. This major would have students take an Introduction to Engineering Design class,Statics, Materials, complete an external project, and do a one-semester capstone. Thisengineering curriculum would be supported by math, physics and chemistry courses, includingelectronics and thermodynamics through the physics department. The initial engineering sciencedegree was not meant to be an ABET-accredited degree but a pathway for students interested inengineering to gain engineering training while integrating other interests such as business,environmental science, and data science. This degree was intended to provide strong preparationfor careers in areas such as entrepreneurship, project management, architecture/design,government technology policy
sustainability. The Civil Engineering Technology program at Rochester Instituteof Technology is well poised to incorporate curricular changes that incorporate sustainability andinnovation. This project focused on introducing students in the Civil Engineering TechnologyProgram to sustainability concepts using the EOP framework. Curricular adaptations wereimplemented for two courses: Introduction to Civil Engineering and Structural Steel Design,both in the Civil Engineering Technology Program reaching 102 students. The two pilot coursesserved as examples to incorporate sustainability concepts into other technical courses within theprogram to ensure the students are well-grounded and prepared to be sustainability change agentsin their future careers in the
greater sense of belonging to discipline, self-efficacy, and career readiness; particularly for under-represented minority (URM) students [3].However, such active-learning experiences are usually offered late in their engineering degree(e.g., senior-capstone projects) rather than early and often throughout the curriculum. Mostredesign efforts to address this issue typically focus on single, or multiple but disjointed gatewaycourses [4]. An example of a critical path in the Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EEE)department at Sacramento State is shown in Figure 1.Figure-1: Example curriculum path in the EEE major, showing long engineering pre-requisite chains called critical-paths. Courses shown in Bold, shaded, are redesigned as a part of the
Washington. Dr. Edwards is currently a University Distinguished Professor, and teaches courses on engineering ethics and applied aquatic chemistry. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Ethics and the Public: Impact of a Graduate-Level Course on Students' Personal and Career Priorities and Values (2010-20)AbstractA graduate level three-credit elective course entitled “Engineering Ethics and the Public” has beenoffered by the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Virginia Tech since 2010. Thecourse draws on high profile case studies, both past and unfolding, to examine real-world ethicaldilemmas that confront engineers and scientists in research, policy, and practice. Course
without any physicalequipment. Establishing a virtualized learning environment is an effective approach forcybersecurity teaching [5]. The use of game-based learning in cybersecurity camps can be aneffective way to introduce students to key topics in cybersecurity [6]. As technology becomes morepervasive, helping students understand the importance of cybersecurity in their careers is crucialfor preparing them for the demands of the modern workforce[7]. A cybersecurity awarenessprogram that utilizes a game-like learning environment can be an effective way to engage studentsand promote cybersecurity best practices [8].Goal and ObjectiveThis project aims to expand high school students’ knowledge about cybersecurity. Therefore, weoffered a free
education and career and technical educa- tion. Dr. Clark is recognized as a Distinguished Technology Educator by the International Technology Engineering Education Association and for the American Society of Engineering Education; Engineering Design Graphics Division.Mr. Erik Schettig, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Erik is a lecturer in the Technology, Engineering, and Design Education department and a Ph.D. student in the Learning and Teaching in STEM program at NC State University. He has served as a technology, engineering, and design education teacher in middle and high schools. Erik teaches introductory engi- neering graphics courses at NCSU and his research interests focus on developing engaging
students in a learning experience, which can further lead them to computer science,mechatronics, electrical engineering, and electrical engineering technology career pathways. Thepaper also presents sample Arduino projects showcased through readily available Arduinosimulators.IntroductionAs time progresses, so does the development of technologies, which affect the world around us[1]. Nowadays, computers are found in almost every facet of a person’s daily life, ranging fromsensors used in various devices [2] to personal devices and home devices, as well as advancedcomputing that supports various daily activities. Computers can be found on a personal level inthe form of a smartphone, which can allow people to communicate with each other across
Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Dissecting 3D Printing for Engineering Design Process Education of High School Preservice Teachers Abstract 3D printing (3DP) has been becoming more and more popular throughout the education systemfrom Kindergarten to University. High school is a critical period for students to decide theirimminent university major selection which in turn will impact their future career choices. Highschool students are usually intrigued by hands-on tool such as 3DP which is also an importantcontributor to other courses such as robotics. The recent years have seen more investment andavailability of 3DP in high schools, especially Career and
Technology Program for 2018-19 and 2022-23. Dr. Johnson was the recipient of a 2001 U.S. National Science Foundation ”Early Faculty Career Devel- opment (CAREER) Award,” the Junior Research Prize and Medal from the International Association for Structural Safety and Reliability (2005), and an Outstanding Recent Alumnus Award (2003) and a Dis- tinguished Alumni Award (2016) from the University of Illinois. He is a senior member of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), and a member of both the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). Dr. Johnson has served as the Chair of the ASCE EMI Technical Committee on Structural Health Monitoring and
, anexperiment was performed where people viewed three Navy job descriptions in their respectiveSTEM fields and were asked their level of interest. This paper will show that women who do nothave a background in the jargon are less likely to apply on jargon-filled, STEM job descriptionsthan men. Conversely, when women have a background with the jargon, this paper will showthat these women have a higher interest in the jargon-filled job advertisements than men do.KeywordsDiversity, Jargon, STEM, Job Advertisements, Gender.IntroductionResearch has shown that science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers aremale dominated [1]. Among first-year college students, women are much less likely than men tosay that they intend to major in STEM
professional persistence test. The academic persistence test answered thefollowing four questions on a 7-point likert scale from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7):1) I intend to major in an engineering field, 2) I plan to remain enrolled in the college ofengineering and technology over the next semester, 3) I think that earning a BS in engineering isa realistic goal for me, and 4) I am fully committed to getting my college degree in engineering.Professional persistence was measured on a 5-point likert scale, where 1 was definitely not and 5was definitely yes, where students in collaborations 2 and 3 answered the following questions: 1)Do you see yourself pursuing a career in engineering or engineering technology? 2) How likelyis it that you
as “other” such as biology, chemistry, business, computer science, safety, andcommunication, among others, has led to the evolving definition of chemical engineers. Theboundaries of this discipline have become grayer and allow for more interdisciplinarycollaborations and broader research interests, leading to impactful discoveries. The need for periodic review of processes is needed in all fields of endeavor, andchemical engineering education is no different. Curricula must change and evolve as the worldchanges and evolves to match the variety of applications and jobs/careers the students willundertake after completing their degree. These changes to the scope of chemical engineering canbe seen in the undergraduate education curriculum
competitions inengineering can be taken on as an extra-curricular activity or included in the curriculum in theform of a group or senior project. Students work in a collaborative environment, often in groupsinvolving students from different disciplines, to design and build a specific product within a narrowtimeframe and budget that will satisfy certain criteria and perform competitively to completespecific objectives. These projects allow students to get hands-on experience in solving a range ofengineering problems like those they will face in their careers, while also gaining professionalskills that enable them to work with others as a team. It is this real-world problem solving andteamwork that makes student competitions an excellent place for
Agricultural & Techni- cal State University where he earned degrees in both Chemistry and Chemical Engineering as a part of the Atlanta University Center’s Dual Degree in Engineering Program. While in college he was a Ronald E. McNair Scholar which afforded him the opportunity to intern at NASA Langley. He also earned distinc- tion as a Phi Beta Kappa member and an American Chemical Society Scholar. Dr. Henderson completed his Ph.D. in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. During his time as a graduate student, he was a NASA Harriet G. Jenkins Graduate Fellow. Dr. Henderson has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students who are on pathways to pursue
careers. Alex received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The Pennsylvania State University in 2015 where he studied combustion instabilities in gas turbine engines and also served as a Graduate Teaching Fellow.Dr. Ashley Lytle Ashley Lytle is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. Lytle earned her PhD at Stony Brook University, New York, USA. Her research explores how prejudice, discrimination, and stereotyping imDr. Maxine Fontaine, Stevens Institute of Technology Maxine Fontaine is a Teaching Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. in 2010 from Aalborg University in Aalborg, Denmark
