Paper ID #37189A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering Project TeamsDr. Grace J. LiangDr. Rick Evans, Cornell University Sociolinguist and Director of the Engineering Communications Program in the College of Engineering at Cornell UniversityMojdeh AsadollahipajouhDr. Stacey E. Kulesza, P.E., Kansas State University Dr. Stacey Kulesza is an associate professor in the civil engineering department at Texas State University. Dr. Kulesza is a graduate of the American Society of Civil Engineers Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEED). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in geotechnical
translate to many types of academic institutions, including creatingresearch opportunities with community college students. Our team has developed materials for mentortraining, recruiting students, and long-term funding strategies using templates for faculty grants. In ourfirst course offerings students have demonstrated a strong increase in research identity as observed instudent journal prompts and survey results.IntroductionThis research project is focused on developing and supporting equitable pathways to STEM graduateeducation for Women and Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students. Nationally, only 20% of undergraduateengineers and computer scientist degrees are awarded to women, and only 6% are women of color [1].Black/African American
through management and evaluation. Dr. Leggett-Robinson has more than 15 years of higher education experience which includes STEM academic and student success/support programming, strategic plan- ning, data analytics, and program evaluation. As a PI, she has garnered funds in excess of $3 million dollars from both NIH and NSF for broadening participation in STEM Undergraduate Education and as an Evaluator has worked on large projects with NSF (Big Data, BioGraph), Google CS-ER, and DOD STEM Student Success. Her distinguished record of STEM programmatic success (at HBCUs and PWIs) is well documented in publications and presentations. Dr. Leggett-Robinson’s latest publications, ”De- mystifying Promotion & Tenure: A
complete and reflect upon the results of two implicit association testsperformed on their own through Project Implicit [25]. An additional third assignment requiredthe students to catalogue and reflect on instances of bias or discrimination that they observedthroughout the remaining half of the semester. At the end of the semester, SES led a finalsummary and in-class discussion of the content and reflections related to our educational module.Additionally, the importance of moving beyond individual bias and addressing systemic biaswithin institutional policies was communicated [20], [26] followed by an in-class brainstormingactivity asking students to identify academic policies at PSU that they believe maybe contributeto lack of diversity, equity
workforce. She is co ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Fostering Inclusive Department Climates: A Workshop for Department Chairs at the University of DelawareThis evidence-based practice paper describes the development and implementation of aninteractive workshop for department chairs focused on strategies to foster inclusive departmentclimates at the University of Delaware (UD). Literature on the underrepresentation of women inSTEM suggests climate is a key factor in women faculty’s lower levels of job satisfaction andhigher rates of turnover. Building on this scholarship, multiple research projects at UD motivatethe need for institutional efforts to improve climate and the
engineeringhas increased from 18% to 21% [2], [3]. This 3% growth over a nearly two-decade period isindicative of larger social issues among institutions regarding women and other marginalizedstudents [4]. This observed lack of women and racial minority representation in STEM degreeattainment ultimately impacts representation in professional fields, which could lead to increasedgender and racial labor market inequality [4]. Minority retention research in engineeringeducation spaces is conducted to increase STEM graduation rates, which could be used as a toolin socioeconomic mobility for minority members [5]. This work in progress paper presents the preliminary results of a qualitative research andanalysis project conducted with the goal of
, “The overall goal of the project is to changefrom a culture of attrition to a culture of development and improve diversity and inclusion of SDMines faculty. The objectives of the project are: • Raise awareness of implicit bias • Improve campus culture to be more inclusive • Create a heightened sense of belonging and engagement of faculty • Develop pathways for success of faculty in all tracks and ranksThese objectives are directly in line with the vision of OFDA, “to cultivate and support a vibrantcampus culture where faculty members feel supported, valued, and challenged to grow bothpersonally and professionally from hire to retire5.” The programs have supported each other inefforts to create a supportive an equitable culture
women in engineering and has published numerous articles in ASEE conferences.Dr. Kimberly Stillmaker, P.E., California State University, Fresno Dr. Stillmaker is an Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at CSU, Fresno. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in structural engineering. She attained her PhD in Civil Engineering at UC Davis. Her research interests includeDr. Lizabeth L. Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the
