will be available to answer questions and offer guidance to attendees. • Goal: The goal of this session is to provide female minority students in the bachelor STEM degree programs with the opportunity to connect with junior and senior female minority students in the same program and gain valuable insights and confidence from their experiences. Peer-led activities have been shown to create a sense of community and increase retention of minority students [18]. Building a supportive network can enhance the academic success of these students.The findings from these initiatives will be reported at a future ASEE conference.Work Cited[1] C. Botella, S. Rueda, E. López-Iñesta, and P. Marzal. "Gender diversity in STEM
• Optimize • Iterate • Set Final Specifications Implement • Communicate • ReflectReferences[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023 | ABET.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2022-2023/ (accessed Feb. 23, 2023).[2] R. Graham, “Global state of the art in engineering education - March 2018,” p. 170.[3] S. S. Tolman and M. J. Jensen, “Design Across The Curriculum: An Evaluation Of Design Instruction in a New Mechanical Engineering Program.,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual
Intelligence. AI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4830. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6_12 10. Kotrajaras, Vishnu, and Tanawat Kumnoonsate. "Fine-tuning parameters for emergent environments in games using artificial intelligence." International Journal of Computer Games Technology 2009 (2009) 11. Chen, Chunlei, et al. "Deep learning on computational-resource-limited platforms: a survey." Mobile Information Systems 2020 (2020): 1-19. 12. Paszke, Adam, et al. "Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library." Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019). 13. K. Afsari and M. Saadeh, "Artificial Intelligence
? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 463–492, Apr. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373.[4] C. Kepple and K. Coble, “Investigating potential influences of graduate teaching assistants on students’ sense of belonging in introductory physics labs,” PERC Proc., pp. 282–287, 2019.[5] S. M. Love Stowell et al., “Transforming Graduate Training in STEM Education,” Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 317–323, Apr. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.317.[6] N. M. Trautmann and M. E. Krasny, “Integrating Teaching and Research: A New Model for Graduate Education
Res. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 308–333, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1477878515606621.[3] K. Aslaksen and H. Lorås, “The Modality-Specific Learning Style Hypothesis: A Mini- Review,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, p. 1538, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01538.[4] D. Kolb A., Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice-Hall., vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.[5] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding Student Differences,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 57–72, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x.[6] L. K. Soiferman, “The Debate Rages On: Learning Styles--Fact or Myth,” Online Submission, 2019.[7] Z. Naimie, S. Siraj, C. Y. Piaw, R. Shagholi, and R. A. Abuzaid, “Do you
Mus. J., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2013, doi: 10.1111/cura.12007.[13] R. R. Pelan and R. L. Kajfez, “Investigating Researchers’ Motivations and Identities through Convergent Learning from Divergent Perspectives,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, Cincinnati, OH: IEEE, 2019. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028364.[14] R. R. Pelan, T. D. Drayton, R. L. Kajfez, and J. Armstrong, “Convergent learning from divergent perspectives: An executive summary of the pilot study,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual, 2020. doi: 10.18260/1-2--34333.[15] R. R. Pelan, R. Desing, R. L. Kajfez, and A. Dyche, “Mapping Trajectories of Researcher Development with Qualitative Longitudinal Analysis: An Executive
and teaching thecourse since they likely took a course with similar content in their academic preparation giventhat the content largely remains the same.The authors aim to extend this investigation and attempt to correlate the findings of the facultysurvey with what the construction industry considers as “static” and “dynamic” courses, andevaluate what industry professionals perceive as topics that need constant update, and whattopics require the teaching of the fundamentals alone. The results can be used to evaluate thestatic/dynamic nature of an academic program as a whole.References1. Hartman, J.C. Engineering economy: suggestions to update a stagnant course curriculum. in Proceedings of the 1998 Annual ASEE Conference, June 28
Paper ID #38301”Better Living through Chemistry?” DuPont & TeflonDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud retired in 2017 as a professor emerita in the Communication Department at Oregon In- stitute of Technology, where she taught classes in writing, speech, rhetoric, and ethics for four decades. She received her BA in 1972 from the University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA, and her graduate degrees from Purdue University: MA in 1974 and PhD in 1980. She became involved in engineering education by joining ASEE in 1983 and is currently active in two divisions: Engineering Ethics and Engineering
communicated with engineering faculty who are unfamiliar with effectiveinstructional practices. The objective is for engineering faculty members to incorporate any of therecommended practices to enhance student engagement, comprehension, and scholarship abilities.With these results, the authors are in the process of organizing several internal workshops tocommunicate the results with the engineering faculty.REFERENCES[1] Boy, A. V. and Pine, G. J. (1988). Fostering Psychosocial Development in the Classroom.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.[2] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. Creating a Learning Environment that Engages EngineeringStudents in the Classroom via Communication Strategies. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl
