companies havesignificantly transformed how students study and learn in online, hybrid, or onsite environments[3]. Online learning environments have both advantages and disadvantages. A significantchallenge is how proper assessments can be conducted fairly. Academic practice is affectedsignificantly by the symbiotic relationship between the increasing number of onlineexaminations and contract cheating services. For instance, controlling the online assessmentenvironment is more challenging than controlling the onsite one. Cheating in a remotelyproctored online testing (RPOT) environment is a planned undertaking rather than panic cheatingbecause students complete their exams in isolation in their comfort zone [4]. Cheating is aided bythe rapid
% Fall 2022 December 2022 6 8 75%Each fall, after closing the survey, the evaluator downloaded response data from Qualtrics surveysoftware to Microsoft Excel and analyzed them. To improve validity of the analysis, and tosupport planning and decision-making for the course and the NRT program, results werediscussed during a co-interpretive session with NRT program leaders [17]. Noticeable from theannual review sessions is that responses changed little from year to year. For this paper,quantitative data analysis involved aggregating survey responses from four cohorts and thendepicting totals in bar graphs and tables to allow for comparisons.To gain insight into how students were building skills
-0.6 D2 369 4.92 1.47 -0.6 -0.55 D3 373 5.03 1.5 -0.63 -0.41 E1 375 4.9 1.76 -0.41 -0.89 E2 374 3.46 1.6 0.48 -0.43 E3 375 3.77 1.66 0.25 -0.81We initially conducted a model containing the five factors and all planned items. However oneitem (E4) had inadmissible negative variance [35], and so we removed it and respecified themodel.We examined goodness of fit indices, comparing a one-factor model to the theoretically-derivedfive-factor model. The fit indices are found in table 3. A significant χ2 indicates
throughtheir education. This research recommends best practices, including the reimaging of coursecurricula to intentionally scaffold the learning and practicing of communication as a professionalskill into coursework and other co-curricular and extra-curricular experiences. Communicationskills must be holistically learned and practiced as part of student preparation, and not solely as aone-time course requirement to be completed because it is part of the student's plan of study.Specifically, students engaged in learning oral and written communication skills must do sowithin engineering contexts (i.e., problems, challenges, and research opportunities). By engagingcommunication within engineering contexts, students will learn about their own
concepts learned in the classroom, provide an enhancedlearning experience to the students, and improve their competency level. Hardware and softwaredesign, details of the lab exercises, and future improvement plans are presented.Introduction:Transition to renewable energy has become more important over the last few decades due to thegrowing concern over climate change, depleting fossil fuel reserves, and the rising energy demand.Solar photovoltaics (PV) has emerged as one of the most promising and widely used renewableenergy sources, and its share in the electrical energy production market is increasing at a rapidpace. Photovoltaics (PV) has experienced significant growth in the U.S. over the past decade.According to the Solar Energy Industries
a new hire? Is a joint appointment feasible? These are all context-dependentquestions to answer to determine how to begin and build a partnership.Think in the long termThe kind of integrated collaboration we’ve built here did not happen overnight–it took some timeto build and requires continued support. The materials science program is committed tocontinuing this partnership for the long term, and currently, they are working to move beyond ayear-to-year memorandum of understanding between departments/colleges and towardsomething more sustainable. Programs should consider the long term when determiningapproaches and plan ways to ensure the partnership is able to be sustained over time.People who learn togetherAnother recommendation is to
of Engineering. This paperpresents the first-year development, implementation, and outcomes of the program with plans forfuture program improvement.First-Year Implementation of the S-SMART Summer Research Internship ProgramIn 2022, the S-SMART Summer Research Internship Program was piloted with a cohort of tenstudents participating in four research projects across three engineering disciplines - civilengineering, computer engineering, and mechanical engineering. Each project team wassupervised by at least one faculty advisor and one SFSU student peer mentor.Recruitment and Selection of Program ParticipantsThe S-SMART interns were selected through an online application process. The applicationform, created on Qualtrics, asked for information
) - sometimes communication or having clearly understood project requirements can be a larger challenge. Questions and input from industry can help highlight this and give students different perspectives.” “Students can get a better understanding of what it actually possible, when their ideas are a bit too far fetched for what can be accomplished with the tools and resources available to the students. They can also learn more about the design process from those in industry that have worked on large scale product designs and launches.” “Students can benefit from hearing the point-of-view of current professionals on their designs and plans. Hearing the advice of those now outside of the academic side helps
