with most things of a complex nature there are many problems that we maynot foresee. In doing our best to avoid these issues, diligent planning and research-basedsolutions will be utilized to provide students with an environment that is conducive tocollaborative learning. While the development of 3-D modeling skills and spatial ability areintegral to this project it is important to keep in mind that at the heart of the ABLE project is thedevelopment of a collaborative learning experience that can potentially help us addresschallenges we face as a global community.Figure 1Community Water TankFigure 2Automated Milk Line REFERENCESAllen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem
students approach engineering problems in the workplace.This study has been limited thus far by a small sample size of students, which will likely increaseas the course is offered each year. Additionally, future work will aim to identify how the courseimpacts students’ entrepreneurial mindsets and career goals long-term in their senior capstoneprojects. As the course gains interest among engineering students, this study will also aim tounderstand how different engineering majors are influenced by the course activities.References[1] B. Schadl, S. Sheppard, and H. Chen, “Career Certainty: Differences Between Career Certain and Uncertain Engineering Students,” in ASEE , 2017.[2] B. Hughes, W. Schell, B. Tallman, R. Beigel, E. Annand, and M
choices and functionalities of all the available options.Having a one-on-one consultation appointment, in which a CTL advisor walks through ashortened list of alternatives could make the process more palatable to faculty.Considering participant P46’s experiences, another proposed avenue for combatting resource-related barriers to EBIP implementation is training at a graduate level. It is not uncommon inPhD or Master’s programs for students to take on graduate teaching assistant positions. Thisexperience is often considered as preparation for holding an academic position in highereducation. Therefore, it is reasonable at this stage for graduate students to be exposed to EBIPsthrough some form of training. This type of coaching may prepare
. 5, no. 1, pp. 37-52, 2003.[14] L. Malcom, and S. Malcom, “The double bind: The next generation,” Harvard EducationalReview, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 162-172, 2011.[15] M. Wyer, “Intending to stay: Images of scientists, attitudes toward women, and gender asinfluences on persistence among science and engineering majors,” Journal of Women andMinorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, 2003.[16] S. V. Brown, “The preparation of minorities for academic careers in science andengineering: How well are we doing,” Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientificenterprise, pp. 239-269, 2000.[19] Y. J. Xu, “The experience and persistence of college students in STEM majors,” Journal ofCollege Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice
. Figure 11. Color-indexed Hierarchy of Ethics Topics (Green: Top 1-8, Yellow: Top 9-17, Orange: Top 22-36, Red: Uncovered Topics)AcknowledgementProject sponsored by the National Security Agency under Grant/Cooperative Agreement NumberH98230-21-l-0167. The United States Government is authorized to reproduce and distributereprints notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Security Agency. This manuscript is submitted for publicationwith the understanding that the United States Government is authorized to reproduce anddistribute reprints.References[1] S. Deb
] zyBooks. http://zybooks.com/ (accessed April 2023).[13] S. L. Broschat, “Interactive software for undergraduate electromagnetics,” IEEE Trans.Educ., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 123-126, 1993.[14] G. Hagerty and S. Smith, “Using the web-based interactive software ALEKS to enhancecollege algebra,” Math. Comput. Educ., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 183-194, 2005.[15] S. L. Wood, “A new approach to interactive tutorial software for engineering education,”IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 399-408, 1996.[16] G. A. Krohn and C. M. O'Connor, "Student effort and performance over the semester," TheJ. of Econ. Educ., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 328, Winter 2005.[17] J. Yuen, A. Edgcomb, and F. Vahid, “Will students earnestly attempt learning questions ifanswers are viewable
industry mentor(s) over time sothat they could build a relationship with the mentor(s) and feel comfortable enough to ask questions onany range of topics. These sessions, moreover, were designed such that mentor(s) responded to theinterests and needs of the REM students in what we called a “Mr. Roger’s” fashion – inviting a friendof theirs to talk with the students for a little while about an interest they expressed (i.e., EngineersWithout Borders).Interactive Talks with Industry Professionals. The purpose was to give the REM students insight intothe daily life of an engineer working in the energy sector and hear what they are doing around all thedifferent energy sources (e.g., gas, oil, wind, solar), and how their companies are innovating
