Paper ID #40289What Difference Does Difference Make? A Case Study of Racial and EthnicDiversity in a Summer Intensive Research InstituteTryphenia B. Peele-Eady, Ph.D., University of New Mexico Dr. Tryphenia B. Peele-Eady is an Associate Professor of Language, Literacy, and Sociocultural Studies in the College of Education and Human Sciences at the University of New Mexico, where she specializes in African American education and ethnographic research. Her reserach focuses on the social, cultural, and linguistic contexts of teaching and learning practices, particularly in the African American community, and culturally
through the politics of family influence andelitism. These distinct pathways suggest limitations on the talents that may arrive in U.S.postdoctoral positions.The identified external factors also could be particularly instructive to U.S. primary andsecondary school teachers and administrators as they engage parents on the career aspirationsthey hold for their children, strengthen students’ love of science, and ground curriculum in localcommunity needs to foster an early interest in STEM. For example, schools could host parentacademies, offer field trips to STEM labs, fund science fairs, sponsor STEM clubs, partner withlocal higher education institutions to provide STEM camps, and connect with local agencies toenhance their STEM curriculum. U.S
settings [7]. This work-in-progresspaper will outline our strategies for transforming the MCTE track at Duke University, includingthe needs identification, initial findings of student and curricular success, infrastructure changesto support our enhanced tract, and future directions to iterate on our courses. We also present thefirst iteration of our improved MCTE track courses, learning objectives for lecture and student-centered laboratories, and feedback on further improving these core courses to reflect the dynamicchange in the biomedical engineering space.From traditional engineering courses to an enhanced MCTE track Our BME curriculum requires students to take Bio201L: Molecular Biology as aprerequisite for their initial required BME
Paper ID #39344Identifying Collaborative Problem-Solving Behaviors Using SequentialPattern MiningYiqiu Zhou, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignQianhui Liu, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Qianhui (Sophie) Liu is a PhD student in the Department of Curriculum & Instruction, College of Edu- cation at UIUC. Her research interests are learning analytics, educational data mining, computer science education, and explainable AI.Sophia Yang, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Sophia Yang is a second-year Ph.D. candidate with research work focused in the areas of Computing Education, Database Systems
equity, inclusion, andoverall representation in these areas need to be addressed more. In recent years, there has been arise of college-to-company pipeline initiatives with the purpose of increasing thedisproportionately under-representation of black women in tech. However, there has only been aslight increase in the representation of black women in tech from these initiatives, which stillindicate an insufficient level of their representation in tech.The objective of this research is to examine critical factors that impact the representation ofblack women in CS. To look at such factors directly, this article discusses a case-study consistingof a series of focus groups conducted on 24 black women, who were either current CS majors orrecent
which voltage is not already given. • Write a flowchart (in Visio) for a program that would cause the LED on your Arduino (pin 13 has an integrated LED – try it out!) to blink faster if more light is received by the photoresistor and more slowly if less light is received. Ensure the flowchart is only one page and submit it as a PDF. • Develop a Python program named HW11p1_Task2_UCusername.py to accomplish the logic depicted in the flow diagram on the next page. Be sure to include good input and output statements using Pythons input and print functions, respectively.Cognitive Communication incorporates content and, in many cases, both content and reasoning.The audiences specified ranged from a family member
Paper ID #40242Data Science (Dataying) for Early ChildhoodDr. Safia A. Malallah, Kansas State University Safia Malallah is a postdoc in the computer science department at Kansas State University working with Vision and Data science projects. She has ten years of experience as a computer analyst and graphic de- signer. Besides, she’s passionate about developing curriculums for teaching coding, data science, AI, and engineering to young children by modeling playground environments. She tries to expand her experience by facilitating and volunteering for many STEM workshops.Lior Shamir, Kansas State University Associate
, and D. Shallcross, “How Much Do Engineering Students Know about Sustainable Development? The Findings of an International Survey and Possible Implications for the Engineering Curriculum,” European Journal of Engineering Education., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2005, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790512331313804.9. F. Sanchez-Carracedo, F. Sabate, and K. Gibert, "A Methodology to Assess the Sustainability Competencies in Engineering Undergraduate Programs," International journal of engineering education., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1231-1243, 2021.10. L. O. Cezarino, E.C. Abdala, M.A. Soares, and V.D.C. Fernandes, "Students' knowledge of sustainability issues in higher education," Latin American Journal of Management for
