mechanics course,Capstone includes an entire module in DC motor, stepper motor, and servo motor control. Thismodule provides students the hands-on skill set needed to create functional mechanicalengineering prototypes that move as they do not learn it elsewhere in the curriculum. Interestingly, students report enhanced course enjoyment fostered by the opportunity tolearn new skills. So, it is positive that they do learn these skills somewhere in the curriculum andthrough hands-on application in Capstone rather than a pure theory-based exposure. It is, however,worrisome that they are having these experiences for the first time in Capstone rather than learningin a prerequisite course, bringing those skills into Capstone, and using the
Paper ID #38822Board 419: Students use their Lived Experiences to Justify their Beliefsabout How they Will Approach Process Safety JudgmentJeffrey Stransky, Rowan University Jeffrey Stransky is a PhD candidate in the Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) Department at Rowan University. His research interests involve studying engineering ethics and decision making and using digital games as safe teaching environments. He has published in the overlap of these topics by integrating digital games into chemical engineering curriculum to help students build an awareness of the ethical and practical implications of their
, University of California, San Diego Marko V. Lubarda is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego. He teaches mechanics, materials science, design, computational analysis, and engineering mathematics courses, and has co-authored the undergraduate textbook Intermediate Solid Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engi- neering pedagogy and enriching students’ learning experiences through teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research.Dr. Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego Saharnaz Baghdadchi is an Assistant Teaching Professor at UC San Diego. She
cipher mode. See Section 12.5.3 in [10] and Figure 4 for more detail. In thisexercise, we focus on the decryption of a unicast packet such as an ARP or ICMP. In Exercise 3,we focus on the AES CMAC message authentication and integrity code algorithm. WPA3 usesAES with a 128-bit key, 128-bit block size and 8 Byte MIC. Note that WPA3-Enterprise supportsthe use of AES-128 CCM and 192-bit session key with AES GCMP-256 mode. The students areto identify the wTarget, that is, the message plaintext/payload (after decryption using Wiresharkwith the WPA Temporal Key (TK) extracted from the logs and the captured 4-way handshakemessages.) Figure 4: Encryption and Authentication with CCMP using TK or GTK in WPA3.The students are also to be provided
microcredential fits within the department's curriculum and integrates with other courses and programs offered by the department. Additionally, the departmental review allows faculty members to collaborate, allowing them to share their expertise and contribute to the development of a high-quality microcredential.(b). College Review: College review is critical to ensure that the college can commit to the necessary resources and requirements needed for the microcredential course. This includes allocating funding for course development, instructor compensation, and ongoing support for the course. The review also provides an opportunity for collaboration among departments and cross-disciplinary input, allowing for a more well
rateamong engineering graduates in western countries is almost 13% [4], and a staggering62.3% and 42.8% among Fine art and Design graduates respectively [5]. These numbersdo not just disincentivise students from pursuing their desired majors and their passionsbut also suggest a need for an immediate change to improve disciplinary education, ifnot completely returning to an integrative multidisciplinary approach.The vitality of multidisciplinary education is therefore evident. However, the approachtowards this collaborative education is just as important. The way a topic is introducedto a student and the way that topic is applied varies highly with respect to the type ofeducational model being followed. Project based learning, for example gives
Paper ID #39121A Self-Study of the IRE 5-Point Grading Scale for Promoting Growth Mind-setDr. Lauren Singelmann, Minnesota State University, Mankato Lauren Singelmann is an Assistant Professor at Minnesota State University, Mankato with the Iron Range Engineering program. She has a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and STEM Education through North Dakota State University. Her research interests include learning analytics and alternative assessment.Dr. Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Yuezhou Wang is an associate professor in both Iron Range Engineering and Twin Cities Engineering programs
