Paper ID #37906Board 40: Using ”Anchored Instruction” to Teach Fundamental BridgeEngineering Principles: A Case Study.Dr. Benjamin Z. Dymond, Northern Arizona University Ben Dymond obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech before obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Ben is currently an associate professor of structural engineering at Northern Arizona University.Davis Ray My name is Davis Ray. I am 21 years old, and a life-long resident of Arizona. I am a first year Mechanical Engineering graduate student at Northern Arizona University. My
Paper ID #37188Using Active Learning and Gamification to Teach Software Engineering inGame Design CoursesDr. Bruce R. Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bruce R. Maxim is Professor of CIS and the Nattu Natarajan Professor of Engineering. He has worked as a software engineer, project manager, professor, author, and consultant for more than forty years. His research interests include software engineering, human computer interaction, game design, and artificial intelligenceDr. Jeffrey Jonathan Yackley, University of Michigan, Flint Jeffrey J. Yackley is an assistant professor of software engineering in the College of
Paper ID #37081Implementing Transmedia Using a Narrative Framework for an Introduc-toryEngineering CourseDr. Jeremiah Pina, Smith College Jeremiah Pina is a postdoctoral researcher at Smith College. He received a B.S. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Georgia. His current research focuses on developing alternative assessment methods for use in the prDr. Glenn W. Ellis, Smith College Glenn Ellis is a Professor of Engineering at Smith College who teaches courses in engineering science and methods for teaching science and engineering. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lehigh
Paper ID #38224Flipping the Classroom to Create a Student-Centered Learning Environmentin Three Undergraduate Civil Engineering CoursesDr. Amie Baisley, University of Florida I am currently an Instructional Assistant Professor at the University of Florida teaching primarily 2nd year mechanics courses. My teaching and research interests are alternative pedagogies, mastery-based learning and assessment, student persistence in their first two years, and faculty development.Prof. Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Keith D. Hjelmstad is President’s Professor of Civil Engineering in the School of
Paper ID #38482Panel: Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Fellow Perspectives onAdvancing Women and Gender Equity in Engineering - for the Next 130YearsDr. Baishakhi Bose, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Baishakhi Bose is currently a Postdoctoral Scholar at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (LBNL). Her cur- rent research focus is on life cycle assessment of novel polymers, building materials and plastic recycling processes. She obtained her PhD. in Materials Engineering from Purdue University in 2021. Since 2014, she has taught courses in Civil, Materials and First Year Engineering to undergraduates, and mentored
complete instructional strategy that seeks to address student conceptual understanding.Dr. Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his collaborators attracted close to $1M in research grants to study writ- ing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For technical research, he has a
by utilizing affordable, safe, and portable electronic instrumentation devices invarious educational situations (classrooms or laboratories).ECP is a teaching method that integrates with multiple stem disciplines while measuring studentsuccess outcomes. ECP integrates technology with curriculum creation and innovativepedagogies to enable hands-on activities, experiential learning, and group work [13]. Overall,hands-on pedagogy utilizes portable multifunction instruments to substitute larger laboratoryinstruments to achieve interactive learning and long-term knowledge retention [8]. ECPincorporates problem-based activities and constructive learning methods with a hands-on,portable multifunction instrument intended to substitute for larger
goal of this specialeducation project is to provide the types of materials available through the American Institute ofSteel Construction Teaching Aids repository [11].Course DetailsThe Cal Poly Architectural Engineering program includes foundational courses before studentsenter the material lecture and lab series on building materials of steel, concrete, masonry, andtimber. The prerequisite courses to timber design include Structures I and II on the principles ofstatics, how to develop free body, shear, and moment diagrams. Mechanics of StructuralMembers covers topics of stresses in beams, plastic bending, combined stresses, buckling, anddeflection of beams. Structural Systems Laboratory teaches calculation of building loads fromASCE 7 [12
systems for the civil infrastructure, engineering education, and technology transfer through education and community outreach.Dr. James Giancaspro, P.E., University of Miami James Giancaspro, Ph.D., P.E. is an associate professor of civil engineering with an emphasis on struc- tures and mechanics. He has two years of industry experience and 17 years of teaching and research experience at the University of Miami, where he is also currently a graduate program director. His current engineering education research interests include instructional technology in mechanics, undergraduate student retention, and graduate student support.Max Cacchione, University of Miami Agile technology executive with 20 years of experience
Paper ID #38775Assessing the Impact of Weekly In-class Pop Quizzes on StudentPerformance in a Fundamental ECE CourseProf. Olga Mironenko, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Olga Mironenko is a Teaching Assistant Professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She received a specialist degree in Physics from Omsk F.M. Dostoevsky State University, Russia in 2009, and she received a Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from University of Delaware in 2020. Her current interests include improve- ment of introductory analog signal
abilities within the mechanical engineering student population.Introduction Mechanical oscillators, such as the second-order translational “mbk” system have been aclassic topic in undergraduate mechanical engineering (ME) education for many years. Typically,students are first exposed to them in their introductory ordinary differential equations (ODEs)course and in either a “rigid body dynamics” [1] and/or a “system dynamics” [2] course, all ofwhich are required courses, vs. an elective course, such as Vibrations. Coverage in a lecture settingis common and in some cases simulation software is used, such as MATLAB/Simulink [3]. Thatsaid, based on the first author’s experience teaching at multiple institutions and from examiningthe academic
