Paper ID #38817A comparison of shared mental model measurement techniques used inundergraduate engineering contexts: A systematic reviewMr. Gregory Litster, University of Toronto Greg Litster is a PhD student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto in the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice. He received his MASc degree in Man- agement Sciences (2022) and a Bachelor of Knowledge Integration degree (2020), both from the Univer- sity of Waterloo. His research interests are focused on mental models for engineering design teams, group dynamics and how collaboration
workshops to practitioners around the world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Health Equity: Perspective and Pedagogy of Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning and Impact on Learners’ Social IdentityAbstractThis research explored the beliefs related to the health disparities, systems, and innovation ofhonors/engineering students enrolled in a course on Health Equity. This course aims to bringtogether undergraduate students across disciplines from engineering, public health, pharmacy,anthropology, sociology, and other social and basic sciences to learn from each other throughco-designing solutions to address health disparities. The
Paper ID #38541Microelectronic Technology, AI and Academic Dishonesty: An AgileEngineering ApproachMr. Tyler Thomas Procko, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Mr. Procko graduated ERAU in 2020 as a software engineer. He has over five years’ experience in applied Ontology, Linked Data and Semantic Web work. Currently, he is pursuing his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science under the auspices of the Department of Defense through the Science, Mathematics and Research for Transformation (SMART) scholarship program. Mr. Procko spends each summer participating in research at the Air Force Research Lab’s Information
that utilize a WATPS are more competitive in the global workforce[3], [5], [6]. However, there is reluctance to adopt a WATPS due to a lack of class time, time toprepare, and incentives; student resistance; and the faculty researcher/teacher identity tension [7],[8], [9], [10].A forced change requires instructors to adapt their teaching practices. Forced changes comeabout as a result of pandemics and natural and humanitarian disasters as well as accreditationmodifications and department and university unilateral academic policy decisions. In all of theseexamples of forced change, the motivation for change is external and may be time sensitive. Oneexample of a forced change was the COVID-19 pandemic; it provided an external reason
learning pedagogies ofproblem-based and project-based learning (PPBL). Using PPBL as a teaching and learning strategyfacilitates cooperative learning, critical thinking, systemic reasoning, creative approach, andsocietal awareness, which are the core values of sustainability. However, translating this into aworking curriculum is quite complex, and raises implementation issues such as physicalarrangements for an active learning environment, changes in the assessment and grading system,providing both teachers and students with at least rudimentary knowledge of PPBL methods,achieving institutional support, etc. Another issue is the program-level decision of having a fulldedicated course on sustainable engineering, or introducing modules on