opportunities that are being offered to students. We alsoidentified gaps in communication and professional development areas of the curriculum whichcould better match what employers and alumni identified as key skills required to perform jobduties. We suggest a more formal peer and committee-based mentorship which could focus onimproving skills as one potential solutions, or development of special courses designed to teachwriting or communication skills.References1. Altarawneh, M.; Dlugogorski, B. Z., Introducing Quantum Chemistry in ChemicalEngineering Curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education 2018, 95 (9), 1562-1571.2. Fogler, H. S.; Hirshfield, L. J., Process Safety Across the Chemical EngineeringCurriculum. ACS Chemical Health &
design project,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2017-June, 2017. [4] J. P. Michael and M. F. Richard, “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2006. [5] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? a review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, pp. 223–231, 07 2004. [6] S. Farrell, R. Hesketh, and C. S. Slater, “An inductive approach to teaching courses in engineering,” in 2003 Annual Conference. Nashville, Tennessee: ASEE Conferences, June 2003. [7] B. B. Jayasingh, H. Kumar, and G. Aishwarya, “Inquiry based inductive learning practices in engineering
mentoring program for juniorfaculty: Recommendations for practice. In To improve the academy, vol. 16, editedby D. DeZure. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press and the ProfessionalOrganizational Development Network in Higher Education[4] Schlosser, L. Z., S. Knox, A. R. Moskovitz, and C. E. Hill. 2003. A qualitativeexamination of graduate advising relationships: The advisee perspective. Journal ofCounseling Psychology 50(2):178–188.[5] Matthews, K., (2014) Perspectives on Midcareer Faculty and Advice forSupporting Them. Cambridge, MA: Collaborative on Academic Careers inHigher Education White Paper.[6] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019. TheScience of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Washington, DC: The NationalAcademies Press
deliverables associated with each pillar were presented to students during the first week of the course. Pillars were assigned a unique slide tag that was used in subsequent lecture materials to indicate the relevant pillar(s) of operation to the topic in discussion. The Project Management Pillar focused on developing a project-specific schedule, assigningindividual tasks, and managing expenses within a project-specific budget. The instructorsprovided deadlines for high-level milestones (i.e., specific interactions with project sponsorsaround project updates and stage gate reviews) (Figure 2), but student teams were responsible
configurations, and more. The students are also asked to set up the physical interface between the NI myDAQ, the myDevBoard prototype board, and the DC motor. The completion of this laboratory exercise is assessed through successful simulation of the LabVIEW program and understanding of the NI myDAQ specifications and interface. B. Motor Identification and Modeling The goal of this experiment is to develop the transfer function of the lab DC motor. The open- loop transfer function to be obtained is: where K: motor’s torque constant (N/m/s) J: motor’s mass moment of inertia (kg m2) Ra: motor’s armature resistance (Ω) Bm
, vol. 14, n.o 1, pp. 1-11, 2018.[3] P. Appiah-Kubi y E. Annan, «A Review of a Collaborative Online International Learning», International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), vol. 10, n.o 1, Art. n.o 1, ene. 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijep.v10i1.11678.[4] F. F. Guimarães y K. R. Finardi, «Global citizenship education (GCE) in internationalization: COIL as alternative Thirdspace», Globalisation, Societies and Education, vol. 19, n.o 5, pp. 641- 657, oct. 2021, doi: 10.1080/14767724.2021.1875808.[5] V. P. Misra, S. Rautela, A. Sharma, y P. Mishra, «Collaborative Online International Learning (Coil) in Teaching-Learning: Bridging the Student Mobility Gap in Internationalization of Higher Education.», International Journal of Modern
REFERENCESchoice of future major but may not lead to their choice of themajor in this pilot. [1] Mack, K., Rankins, C., and Woodson, K. (2013). From graduate school toB. Interpretations and implications the STEM Workforce: An entropic approcach to career identity development for STEM women of color. New directions for Higher A review of all participants' major interests prior to their Education, 163, pp.23-24.attending in I-CUREs showed that most of freshmen were not [2] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H.,originally
Barbara and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. At AHC, he is Department Chair of Math- ematical Sciences, Faculty Advisor of MESA (the Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement Pro- gram), and Principal/Co-Principal Investigator of several National Science Foundation projects (S-STEM, LSAMP, IUSE). In ASEE, he is chair of the Two-Year College Division, and Vice-Chair/Community Col- leges of the Pacific Southwest Section. He received the Outstanding Teaching Award for the ASEE/PSW Section in 2022.Dr. James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor and chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytech- nic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received
