methods and use of information technology in operations management. Her work is primarily in manufacturing and healthcare delivery operations. She also worked in sheet metal manufacturing and pipe fabrication industry as a process engineer for several years. She obtained her Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering and M.S. in Industrial Engineering from Binghamton University (SUNY); and her Bachelor’s is in Computer Engineering.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of the grant entitled De- veloping Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by Utilizing Integrated Online Modules and a Leadership Cohort. Facilitated
Associate Professor with the chemistry, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi ArabiaKhaled Saleem S. Alatawi, University of Tabuk Khaled S. Alatawi received the B.S. in electrical engineering from King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, in 2008, the M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from University of Denver, Denver, CO in 2013, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from University of Denver, Denver, CO, in 2019. Now, he is an Assistant Professor with the Electrical Engineering Department, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 An Accelerator of Human Innovation: Integrating Continuous
37 17.45% 55 21.15% Prefer not to answer 27 12.74% 29 11.15% I identify as a person with a disability 23 10.85% 11 4.23% Group(s) not listed above: 21 9.91% 7 2.69% I identify as LGBTQ+ 7 3.30% 8 3.08% Total sample n 212 260Note: Reference sample for check all that apply is the preceding multiple choice question(gender)Group(s) not listed above: Hub Regional Pre-Survey Hub Local Pre-Survey -Black -Jewish -Veteran
, M. Henderson, E. Creely, A. A. Carvalho, M. Cernochova, D. Dash, T. Davisand P. Mishra, "Creativity and risk-taking in teaching and learning settings: Insights from sixinternational narratives," International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.1-11, 2021.[6] N.R. Kuncel, S. Hezlett, and D. Ones, "Academic performance, career potential, creativity,and job performance: Can one construct predict them all?," J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 102, no. 3, pp.599-616, Aug. 2010.[7] P. C. Wankat, R. M. Felder, K. A. Smith and F. S. Oreovicz, "The scholarship of teachingand learning in engineering," in Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching andLearning: Exploring Common Ground, vol. 1, Indiana University Press, 2002, pp. 217
skill [23], perspective orway of thinking [24], [25], or compilation of skills and attitudes [26], [27]. Kuratko, Fisher, andAudretsch’s [28] study from a business context describes EM as consisting of three aspects:cognitive, behavioral, and emotional, positing that without all three working together, anindividual’s EM has not reached its fullest potential.The KEEN 3Cs framework captures multiple elements of EM, including motivations, skills, andoutcomes. London et al.’s [12] study developed a conceptual framework for the 3Cs that includesboth mindset outcomes (attitudes) and behavioral outcomes (actions). For example, Curiosity isassociated with the mindset outcome “willingness to challenge accepted solutions” (p. 7), andthe behavioral
% 4.36% 2 or More 3.09% 3.26% 3.05% (n=150) Native Amr 0% 0.09% 0.14% (n=4) Hawaiian(n=0) 0% 0% 0% Table 1. Demographic classification of the data of 4796 studentsStatistical method S Statistical software SPSS version 24 was used to analyze the data. First, generativedescriptive statistics are used to develop a preliminary understanding of the data. Second, A One-Way ANOVA analysis is conducted. To ascertain whether there are any statistically significantdifferences between the means of three or more independent (unrelated) groups, the one
. Students also integrate artinto the design to create an organic shape of fish and craftily shape the fins and tail into the moldto get fish features.3.2 ParticipantsThe participants were students in an Industrial Engineering course at a tribal university withABET Accredited Engineering programs. Six students participated in the course, consisting offive males and one female, aged 20- 36.3.3 Data Collection Instrument(s)The results were collected using a metacognitive reflection assignment consisting of twosections, Part 1 - Photovoice Reflection Prompts and Part 2 - Open-Ended Reflection Questions,with three questions in each area. Each student received a Metacognitive Reflection Assessmentwith Part 1- Photovoice Reflection Prompts and Part 2
one metric (See Table5). For instance, Students 6, 7, 9 and 10 experienced changes for ToA in excess of 10%, with thefirst three experiencing sharp increases and the last showing a substantial decrease. Students 6and 7 also registered similar increases in nAch and GSE, respectively. Students 2 and 4experienced >10% declines in nAch, but Student 12 shows a noteworthy increase in GSE. Thesespikes might be part of the dataset’s background noise. Alternatively, they suggest a trend thatmay prove detectable by a larger study. They certainly beg a few direct questions. Why, forexample, did Student 6’s ToA rise by 25%? A qualitative study might have yielded insight intothis comparatively large change, and future work in this area could benefit
