- Conference Session
- Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Barbara Groh, University of Texas at Austin; Christopher Grady Rylander; Michael Cullinan, University of Texas at Austin; Dipankar Behera
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)
learning new skills with a semester-long independentdesign project. Every week, students attend a lecture dedicated to teaching and exemplifying theskills necessary for the week. Following the lecture, students have a weekly 4-hour, TA-ledlaboratory section that is split into a pre-lab consisting of tutorials for building the skills necessaryto complete the laboratory assignments and actual work on the lab within the context of theirdesign project. A schedule of the weekly topics covered can be found in Appendix A and arrangedsuch that students simultaneously develop their skills in CAE and apply those new skills to thedesign of their project.The design project chosen is a fidget toy colloquially known as a fidget spinner. This was chosenfor the
- Conference Session
- Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Raissa Seichi Marchiori, University of Alabama; Siyuan Song, The University of Alabama; Jewoong Moon, University of Alabama; Sepehr Khorshid, University of Alabama
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)
training, workforce development, and engineering education. Through these research topics, Raissa has been publishing papers for peer-reviewed journal and conference pro- ceedings. Also, she is part of Dr. Siyuan Song’s research lab, the Safety Automation and Visualization Environment (SAVE) Laboratory, which integrates technologies and education themes to improve build- ing performance and safety engineering.Dr. Siyuan Song, The University of Alabama : Dr. Siyuan Song is an assistant professor and the director of the Safety Automation and Visualization Environment (SAVE) Laboratory in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineer- ing at the University of Alabama (UA). Prior to joining UA, she was
- Conference Session
- Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Erik Schettig, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Jeremy V. Ernst, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide; Daniel P. Kelly, Texas Tech University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)
. The traditional instructional model, often a large class sizeor laboratory setting, involves lecture-based content instruction with students completing workoutside of scheduled course time (6). This formal learning environment is ineffective for mostlearners (17). Students at risk of non-matriculation are especially disadvantaged with atraditional lecture-based content delivery format (18, 19, 20). Students at risk of non-matriculation in engineering degree programs include students whose GPA is less than 3.0 andincludes individuals identifying as an underrepresented minority, or first-generation collegestudents. (21). As self-efficacy and academic success, including spatial visualization skills, play anessential role in engineering
- Conference Session
- Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Joshua Gargac, Ohio Northern University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)
weldmentsfeatures were more likely to mention application to their hobbies (i.e. roll cages for race cars,Baja, etc.), whereas students selecting sheet metal modeling were often motivated by a positiveexperience bending metal in a manufacturing laboratory course. Figure 5: Student selected their exploration topic for a variety of reasons.Overall AssessmentStudent performance was tracked for each project and is shown in Table 8. Additionally, a post-course survey was administered by the instructor on the last day of the semester (Friday of Week15). The students were asked to rate their competency with the course objectives on a Likertscale where Strongly Disagree corresponded to a score of 1 and Strongly Agree corresponded toa score of 5. Overall