quality of life [3]. In this plan, the UN developed 17 Sustainable DevelopmentGoals (SDGs) to address the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainabledevelopment, and provide an outline for specific objectives and targets for metrics of progressfor achievement by 2030. Engineering is one of the fields that has been highlighted as integral insuccessfully achieving the SDGs [4], and as such, sustainability must be integrated intocollegiate engineering curriculum to train the next generation of professionals to meet thesegoals and rise to the future challenges. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) validates these updates to curriculum with their student outcomes which highlight theimportance of understanding
and drafting[27]. Since, the curriculum has evolved tremendously, however research has shown thatprofessional engineers still may encounter new issues that they were not faced with while inschool [2]. Educators must carefully consider the needs of today's graduates in order to properlyprepare students for the demands of this work. Academic preparation for the profession inengineering-related fields primarily focuses on technical knowledge, leaving little room for othertypes of competencies within the tightly packed curriculum [28]. To respond to these challenges,incorporating augmented reality in an authentic learning activity has potential to help understandhow young engineers view the real world and make informed decisions that they may
prepared to conduct effectiveeducational research on engineering curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, and faculty developmentamong other topics. With the recency of these programs, there is significant opportunity to learnmore about what constitutes quality within this educational context. In this work-in-progresspaper, authors explore conceptions of engineering education PhD program quality as understoodfrom the lived experiences of the program directors who facilitate their delivery. Research intothe quality of doctoral-level programs is at an all-time high due to increased attention by nationalagencies, disciplinary bodies, and higher education stakeholders. These calls result from severalfactors but are most amplified by the inextricable link
associated. Figure 1. Composition of the Collaborative Design Team.Design and ImplementationThe grant was designed to intentionally integrate undergraduate student perspectives in thedevelopment process of creating these open robotics textbooks. As such, the purpose of theCollaborative Design Team is to review the OER robotics textbook chapters produced by theauthoring team, specifically looking for places to incorporate learner-centeredness into thematerial. The undergraduate students, who review the textbook chapters using their backgroundknowledge and experiences as a lens of what works in an academic setting and what can beimproved, are the key pieces in constructing learning materials that have higher efficacy
Sustainability: The Challenge of Integrating Social and Ethical Issues into a Technical Course. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 30402. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30402Accreditation Board for Engineering & Technology (ABET) (2021)“Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020 – 2021—ABET”. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-foraccrediting-engineering-program s-2020-2021/Benham, A., Callas, M., Fotherby, R., Jones, M., Chadha, J., Dobbin, M., & Johnson, A. W. (2021). Developing and Implementing an Aerospace Macroethics Lesson in a Required Sophomore Course. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109
skills are missing in the undergraduate engineering curriculum?Researcher Positionality/ReflexivityThe first author is an engineer by training. I have both an undergraduate degree in civilengineering and a master’s in environmental engineering. I have spent my whole life surroundedby engineers and engineering. I have, however, not spent a significant amount of time in theagricultural sector. These two facts, along with my enjoyment of learning and people, need to beconsidered during this study. I know that I value engineering and think other people should also,however I need to be objective in the questions I ask. I also know that my lack of experience inthe agricultural sector could be a hindrance in this study. However, I have aimed to be
Risk Management and Insurance industry. Throughout her career, she wrote articles and papers on the topic of Risk Management Information Systems and delivered several invited presentations at Risk Management Conferences as she was a recognized expert in the discipline.Dr. Lisa Cullington, National University Lisa Cullington, Ph.D. is an educational researcher with expertise in curriculum development, learning outcomes and educational assessment best practices. She focuses on building and evaluating academic programs that promote inclusive excellence for all learners. Currently, Dr. Cullington serves as the Director of Learning Outcomes for National University. Previously, she was the Founding Co-Director of the