system(s) that are mimicked and engineering discipline(s) that bio-inspireddesign is used and applied to.STEAM stands for science, technology, engineering, art, and math. It is an innovative expansion fromSTEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) that incorporates artistic elements (the study of thehumanities, language arts, dance, drama, music, visual arts, design, new media and more) into STEMeducation [26][27]. Due to artistic elements, engineering students are engaged and motivated when learningengineering subjects. The challenge of STEAM is how to effectively relate engineering subjects to art.2.4 Contribution to LiteratureThis research demonstrates how bioengineering and bio-inspired design can be used to engage students
necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References 1. SE. Zappe, SL. Cutler, & L. Gase. 2023. A Systematic Review of the Impacts of Entrepreneurial Support Programs in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Fields. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 6(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274211040422 2. F. Hasson, S. Keeney, and H. McKenna. 2000. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey. Journal of Advance Nursing, vol. 32, pp. 1008-1015. 3. F. Hasson, and S. Keeney, “Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research,” 2011, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 78, pp. 1695-1704. 4. P. Wainwright, A. Gallagher, H. Tompsett, & C. Atkins. 2010. The use of vignettes within a
. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495-527. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883- 9026(99)00054-3Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313-321.Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354.Balven, R., Fenters, V., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. (2018). Academic entrepreneurship: The roles of identity, motivation, championing, education, work-life balance, and organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 21
assessment tools and managing the data from the five institutions. The authors wantto thank Dr. Brandy Blake from Georgia Institute of Technology for her great consulting.References:[1] N. H. Hensel, “Characteristics of Excellence in Undergraduate Research.,” 2012.[2] S. E. Zappe, S. L. Cutler, and L. Gase, “A Systematic Review of the Impacts of Entrepreneurial Support Programs in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Fields,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–31, 2023.[3] A. Olson, D. Melton, and M. Johnson, “KEEN Top Resources: The basics of EM in a single card,” Engineering Unleashed, Oct. 07, 2020.[4] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers. Cham
. Barlow, D. Kogan, B. D. Veazey, and J. K. Sweeney, “Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: Career paths survey results,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 394–409, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-04-0018.[4] K. Kricorian, M. Seu, D. Lopez, E. Ureta, and O. Equils, “Factors influencing participation of underrepresented students in STEM fields: matched mentors and mindsets,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 16, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00219-2.[5] T. Chavous, S. Leath, and R. Gámez, “Climate, Mentoring, and Persistence Among Underrepresented STEM Doctoral Students,” High. Educ. Today, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.higheredtoday.org/2018/06/25/climate-mentoring-persistence
] Bureau of Economic Analysis U.S. Department of Commerce, “Gross Domestic Product, 4th Quarter and Year 2020,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.bea.gov/news/2021/gross-domestic-product-4th-quarter-and-year-2020- advance-estimate. [Accessed: 18-Feb-2021].[6] L. Moon, “Industry 4.0: The Future of Competitiveness in U.S. Manufacturing,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://imcpa.com/industry-4-0-future-competitiveness-u-s- manufacturing/. [Accessed: 02-Aug-2021].[7] J. M. Haynie, D. Shepherd, E. Mosakowski, and P. C. Earley, “A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 217–229, 2010.[8] R. D. Ireland, M. A. Hitt, and D. G. Sirmon, “A Model of
students approach engineering problems in the workplace.This study has been limited thus far by a small sample size of students, which will likely increaseas the course is offered each year. Additionally, future work will aim to identify how the courseimpacts students’ entrepreneurial mindsets and career goals long-term in their senior capstoneprojects. As the course gains interest among engineering students, this study will also aim tounderstand how different engineering majors are influenced by the course activities.References[1] B. Schadl, S. Sheppard, and H. Chen, “Career Certainty: Differences Between Career Certain and Uncertain Engineering Students,” in ASEE , 2017.[2] B. Hughes, W. Schell, B. Tallman, R. Beigel, E. Annand, and M