-based learning to higher education,” San Francisco, EUA: Jossey- Bass Publishers, 1996. doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966805.[13]. K. Farnsworth, and J. S Larson, “Problem-based learning in K-12 engineering lessons: Supporting and scaffolding student learning. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020, June.[14]. D. R. Brodeur, P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education,” In Proceedings of the 2002 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition, Montreal, Canada, 2002.[15]. U. Sarı, M. Alıcı, and Ö. F, Şen, “The effect of STEM instruction on attitude, career perception and career interest in a problem-based
.[26] Bir, D. D., Ahn, B., Cetin, B., Akinci-Ceylan, C., Cetin, K. S., Surovek, A. E., ... &Thompson, K. R. (2019, June). Connecting dots: Coding multiple data sources to enhancequalitative analysis. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.[27] Akinci-Ceylan, S., Cetin, K., Ahn, B., Cetin, B., & Surovek, A. (2020, July). A QualitativeAnalysis of How a Student, Faculty, and Practicing Engineer Approach an Ill-structuredEngineering Problem. In Proceedings of the 2020 American Society of Engineering EducationVirtual Conference.[28] Akinci-Ceylan, S., Cetin, K. S., Ahn, B., Surovek, A., & Cetin, B. (2022). InvestigatingProblem-Solving Processes of Students, Faculty, and Practicing Engineers in Civil Engineering.Journal of Civil
Competition Challenge: The TUAH AUVExperience, 2018 In: M. Hassan, (eds) Intelligent Manufacturing & Mechatronics. Lecture Notesin Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore[5] S. Gilbeault, J. D. Iorio, J. D. Santillan, H. Shen and M. Tufenkjian, Practical Application ofRobotics Competition for STEM Education, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Tampa, Florida, 10.18260/1-2--33181[6] A. Downs, Z. Kootbally, W. Harrison, P. Pilliptchak, B. Antonishek, M. Aksu, C. Schlenoffand S. K. Bupta, Assessing Industrial Robot Agility through International Competitions,Robotics and Computer-Integrating Manufacturing, Vol 70, 2021, 102113[7] C. R. Walker, Teaching Engineering Through the use of a Student UAS Competition, 2016ASEE Annual Conference and
/s40594-020-00241-4.[3] W. Faulkner, “Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759–792, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1177/030631200030005005.[4] E. O. McGee, Black, brown, bruised: how racialized STEM education stifles innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press, 2020.[5] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students,” Eng. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.545065.[6] M. Jennings, R. Roscoe, N. Kellam, and S. Jayasuriya, “A Review of the State of LGBTQIA+ Student Research in STEM and Engineering Education,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
Education and bachelors degree mathematics from the University of Miami.Dr. Julie P. Martin, The Ohio State University Julie P. Martin is the Assistant Vice President for Research and Team Talent Development in the Office of Knowledge Enterprise at The Ohio State University. Julie is a Fellow of ASEE and the editor-in-chief of Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38537Dr. Hesborn Wao Hesborn Wao, Ph.D., conducts research that uses mixed methods approaches to investigate the implicit factors associated with the under
engagement in introductory stem courses,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 53, p. 229–261, 2012. [3] T. Tucker, S. Shehab, E. Mercier, and M. Silva, “Board 50: Wip: Evidence-based analysis of the design of collaborative problemsolving engineering tasks,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. [4] T. Nokes-Malach, J. Richey, and S. Gadgil, “When is it better to learn together? insights from research on collaborative learning,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, p. 645–656, 2015. [5] E. Mercier and S. Higgins, “Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 25, p. 13–23, 2013. [6] L. Paquette, N. Bosch, E. Mercier, J. Jung, S
-mentoring/docview/1355441588/se-2.[4] J. McDermott, J. Beagle, “GradTrack Scholars: A comprehensive online mentoring programto build community and prepare the next generation of underrepresented minority graduatestudents (Work in Progress),” ASEE PEER Document Repository, 23-August-2022. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/gradtrack-scholars-a-comprehensive-online-mentoring-program-to-build-community-and-prepare-the-next-generation-of-underrepresented-minority-graduate-students-work-in-progress. [Accessed: 09-Feb-2023].[5] P. Boyle-Single and C. B. Muller., “When Email and Mentoring Unite: The implementationof a nationwide electronic mentoring program,” in Creating mentoring and coaching programs,L. Stromei, Alexandria, VA: American Society
, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.[2] "The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 259-261, 2006.[3] K. D. Beddoes, "Undisciplined Epistemology: Conceptual Heterogeneity in a Field in the Making," in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[4] C. Faber and L. C. Benson, "Engineering Students' Epistemic Cognition in the Context of Problem Solving," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 677-709, 2017.[5] Y. Yang, "Examining Epistemological Views of Engineering among First-Year Engineering," in 126th Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[6] J. Gainsburg, "Engineering Students’ Epistemological Views on Mathematical Methods in
engineering graduate school. She is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and has been recognized with the PAESMEM award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Designing Professional Development to fit your Audience (Other)AbstractProfessional development for engineering education in the precollege space can vary widely formany reasons. One of the most compelling reasons for differentiation is the learning needs of theaudience. A workshop for teachers who have immediate need for activities to incorporate in theirclassroom looks different from a workshop for counselors who are guiding students throughcareer choices. This paper looks at the design considerations for professional developmentworkshops by using