students.Dr. Emily Dringenberg, The Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State Uni- versity. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her current career purpose is to learn about and reveal beliefs that are widely-held as an implicit result of our socialization within systems of oppression so that she can embolden others to reflect on their assumptions and advance equity in their own ways.Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical
Science Career Choice Intentions,” J. Career Dev., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 141–158, Apr. 2014.[33] M. C. Cadaret, P. J. Hartung, L. M. Subich, and I. K. Weigold, “Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 99, pp. 40–51, Apr. 2017.[34] A. Meador, “Examining recruitment and retention factors for minority STEM majors through a stereotype threat lens,” Sch. Sci. Math., vol. 118, no. 1–2, pp. 61–69, Feb. 2018.[35] J. A. Mejia, R. A. Revelo, and A. L. Pawley, “Thinking about Racism in Engineering Education in New Ways [Commentary],” IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag., 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9288820/.[36] S. M. Lord, M
national and international conferences, scientific journals, and books. Stan serves as a reviewer and a member of program committees for a number of national and international conferences. During his academic career, Stan received over seven million dollars in funding from private and federal sources. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Using Agile Principles for Cohort Building in a Graduate Software Engineering ProgramAbstractThis report describes an approach to building a cohort of students in a graduate softwareengineering program supported by the Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (S-STEM) Program of the National
program, specifically, werecommend checking out the 2022 paper by Reyes and colleagues.1Early successes from the PINC program have contributed to the development of seven additionallarge-scale, NSF- and foundation-funded projects that focus on increasing equity and diversity incomputing through the use of peer mentoring, career-building and professional development, andevidence-based teaching practices, including real-world applications of course material. Weoutline these grants and their goals below and explain their conceptual ties to components of thePINC program.Expansion and Sustainability EffortsGOLD: The Graduate Opportunities to Learn Data Science (GOLD) program (2019-2022) wasfunded by NSF Innovations in Graduate Education to support the
introducing this technology in a course or including examples of hightechnology applications in civil engineering throughout an undergraduate’s career, while abidingby ABET and other accreditation requirements. As this is a work in progress, the paper in itscurrent form evaluates how universities have integrated high technology in their civil engineeringcurricula, defines ABET requirements for new coursework, and provides sample questions togauge public perception of high school students interested in engineering. Future work includesproviding a sample syllabus of a new high technology course and how a four-year plan can berestructured to incorporate these concepts. Although the curriculum may not be the only factoraffecting enrollment and retention
opportunities for learning the topics of disastersocial impacts and DEI in their education. As they practice structural engineering in their career,this lack of understanding may serve as an obstacle for them to play the required role as a riskmanager. This highlights a significant gap between the role needed by society and theeducational preparation for structural engineers.Despite the importance of incorporating community resilience and DEI concepts into thecurriculum, it is not a trivial task due to the concepts’ complexity. These concepts are definedbased on other complex subjects, such as multi-criteria decision-making, systems analysis, riskanalysis, and socio-economic disaster impact analysis. It is one of the reasons why theseconcepts are often
Engineering Dept. Heads Assoc. (ECEDHA)Dr. Barry J. Sullivan, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department Heads Assn Barry J. Sullivan is Director of Program Development for the Inclusive Engineering Consortium. His 40- year career includes significant experience as a researcher, educator, and executive in industry, academia, and the non-profit sector. He has developedDr. John C. Kelly, North Carolina A&T State University (CoE) Dr. John C. Kelly, Jr. is chair and associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at North Carolina A&T State University. He received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Delaware. Dr. Kelly’s research interests include hardware
, conducting literature review, and evaluatingand communicating results of research. Follow-up activities are ongoing during the teacher’sacademic school year, including carrying out the lesson plans in their classroom, teacherstraveling to conferences related to their field, and introducing students to careers in simulation,visualization, and industrial research, as well as STEM in general through presentations and fieldtrips.IntroductionSTEM Education provides students with multidimensional capabilities that are necessary to meetcurrent and future workforce needs due to constant technological advances in nearly all industries[1-4]. Unfortunately, only a small portion of students are both proficient and interested in STEMfields [5]. Researchers