. Senior, “What is AgTech?,” AgtechThinking - technology & entrepreneurship in agriculture, Oct. 12, 2020. https://agtechthinking.com/2020/10/12/the-4th-agricultural- revolution/ (accessed Dec. 13, 2022).[2] S. István, “Messages from ‘industry 4.0’ to agriculture,” in Towards Sustainable Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, A. Nyéki, A. J. Kovács, and G. Milics, Eds. Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Ltd., 2017, pp. 63–77. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aniko- Nyeki/publication/335339931_Towards_sustainable_agriculture_and_biosystems_engine ering_book_Edited_by_Aniko_Nyeki_Attila_J_Kovacs_Gabor_Milics/links/5d765da492 851cacdb2caef0/Towards-sustainable-agriculture-and-biosystems
interviews. It maynot be able to reflect the full extent and complexity of entrepreneurship education. The modelproposed here is intended to be a starting point for discussion rather than a fully validated model.In the future, we would like to continue to conduct a deeper investigation of program setups toinclude co-curricular and extracurricular activities in our program analysis. We would also like tointerview more universities to understand if the model captures the elements in other universitiesas well. The authors would like to receive feedback and welcome collaborations on this topic.References[1] E. Fisher, A. R. Reuber, S. Business, and T. Branch, The state of entrepreneurship in Canada. Industry Canada Ottawa, ON, 2010.[2] I. Government
"Project-based learning: A review of the literature," risk factors associated with different project Improving schools, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 267-277, environments and delivery models helps engineers better manage and mitigate risks, especially in 2016. projects with high uncertainty and complexity. [8] G. Solomon, "Project-Based Learning: a Primer.(2003)," Retrieved January, vol. 22, 2016.We want to conclude with an important note. Due to individual [9] S. Santos, G. Alexandre, and A
technology. Students enrolledin the minor of industrial robot courses were required to participate in real-world projects.Sixteen students participated in this project, six of the students are seniors, and ten weresophomores. All the students participated in the project but only fourteen of them submitted thecompleted photovoice metacognitive reflection assignments [16].3.3 Data Collection Instrument(s)The data collected from the participating students through the implementation of the newapproach through students’ reflections promotes. The open-ended survey questions were given tothe students to reflect on their perspectives during the project implementations. The open-endedsurvey questions are provided here [17]. 1. Explain how participating in
were given the option of selecting their project team members.Two students worked individually, and six worked in groups of two. Participants’ gender andrace were not collected or used for the purpose of this study. The university IRB approved theresearch, and all participants were informed that the project would be used for research.3.3 Data Collection Instrument(s)All students in the class were required to complete a photovoice reflection assignment as part oftheir four milestone submissions [17]. Photovoice is a qualitative learning assessment tooldeveloped in the mid-1990s as a participatory methodology [18]. The tool has been modified andadapted in pedagogical research to observe students learning and study their engagement inlearning
(NAPE) Foundation and theDavid Okai Okantey Foundation. Any opinions, findings & conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofNAPE Foundation or the David Okai Okantey Foundation.References[1] “History,” Palm Institute. https://palm.edu.gh/about-us/history (accessed Jan. 18, 2023).[2] “Palm Institute adopts Honour System,” Citinewsroom - Comprehensive News in Ghana, May 13, 2021. https://citinewsroom.com/2021/05/palm-institute-adopts-honour-system/ (accessed Feb. 09, 2023).[3] “Palm Institute adopts the Honour System,” Palm Institute. https://palm.edu.gh/about-us/honour-system/ (accessed Feb. 09, 2023).[4] M. Nager, C. Nelsen, and F. Nouyrigat
Paper ID #37514Undergraduate students are the ”secret sauce” to help research programsbe successfulDr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University KEN VAN TREUREN is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor Univer- sity and serves as the Associate Dean in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in 1977 and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in 1978. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom in 1994. He then taught at the USAF Academy until his military
-endedproblem-solving is because of the limited guidance or literature on how to effectively integratewicked, real-world problems into engineering courses at the level of technical core.1.1 Current Approaches: Capstone Design and Co-op/InternshipIt is known that capstone experiences instituted in various formats do provide an effectiveculminating opportunity to engineering students for gaining a real-world experience with theengineering design process. However, since capstone projects come at the very last semester(s)and since each project cannot cover the whole range of technical areas that students are expectedto learn in their degree program, this approach cannot be the only solution for creating learningexperiences that support the growth of
