FUTURE OF FARMING TECHNOLOGY In Collaboration With,” 2018. Available: https://www.marshmclennan.com/content/dam/mmc- web/insights/publications/2018/november/agriculture-4-0/Oliver-Wyman-Agriculture- 4.0.pdf[7] “The main difference between entrepreneurship and startup,” The Gritti Fund, Feb. 21, 2019. https://thegrittifund.com/entrepreneurship-ecosystem/entrepreneurship-vs- startup/#:~:text=Startups%20do%20differ%20from%20entrepreneurships.%20Entrepren eurship%20refers%20to (accessed Dec. 13, 2022).[8] M. Hrytsaienko, H. Hrytsaienko, L. Andrieieva, and L. Boltianska, “The Role of Social Capital in Development of Agricultural Entrepreneurship,” Modern Development Paths of Agricultural Production, pp
-development[18] L. H. Mayled et al., “Coaching and Feedback in a Faculty Professional Development Program that Integrates the Entrepreneurial Mindset and Pedagogical Best Practices into Capstone Design Courses,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/coaching-and-feedback-in-a-faculty-professional-development-program-that-inte grates-the-entrepreneurial-mindset-and-pedagogical-best-practices-into-capstone-design-courses[19] H. E. Dillon, L. Hamilton Mayled, M. L. Nagurka, M. I. Carnasciali, and D. E. Melton, “Intercollegiate Coaching in a Faculty Professional Development Program that Integrates Pedagogical Best Practices
innovation management,” J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 623–644, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1111/jpim.12594.[10] L. Bosman, N. Duval-Couetil, B. Mayer, and P. McNamara, “Using Online Discussions to Develop the Entrepreneurial Mindset in Environmental Engineering Undergraduates: A Case Study,” Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy IJEP, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 4, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijep.v9i3.9491.[11] S. Streiner, C. Bodnar, K. Mallouk, B. Oestreich, and K. Dahm, “Building Toys for Children by Applying Entrepreneurial-minded Learning and Universal Design Principles,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Online: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 34242. doi: 10.18260/1-2--34242.[12] J. S. London
outcomes. Results generated from this surveyshow a modest increase in innovation self-efficacy. Nevertheless, less impact was foundcompared to the previous year when innovation attitudes were weaker in the pre-survey.IntroductionEducation for innovation is of critical importance in our era (Xiao, 2022; Anderson et al, 2014;Law and Geng, 2019; Barack and Usher, 2019). Innovation will be necessary to meet the GrandChallenges for environmental engineering in the 21st Century identified by the NationalAcademies (NASEM, 2019). There are a variety of definitions for innovation, but at its mostbasic “innovation simply involves the introduction of a new (or significantly improved) productor service in the marketplace or the implementation of a new (or
, with the most focus placed on research [3].Successful faculty strive to improve their teaching, by attending workshops and conferences(such as ASEE), by observing other professors in the classroom, and by studying the literature.Being an excellent teacher takes time and effort. It is often thought–perhaps wishfully–thatteaching and research complement each other; however, early studies, as described by Prince etal., showed that there was no correlation between teaching and research [4]. In more recentyears, there has been a trend to include research in classroom activities, with the goal to exposestudents to the possibility of participating in research.Service is often the most undervalued activity of faculty, by faculty and administrators
; Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28093[6] Haidar, D. R., & Melville, M. C. (2019, June), Students’ Self-Assessment of Modern MakingSkills. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida.10.18260/1-2--33318[7] Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., and Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of SituationalIntrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation andEmotion 24(3), 175-213.[8] Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Sportand Exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise (Champaign,IL: Human Kinetics).[9] Kashdan, T. B., (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: capturing the bandwidth
, clean air engineering, simulation and optimization methodology, reliability engineering, and application of operations research. Dr.Omar has several Journal publications and articles in conference proceedings. His professional affiliations include ASEE, IEEE, IISE, Alpha Pi Mu, ORSA, and SMEDr. Ibrahem E. Atawi, University of Tabuk Ibrahem E. Atawi received the B.S. in electrical engineering from King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, in 2005, the dual M.S. degrees in electrical engineering and engineering management from Florida Institute of Technology, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, in 2013. Since 2018, he has been an
researcher in tech companies. Amin’s hobbies include exploring the outdoors, trying new food, and traveling.Dr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leading ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE ConferenceLandscape Review of Entrepreneurship Education in Canada and The Presence of Systems Thinking Amin Azad and Emily Moore
Entrepreneurial Mindset Acquired through Curricular and Extra-curricular Components,” in Proceedings of 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, lorida, June 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/319056. S. Purzer, N. Fila, and L. Nataraja, “Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education,” Adv. Eng. Educ. vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-27, 2016. Available: http://advances.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/vol05/issue01/Papers/AEE-17-E- ship-Purzer.pdf7. J.B. Du Prel, B. Röhrig and M. Blettner, “Choosing Statistical Tests: Part 12 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications,” Dtsch Arztebl Int. vol. 107(19), pp. 343-348, May 2010, ePub. May 2014, doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0343.8. G.M
, pp. 355-376, 2019.[13] Bryan, R., "The influence of tribal colleges and universities on Native American student persistence.," in New Directions for Student Services, vol. 167, 2019, pp. 49-62.[14] Bosman, L., & Shirey, K. (2022),, "Using Bio-Inspired Design and STEAM to Teach the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition., 2022.[15] Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M., "New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation," Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 59- 69, 2008.[16] Price, M., Kallam, M., & Love, J., "The learning styles of Native American students and implications for classroom practice," In