areeffective and welcomed. These strategies can be tailored to other engineering courses. There have been various pedagogical approaches specifically designed for probability andstatistics courses for engineering students. For example, the use of technology was discussed in[1], where the author also illustrated the helpfulness of laboratory-like exercises through computersimulations in a probability and statistics course in Texas A&M University. A set of constructivistexercises have been developed in teaching probability and statistics in the University of SouthFlorida [2] to promote realistic mathematics education and inquiry-oriented teaching and learning.These exercises encourage students to work in teams, create their own knowledge, and
a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. Aaron has served in the military for 24 years as an Engineer Officer with assignments around the world to include Afghanistan, Egypt, and Bosnia- Herzegovina. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Virginia and a Project Management Professional. Aaron’s primary areas of research are engineering education, the behavior of steel structures, and blast. Aaron mentors students by serving as an advisor for capstone projects and through service as an Officer Representative for Women’s Volleyball and Men’s Basketball. His passion for teaching and developing tomorrow’s leaders resulted in his selection for the 2009 American Society of Civil Engineers
. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The CARE methodology: a new lens for introductory ECE course assessment based on student Challenging And Rewarding ExperiencesAbstractIntroductory Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) education is of great importance tostudents interested in exploring the field, as it introduces them to the fundamental conceptualunderstanding of the governing laws and theories of ECE, as well as to indispensable hands-onlab skills to apply theory in practice. These
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Preliminary Experience and Impact of Experiment-focused Teaching Approach in a Computer Architecture Course in Computer ScienceAbstract—One of the key knowledge areas in Computer Science (CS) is Digital Logic andComputer Architecture where the learning outcome is an understanding of Boolean algebra, logicgates, registers, or arithmetic logic units, etc. and explaining how software and hardware arerelated to a computing system. Experimental Centric based Instructional Pedagogy (ECP) withportable laboratory instrumentation might provide real hands-on experience to obtain a practicalunderstanding of those concepts at a lower cost compared to virtual hands-on laboratories thatlack direct
Paper ID #38869Experience with a Method Allowing One Instructor to Teach a Course inTwo Classrooms Simultaneously at Different LocationsDr. John W Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University John Blake is a Professor of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. He has served as chair of the Engineering Technology Department at his institution, and has served as the chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division of the ASEE. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer
Paper ID #37470The Impact of a 16-Week Preparation Course on the TechnologicalPedagogical Content Knowledge of Graduate Teaching Assistants inEngineeringDr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Saadeddine Shehab is currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He works with a group of under- graduate and graduate SCD scholars at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates the practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and in- formal
. T. Puente, and F. Torres, “Hands-on experiences of undergraduate students in Automatics and Robotics using a virtual and remote laboratory,” Comput. Educ., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2451–2461, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.003. [Accessed April 28, 2023].[3] C. S. Cheah, “Factors contributing to the difficulties in teaching and learning of computer programming: A literature review,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/8247.[4] B. Bettin, M. Jarvie-Eggart, K. S. Steelman, and C. Wallace, “Preparing First-Year Engineering Students to Think About Code: A Guided Inquiry Approach,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 309–319, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TE.2021.3140051
? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 463–492, Apr. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373.[4] C. Kepple and K. Coble, “Investigating potential influences of graduate teaching assistants on students’ sense of belonging in introductory physics labs,” PERC Proc., pp. 282–287, 2019.[5] S. M. Love Stowell et al., “Transforming Graduate Training in STEM Education,” Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 317–323, Apr. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.317.[6] N. M. Trautmann and M. E. Krasny, “Integrating Teaching and Research: A New Model for Graduate Education
Paper ID #38268Integrating Companies and Higher Education in the Teaching-LearningProcess of Lean Thinking Using Challenge-Based LearningDr. Araceli Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey Araceli Zavala has worked since 2005 at the Industrial and Systems Engineering department at Tecno- logico de Monterrey campus Guadalajara as a full-time professor teaching both undergraduate and gradu- ate courses related to the area of Statistics, Operations Research and Supply Chain mainly. She has been a consultant for several small and big companies in Mexico. Before working as a professor, she worked as General Manager at a textile
Development in UW–Madison College of En- gineering’s Inclusion, Equity, and Diversity in Engineering (IEDE) Office, and the Assistant Director of Wisconsin’s Equity and Inclusion Laboratory (Wei LAB). Don also serves as PI and co-PI of multiple NSF-funded projects, including: the NSF Eddie Bernice Johnson INCLUDES Aspire Alliance, the NSF IUSE: Inclusive STEM Teaching Project, and the NSF LEAPS: EVOLVED project. He received his Ph.D. in Cell & Molecular Biology (University of Wisconsin-Madison) and B.S. in Biology (Bucknell University). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Creating Inclusivity in Engineering Teaching and Learning Contexts: Adapting the Aspire