currently addressing through this project.1 https://www.globethics.net/blogs/-/blogs/restorative-hope-and-ethical-leadership-in-times-of-natural-catastrophesReferences[1] J. R. Lohmann, H. A. Rollins, and J. Joseph Hoey, “Defining, developing and assessingglobal competence in engineers,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp.119-131, 2006.[2] R. Taraban, W. M. Marcy, M. S. LaCour, S. H. C. Prasad, and S. Zasiekin, “Using the web todevelop global ethical engineering students,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 3,pp. 1-21, 2020.[3] R. Taraban, M. Iserman, J. C. Pittman, N. Yeo, R. C. Campbell, J-H Kim, and D. D. Reible,“Assessment of reflective thinking in graduate engineering students: Human and machinemethods
department at the case University in November 2022, six teachers agreed to beinterviewed. Previous studies had used the interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)method to collect data from a small sample size (e.g., six interviewees in Wartenweiler’sstudy and Five interviewees in Wood et al.’s study [29][30][31]). The researcher decided todeploy the IPA method to work with the six female CS and engineering teachers. Duringinterviews, the questions were asked based on these guiding research questions: Whatperceived role and responsibilities do female faculty of computer science and engineeringhold? In what ways faculty’s gender identity influence their perceived roles andresponsibilities? How do they carry out their roles and responsibilities in
participation in these career fields [12], [13],[14], STEM-VRCE represents one avenue of change for modern career development.References[1] S. Provasnik, et al. “Status of education in rural America,” US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, 2007.[2] D. J. Gagnon and M.J. Mattingly. "State policy responses to ensuring excellent educators in rural schools," Journal of Research in Rural Education, Vol 30.13, pp. 1-14, 2015.[3] B.C. Hutchins and P. Akos. "Rural high school youth's access to and use of school-to-work programs," The Career Development Quarterly, Vol 61.3, pp. 210-225, 2013.[4] A. Byars-Winston. "Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career
students’ acquisition of the importantparticipatory capacity of engineering judgment.AcknowledgmentsThis project is supported by National Science Foundation under grant numbers xxxxxxx andxxxxxxx. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.ReferencesBaybutt, P. (2018). The validity of engineering judgment and expert opinion in hazard and risk analysis: The influence of cognitive biases. Process Safety Progress, 37(2), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11906Bruhl, L. C. J. C., Klosky, J. L., Mainwaring, T., & Hanus, J. P. (2017). Accelerating the development of engineering judgment
-world engineering applications, Dr. Bairaktarovaˆa C™s experiential learning research spans from engineering to psychology to learning ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WORK IN PROGRESS: Thinking with mechanical objects: A think-aloud protocol study to understand students’ learning of difficult and abstract thermodynamic conceptsAbstract Since Froebelian time, tangible objects have been used in education to facilitate learningof concrete and abstract phenomena. The efficacy of humanly made artifacts in educationalsettings are widely studied in art, communications, and more recently in STEM education.Physical objects have
Test Blueprints provided a guided way of properly preparingassessment material to capture the intended learning outcomes of the course. Test Blueprintsclearly showed across all courses that faculty were missing some important learning outcomeswhen their assessments were not guided by a Test Blueprint. It was also evident that TestBlueprints varied significantly depending on the nature and the delivery mode of the course.AcknowledgementsThis project is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1821023. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] D. Boud
many other engi-neering mechanics lab courses, is the universal testing machine. As noted in Table 1, 12 of the 14labs involved physical experimentation, and of these, 6 involved the use of a universal testing ma-chine. The custom universal testing machine is shown in Figure 1, and was designed much likeconventional universal testing machines. It has dual lead screws with a crosshead that moves with Figure 1: Custom Universal Testing Machinethe rotation of the two screws. The crosshead supports a 500 kg (1100 lb) s-type load cell, andTable 1: Weekly Laboratory Activities, Feedback Writing Assignments, and Equipment forStrength of Materials Lab Week Lab Activity Writing Writing Feedback
. Senior, “What is AgTech?,” AgtechThinking - technology & entrepreneurship in agriculture, Oct. 12, 2020. https://agtechthinking.com/2020/10/12/the-4th-agricultural- revolution/ (accessed Dec. 13, 2022).[2] S. István, “Messages from ‘industry 4.0’ to agriculture,” in Towards Sustainable Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, A. Nyéki, A. J. Kovács, and G. Milics, Eds. Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Ltd., 2017, pp. 63–77. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aniko- Nyeki/publication/335339931_Towards_sustainable_agriculture_and_biosystems_engine ering_book_Edited_by_Aniko_Nyeki_Attila_J_Kovacs_Gabor_Milics/links/5d765da492 851cacdb2caef0/Towards-sustainable-agriculture-and-biosystems
