undergraduate students, we began theUNdergraduates Improving TEamwork Skills (UNITES) Module 3: Understandingproject. We are in the process of developing lecture and Managing SENIORmodules to integrate into our undergraduate curriculum Conflicts In avertically. We planned to cover this broad topic in three Teamlecture modules. Each curriculum level, starting fromsophomore, would have one lecture module discussingseveral relevant issues, as shown in Figure 2. Although Module 2
the author developedand implemented a plan to improve the ME senior seminar based on the course evaluation results.About ME Senior SeminarThe ME senior seminar is a highly focused and topical course. Its purpose is to acquaint studentswith a sufficiently broad spectrum of policies, practices, procedures, and ethics in mechanicalengineering. It is a one credit course so a 50-min session per week is devoted to lectures, but twoto three hours of outside classwork per week are required. The author joined SDSU in July 2021and started to teach this class in the fall semester. It is worth mentioning that the author had nevertaught such a class before.Based on the ultimate goal of senior seminars and industry expectations for mechanicalengineering
, [6] found that during atransition from quarters to semesters, students faced increased anxiety levels about graduating ontime, new degree requirements, and credit conversions. As another example, there is fear ofadditional faculty workload under the new system [7].Initial curriculum development We approached the curriculum design using a backward design approach [8], [9]. Thisapproach has three stages: 1. Identify design results, 2. Determine acceptable evidence, and 3.Plan learning experiences and instruction. It includes establishing curricular priorities ofknowledge and skills of enduring understanding, important to know and do, and worth beingfamiliar with. The design results that we identified were the goals of the curriculum
team-based work structures, perfor- mance management, quality management, research methodology, and engineering education.Mr. Francisco Cima, Old Dominion University Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Techno- logical Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovDr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is an Assistant Professor and director of the Collaborative Robotics and Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Old Dominion University. Dr. Kaipa received his BE (Hons
wouldpractice the principles of design for manufacturability (DFM). This paper details a plan for aproject-based course conceived to accomplish exactly this while maintaining a realistic scope interms of safety and available resources. This plan includes curriculum additions such as reviewof DFM case studies, a hands-on casting lab, and machining observation, although the majorityof the course would be self-paced and taught through computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)software tutorials and computer projects. Avoiding the mistakes of past attempts to incorporatemanufacturing topics into mechanical engineering education by instead narrowing the vision forthe course to the practical context of enhancing students’ design skills, the proposed content
significant undertaking that requires properplanning and commitment. The planning phase is crucial in defining the scope of the work andsecuring the necessary resources for the project. During this phase, I used the followingquestions to guide my thought process. • Why is this open textbook project important? • What features are essential and are of pedagogical significance? • What resources are required for this project in terms of time commitment, funding, and team support? • What open platforms will be used to host the book? • How to maintain the book in the post-publication stage?As of 2019-2020, there were limited OER on thermodynamics [8-10] and on relevantengineering subjects in general. The proposed open textbook aims to
is similar to their career aspiration, identify other LinkedIn users whocurrently hold positions similar to the freshman’s career aspiration, and evaluate the backgroundof these professionals to create a 5-year plan of steps the freshman should take to achieve theirgoal. Responses were submitted for grading to D2L (Desire2Learn), “an integrated learningplatform designed to create a single place online for instructors and students to interact” [21].Responses were organized in Microsoft Excel. The student's name, aspiring position andcompany were recorded. Each student was assigned a number to anonymize theirparticipation.(n=127, 3 semesters). The 127 students surveyed are considered representative of asingle-entry class.Nearly every company
, withone phase finished by one group and handed off to another group for continuation. Students thenprepare a brief written proposal, and a memorandum of understanding (MOU) is signed by boththe faculty advisor(s) and student(s). A second one-credit course is taken in the spring semester of the junior year when studentsdo a deeper dive into the relevant literature, develop a detailed plan for executing the projectduring their senior year, and prepare a poster on their project that is presented at a symposium.Two faculty members co-taught this course, with the symposium poster and written proposalcounting for 50 percent of their grade. This grade is given by the faculty advisor(s) who havesigned the MOU with students. In the senior year