Design. She is the faculty advisor for ASME student organization, and I am ME! Drexel Women in Mechanical Engineering organization. She is a member of ASEE and ASME.Christine Chesebrough, Drexel UniversityDr. Lutfi Agartan, Drexel UniversityAaron Herbert BernardJen Katz-BuonincontroEvangelia G. Chrysikou, Drexel University Dr. Evangelia G. Chrysikou is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Drexel University, the Director of the Applied Cognitive and Brain Sciences PhD Program (https://drexel.edu/coas/academics/departments-centers/psychology/research/applied-cognitive-and-brain- science/), and the Associate Dean for Research for the College of Arts and Sciences. She is also the
. Hughes, W. J. Schell IV PE, B. P. Tallman, R. Beigel, E. Annand, and M. Kwapisz, “Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.Appendix A. Alternative Project 1 Design ENGR XXXXX – Project 1: The Water Filtration DeviceBackgroundWater is a source of life for everyone! Unfortunately, many populations in our current worlddon’t have easy access to clean drinking water. Currently, about 17% of the world doesn’t haveeasy access to safe drinking water. The problem is serious enough that it was listed as one of the14 great engineering challenges of tomorrow. Your engineering team has been hired to workwith the
inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN).Ms. Jazmin Jurkiewicz, Virginia Tech Jazmin Jurkiewicz (she/they) is a fourth-year PhD candidate in Engineering Education at
, Mechanics and material engineering, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 467–478, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.1299/jsmea1993.39.4_467.[2] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, and D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineeering Education: The CDIO Approach, 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2007.[3] Lindsay Ellis, “TK Corporate Ed Boeing Wanted Better Engineers. Higher Education Would Never Be the Same.,” Chron High Educ, vol. 66, no. 7, Oct. 2019.[4] E. F. Crawley, “The CDIO Syllabus A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education,” 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org[5] L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini, and J. Fredricks Volkwein, “Engineering Change: A Study of EC2000,” 2006. [Online]. Available: www.abet.orgwww.ed.psu.edu
). Throughout her engineering career, she has tried to integrate global engineering into her work. Most recently, she spent the final year of her PhD at the University of Cape Town, integrating her benchtop cardiovascular research into computational models. In 2018-2019, she spent a year living and working in Tanzania, in East Africa through the Fulbright US Scholar program, teaching and conducting clinical research. Now at UD, her scholarship work includes embedding global engineering opportunities into the engineering curriculum through study abroad programs, new courses, serving as an advisor for UD’s Engineers Without Borders, and hosting global design workshops. ©American Society for Engineering
Competency standard for professional engineers," Engineers Australia, 2019. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/publications/stage-1-competency-standard- professional-engineers[3] R. Lawrence, "The promotion of future opportunities and possibilities for engineering graduates," Australian Council of Engineering Deans, 2020. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aced.edu.au/downloads/Engineering%202035%20report.pdf[4] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, "Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science," in 2011 Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2011: IEEE, pp. F1C-1- F1C-5.[5] J. Burdett, "Making groups work: University students
Learn., vol. 7, no. 2, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1339.[6] T. J. Moore, S. S. Guzey, and A. W. Glancy, “The EngrTEAMS Project: STEM Integration Curricula for Grades 4-8 (Curriculum Exchange),” presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1212.1-24.1212.2. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-engrteams-project-stem-integration-curricula- for-grades-4-8-curriculum-exchange[7] A. Hira and M. M. Hynes, “Design-based research to broaden participation in pre-college engineering: research and practice of an interest-based engineering challenges framework,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 103–122, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080
a Graduate Assistant for the UBelong Collaborative.Anne-Ketura Elie, University of Pittsburgh Anne-Ketura Elie earned a BS degree in 2019 in psychology from the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. She is currently a graduate student researcher at the University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Her research interests are the factors that foster sense of belonging in academic settings, more specifi- cally teacher-student relationship factors that promote student’s sense of belonging and adaptive meaning making. Ms. Elie is also a member of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
University Emma Treadway received the B.S. degree in Engineering Science from Trinity University in 2011, and her M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2017 and 2019, respectively. She is an Assistant ProfesShea E. LapeAlison Casson ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Open-ended Modeling Problems and Engineering IdentityAbstractEngineering identity is an integral determinant of academic success in engineering school, as itallows students to have an understanding of themselves in relation to what they study. Studies inengineering and other STEM disciplines have shown a positive correlation between identity andretention. Previous