academic settinghelped to solidify their engineering identity and impact their future career decisions. It is alsoevident that the relationships students developed and the accessibility of resources served asprotective factors against several of the challenges they experienced. Students who were able toform study groups, seek out tutoring, and/or receive mentorship from engineering professionals feltsupported and grounded in their engineering identity.Implications The preliminary results suggest the importance of relationships, social capital, andagency on the development of students’ engineering identity. The results also indicate howstudents navigate academic and personal challenges based on the amount of social capitalwealth they possess
Summer Evaluation Institute. Besides teaching, she has worked as an evaluator in grants awarded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), National Insti- tutes of Health (NIH), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Currently she is the internal evaluator for the projects Recruiting, Retaining and Engaging Academically Talented Students from Economically Disadvantaged Groups into a Pathway to Successful Engineering Careers (PEARLS) and for Building Capacity at Collaborative Undergraduate STEM Program in Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructure (RISE-UP). Both projects are funded by NSF.Maryliz Soto, University of Puerto Rico, MayaguezDr. Carla Lopez Del Puerto
well as measuring student inclination and/or intent to pursue advancedSTEM study. In this capacity, research questions were asked to elucidate how the construction ofthe team affects its performance, how VIP affect learning experiences differently as compared totraditional one-on-one student mentoring as well as students’ inclinations to pursue advancedSTEM study and careers. On gathering information via surveys and interviews, conclusions weredrawn that highlighted the benefits of constructing and deploying such teams in contrast totraditional one-on-one research mentoring of a student. In general, students showed significantgrowth under the categories of understanding engineering design, problem solving, andcommunication, besides positive
courses; and (3) students tend to treat sustainability courses as a one-off class, andoften lack a vision and clear next steps toward a career path in designing and innovating aroundsustainable products.To address the challenges above and to improve the skills and competency of engineeringstudents, we have introduced in our sustainability course two additional sets of training – one oninnovation and product design principles, practices, and methods and one on the entrepreneurialmindset. These additional training sets aim to: (1) encourage constant curiosity among studentsabout our changing world and anticipate the challenges of currently accepted solutions; (2) makeconnections from many resources to intersect ideas; and (3) develop product
in innovation, leadership, and engineering entrepreneurship that is open tostudents of all majors and levels; 2) a year-long innovation course designed for first-yearstudents who must apply and be accepted into this academic program; and 3) a semester-longintroduction to innovation course that is available exclusively to students living in a certainresidential living-learning program for first- and second-year students. The first two courses havetypical enrollments of 40 students or less while the third course enrolls between 100-150 studentswhen it is offered each fall. This exploration will discuss the importance of formally introducingstudents to innovation and entrepreneurship early in their academic careers, specific curriculumand
, explored the mechanics and chemistry of bubbles made from atomically thin materials. From 2016 to 2019, Dr. Sanchez served in many leadership roles through Out for Undergrad and the UT Austin chapter of oSTEM - both of which promote the professional development of LGBTQ+ STEM students. He currently serves on the O4U Life Sciences Conference Advisory Board.Dr. Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Dr. Roc´ıo Chavela Guerra serves as an instructor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. In her prior role, she served as Director of Education and Career Development at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and as headquarters liaison to
Paper ID #37671Work in Progress: Broadening Participation in Engineering with the STEMExcellence in Engineering Equity (SEEE) ProjectTaryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh Taryn Melkus Bayles is a Professor, Teaching Track, in the Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Depart- ment at the University of Pittsburgh, and serves as the Vice Chair of Undergraduate Education. She has spent part of her career working in industry with Exxon, Westinghouse, Phillips Petroleum and Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center (now NETL). Her industrial experience has included process engineering, computer modeling and control, process