accreditation; they offer helpful details on implementation of an assessment plan, from filemanagement to faculty consensus building. Notably, they include their rubrics. Rubrics areguides for scoring student work and ABET recommends their use in assessment [2]. Rubricsdecompose student outcomes into performance indicators (PIs), increase inter-rater reliability, anddefine performance levels. Assessment of outcomes 3–7 in capstone has been described [3], ashas a multidisciplinary capstone project in which all seven SOs are assessed [4]; however, thosepapers do not include the related rubrics. This paper builds on previous efforts by describing andpromoting a pragmatic approach to assessment, stating the rationale for how each outcome isassessed, and
include: failures to recruitnon-engineering students despite partnerships across campus, challenges in selecting projectsthat fit within the framework of an academic course structure, student successes and challenges,the existing funding structure and the challenges of developing this aspect within the course, andfinally future directions and plans to continue the effort.Introduction to “Entrepreneurial Design Realization” (EDR)In Spring of 2020, the authors were awarded a small grant to integrate and track sustainabilityaspects into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. A major aspect of this effort is toconsider the overall student impact across the multi-year experience. In exploring thisprogrammatic impact, a question arose, “Are we
perceived preparedness for a career in GEI as a result of educational interventions, The survey developed in this study helps to measure the willingness and preparedness ofstudents to join GEI, and the educational interventions gauge various approaches and implementthe ones that fulfill the needs of specified cohorts. The survey and interventional results mayprovide transformable guidelines to create environmental behavior in engineering students. Anamended curriculum and tailored educational program could cultivate requisite skillsets suitablefor GEI. The intervention plans we developed and used for this study align with the United NationsDecade of Education for Sustainable Development framework, which emphasizes the need
introductory engineering course at RowanUniversity. A student team of four was formed and the key success of student learning lies inthe pre-lab as well as within lab notebook page reviews. The pre-lab session is an in-classdiscussion between students and an instructor to help students at the initial stage to organizetheir body of conceptual work. During this discussion, the instructor will be able to assess theaccuracy and quality of the students pre-existing knowledge and subsequently be able tosuggest relevant formative feedback to the students. The teamwork project involvedmultidiscipline knowledge ranges from performing stoichiometric calculations, identifying,and planning appropriate measures to mitigate risk, modifying a process to achieve a
be integrated into existing MEEG core courses, including i) nonparametricregression for MEEG 2703 Computer Methods in Mechanical Engineering, ii) generative designsfor MEEG 4103. Machine Element Design and iii) genetic algorithms for MEEG 4483 ThermalSystems Analysis and Design. The developed modules will include source codes with embeddedtutorials and instructions using MATLAB live script and Jupyter Notebook (for the Pythonversion). The modules will introduce built-in MATLAB commands/examples and availablePython packages for machine learning and deep learning to reduce the challenges in coding. Thedeveloped course modules will be made available to the public using open-source repositories onGitHub and File Exchange.Fig. 6 Plan for data
suggested academic plan should have completed theorycourses for material structure and properties and enrolled in the heat transfer coursesimultaneously. Potentially, this explained the increase in neutrality in applying previous courseknowledge for the Thermofluid students since not all students had previous Heat Transferexperience. Figure 4. Student's rating of the effectiveness of the course to help them understand the real- world application of the theory (Thermofluid: n = 75; Mechanical: n = 82) Figure 5. Student's rating of the effectiveness of the course to help them apply previous curriculum knowledge (Thermofluid: n = 75; Mechanical: n = 82)c. Evaluate the effectiveness of different built-in activitiesWe
Lifelong Learning) ● Workplace Effectiveness (Teamwork; Client/Stakeholder Focus; Planning and Organizing; Creative Thinking; Problem Solving, Prevention and Decision Making; Seeking and Developing Opportunities; Working with Tools and Technology; Scheduling and Coordinating; Checking, Examining, and Recording; Business Fundamentals) ● Academic (Reading, Writing, Mathematics, Science and Technology, Communication, Critical and Analytical Thinking, Computer Skills) ● Industry-wide Technical (Foundations of Engineering; Design; Manufacturing and Construction; Operations and Maintenance; Professional Ethics; Business, Legal and Public Policy; Sustainability and Societal and Environmental Impact; Engineering
