Tampa, Florida. [Online]. Available: ASEE PEER, Doi: 10.18260/1-2—33581.[8] C. King, D. Salvo, J. Wang, S. Rao, R. Sreedasyam, A. Kulkarni, S. Braich, and I. Sharma. Work in progress: Development of virtual reality platform for
Numbers of Students and Its Effect on Engineering Design Self-efficacy,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Mar. 21, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-skills-focused-approach-to-teaching-design- fundamentals-to-large-numbers-of-students-and-its-effect-on-engineering-design-self- efficacy[4] T. P. Carpenter et al., “Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis,” Behav. Res. Methods, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 2194–2208, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3.[5] A. G. Greenwald, B. A. Nosek, and M. R. Banaji, “Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol
Immersion 2015.8. Breanne, P. and D.D. John, The DeFINE Program: A Clinical Immersion for Biomedical Needs Identification. ASEE Conferences: Seattle, Washington.9. Jennifer, K., et al., Work-In-Progress: Clinical Immersion and Team-Based Engineering Design. ASEE Conferences: Seattle, Washington.10. Singh, A., et al., Efficacy of Clinical Simulation-Based Training in Biomedical Engineerig Education. J Biomech Eng, 2019. 141(12): 121011(7 pages).11. Siewerdsen, J.H., et al., Surgineering: Curriculum Concept for Experiencial Learning in Upper-Level Biomedical Engineering. Int J Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2020. 15: p. 1-14.12. Ackerman, J., Schaar, R. , Clinical Observational Design
-writing- style/reflective-writing (accessed 2021).[19] D. Boud, R. Keogh, and D. Walker, Eds. Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge, 1985, p. 172.[20] D. Schon, The reflective practioner - How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.[21] D. Chatterjee, J. Ford, J. Rojewski, and S. Watts, "Exploring the impact of formal internships on biomedical graduate and postgraduate careers: An interview study," CBE-Life Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. ar20, pp. 1-13, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-09-0199.[22] K. Csavina and C. Nethken, "Assessing student understanding of reflection in engineering education," presented at the ASEE 123rd Annual Conference and
Curriculum.” ASEEConference Proceedings, 2022.[3] R. R. Hake, "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-studentsurvey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses," American Journal ofPhysics, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64-74[4] N. T. Buswell, B. K. Jesiek, C. D. Troy, R. R. Essig, and J. Boyd, “Engineering instructors onwriting:Perceptions, practices, and needs,” IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 55–74, Mar. 2019.[5] K. Topping, “Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities,” Review ofEducational Research, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 249–276, 1998.[6] K. Cho, & C.MacArthur. “Learning by reviewing.” Journal of Educational Psychology,2011.103(1), 73–84.[7] E. F. Gehringer, “Helping students to
/1-27/9. Accessed: Jan. 27, 2022.[8] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, “The role of role-play in student awareness of the social dimension of the engineering profession,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 882–905, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1624691.[9] J. E. Lewis and D. Wheatley, “Using a Mock Hearing to Engage Students in Critical Thinking,” presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.1602.1-22.1602.13. Accessed: Jan. 21, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-a-mock-hearing-to-engage-students-in-critical-thinking[10] J. L. Carlson and N. T. Skaggs, “Learning by Trial and Error: A Case for Moot Courts,” Journal of
://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002.[4] M. Wilkerson, V. Maldonado, S. Sivaraman, R. R. Rao, and M. Elsaadany, "Incorporating immersive learning into biomedical engineering laboratories using virtual reality," Journal of Biological Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 20, 2022/08/08 2022, doi: 10.1186/s13036-022- 00300-0.[5] S. Robert, "Biomedical Engineering Virtual Circuit Simulation Laboratories," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007/06/24, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/2171.[6] P. D. Ryan, M. Dominik, and T. G. Cheryl, "WIP: Pilot Study for the Effect of Simulated Laboratories on the Motivation of Biological Engineering Students
virtual community ofpractice for biomedical engineering (BME) and bioengineering (BIOE) educators interested inimproving educational practices. BEEC utilizes online platforms such as Slack (SlackTechnologies LLC., San Francisco CA) and Zoom (Zoom Video Communications Inc., San Jose,CA) to allow educators to communicate through both text and video mediums. To advertise theBEEC virtual community to educators, announcements have been made at the American Societyof Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference during Biomedical Engineering Division(BED) events and meetings, through the ASEE BED’s monthly newsletter and website, anddirectly through the BEEC community email list to encourage members to recruit others whomay be interested in joining
explore how SDL, andspecific prompts, could present in stories as components of the construct of empathy. Zaki’smodel (2019) guided our investigation, a framework for empathy that considers its emotional,cognitive, and action-focused aspects. In our study, we sought to answer the following researchquestions (RQs): • RQ1: How do unique story prompts elicit different aspects of empathy from Zaki’s model, including sharing, thinking about, and caring about others? • RQ2: How do biomedical engineering students self-perceptions of empathy correspond to external evaluations of empathy from stories shared?We elaborate further on Zaki’s model and empathy in Section 2. We then detail “The Art ofTelling Your Story” and its prompts in
. Williams, “OPINION: Why EM? The potential benefits of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset.,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2018.[7] M. Dyer, “STEAM without hot air: strategy for educating creative engineers,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 74–85, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2019.1693122.[8] N.-H. Kang, “A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea,” Asia-Pac. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y.[9] M. Mcauliffe, “The potential benefits of divergent thinking and metacognitive skills in STEAM learning: A discussion paper,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Change, vol. 2, no. 3, May
? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 463–492, Apr. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373.[4] C. Kepple and K. Coble, “Investigating potential influences of graduate teaching assistants on students’ sense of belonging in introductory physics labs,” PERC Proc., pp. 282–287, 2019.[5] S. M. Love Stowell et al., “Transforming Graduate Training in STEM Education,” Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 317–323, Apr. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.317.[6] N. M. Trautmann and M. E. Krasny, “Integrating Teaching and Research: A New Model for Graduate Education