Computing Education Research (CER) to advance personalized learning, specifically within the context of online learning and engagement, educational technologies, curriculum design which includes innovative and equitable pedagogical approaches, and support programs that boost the academic success of different groups of students. She teaches in active learning environments, such as project-based learning and flipped classrooms. She aims to bring EE and CER into practice.Dr. Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida Lilianny Virguez is a Instructional Assistant Professor at the Engineering Education Department at Uni- versity of Florida. She holds a Masters’ degree in Management Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering
programs. This line of research also seeks to understand the nuances and complexities of participation and persistence in these fields and develop new models for explaining such phenomena. Her secondary research strand focuses on the participation and achievement of Black students and professionals in higher education. She is the PI or co-PI on several grant-funded research projects including the national Black Doctoral Women Study (BDWS), the Women in Engineering Study (WIES), and Bulls-Engineering Youth Experience for Promoting Relationships, Identity Development, & Empowerment (Bulls-EYE PRIDE).Dr. Johnny C. Woods Jr., Virginia Tech Johnny C. Woods, Jr. is a Postdoctoral Associate in the School of Education at
Pennsylvania Brett Frankel received his Ph.D. in mathematics in 2016 from the University of Pennsylvania. After an instructionally-focused postdoctoral position at Northwestern University, he returned to Penn as a senior lecturer. Dr. Frankel was a 2009-2010 Fulbright fellow to Budapest, Hungary studying mathematics and mathematics pedagogy, and a 2017-2018 Project NExT fellow. He served as a graduate assistant to the Penn Emerging Scholars Program, and co-founded the Northwestern Emerging Scholars Program to improve female retention in pipeline courses for the mathematics major. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Impact of an Emerging Scholars/Peer Led Team Learning program on
, Aerospace, Junior, White)Figure 8: Female students rate the degree to which they feel isolated in their engineering classes. Figure 9: Female students participants rate the frequency of being treated as if they were not competent while working with peers.The literature shows that women pursuing engineering often receive negative messages regardingtheir abilities [1]. Our female interview participants acknowledged this and indicated that acommon outcome is that women are often pushed towards non-technical roles in group projects.Our results show that 44% of our female participants are sometimes or often denied the opportunityto participate fully in group projects, as shown in Figure 10. A survey participant also
. Having an understanding of what contributes to barriers to belongingness has helpedinform the scope and data analysis of this project. In summary, the three barriers to belongingdiscussed were faculty interaction with women students, negative interactions with men-identifying peers, and stereotype threat.Research Statement While the literature abounds with studies evaluating the impact of varying REU programson student participants, less attention has been placed on evaluating specifically the experiencesof women REU participants. It is important to ensure that these experiences are inclusive andcontribute to positive experiences for all students, including women students. The researchquestions for this study seek to investigate: (1) How
engagement projects, evaluation tools and tech- nology, and gender issues in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179Prof. Marcela Silva, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile Marcela Silva is the Academic Director at the Engineering Faculty of the Andres Bello University in Campus Santiago. She works as a teacher in the Construction Engineering career and supports innovation and entrepreneurship courses. She obtained a BacheloDr. Carolina Alvarado, California State University, Chico Dr. Alvarado is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Science Education at California State University, Chico. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics and a doctorate in Physics Education from
the students to determine one of two audiences first: Is this person trying to learn?Or is this person giving you grief? Either way a four-step heuristic script can help: (1) Optional graciousappreciation; (2) Return to the mission; (3) Provide some evidence; and (4) Offer to follow up. Afteroffering the heuristic, Author 1 provided a number of example scripts. “Thanks for that question. We see our mission as a problem-solving mission: to address the exclusion of particular groups of people from engineering and STEM more broadly. So, in terms of problem definition, particular end users fall outside of the specs for this project and organization because, simply put, not all end users face this problem. In the