evenjust awareness of the secondary and tertiary curricula could help both levels. However, it is stillrare to have this kind of pipeline. In the next section, we will focus on a case of a high schoolprogram and its connections to a university program that might offer some lessons for how thecreation of a pipeline might be supported.connection between college and high school programs An intrapreneurship training program for electrical and computer engineering studentswas implemented through an NSF S-STEM grant at an R1 university. The intrapreneurshipprogram was designed to teach students how to be innovative and entrepreneurial within anexisting company, since the vast majority of students will not be interested in starting their
Vanderbilt University.Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University KEN VAN TREUREN is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor Univer- sity and serves as the Associate Dean in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in 1977 and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in 1978. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom in 1994. He then taught at the USAF Academy until his military retirement. At Baylor University since 1998, he teaches courses in fluid mechanics, energy systems, propulsion sys- tems, heat transfer, and aeronautics. Research interests include
] S. von Stumm, B. Hell, and T. Chamorro-Premuzic, “The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 6, pp. 574–588, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1745691611421204. [6] C. A. Berg and R. J. Sternberg, “Response to novelty: continuity versus discontinuity in the developmental course of intelligence,” Adv Child Dev Behav, vol. 19, pp. 1–47, 1985, doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60387-0. [7] P. J. Silvia, “Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity,” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 94–113, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1080/02699930701298481. [8] W. F. Massy, T.A. Sullivan, and C. Mackie, “Improving measurement
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 2023 ASEE Conference[2] https://www.canada.ca/en/innovation-science-economic-development/services/small-businesses.html[3] Schumpeter, Joseph A., and Archibald J. Nichol. "Robinson's economics of imperfectcompetition." Journal of political economy 42, no. 2 (1934): 249-259.[4] Lerner, Josh, and Antoinette Schoar. "Does legal enforcement affect financial transactions?The contractual channel in private equity." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, no. 1(2005): 223-246.[5] Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2015). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2014global report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.[6] Audretsch, D. B. (2015). Everything
Education, 3(2), 137-146. 7. Nordin, N. M., Abdullah, R., & Sipon, S. M. (2018). Developing entrepreneurship skills through project-based learning in manufacturing engineering education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 10(1), 1-10. 8. Sánchez-Gálvez, V., Ordoñez, J. J., & Ríos, J. A. (2020). Entrepreneurship education in engineering: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(9), 3583. 9. Arvanitis, L., & Athanasopoulos, E. (2019). Entrepreneurship education and manufacturing innovation: A case study. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(3), 23-44. 10. Jukola, S., Kujala, J., & Käpylä, J. (2017). Implementing entrepreneurial mindset in engineering
project,” J. Eng. Entrep., vol. 7, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Feb. 2017, Accessed: Feb. 03, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.jeenonline.org/Jeen_Vol7_Num3.html[2] D. Grzybowski, E. Park, A. Leonard, J. DeLano, and D. Tang, “Review of Entrepreneurial Mindset Instruments & Surveys for Assessment,” Engineering Unleashed, 572, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/572[3] K. Morgan and J. M. LeDoux, “Annotated Bibliography: Learning Sciences Constructs for Entrepreneurial Mindset.” Georgia Institute of Technology.[4] C. A. Bodnar, S. Jadeja, and E. Barrella, “Creating a master entrepreneurial mindset concept map,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for
participants are very valuable and will be incorporatedinto the project and its implementation in the future.Individual Reflections ResultsThe individual reflections from the 112 participants were analyzed following the process forthematic analysis described by Braun and Clark [13]. Two researchers independently reviewedthe data to become familiar with it and then identified themes based on the literature to use as theframework for the thematic analysis to measure student motivation, curiosity, connections, andmaking skills. The two researchers then independently coded the data by labeling excerpt(s) fromeach reflection that reflected a theme and recording it in a spreadsheet. The analysis results fromboth researchers were compared and any