Faculty," ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[9]. A. Hajshirmohammadi, "Incorporating Experiential Learning in Engineering Courses," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 166-169, Nov. 2017. Available: doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1700373. [accessed in December 2022].[10]. L. Bosman and K. Shirey, “Using Bio-Inspired Design and STEAM to Teach the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers,” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, August 2022.[11]. D. Kolb , Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice Hall, 1984.[12]. S. L. Ash and P. Clayton, “Documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning,” Journal of Applied Learning in Higher
. Kwapisz, “Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.[3] C. T. Amelink and E. G. Creamer, “Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01044.x.[4] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E. Brawner, and T. K. Miller, “The effect of an entrepreneurship program on GPA and retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 4. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 293–301, 2004. doi: 10.1002/j.2168
Activity. She obtained a Ph.D. in English Literature from Chiba University in 2002. Her current main research interests are: 1) how including humanities courses in an engineering education curriculum can help students to gain flexibility, and an appreciation of equity, and a greater richness of ideas; 2) finding and solving the systematic issues impacting the effectiveness of engineering education, specifically in the context of project-based learnings; and 3) assessing the impact of interdisciplinary engi- neering project-based learnings. Below are her recent presentations at international conferences: WERA 2022, APAIE 2022, IIAI DSIR 2021, IIAI DSIR 2020, WERA 2019. She obtained the Outstanding Paper Award in DSIR
Differences, vol. 149, pp. 57–65, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.038.[22] M. A. G. Maureira and I. Kniestedt, “Games that Make Curious: An Exploratory Survey into Digital Games that Invoke Curiosity,” presented at the 17th International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC), Sep. 2018, vol. LNCS-11112, p. 76. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99426-0_7.[23] A. Taram and F. Setyawan, “Stress Tolerance in Probabilistic Thinking: A Case Study,” Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, 2022.[24] J. Vernon and Y. Huang, “Work in Progress: An Evaluation of a First-year Chemical Engineering Module on Students’ Curiosity and Connectivity,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020
ME studentsExecuted in the fall of 2019, the intervention began with recruitment of six student “clients”majoring in entrepreneurship or involved in the entrepreneurship club. These clients pitchedtheir ideas to engineering students enrolled in the CAD course during an event facilitating briefinteractions with both sets of students. Small groups (3-4) of engineering students rotated amongpotential clients, hearing and responding to the clients’ pitches. Some clients openly expressed adesire to recruit engineering students to their entrepreneurial teams for purposes beyond thebounds of the CAD course project. Both the entrepreneurial student clients and engineeringstudent “consultants” rated each other, and the ratings provided a means of
/1-2--34820.[8] H. E. Dillon, J. M. Welch, N. Ralston, and R. D. Levison, “Students taking action on engineering ethics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2020. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35247.[9] Association of American Colleges and Universities, “Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education (VALUE),” Association of American Colleges and Universities., 2009. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value[10] B. Hylton, “Mapping the VALUE Rubrics for Application to the KEEN Framework,” Engineering Unleashed, 1797, 2019. Accessed: Feb. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https
Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri- Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University Liping Liu is an associate professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence
, professional development of science teachers, and issues of college student retention. He teaches coursework in science and research methods. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Promoting Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering Students Using IoT- Focused Project-Based Learning1. Introduction1.1 Problem IdentificationIn a recent report by the Society of Human Resource Management, over 50% of industryexecutives reported that recent college graduates lack problem-solving, critical thinking,innovation, and creativity. The report also identified communication and teamwork skills asother missing attributes in recent engineering graduates [1]. In its 2019 Job Outlook survey, theNational
, and L. Benson, “Work in progress: How differences in student motivation characterize differences between engineering disciplines,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2012.[33] D. Shah, E. Kames, C. C. McKenzie, and B. Morkos, “Examining the differences in student motivation for industry projects and non-industry projects in senior capstone design,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[34] L. Bosman, N. Duval-Couetil, and K. Jarr, “Mentoring Engineering Educators with an Entrepreneurial Mindset – Focused SOTL Professional Development Experience.” ASEE Conferences, Minneapolis, MN.
physical prototyping and detailed design activities can mesh with this intervention.References:[1] National Academy of Engineering, U. S. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineeringin the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[2] Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637[3] Lönngren, J. (2017). Wicked problems in engineering education: preparing future engineers towork for sustainability. Chalmers University of Technology.[4] “Grand Challenges - 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering,” Engineeringchallenges.org, 2019.http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx[5] De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: implementation of