workshops held at WPI’s Makerspace and Prototyping Lab, while collaborating with clubs and organizations on campus to bring new workshops into the space.Cameron Wian, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Robotics Engineering and Computer Science Student Makerspace Workshop CoordinatorSydney Kerivan, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Sydney Kerivan is an Environmental Engineering student at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) in Worcester MA. Her position as Workshop Coordinator at the WPI Innovation Studio focuses on leading a team of facilitators to develop and teach educational workshops for the WPI community. She is currently focusing on the training systems for the workshop team and is responsible for weekly events and
National Science Foundations Advanced Technological Education (NSF-ATE) as a Regional Center of Excellence. FLATE’s mission is to support manufacturing education in K-14 programs through outreach, professional development, curriculum reform and technician research. She earned a Ph.D. in Civil En- gineering/Environmental from the University of South Florida and served on the Engineering faculty at Hofstra University and the FSU-FAMU College of Engineering. Dr. Barger has authored over 50 papers for presentations on engineering and technology education, serves on several national advisory boards for CTE and workforce education initiatives, and is a Fellow of the American Society of Engineering Edu- cation (ASEE) and the
appointments in the Department of Curriculum & Instruction,the Department of Psychology, and the Wisconsin Center for Education Research. He is a member ofthe steering committee for the Delta Program (part of the national CIRTL Network), which promotesthe development of a future national STEM faculty committed to implementing and advancing effectiveteaching practices for diverse student audiences. Prof. Nathan currently is Director of the Center on Edu-cation and Work and Director of the Postdoctoral Training Program in Mathematical Thinking, Learning,and Instruction. He is an inductee and executive board member of the University of Wisconsin’s TeachingAcademy, which promotes excellence in teaching in higher education
. 241–263, 2011.[2] M. Laugerman, D. Rover, S. Mickelson, M. Shelly, “The Middle Years in Engineering: An Effective Transfer Partnership Drives Student Success in STEM,” Advances in Engineering Education, 2019 [Online], Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1236915.[3] L. Smith-Doerr, S.N. Alegria, T. Sacco, “How diversity matters in the US science and engineering workforce: A critical review considering integration in teams, fields, and organizational contexts.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, Vol. 3, pp. 139-153, 2017[4] Y.L. Zhang and T. Ozuna, “Pathways to engineering: The validation experiences of transfer students,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 39, no
Paper ID #36867Using Capstone PBL to Demonstrate Achievement of ABET OutcomesDr. Maher Shehadi, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Shehadi is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) in the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University. His academic experiences have focused on learning and discovery in areas related to HVAC, indoor air quality, human thermal comfort, and energy conservation. While working with industry, he oversaw maintenance and management programs for various facilities including industrial plants, high rise residential and commercial buildings, energy audits and
to complete their 62.50% degree in 4 years Figure 7: FTIC students who anticipate graduating on timeThe students that anticipated to complete their degree on time reported that they wouldaccomplish that goal by (a) studying hard, passing their classes, and working hard; (b) taking asmany courses every semester as possible, such as 4 courses per a regular semester and 3 insummer, and not skipping semesters; (c) following their undergraduate major map andcompleting the required curriculum; (d) planning and managing their time efficiently; and (e)working with an advisor to create a career path and following the roadmap the
with feedback. Our data is collected through a surveywhich follows students’ interaction with our web-based drill and practice programming systemcalled Edugator in the context of a Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) course at a large publicuniversity in the United States. Our system provided students two workflows for solving andreceiving feedback on short programming problems: (1) using a browser-based workflow and/or(2) downloading an equivalent template of the problem and feedback, and coding it locally on theircomputer (a native workflow). We qualitatively coded 199 students’ responses regarding choicesusing inductive thematic analysis to identify common themes. Our study found that while moststudents were motivated by convenience and
University Emma Treadway received the B.S. degree in Engineering Science from Trinity University in 2011, and her M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2017 and 2019, respectively. She is an Assistant ProfesShea E. LapeAlison Casson ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Open-ended Modeling Problems and Engineering IdentityAbstractEngineering identity is an integral determinant of academic success in engineering school, as itallows students to have an understanding of themselves in relation to what they study. Studies inengineering and other STEM disciplines have shown a positive correlation between identity andretention. Previous