discovering gaps in EM assessment tools? 3. How might we connect people to EM assessment tools that already exist?BackgroundEngineering faculty have been working to incorporate entrepreneurial mindset in curriculum formany years. Several efforts have been made by prior authors to summarize the existing literatureon assessment of EM. In an effort to find the appropriate tools for assessing entrepreneurialmindset, a systematic literature search resulted in a comprehensive listing of availableinstruments and surveys. Prior work by Grzybowski et al. had provided a preliminary structurecategory [2]. Each individual instrument or survey has multiple items listed including what isbeing assessed, any studies used to determine its
activities that are nottypically seen as “engineering” by engineering culture and curriculum (in opposition to acceptedactivities such as engineering club participation, engineering service, etc.), but that studentsidentify as connected to their goals in engineering. Examples of these activities could includestudents’ participation in competitive or recreational sports, artistic hobbies, and other leisure-based activities, though nearly any activity could be identified in this way by a student.Literature shows that students’ participation in on- and off-campus activities influence their senseof belonging and conceptions of themselves as engineers [1], [2]. Amongst these activities,students are exposed and integrated into cultures of engineering that
’ and prepares students for full-time careers in industry. Themulti-module program encompasses the overview, in depth anatomy, search techniques, andeveryday utilization of standards. The program was implemented with flipped classroom andteam-based project instruction in mechanical design engineering classes with great success. Not only the knowledge of engineering standards is necessary, but educating studentson the real-world applications of engineering standards is crucial. Currently, standardseducation is lacking and not fully incorporated into the undergraduate mechanical engineeringcurriculum. So far researchers only mentioned Purdue University in the US as an example ofsuccessful integration of codes and standards education into
d’Entremont, P.Eng., is an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UBC. Her work focuses on student learning and curriculum development in mechanical en- gineering. She teaches courses in mechanics, including orthopaedic biomechanics and injury biomechan- ics, and mechanical design, and teaches Arts and Commerce students about engineering. Her teaching- related interests include active learning, open educational resources (OER), and open pedagogy. She also focuses on student mental wellbeing and equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) issues in engineering education and the broader engineering profession.Dr. Katherine A. Lyon ©American Society for Engineering
semester with the overall goal ofdecomposing the project into functional modules. In the spring modules are built and tested,integrated, iterated, then the project finally undergoes an acceptance test. While the V-model isintuitive for those with design experience, as a project management model it does not accuratelythe reflect the actual and iterative work of design so it needs to be implemented flexibly and withsignificant scaffolding.Because capstone courses can be very time-intensive for faculty, the instructors have developed asignificant amount of scaffolding over time using an action-based research approach [4] (seenext section). This has resulted in a “hands-off” approach where students have responsibility formost project decisions. While
techniques. A few reasons could explain the results. One, as the students spend a disproportionateamount of time using analytical solutions, they are more likely to recall instances where theirknowledge was limited. Conversely, good programming technique is not utilized heavily in thecore curriculum, so they do not have the chance to continuously struggle with new material, andthus have an inflated sense of knowledge concerning the material. Another reason could be that,it is possible that the coding-heavy nature of the course enabled the students to remember goodprogramming practices, and this is reflected in the subsequent semesters. The lowest self-rating was given to the question “I can code my own numerical solutionsto PDEs
, gas power cycles, and refrigeration cycles. Each cyclewas covered in an assignment. The assignment prompt was to analyze the cycles by hand usingsteam tables or ideal gas relationships and then to simulate the cycle using a commonly usedprocess simulator, Aspen Plus. This allowed students to compare their hand-calculated answerswith the Aspen simulation. Students were provided a comprehensive video tutorial in thebeginning of the semester to explain how to use the software. After evaluating the assignmentssubmitted by the students, it was found that students were proficient in the use of the software toanalyze basic and complex thermofluid cycles. By integrating software that is commonly used inindustry, students will be better prepared to
