, doi: 10.1080/26379112.2020.1782232.[5] D. Goodley, Dis/Ability Studies: Theorizing disablism and ableism, 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2014.[6] C. Dudley-Marking and D. Baker, “The Effects of Market-based School Reforms on Students with Disabilities,” Disabil. Stud. Q., vol. 32, no. 2, 2012.[7] D. Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, 2005. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001.[8] T. Ganti, “Neoliberalism,” Annu. Rev. Anthropol., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 89–104, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155528.[9] P. N. Rastogi, “The Culture of Productivity,” Indian J. Ind. Relat., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 148–167, 1986.[10] A. M. Wofford and J. M. Blaney, “(Re)Shaping the Socialization of
incentives on participation bias. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (Vol. 27, pp. 823–835). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819936[14] M. D. Mumford, A. L. Antes, J. J. Caughron, and T. L. Friedrich, “Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: Multi-level influences on emergence and performance,” Leadership. Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 144–160, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.002. 10
minute research presentations with Q&A each meeting).Program StructureBTD students represented the Level 1 students participating in NYC LSAMP programs whowere research assistants. Selected students had one or more years of research experience andshowed promise for graduate study. Numerous barriers have been identified for URM graduateschool attendance and financing the degree was one of them. In administering the BTD programthe students received monthly stipend support ($2,500 for up to 24 months).All selected BTD students received a monthly stipend of ($2500 or more as the rate changedduring the duration of the program) and educational benefits during the duration of their stay inthe
.2021.828894[11] DeRoma, V. M, Martin, K. M., Kessler, M., L. (2003). The Relationship Between Tolerancefor Ambiguity and Need for Course Structure. Journal of Instructional Psychology; Milwaukee,Wis. Vol. 30, Iss. 2, (Jun 1, 2003): 104[12] Mohammed S., Okudan G., & Ogot, M. (2006). Tolerance For Ambiguity: An InvestigationOn Its Effect On Student Design Performance. June 2006, ASEE Annual Conference: Chicago,IllinoisDOI: 10.18260/1-2--909[13] Stryker S. & Burke P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. SocPsychol Q. 2000:284-297[14] Godwin, J. (2003). Students' perspectives on debate exercises in content area classes.Communication Education. 52(2). 157-163[15] Ross, M. S., Godwin, A. (2016), Engineering Identity
0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Q [mL/min] Figure 4. Pressure drop data from increasing and decreasing flow rates in a bed filled with particles and theoretical pressure drop values from increasing the flow rate.As the pump reaches its maximum power at approximately 800 mL/min, some, but not all, of theparticles are repacked at the top of the column. As shown by the exponential trend reflected asthe red line in the last third of the plot, this repacking of some of the particles results in a higherpressure drop compared to the pressure drop in the packed bed. The
the final project poster presentation, students were asked to demonstrate their effectivecommunication skills. The result was remarkable, with 95% of students reporting that itsignificantly helped them initiate conversations and engage with the audience. Additionally, 63%of students found it useful in handling Q&A sessions, and 74% of them reported increasedconfidence in their communication skills. Some students (26%) also mentioned that they learnedhow to create a poster and organize their poster layout. When asked for suggestions to improvethe course, one main recommendation from students was to introduce short quizzes after eachtopic to reinforce lecture content.The survey results indicate that students found the course engaging and
class, not just controls, but safety or optimization. Include juniors in Senior Design presentations Increase the presentation time for the juniors' deliverablesFuture WorkThe authors acknowledge the timing between the work done in the Process Control and Safetyclass and the timing for the Seniors' deliverables is less than ideal. Adjustments in both classesare possible and would be looked into. Some other improvements would be to have more timefor the interviews, have the design group project information provided to the potential internsbeforehand, and incorporate a 5-7 min Q&A with all the groups at once, where the intervieweescan ask all the groups at once certain questions.We need to find a solution to the perception that only students