Paper ID #38404Measuring the Impact of Budding Support Programs for WomenUndergraduates in Computing DegreesDr. Ilknur Aydin, State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale Ilknur Aydin is an Associate Professor of Computer Systems at Farmingdale State College in New York. She received her Ph.D. in Computer Science from University of Delaware in DE, USA and received her BS degree in Computer Engineering from Marmara University in Istanbul, Turkey. She also worked as a software engineer in Turkey on projects about implementation of a GPS (Global Positioning System) based vehicle tracking system. Dr
evident in the discriminatory treatment ofwomen during the selection and appointment of faculty positions. These biases, along withmany psychological, sociocultural, and cognitive factors, resulted in the underrepresentationof women in STEM majors.3. MethodologyAn analysis was conducted on semi-structured interviews with a cohort of eighteen femalestudents who participated in the study. This qualitative research project collected data fromundergraduate students from the leading research university in the country over the span of ayear. The purpose of the study was to investigate the factors influencing the development ofwomen in STEM. An invitation for voluntary participation was sent to the potentialinterviewee via corporate email. As approved
profession. These efforts have mostlyfocused on women in undergraduate studies or industry. Outreach and retention efforts forwomen considering or pursuing graduate studies are limited, despite the underrepresentation ofwomen in postgraduate studies in Canada.At a major research-based Canadian university, we investigated a) the recruitment practices ofengineering departments for graduate studies, and b) the factors contributing to undergraduatestudents’ intention to apply to graduate studies and their admission success. This article presentsfindings from the first phase of a multiphase mixed-method research project exploring thebarriers women face in pursuing engineering graduate studies and existing interventions toaddress these barriers.Using
Paper ID #37494Characterization of leadership styles, with a gender approach: a studywith final-year students from an Engineering School in ChileProf. Camila Zapata, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile Master in Marketing and Market Research from the University of Barcelona, Spain. Industrial Civil Engi- neer from the Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo. She has three diplomas in the areas of coaching, digital marketing and equality and empowerment of women. Her professional experience is linked to higher education as a project engineer and university management in the public and private area. Teacher at different univer
methodologies, community engagement projects, evaluation tools and tech- nology, and gender studies in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179Prof. Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andr´es Bello, Santiago, Chile Mar´ıa Elena Truyol, Ph.D., is full professor and researcher of the Universidad Andr´es Bello (UNAB). She graduated as physics teacher (for middle and high school), physics (M.Sc.) and Ph.D. in Physics at Universidad Nacional de C´ordoba, Argentina. In 2013 she obtained a three-year postdoctoral position at the Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Her focus is set on educational research, physics education, problem-solving, design of instructional material, teacher training and gender studies. She teaches
research is a stakeholder-ownedmeans by which to elicit community member needs. Participatory research has been conductedand examined in contexts of COVID-19, climate adaptation, neurodivergence, and many otherareas of research [14] - [16]. This approach translates into strategies that are developed bycommunity members themselves to address those needs. Authors of the book ParticipatoryResearch for Health and Social Well-Being state that participatory means involving peoplewhose lives are at the center of research in making key decisions of any research project,including decisions pertaining to the (1) focus of the research, (2) research questions, (3) methodof answering questions, (4) information to collect, (5) method of making sense of
BS degree in Computer Engineering from Marmara University in Istanbul, Turkey. She also worked as a software engineer in Turkey on projects about implementation of a GPS (Global Positioning System) based vehicle tracking system. Dr. Aydin’s research is in the general area of wireless and mobile networks with a focus on transport layer issues including multihoming, SCTP, congestion control, and network coding. Dr. Aydin has mentored undergraduates and high school students on research projects that involve the use of Arduino boxes and Raspberry Pi’s in the context of Internet of Things. Dr. Aydin has been a vivid supporter of women in computing and increasing diversity in computing. She has been the co-faculty