Understanding Problem Solving using Multiple Solution Methods Hao Li (WL11@mit.edu) and A. E. Hosoi (peko@mit.edu) Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyBackgroundOne of the key challenges of Engineering Education is developing students’ ability to navigateand solve moderately- or ill-structured problems with multiple solution paths. Existingtheoretical and conceptual frameworks can provide a basis for understanding this challenge. Theframework of self-regulated learning can be applied to problem solving. In self-regulatedlearning, the problem solver (or learner) first plans, sets goals, and lays out strategies
and Three are accomplished through introduction ofstudents to the basic foundational concepts and skills in the four-degree programs and byinvestigating course plans for the various majors and traditional careers within the disciplines.The gateway course learning outcomes are presented below: 1. Develop an academic pathway for success in the student's selected major. 2. Select appropriate strategies and technologies to solve technical problems. 3. Apply foundational principles and tools of electrical, industrial, manufacturing, and mechanical engineering technology to address technical problems. 4. Apply computational tools to address technical problems. 5. Work in a team to solve an engineering technology problem. 6
beneficial as it allows designers to meet requiredstandards and provide specifications for other departments when creating the given product. In theengineering stage, PLM should be implemented as early as possible in the creativity and designtasks leveraging marketing data [11]. The design, analysis, and testing cycle often iterates multipletimes before final approval. Ideally, design and development engineers should interact with theproduct information to properly capture the products operational space and features [1]. Rememberthat PLM systems support the changes and updates that occur during the planning and designphases, and allows them to build upon older successful designs as well as revert back to previousreleases. This rapid flexibility
paved and other impervious surfaces that prevent water from enteringthe soil. Each member of the team becomes an expert on one type of land use, investigating thesources of nutrients and the most effective strategies for managing them. Teams then worktogether to optimize their plans for the entire watershed, encompassing all types of land uses,negotiating tradeoffs, as needed, to optimize management strategies for overall effectiveness.MethodsWe piloted the curriculum in classrooms from May–June 2022. The pilot teachers were theteacher who had advised on the curriculum and her co-teacher who taught the same subject andgrade within the school. The school where the curriculum was piloted is located in a rural regionof the country that is directly
had acomplete program experience without a COVID-19 disruption. Moreover, each cohort has beenaffected differently and at different points in the Endeavour Program. Endeavour S-STEM wasdesigned to be an engagement-focused program and was severely limited in how it could engagewith its students. The disruptions have made the originally planned engagement study infeasible.However, COVID-19 was not the only obstacle in collecting engagement data. Initially,engagement data for two of the engagement dimensions (cognitive and affective) were to becollected through a validated survey. However, after conducting the survey multiple times in thefirst two years it was felt that the initial data failed to capture the high levels of engagement thatthe
collection, anexploratory factor analysis of the two pilot surveys. Additionally, we are developing a usermanual for this questionnaire, which we plan to disseminate in Year 3. In Year 3, we willconduct a full administration of this survey beside multiple previously published measuresincluding mental health distress symptoms [25], intention to persist [26], and potentially otherconstructs such as engineering culture, quality of life, and quality of social relationships.Analysis of Year 3 data will provide further, confirmatory validity evidence and establish thecorrelative or predictive power of measuring the stressors found in the SDSQ-E with relatedtopics.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation
, earned her PhD in Biological Sciences from Stanford University, and did a postdoctoral fellowship at Cornell University. She was faculty at North Carolina State University for seven years before joining the University of Oregon. Dr. Singh’s research focuses on evolutionary genetics and uses Drosophila melanogaster as a model system.Elizabeth A. Wentz, Arizona State University Dr. Elizabeth A. Wentz is the Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate College and Professor in the School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning at Arizona State University. She earned her PhD in Geography from the Pennsylvania State University and MA and BS from the Ohio State University. Her research focuses on geospatial technologies in
