and integrated computational materials engineering concepts and tools into core courses in materials science and education.Andrew Minor, University of California, Berkeley and Larwrence Berkeley National Laboratory Andrew Murphy Minor is a Professor at the University of California, Berkeley in the Department of Mate- rials Science and Engineering and also holds a joint appointment at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab- oratory where he is the Facility Director of the National Center for Electron Microscopy in the Molecular Foundry. He has over 260 publications in the fields of nanomechanics, metallurgy, electron characteriza- tion of soft matter and in situ transmission electron microscopy technique development
laboratories are favorable and also provide learnerinsight on the new gamified activities introduced within the curriculum. We note severallimitations on the interpretation of these results, the need to collect more data over time and outlinedifferent courses of action for future improvements to these measures. Overall, from positivesurvey results and anecdotal feedback from teaching staff, we are encouraged to pursue moregamified strategies within our first-year curriculum and beyond.2. Setting Context – Classroom Description & Gamified ApproachesThe introduction of project-based learning to evolve our undergraduate engineering designcurriculum at McMaster University, known as “The Pivot” initiative, is leading to large-scalechanges to the
-strain curves from materialsamples upon which the remainder of the course content is built. The global pandemic forcedengineering students online, challenging materials laboratory instructors to adapt instructionaldelivery to remote learners.There currently exist no ABET-accredited undergraduate mechanical engineering programs taughtfully online.i Moreover, while many other college disciplines have extensive histories of successfulremote and online instruction, the engineering education community has limited experienceteaching lab classes online. Affordable, small, and easily mailed experimental educational lab kitshave emerged as a key advancement in hands-on undergraduate engineering instruction. ii,iii Asmall, inexpensive, and safe benchtop
was the first time infive years that the Island suffered a direct hit from a storm, and this time it was different. Hurricane Fiona 2did not bring the highest winds, but it arrived as a heavy rain system that poured over 20 inches of rain injust under two days. This impact completely severed the electrical system of the island along with aninvisible adversary that made the recovery even worse, humidity in electrical systems. All in all, we wenttwo weeks without classes; and just when we came back from the Hurricane, a political strike from theworkers, left us with more days without access to classes and laboratories. This might have
Paper ID #39157Differences Between First- and Third-Year Students’ Attitudes TowardComputational Methods in Engineering (WIP)Nina PerryDr. Timothy Chambers, University of Michigan Dr. Chambers is a Lecturer in Materials Science & Engineering at the University of Michigan. He teaches advanced laboratory courses in MSE as well as introduction to engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023AbstractThis Work-In-Progress study investigates differences in freshman and junior engineering students’valuation of and self-efficacy for computational work in engineering. We administered a survey to N
Multifunctional Materials Laboratory, Shell Office Complex, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 7 School of Science, Atlantic Technological University, Ash Lane, Ballytivnan, Sligo, Ireland8 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana Corresponding author: David O. Obada (doobada@abu.edu.ng)ABSTRACTGroup project forms an integral part of engineering education because creatingconnections between the course modules and its applications can be a difficult task.Therefore, team dynamics/cooperative learning can play a major role in determining thesuccess rate of learners, with new pedagogies and think-pair
), Applications of SolidWorks in Teaching Courses of Statics and Strength of Materials Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--20959[11]. Northrup, S., & Burke, J. (2008, June), Continuous Improvement In Electrical Engineering Student Outcomes Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2—4114[12]. M. Budhu, “Virtual Laboratories for Engineering Education”, Proceeding of International Conference of Engineering Education, Manchester, UK, August 18-21, 2002.[13]. P. Bhargava1, C. Cunningham, M. Tolomeo, and A. Zehnder, “Virtual Labs, Real Data for Statics and Mechanics of Materials”, ASEE 2003 Annual Conference
is what the traditional classroom is based on [4]. Interactive strategies arebased around class discussion and group assignments. Students are forced to interact with eachother and the instructor in figuring out the task or concept at hand. This method promotes activelearning and is heavily relied on in the flipped classroom model. Individualized strategies run offthe notion that students learn at different paces, and these strategies are heavily based onprogress in sequential steps. Experiential strategies involve putting a student in the field orsimulated environment that is similar to the environment they could potentially be working in.This type of strategy is very common when it comes to internships, laboratory settings
, ˜ Schleife is a Blue Waters Assistant Professor in the Department of Materials Science and En- AndrA© gineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He obtained his Diploma and Ph.D. at Friedrich-Schiller-University in Jena, Germany for his theoDr. Cecilia Leal ˜ Leal is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the CecAlia Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign since 2012. She graduated in Industrial Chemistry from CoiProf. Dallas R. Trinkle, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dallas R. Trinkle is an associate professor in Materials Science and Engineering at Univ. Illinois, Urbana- Champaign
Paper ID #37519Improving the Quality of Data Graphics in Materials EducationDr. Barry Dupen, Purdue University Fort Wayne Dr. Dupen is a Metallurgist and Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue University Fort Wayne (PFW). He has nine years of experience as a metallurgist, materials engineer, and materials laboratory manager in the automotive industry. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Improving the Quality of Data Graphics in Materials EducationAbstractMaterials education is an inherently image-intensive and data-rich endeavor. Educators draw onprimary and secondary