indifference, making the melding ofidentities and feeling able to bring one’s whole self to the profession difficult. This paper will sharefindings and implications highlighting how college students can connect their engineering and religiousidentities. This qualitative, phenomenological study – part of a larger, National Science Foundationfunded project – is focused on two broad questions:(1) How does an undergraduate college student develop their engineering identity?(2) How does the religious identity of an undergraduate college student influence the development of anengineering identity?This study represents a deep dive into the lived experiences of one engineering woman’s college studentexperience with this phenomenon. Over a three-interview
engineers, students will be comforted to know they can achieve success inengineering and be prepared for the issues they will face in the field. By including social contextfor engineering design, the next generation of engineers will create socially conscious designs andfight for equity in their future careers. This inclusion of social context should be in the forms ofcase studies, debates, or role play, capstone projects rather than just historical examples, whichwill teach students how to critically think about such issues and consider ways in which largersocial structures serve to empower or disenfranchise people. Furthermore, education shouldinclude inclusivity training to discuss issues of equality and inclusion, including gender equity inthe
Paper ID #36814Why engineering needs women—insights of female and nonbinary Finnishupper secondary schoolersDr. Johanna Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, Finland Johanna Naukkarinen received her M.Sc. degree in chemical engineering from Helsinki University of Technology in 2001, her D.Sc. (Tech) degree in knowledge management from Tampere University of Technology in 2015, and her professional teacher qualification from Tampere University of Applied sci- ences in 2013. She is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher and project manager with the School of Energy Systems at Lappeenranta-Lahti
Paper ID #39178Work In Progress: Engineering Faculty and Role ModelsMr. Syed Ali Kamal, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Syed Ali Kamal is a doctoral student at the Department of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. His research interests lie in the area of social justice and issues related to diversity, equity and Inclusion. Before University at Buffalo he worked in teaching capacity in the higher education sector of Pakistan. Additionally he has worked as a researcher in projects aimed at promoting climate change adaptation in Pakistan.Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo
, and all the aspects that encompass an individual’scapabilities as it broadly applies to engineering. In this model, we show a “Potential Engineer” asa starting circle (to the left) that over time might progress into a “Future Engineer”. The “FutureEngineer” is not a specific endpoint, but we might define it as someone who has completed anundergraduate engineering degree. In this transformational process, we show spirals that representthe progress of an individual and their overall growth in efficacy that comes with experiences inthe classroom and labs and outside the classroom in the form of internships, projects, and life.The larger circle that encompasses the “Future Engineer” is the ”Mythical Engineer”, where thisrepresents what a
motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of studenDr. Kelly J. Cross, University of Nevada, Reno Dr. Cross is currently an Assistant Professor in the Biomedical Engineering Department at Georgia Tech. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 “Are you sure you know what you’re talking about?”: Epistemic Injustice Exposed by Stereotype Threat in EngineeringAbstractCurrently and historically, women are underrepresented in engineering. One possible explanationfor this phenomenon is the masculine engineering culture that rewards the ideas and behaviors ofmen over women. Researchers have shown that women who display more masculine attributestend to be more
Paper ID #36813Interplay of Gender and Nationality in the Early Careers of FinnishEngineering Doctoral GraduatesDr. Johanna Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Finland Johanna Naukkarinen received her M.Sc. degree in chemical engineering from Helsinki University of Technology in 2001, her D.Sc. (Tech) degree in knowledge management from Tampere University of Technology in 2015, and her professional teacher qualification from Tampere University of Applied sci- ences in 2013. She is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher and project manager with the School of Energy Systems at Lappeenranta
that maternity leave may delaycompany projects and negatively affect firm operations [30], [38]. Furthermore, women engineersin the Arab world are also limited in their job opportunities because cultural norms prevent themfrom traveling offshore alone [30]. As a result, companies prefer to hire men over women [30]. In Palestine, women engineers face similar limitations due to cultural norms, includingfeeling disrespected and unsafe in the workplace and having limited access to site experience [38].Moreover, despite engineering firms in Palestine being willing to hire women, the majority stillprefer men, highlighting the role of gender bias as a significant barrier for Arab women [38].Discussion Women in STEM fields, particularly