initially hesitant to engage with us on this project due to the logistics of kitcirculation and concerns with how kits would fit within their existing structure of their summerreading program. To allay the library’s concerns, we worked out a plan to utilize their existingactivity registration system to sign families up and their main branch for distribution. Our teamresponded to all email inquiries from the participants, provided weekly online Q&A sessions,and restocked used materials in kits. The library maintained control over registration andcommunication with families, including all personal identifying information. Our library partnersnoted that they appreciated that we worked within their parameters of lead time for planning ofthe summer
Sign-In/Team Assignmentsworkshop participants to a series of 9:00 AM Introductions/Team Icebreaker Activityengineering activities and careerpaths. Through the SWEET 9:30 AM Overview of Engineering Disciplines PresentationProgram, middle school-aged girls 10:00 AM Activity 1were exposed to the exciting andmeaningful career possibilities in 11:00 AM Lunch/Engineering Facilities Tourengineering from the perspectives of 12:00 PM Q&A with SWE Professional Membersfaculty, current students, and women 12:30 PM Activity 2in the industry. Workshopparticipants
Paper ID #37522Understanding the Impact of an LSAMP Scholar ProgramDr. Yang Lydia Yang, Kansas State University Yang Lydia Yang is an Associate Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Educa- tion, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction from Florida Inter- national University. Her research interest include quantitative educational research design and statistical analyses, Q methodology, and recruitment and retention in STEM fields.Dr. Brenee King, Kansas State UniversityDr. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is the Assistant Dean for Retention
principle used to solve. Table 1 Fundamental Engineering Principlesa) Section The ability of an object to resist stress is proportional to its A = ∫dA Properties area (A), first moment of area (Q), and second moment of Q = ∫y·dA area or moment of inertia (I). Ixx = ∫y2·dAb) Static Sum of all forces on object, part, or
. PublicAffairs, 2021.[7] K. Beck, White feminism: from the suffragettes to influencers and who they leave behind. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 2021.[8] K. W. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics.,” University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 139–167, 1989.[9] K. W. Crenshaw, “Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color,” Stanford Law Rev., pp. 93–118, Feb. 1991.[10] B. Moradi, M. C. Parent, A. S. Weis, S. Ouch, and K. L. Broad, “Mapping the Travels of Intersectionality Scholarship: A Citation Network Analysis,” Psychol. Women. Q., vol. 44
tool for recruiting, engaging, retaining and educating students,” in Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS international conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems, 2012, pp. 196–201.A. C. Passos, F. L. Junior, and H. H. de Arruda, “Project-based learning activity with robotics: A low-cost case study,” in 2022 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2022 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2022 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), 2022, pp. 360–365.J. McLurkin, J. Rykowski, M. John, Q. Kaseman, and A. J. Lynch, “Using multi-robot systems for engineering education: Teaching and outreach with large numbers of an advanced, low-cost robot,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2013.L
. Seaton, “Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX’s First MOOC.,” Res. Pract. Assess., vol. 8, pp. 13–25, 2013.[6] A. McAuley, B. Stewart, G. Siemens, and D. Cormier, “THE MOOC MODEL FOR DIGITAL PRACTICE:”.[7] T. R. Liyanagunawardena, A. A. Adams, and S. A. Williams, “MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 202, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455.[8] R. Legon, “MOOCs and the Quality Question,” 2013.[9] L. Wiest, “Effective Online Instruction in Higher Education,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ., vol. 13, pp. 11–14, Jan. 2012.[10] J. R. Drake, M. T. O’Hara, and E. Seeman, “Five Principles for MOOC Design: With a Case Study
, particularly the InvertedClassroom format at the use of the Mastery Tests (but not the repeated opportunities). Table 2. Characteristics of Teaching Methods Phase > Regular Inverted Inverted + Mastery Inverted + StudioElement 1997-2008 F2009-present F2020-S2022 F2022-presentLecture Format/ Instructor presents Minimal notes presented; Q&A with entire Minimal notes presented; activity-Instructor Role notes on board class; example-driven; Instructor provides driven; Instructor and peer tutor and leads Q&A some individual consultation