positive effect for White American and Hispanic students, but nocorrelation could be found with other groups due to very small sample sizes. In addition to themodel results generated, the students' perception was that reviewing the prerequisites helpedthem to better perform in the class.In this paper, the authors show their attempt to develop and implement a plan to decrease theattrition rates of second- or third-year STEM engineering students and to increase the graduationrates through a planned set of interventions in the two most critical fundamental sophomorecourses; Engineering Analysis Statics and Engineering Analysis Dynamics Both these coursesare critical in the graduation path of almost every engineering major and are
University Pilar Pazos is an Associate Professor at Old Dominion University’s Department of Engineering Manage- ment and Systems Engineering. Her areas of research expertise are team-based work structures, perfor- mance management, quality management, research methodology, and engineering education.Mr. Francisco Cima, Old Dominion University Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Techno- logical Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovIsaac Koduah Kumi, Old Dominion University Isaac K. Kumi is a Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. student at Old Dominion University. He
, Seoul, Korea, in 1999 and 2003, respectively. He received the IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering Best Paper Award in 2015. He is a member of IEEE and ASME. He is interested in education of engineering students with the emphasis on robotics and control systems. His research mainly concerns various theoretic problems in robotics such as path planning and kinematic modeling. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Design and development of a teaching apparatus for undergraduate vibrationeducation through capstone design projectAbstractThis paper documents our effort to improve learning experience for students in mechanicalvibration class by designing and developing a
UTSA and only about one-thirdat UTSA. Calculus I is a major predictor of future success in science and engineering programs,hence it is critical that students master the course material [1]-[2]. The future success of transferstudents is essential to a 4-year University like UTSA which has many transfer students. It isreported that transfer students often experience difficulty feeling part of the student communityand this can negatively impact their future academic achievements [3]. UTSA, like many 4-yearuniversity engineering programs work with local community colleges to create a detailedsemester-by-semester course plans for eventual transfer [4], some social and academicintegration activities [5] as well as cohort activities for transfer
simulators.The authors feel that this project did help introduce students to a modern process simulator that isused in industry so there is a plan to continue such a project in the next course offering. References[1] S. Brunhaver, et al. Bridging the Gaps between Engineering Education and Practice. Us Engineering in a Global Economy. University of Chicago Press, 2017. 129-63. Print.[2] A. Elshorbagy and DJ Schonwetter. Engineer Morphing: Bridging the Gap between Classroom Teaching and the Engineering Profession. International Journal of Engineering Education 18.3 (2002): 295-300. Print.[3] K. Volkov, Thermofluids Virtual Learning Environment for Inquiry-Based Engineering Education
distribution of problem-solving scores on the final projects across the two offerings. Dashedlines show median scores.Students in the intervention offering were given low-stakes opportunities to practice both theactual skills (e.g., prototyping focused on answering a driver question with a plan to test and 9report findings based on pre-determined metrics for success) and the skill of documenting theirprocess and representing their findings.For example, in the first week of the house project, the midterm project of the interventionoffering, students were asked to document their process when prototyping laser-cut, friction-fitwalls as part of their
others. For example, if weuse final exam performance on a statics exam to measure academic achievement, it is likely thatthe scores students obtain are coming primarily from their participation in class rather than theirextra-/co-curricular involvement. It is possible that a planned future activity for this study –conducting interviews with students, as explained in the “Future Work” subsection of this paper– may shed some light on how extra-/co-curricular participation impacts their academicachievement.The sample size is also smaller than we would have preferred, leading in some cases to numberstoo small to yield meaningful results (e.g. only four participants were involved in a servicelearning activity, so the results for this type of activity
information can be accessed too.3.3.2 Workshop information sharing Participants showed interest to share the information learned in the workshop with theirstudents or colleagues through different methods such as hands-on activities, videos, and writingin the school newsletter, as summarized in Table 5. Table 5: Participants’ intention to share workshop information. Yes. Through hands-on activities and videos. I would talk to them about it. Yes... share info about organizations that presented. Yes, hopefully, will be able to purchase the robot. The learning curve will be smaller. Yes, I plan to discuss my notes with colleagues and the administration. I also plan to discuss the needs with students to continue to motivate them