change the design landscape into a more inclusiveecosystem [1,2]. And the Design Justice principles can be a concrete set of guidelines that canhelp teach engineering students how to integrate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practicesin their profession.Research shows [3], while typical engineering programs have plenty of design content, theconcepts of design justice are rarely taught. This paper talks about the experiences of introducingsome of the concepts of design justice into several undergraduate courses. It was done through acase study of a section of an interstate that was built in the 1950s cutting across a thrivingneighborhood that was eventually decimated. This case has been in recent news, since federalgovernment money is
connecting representations. Students also tend to focus on thesurface features instead of the underlying scientific principles.In chemical engineering, students are introduced to block flow diagrams (BFDs), a new type ofpictorial representation of a chemical process, early in the curriculum. For example, in thesophomore-level material and energy balances, often an initial exercise is to convert a wordproblem into a simple block flow diagram. The block flow diagram consists of a series of blocksrepresenting different equipment or unit operations that are connected by input and outputstreams. Important information such as operating temperatures, pressures, and flow rates areincluded in the diagram. However, the diagram does not include any details of
of the final project. Assuming that an individualworks well with the team, this should be reflected in the quality of the final presentation, finalreport, and the functionality of the final project. However, there are some cases where studentsdo well individually in projects 2 and 3 but fail to integrate their work into the final project. Thiscan be detected when there is no strong connection between the individual part and the finalproduct. 4. Peer evaluationsAt the end of the semester, students were required to evaluate their teammates using aquestionnaire that rated their peers in three categories: management, collaboration, andinclusivity. The rating structure was based on a scale of unsatisfactory (1/3 point), developing(2/3 points
or collaborative Legobuilds that span an entire day or two engage many people and promote social interactionacross grade years. Individual activities such as coloring or origami promote mindfulness.Having one or more graduate or undergraduate student assistant(s) that work with a faculty orstaff organizer for the wellness programming is beneficial to not only assist with overseeingprogramming content, but they also serve as a friendly face to welcome and encourage otherstudents to engage in the activities. When faculty and staff engage in the activities itdemonstrates to the students the value of making time for wellness, which helps to integrate itinto the organizational culture.Offering food, especially pre-packaged snacks, is a great way
Paper ID #39319Board 2A: WIP:Opportunities in Cultural Dimensions between Architectureand Civil Engineering students in EcuadorDaniel Cartuchevictor R viteriDr. Miguel Andres Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ MiguelAndres is an Assistant Professor in the Polytechnic College of Science and Engineering at Uni- versidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. He holds a BS in Civil Engineering from USFQ, a M.Sc. in Civil Engineering in Construction Engineering and Project Management from Iowa State University, a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with emphasis in Sustainable Construction from Virginia Tech, and two Grad- uate
engineering to real-world problems. While similar models ofreal-world engagement (e.g., EPICS) exist, they are either limited to a specific category ofstakeholders, such as industry or community, or a particular program, such as capstonedesign. The TRUE projects allow learners across the four-year engineering curriculum toparticipate while holistically building the skills required for the projects via specializedcourses, outreach programs, and mentorship.Implementation of the TRUE initiative over the past seven years provides an opportunity toqualitatively understand the development of students' engineering self-efficacy as a result oftheir participation. Self-efficacy measures students' beliefs in their ability to achieve tasks [2].In this study, it
majority of the overall populationof students from a non-STEM field came from Liberal Arts/Humanities (51.7%). This was alsothe most highly ranked prior major for International women (41.7%) and White women (32.7%),as articulated in Table 4. This presents an opportunity to think about how computing can becombined with such fields or cover topics related to these areas.Increasingly, institutions are beginning to consider “CS+X” options, where X refers to anemphasis in another discipline, allowing for students to complete a core curriculum in computerscience while considering intersecting fields as well. At the University of Illinois, options rangefrom areas like “CS + Advertising,” “CS + Economics,” and “CS + Music” [35]. Apart from theemergence of
Paper ID #37252Developing Design Thinking in Senior Capstone Bioengineering StudentMr. Brandon K HarrisonMr. Michael Alexander Phelan I am a PhD student in Bioengineering at Temple University and a predoctoral fellow at the National Eye Institute. My research primarily focuses on the design and testing of bioreactors to enhance the growth and differentiation of stem cell-derived retinalVahid AlizadehAratrik GuhaDr. Yah-el Har-el, Temple University Dr. Har-el is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the Department of Bioengineering at Temple Uni- veristy.Dr. Ruth Ochia, Temple University Dr. Ruth S. Ochia is a