editions. This demonstrates theneed for clearer communication of what books are required and what editions are acceptable toavoid unnecessary costs.ConclusionsThough the survey indicates that students are spending $100 per quarter or less, we feel that thisis not representative of what students are being asked to spend on textbooks for their courses.Because of this, we are still pursuing ways to make textbooks more affordable to students in theschool of engineering and across Dartmouth. We conclude that there are several ways to reducestudent textbook costs at the school of engineering.For professors interested in reducing costs but still planning to use a textbook from a publisher,considering the upfront cost of the current edition and being open
contexts • ABET 5: Function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives • ABET 7: Acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategiesCommunication, ethics, teamwork, and learning strategy development have been identified askey elements of success in the engineering workplace [4]. By incorporating these elements ofprofessional development into undergraduate curriculum, students have time to learn and grow inthese areas before they enter the workforce. This combination of technical and professional skilldevelopment helps to launch recent graduates into successful careers
importanceof building in some time for networking, both structured and unstructured. To facilitate this, wedrew from successful events from previous Summer Schools. There were informal buttopically-structured networking events on Monday and Thursday, after the last regular session ofthe day and before dinner. There were also two poster session events for new attendees onMonday and Tuesday evenings to allow participants to share their work, current or planned, aswell as interact with more senior members of the community. Finally, on Wednesday there wasan Industry Expo, which allowed participants to interact with corporate and academic partnersand sponsors, followed by a variety of social events, ranging from a Colorado Rockies Game towhitewater rafting
show deeper understanding in their communications,verbalism, and capabilities. They challenge the instruction team constructively in well thoughtout ways. The teams work in unity to overcome challenges. The instruction team shifts awayfrom facilitating the discussion during the games as the teams are self-sufficient. Concerns usually associated with team-based learning especially in terms of completing thecurriculum are greatly diminished by this stage. The students are now autonomous learners. Theywillingly put in the effort and work effectively as a group to cover topics quickly. The instructionteam comes up with a study plan that the teams execute on their own based on their individualstrengths and weaknesses. The emancipation stage
Pylint, and weconsider linter output in our assessment rubrics. These works provide support that our practices inhow we teach software engineering in the context of SoftDes are effective, and provide us withideas for further improvement.Next StepsWe are continuing to interview students. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the vast majority of our surveyrespondents are majors in a computing-related field, and most of them have used skills fromSoftDes in further courses at our institution and in industry rather than in graduate studies oracademia. We hope to recruit and interview more students in these areas to get a more diverserange of perspectives on the course.Once we have a complete dataset and have identified themes in participant responses, we plan
variety of engineering fields, and their proposals and budgetary plan were reviewedby the senior club members for revision and final approval. Accordingly, as will be discussedlater, the second implementation of the mentorship program was modified to provide effectivesupport and to leverage for enhancing mentoring experience. Engineering and education mentors: Voluntary student mentors from both theengineering and education departments in the State University of New York (SUNY) at NewPaltz were selected to participate in the mentorship program. Engineering students, majoring inelectrical, computer, or mechanical engineering, were at different years of their 4-year degreewith varying experience in robotics. As an ABET-accredited
, environmental, and societal contexts. 5. an ability to function effectively on a PBL is often conducted in small teams team whose members together provide working collaboratively. leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. 6. an ability to develop and conduct PBL can be extended from conceptual to appropriate experimentation, analyze, and experimental, allowing students to evaluate interpret data, and use engineering their designs. judgment to draw conclusions. 7. an ability to acquire and apply new PBL does not follow textbook examples and knowledge as needed, using appropriate requires students to research
robotics andthe problem of protein folding/unfolding. One of the interesting moments in this presentation waswhen the students got excited when hearing about the fact that some of the underlyingoptimization, path planning, and control algorithms that are utilized for solving challengingrobotics and autonomous vehicle control problems can also play an integral role for guidednumerical simulation of protein folding/unfolding processes. In addition to the presentation, thestudents had the chance to inquire about some of the tools that they were asked to work with inperforming the project tasks.Challenges and opportunitiesOne of the main challenges in the first implementation of this PBL initiative was trying to exposesenior year students who were