complete the course survey, it will count as passing one class assessment. We also setup a criterion to urge students to pass at least three assessments by a certain time in the semesterto have a passing grade at the time of issuing early warning grades and pass at least sixassessments by certain time to have a passing mid-term grade. We also requested students toemail the instructor a schedule (on a week-by-week level) as to what FE modules they plan towork on/complete each week of the semester with a plan to complete all the assessments beforethe dead week of each semester. To encourage more students to take the FE exam, students whoregistered for the FE Exam can receive a $100 reimbursement thanks to a donor's generosity.Students who passed the
? 3. What are you hoping to gain from this research experience? 4. How is your research going so far? 5. How do you plan to fit your research into your schedule?Data AnalysisA priori coding [16] was used to identify what students expected to learn, what they had learnedalready, and what challenges they had faced. In vivo subcodes were then applied in order toidentify what kinds of learning occurred and challenges that were encountered. The subcodeswithin each primary code were analyzed and grouped in order to identify themes that answeredeach research question. Coding was conducted primarily by Author 1, and coding checks wereconducted by Author 2.LimitationsThis study was conducted in one department at one university and hence
[…] I’ve built so many skills, working on the computer, working on the net, using so many resources, like my way of processing data has changed. My planning and scheduling has changed. Like I didn’t even know I could become a better planner because of this lockdown, which is pretty cool.UnpreparedWhile two students felt that the pandemic made them more prepared for industry, six of the eightparticipants in this category indicated that the pandemic had a negative influence on how theyfelt prepared for the workplace. All students in this subcategory were concerned that COVID hadinterrupted their professional development. Four students highlighted that they had missed out onthe hands-on and practical component of their engineering
seven current ABETStudent Outcomes (SOs), it is envisioned that, with the appropriate performance indices, the coursewill contribute to satisfying SO (1): Identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems,SO (5): Ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership,create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives,and SO (7): Ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learningstrategies. Student reporting requirements and the necessary rubrics are incorporated to enable theassessment of the various performance indices for the ABET SO’s.IntroductionTraditionally, undergraduate computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer
lecture. Additionally, the plan is to present this work as aworkshop at Lilly Conferences, which provides opportunities for the presentation of scholarshipof teaching and learning. With more historical background, this work could showcase thedevelopment within fluid mechanics against the backdrop of scientific progress.In April 2015, the University Faculty Senate at the Pennsylvania State University approved anew requirement for Integrative Studies within the General Education program. Theimplementation details for this requirement were approved in March 2016 and apply to studentswho started at the Pennsylvania State University during or after the summer of 2018. TheIntegrative Studies requirement offers two pathways for students to fulfill it
, no. 4, pp. 461-480. 2019.[34] Penn State Department of Mechanical Engineering, “Strategic Plan 2020/2021-2025/2026,” Penn State Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2020.[35] H. Weigand, P. Johannesson, & B. Andersson. “An artifact ontology for design science research.” Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 133, p. 101878. 2021.[36] B. M. Wildemuth. “Existing documents and artifacts as data.” Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, pp. 158-165. 2009.[37] H. J. Rubin & I. S. Rubin, I. S. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.[38] K. Charmaz. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. 2006.[39] E
, she felt the project was properly planned, and resulted in a textbook that can be extremelyuseful for students. She believes that incorporating student examples gives the students a chanceto develop and solve their own problems, which helps in the learning process. The opportunity tohave their work included in a textbook also incentivizes the students to want to participate and dotheir best work for the submissions. She recognizes that there is a range in the complexity andquality of submitted problems, but they are all useful to convey content. She encourages professorsto incorporate OERs and self-generated problems as it is financially economical for students andbeneficial for their learning.Student Researcher BStudent researcher B