Paper ID #39912Board 82: Remote, Hands-on ECE Teaching: Project RECETDr. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and The Inclusive Engineering Consortium Kenneth Connor is an emeritus professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engi- neering (ECSE) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) where he taught courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research in- volves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photonics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology
curricula to make education more all-inclusive and effective is too important to ignore [1].To enhance imaginative and creative thinking skills of undergraduate students in industrial andsystems engineering, poetry-writing assignments were incorporated into a required upper-levelcourse that focused on the modeling and analysis of inventory and supply chain systems in alarge public university’s industrial and systems engineering curriculum [4]. An assessment ofstudent perceptions of these assignments revealed that poetry writing not only provided thestudents with an opportunity to practice their imaginative and creative thinking skills as expectedbut strengthened their conceptual understanding of the technical material as well [5]. To this end
Paper ID #39226A Framework for the Development of Online Virtual Labs for EngineeringEducationDr. Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia Genisson Silva Coutinho is an Associate Professor at the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials at the Federal Institute of Science and Technology of Brazil. Genisson earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His specialties are engineering education research, ed- ucational innovation, laboratory education, product design and development, finite element analysis, ex- perimental stress analysis, product
and teaching thecourse since they likely took a course with similar content in their academic preparation giventhat the content largely remains the same.The authors aim to extend this investigation and attempt to correlate the findings of the facultysurvey with what the construction industry considers as “static” and “dynamic” courses, andevaluate what industry professionals perceive as topics that need constant update, and whattopics require the teaching of the fundamentals alone. The results can be used to evaluate thestatic/dynamic nature of an academic program as a whole.References1. Hartman, J.C. Engineering economy: suggestions to update a stagnant course curriculum. in Proceedings of the 1998 Annual ASEE Conference, June 28
❏ Include a diversity/inclusive statement and land acknowledgment in your course syllabi - Make course names and descriptions inclusive so they correspond with everyone - Add pronouns and inclusive language to syllabus - but not as separate thing, as integrated into the syllabus so it becomes normalized (and talk about it) - Resources: Sample Inclusive Teaching Statements for the Course Syllabus ❏ Clarify the role of the instructor during your first-day instruction -- as a facilitator of learning as opposed to an authority figure - Share your personal story and motivation with the class - go beyond your professional titles. Students tend to feel connected with instructors who are willing
and better communicate to students how all engineering decisions should be madewithin the broader moral landscape, as opposed to a select few decisions. An engineeringeducation integrated with ethics as a way to make longer-lasting systemic change [13], [12].Incorporating experiences such as community outreach and guest speakers helps, in part, toframe an education in the ethical issues beyond the workplace [16]; however, this is just anextension, albeit a very valuable one, of the current education strategy. More recent papershave proposed game-based learning experiences, or ‘playful learning’ as a way for students toimmerse themselves in ethical issues and consider them from new perspectives [9], [8]. Thesestrategies provide an alternative
Classroom in the Online Environment of Covid? Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2022. 30(2): p. 517-531.5. Morgan, J., E. Lindsay, C. Howlin, and M. Bogaard, Pathways of Students' Progress through an on-Demand Online Curriculum, in ASEE Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.6. Tsai, Y.-S., D. Rates, P.M. Moreno-Marcos, P.J. Muñoz-Merino, I. Jivet, M. Scheffel, H. Drachsler, C.D. Kloos, and D. Gašević, Learning Analytics in European Higher Education—Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education, 2020. 155: p. 103933.7. Mavroudi, A., M. Giannakos, and J. Krogstie, Supporting Adaptive Learning Pathways through the Use of Learning Analytics: Developments, Challenges and Future
theassigned projects, students apply the basic programming knowledge they learned in theBasics part to engineering applications. The Student-Led project allows students to solidifytheir programming knowledge by using MATLAB to build an engineering product of theirchoice. Systematically designed application problems and guided problems are provided tohelp students understand programming concepts at each step of learning in the Basics partand the two assigned projects in the Projects part.This proposed course is designed for 1 – 2 credit hours with a recommended minimum of 2contact hours per week to provide enough time for students to practice in class. This course issuggested to be offered as a full college-level course. However, the curriculum of