difficult it can be to take ideas and designs that I have created and drawn on paper and turn them into functional prototypes.” • “I worked on these processes on my own and was able to learn more about each of them. It helped me learn a lot about the overall design process.”There are many more comments like these. Some comments indicate students appreciated theopportunity to work for a short term outside of the project team. Students also learned how muchknowledge can be acquired from a test that fails. This realization and learning did not occur priorto adding the prototyping and testing assignments. This analysis, however, is incomplete. Asstated previously, a study using a text analysis tool is planned for the near future
student stress around recordingthe “perfect” presentation. Additionally, for every module, regardless of finalpresentation mode, students gave a short in-person preliminary presentation describingtheir plans for their project before beginning working on the actual code. In the shortanswer, one student noted that they preferred to have the final presentation be pre-recorded and the preliminary presentation be in-person in order to practice presentationskills for both but being able to pay better attention to other groups’ final presentations inclass rather than practicing their own before delivering it.Conclusions and Future Directions In conclusion, students indicated a strong preference for in-person presentationsover pre-recorded
choosing a format, language, or graph that enhances meaning. Make clear the interdependence of language and meaning, thought, and expression. Envision a future self. Make plans that build on past experiences that have occurred across multiple and diverse contexts. Table 2 Likert Scale Values 1: Not at all - I am not aware of or do not recognize this behavior. 2: Low Degree - I am only aware of and recognize this behavior. 3: Somewhat Low Degree - I cooperate or comply with this behavior if required by others. 4: Somewhat High Degree - I recognize the value of and prefer this behavior. 5: High Degree - This behavior is an important priority to me. 6: Very High Degree - This behavior is natural to me, is habitual to me, and embodies who I am.In an
go back and change previous answers. The first three questions aredemographics questions to allow the authors to separate out non-mechanical engineeringstudents and determine how far into the program the students are. Of the 258 total respondents,193 were Mechanical Engineering students with 68 identified as first-year, 34 identified assecond-year, 27 identified as third-year, and 64 identified as fourth-year. One plan for futureimprovements on the survey is to have separate surveys for each course, so students do not haveto self-identify which course they are currently taking. This self-identification problem was anunexpected issue as the ME 4810 Capstone I course only had 54 enrolled students, yet 64claimed they were currently taking ME
techniques to designinstructional videos. However, there is a need to establish clear guidelines for implementingmixed reality techniques to augment training and education for design and manufacturingeducation. Faculty might also face cognitive dissonance when being pressured to utilize noveltechnologies within their pedagogy to implement the teaching curriculum. Cognitive dissonancecan also occur when a person holds two or more contradictory beliefs or attitudes. For example,faculty believing in the value of hands-on learning might question the efficacy of AR/VR tools.Still, they might also value exposing future engineers to the latest technology. Hence, wepropose a framework that faculty could use to develop a systematic transition plan for
the lab activities tied to the investigated technical skills. Therefore, preliminaryresults confirm that the new proposed course can be considered successful. Insights fromstudents’ feedback will be considered for improvement for Fall 2023.Future plans include developing a pre-course survey in addition to the exit survey and extendingthese surveys to all the sections in the ECE program to have higher number of participants. Along-term study will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of this course in guaranteeingstudents’ success and satisfaction and in increasing the retention rate of first-year students.Moreover, the impact on students’ success from diverse groups will be analyzed. References
Blackfaculty [5]. Federally funded colleges and public institutions benefit from a more diverse faculty[5]. A higher likelihood of women faculty appears in research institutions with plans to focus onthe needs of women. The quantity of African American/Black women and Hispanic/Latinawomen faculty employed remains small among prestigious engineering and science researchinstitutions compared to other universities and colleges [5]. Women and multicultural facultybear little presence in selective universities as well [5]. Women of Color professors hold a scintilla of authority with less power and value thantheir cohorts [8]. Departments hire women of Color to instruct sizeable introduction and newpreparation courses [8], which leads to heavy