Paper ID #39311Board 167: Exploring Elementary Pre-service Teachers’ PersonalEngineering Efficacy and Engineering Teaching Efficacy in a ScienceMethods Course Incorporating Engineering Design Activities (Work inProgress)Mr. Miracle Moonga, Montana State University - Bozeman Miracle Moonga is a graduate student in the Curriculum and Instruction program at Montana State Uni- versity (MSU). He also works as a teaching assistant in the department of education at MSU where he teaches a science methods course and a laboratory safety course. His research interests are in K-12 science and engineering education.Dr. Rebekah J. Hammack
Laboratories (1991-1999) and the AT&T Labs Fellowship Program (1996-2006). At Bell Laboratories Dr. Thompson created with the Vice President of Research and Nobel laureate, Arno Penizas, the W. Lincoln Hawkins Mentoring Excellence Award (1994). This award is given to a member of the research staff for fostering the career growth of Bell Labs students and associates. This award is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #39627 ¨ os highest honor for mentoring contributions. In 1998, AT&T Labs instituted a similar award ResearchAˆ named for Dr. Thompson. Charles
necessity, engineers must engage in learning throughout theircareer. Figure 5: Survey Response Frequency on Current Laboratory Learning Outcomes Figure 6: Survey Response Frequency on Past Positive Laboratory Learning OutcomesThe use of Kolb’s cycle in undergraduate engineering has been found to accomplish this mission[20]. Students in a mechanics course undertook a laboratory intended to teach how to derive amaterial’s yield strength. The students were given a combined torsion and bending apparatus andasked to derive equations for torque and moment. After graphing how these variables changedwith the deflection of the experimental apparatus, students measured the deflection of a sampleunder varying loading conditions. They then were
the instructors. Thus, the hands-on laboratories provide an experience-based learning opportunity. In the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Iowa, the robotics classesare designed to teach students the basics of robotics and robotic kinematics. Robotics is a verylarge interdisciplinary field with multiple job opportunities ranging from programming tomanufacturing [5]. Given the overwhelming breadth of potential material, the class of interest inthis study primarily focuses on teaching students the basics of robotics with respect to anindustrial setting. The topics covered include three-dimensional (often nonlinear) concepts likerotation matrices and forward kinematics. Since the class consists exclusively of
laboratories are favorable and also provide learnerinsight on the new gamified activities introduced within the curriculum. We note severallimitations on the interpretation of these results, the need to collect more data over time and outlinedifferent courses of action for future improvements to these measures. Overall, from positivesurvey results and anecdotal feedback from teaching staff, we are encouraged to pursue moregamified strategies within our first-year curriculum and beyond.2. Setting Context – Classroom Description & Gamified ApproachesThe introduction of project-based learning to evolve our undergraduate engineering designcurriculum at McMaster University, known as “The Pivot” initiative, is leading to large-scalechanges to the
collegeand come from low-income families, with over 80% of undergraduates working part-time. Bothprograms are ABET-accredited and offer four-year undergraduate degrees. These programs followa hands-on laboratory-based approach to teaching and have an average 10:1 student-faculty ratioin their core courses. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, all the courses in both programs were offered in-person.FAMU has adapted Canvas as a learning management system tool, which can facilitate courseinstruction, communication, sharing of materials and recorded lectures, discussion forums, anddesign and management of assessments, assignments, and grades. During the pandemic, facultyhad to adapt their traditional course material to suit online teaching through
to teach students the basic principles ofdrone aeronautics through laboratory programming.This course was designed by professors from Vaughn College of Aeronautics andTechnology for high school students who work on after-school and weekend programs duringthe school year or summer. In early 2021, the college applied for and was approved to offer acertificate program in UAS (Unmanned Aerial Systems) Designs, Applications and Operationsto college students by the Education Department of New York State. Later that year, thecollege also received a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to providetuition-free early higher education for high school students, allowing them to complete themajority of the credits in the UAS certificate
Mathematics (STEM) graduatesspecifically trained to handle the technical challenges and meet the job market demand. Thisproject is funded through the Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program of NationalScience Foundation (NSF), and has been conducted at New Jersey Institute of Technology(NJIT) with the objective to train the required workforce for the solar photovoltaic (PV) jobmarket through several activities that will provide benefits to university students, K-12 students,faculty members and instructors, and remote users all around the U.S.In this paper, the five major activities of the project are explained, which include: (i) Design anddevelopment of the new laboratory entitled “Renewable Energy Systems Training (REST)” andthe associated
for engineering students [15]. The goal of this project is to develop high-impact online lab teaching practices and to testtheir effectiveness of them. Accordingly, during the two long semesters in 2022, we tested ourinnovative online lab teaching strategies in the laboratory sessions with the following activelearning strategies in the laboratory sessions by a) developing and implementing open-endeddesign experiences into lab work, b) establishing teamwork in online labs, c) creating an onlinelearning community and to overcome isolation, and d) incorporating pre-lab simulations and pre-lab video demonstrations. These core lab learning strategies were applied in five EE courses:Circuits, Electronics I & II, Microcomputers, and