Paper ID #38645Death by 1000 cuts: Workshopping from Black engineering narratives frominterview to stageDr. Debalina Maitra, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Debalina Maitra is a Post-doctoral Research Associate at ASU. Prior to her current role, Debalina Maitra was employed by CAFECS (Chicago Alliance for Equity in Computer Science), a NSF-funded Research Practice Partnership, for almost two years. She complDr. Brooke Charae Coley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Brooke Coley, PhD is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona
lower division courses o Highly significant predictor in 4 of 4 cohorts o With an ideal transfer environment, students would not take any lower division coursework at their 4-year institution. o Appears to be a systemic issue due to curricular that are FTFY-oriented. Curriculum redesign is underway as part of the semester conversion. • Number of upper division courses o Highly significant predictor in 3 of 4 cohorts, or significant o An unusual result. Transfers take 3-4 more upper division courses, typically, compared to FTFY. The difference is significant, although with a small to moderate effect size. Issue deserves more
toward community needs. It also,importantly, requires that students tie their work with the community to a deeper understandingof their discipline.Service learning plays an important role in engineering education because it connects the oftentheoretical engineering curriculum to the world they are seeking to better. Historically, mostengineering classes have been heavily focused on imparting science and math knowledge to thestudents. The students often solve simple technical problems or design well-defined technicalsolutions to theoretical problems. There is, therefore, a gap between what students are toldengineering will be (changing the world) and what they are practicing as students (theoretical,well-defined problems). Project-based service
engineering being amongst the most active participants in embeddingentrepreneurship into curricular and cocurricular activities [1]. Well-developed and theoreticallygrounded educational interventions have been shown to increase entrepreneurial skills andperception among students [1] - [4]. Organizations including the National Science Foundationthrough the Lean Launch Curriculum and I-Corps program, VentureWell through curriculumdevelopment grants and their E-Team program, and the Kern Family Foundation through theKern Entrepreneurial Education Network (KEEN) have provided significant funding to embedand transform entrepreneurial teaching and practice into colleges of engineering [5] - [7]. Thisactivity combines with an added emphasis among
? Learning Environment Relationships Does the instructor integrate faith [BYU is a faith-based institution] into the course and inspire students in their learning? Are instructor-student interactions appropriate, respectful, inclusive, and motivating to students? Does the instructor foster positive and supportive student-student interactions and ensure respectful discussions of challenging issues? Settings Does the instructor use the classroom, lab, studio, etc. to create an effective setting for inspiring learning? Does the instructor create an atmosphere that motivates students to be active and engaged learners? Does the instructor create an atmosphere of civility and respect that welcomes
). Throughout her engineering career, she has tried to integrate global engineering into her work. Most recently, she spent the final year of her PhD at the University of Cape Town, integrating her benchtop cardiovascular research into computational models. In 2018-2019, she spent a year living and working in Tanzania, in East Africa through the Fulbright US Scholar program, teaching and conducting clinical research. Now at UD, her scholarship work includes embedding global engineering opportunities into the engineering curriculum through study abroad programs, new courses, serving as an advisor for UD’s Engineers Without Borders, and hosting global design workshops. ©American Society for Engineering
curriculum: at Tufts, students take the course(ES 4) in the fall semester of sophomore year and it forms part of their core conception of whatelectrical and computer engineering is. In general, their courses up to this point have been genericacross engineering, and many students see the course as a way to confirm whether an electrical orcomputer engineering major is right for them. As a result, we have both an opportunity and anobligation to inspire and motivate students in addition to helping them develop prerequisite skillsfor other courses.Digital logic labsAs at most universities, our offering of the course has a substantial laboratory component, wherestudents put in the hard (and rewarding) work of translating pencil-and-paper logic designs