Journal of Engineering Education, 43(6), 927–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1462766Faber, C., & Benson, L. C. (2017). Engineering students' epistemic cognition in the context of problem- solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 677–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20183Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, 'big data' and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417Godwin, A. (2017). Unpacking Latent Diversity. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, OH. https://peer.asee.org/29062Godwin, A., Benedict, B., Rohde
. Fathi, M. Iranmanesh, P. Maroufkhani, and M. E. Morales, "Industry 4.0 ten years on: A bibliometric and systematic review of concepts, sustainability value drivers, and success determinants," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 302, p. 127052, 2021.[3] K. Rojko, N. Erman, and D. Jelovac, "Impacts of the Transformation to Industry 4.0 in the Manufacturing Sector: The Case of the US," Organizacija, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 287-305, 2020.[4] L. Georgios, S. Kerstin, and A. Theofylaktos, "Internet of things in the context of industry 4.0: An overview," 2019.[5] M. O. Gokalp, K. Kayabay, M. A. Akyol, P. E. Eren, and A. Koçyiğit, "Big data for industry 4.0: A conceptual framework," in 2016 international conference
on one part of the car. • The smallest speed would be B in this one because B is toward the center and A C and D will have the same. • Which has the smallest speed. A B C or D … wow this is what got me in Physics, I really need to review this. Um I think A C and D speed … but B … No they might just all have the same speed if we’re looking at … yeah … I’m going to say they have … I’m going to say E • The “S” and “L” component of velocity based on the tire’s movement. Since it’s in the very center basically everyone one of them is moving at B, the velocity of the car, but each has their own velocity of the tire s well, except for B.Correct Responses • Nothing was said aloud – scored as incorrect
can lead to better performance and less focus onmemorization. Additionally, online students had more positive feedback about the quality of thecourse and instructor compared to the in-person students. From an institutional perspective, onlinecourses can increase enrollment and allow students to access education at their own pace and fit itinto their flexible schedules.References[1] T. Braun, “Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students,” J. Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 63–92, 2008.[2] P. C. Holzweiss, S. A. Joyner, M. B. Fuller, S. Henderson, and R. Young, “Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences,” Distance Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 311– 323, 2014.[3] V. Benigno
suitable forembedded systems courses in engineering and engineering technology programs [5]. Theseprojects required MicroPython with the Pi Pico. Project deliverables included the following. • Executive summary of the results (Word file): o Written description (1-2 paragraphs) of the hardware design (also include OrCAD PSpice schematics) o Written description (1-2 paragraphs) of the software design (also include a flowchart created in Word, ppt, or other s/w) o Testing procedure (numbered step by step testing procedure for each engineering requirement) o Results (1-2 paragraphs) o Signed academic integrity statement • 2-3 minute video (posted on YouTube) demonstrating
recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.ReferencesBarton, A. C., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning fromMiguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the NationalAssociation for Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871-889.Bowen, C. L., Thompson, L. L., Menezes, G. B., & Restrepo Nazar, C. (2022a).Work-In-Progress: Measuring Systemic Educational Wellness using the Eco-STEM EducationalEcosystem Health Survey. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Bowen, C. L., Heubach, S., & Dong, J. (2022b). Eco-STEM Tools: Changing the Culture ofTeaching and Learning in STEM. In 2022
/s11165-006-9029-2[3] Oermann, M. H. (1999). Critical thinking, critical practice. Nursing Management, 30(4),40C-40F, 40H-40I. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/critical-thinking-practice/docview/231387045/se-2[4] S. Schrader, W. M. Riggs, & R. P. Smith (1993). Choice over Uncertainty and Ambiguity inTechnical Problem Solving, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 10, 1993,https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/46980/choiceoveruncert00schr.pdf?s[5] Furnham, A. & Ribchester, A. (1995). Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Concept, ItsMeasurement and Applications. Current Psychology: Developmental ° Learning • Personality °Social, Fall, 1995, Vol. 14, No. 3, 179-199[6] Furnham, A., & Marks