pathways and the options theyhave.Students indicated that speaking with engineering entrepreneurs provided them with moreknowledge of and confidence in the industry. Students from underrepresented groups and first-generation students in engineering may have had fewer opportunities to discuss compensationand negotiating strategies. However, students reflected on learning how to ask for their worthand discuss these important leadership and career strategies in their surveys. One student shared, This week's Q&A session with engineers who are also entrepreneurs. I was able to hear how our speakers have dealt with not knowing how to confidently name their prices. I feel that as people of color, it is a challenge for us to assign
beginning of each event. • Emphasize the participation of HUG students: We put a line in the registration form stating that “This program is designed for HUG students. If you don’t identify as HUG, we kindly ask you to quietly observe, refrain from asking questions, and not take up space during the event.” • Implementing an online anonymous comment tool: From the experiences of the first two panel events, we found that HUG students favored asking questions and providing feedback anonymously instead of raising their hands in front of audiences. Thus, we included the interactive Q&A online tool, allowing attendees to ask questions anonymously. • Discuss HUG students’ challenges in pursuing a research career
response. 𝑝𝑝: 𝑝𝑝 value of a Mann Whitney U-testcomparing pre- and post-survey distributions. Bias: Noting if the result was significant betweenpre- and post-survey responses and that the distribution does not appear to have acquiescencebias. 3.a. Responses from Hispanic/Latino(a) Population Pre-survey Response Post-survey Response Q. Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew Mode Med. 𝜎𝜎 𝑓𝑓 Skew 𝑝𝑝 Bias 1 4 4 1.14 0.48 -1.23 5 5 0.80 0.65 -2.06 0.004 Yes 2 1 2 1.19 0.13 0.45 1 1 1.41 0.54 1.32 0.314 3 5 5 0.67 0.83 -3.27 5 5 0.32 0.88 -2.48 0.526 4 4
drastically different, as I replaced in-person office visits with online Q&A. (#93) Content: often could not cover as much online Delivery: many videos created, used webcam/doc cams, Zoom Preparation time: about double the preparation Assessment methods: online exams had to be a completely different format to lower effect of cheating Supporting students: bookable virtual office hours and more 1-on-1 meetings. (#42)Of those instructors who completed the survey (n=81), 85% (i.e., 69 instructors) reported havingaccessed at least one of the eight options in the survey for instructional support during thepandemic. As shown in Table 2, the most widely accessed one was the online resources providedby the education
to discuss their researchareas with clear application to the K-8 classroom. As with the teachers, we met with theresearchers a week prior to the workshop and asked them to prepare an 8 minuteteacher-practice-friendly presentation about some of their research that would directly apply toclassrooms. The structure of this session was as follows: • 8 minutes for researcher presentation • 5 minutes of table talk within small groups in the audience • 5 minutes Q& A between the audience and researcher (influenced by the table talk)The researchers’ topics included negative impacts of gender stereotypes in K-8 CS education,scaffolding CS curriculum for K-8 students, and strategies to include students with disabilities inK-8 CS
instruction in multiple STEM disciplines,”presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Conference, Jul 26-9, 2021. Available:https://peer.asee.org/37955.[2] C. Torres-Machi, A. Bielefeldt, and Q. Lv, “Work in progress: The strategic importanceof data science in civil engineering: Encouraging interest in the next generation,” presented at theASEE Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, Jun 26-9, 2022. Available:https://peer.asee.org/40713.[3] S. Grajdura and D. Niemeier, "State of programming and data science preparation in civilengineering undergraduate curricula," Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 149, no. 2, p.04022010, 2023, doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000076.[4] J. G. Hering, "From slide rule to big data: How data
, 2011.[10] J. Gerlach, “Is STEM interest fading with students?” Everfi.com. https://everfi.com/infographic/k-12/is-stem-interest-fading-with-students/ (accessed December 1, 2022).[11] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, & X. Fan, “Planning early for careers in science,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5777, pp. 1143-1144, 2006.[12] A. Martinez Ortiz, L. Rodriguez Amaya, H. Kawaguchi Warshauer, S. Garcia Torres, E. Scanlon, & M. Pruett, “They choose to attend academic summer camps? A mixed methods study exploring the impact of NASA academic summer pre-engineering camp on middle school students in a Latino community,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 8, no. 2, Article 3, 2018