internationally, STEM majors experience more attrition and longer times tograduate than other majors. The high rate of attrition has been documented from a public policystandpoint at various universities in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and SouthAfrica [1]. The cost of attrition is significant. Students who attrite are personally burdened by thecost of a partial education when the costs of college are rising [2] and by the loss of income froma lucrative STEM career. Socially, attrition of STEM majors reduces the size of the workforce ata time of high demand for skilled college graduates [3]. The cost of attrition is particularlydetrimental to underrepresented minority (URM) groups who attrite in larger numbers [4], and tothe diversity of
variance in research persistence. This research hassignificance if we are to attain more diverse faculty for the emerging student population whichrequires an increase in the number of Latinas graduating with a doctoral degree and continuinginto academia.IntroductionInnovation is a necessary element for our nation’s continued progress in science and technology.Many sources agree that diversity is imperative in STEM if we are to tackle the increasinglycomplex challenges that require innovative solutions [1]–[3]. The capacities and experiences ofengineers from diverse backgrounds enable these novel solutions. Additionally, as the racial andethnic demographics of the United States continue to shift, with the percentage of minoritygroups increasing [4
that “this course isirrelevant to my future! I’m only taking it to fulfill the course requirements.” The USTstudent’s dissatisfaction may also be attributed to the fact that many of them are graduate orPh.D. students, and some are with familial responsibilities, which makes it difficult for themto devote additional time to the course and its assignments. A few students from UST endshad also told us that such a course offered them an opportunity to “have a slight deviationfrom my main capacity or major”. However, some students from UST also expressed theirinterest in this course content, stating that “I chose this class specifically to challenge myselfto a topic more socially oriented” or to seek for “a diverse class environment”.PEDAGOGYAs
that Influence Engineering Freshman to Choose Their Engineering Major, 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013[2] Anderson-Rowland, M. R., Rodriguez, A. A., and Grierson, A., Why Some Community College Students Choose Engineering and Some Don't, 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.[3] Ngambeki, I, Dalrymple, O., and Evangelou, D., Decision Making In First Year Engineering: Exploring How Students Decide About Future Studies And Career Pathways, Purdue University, School of Engineering Education Graduate Student Series, 2009.[4] Painter, Jackson Kia, Snyder, Kate E., and
retention both within STEMmajors and in college overall, and improved satisfaction with college. It is therefore critical tocreate pathways for early-stage college students to engage in undergraduate research.Transdisciplinary Grand Challenges programs at large public universities provide an opportunityto engage undergraduates in research that is directly tied to their community’s needs. Theobjective of this paper is to present the development and implementation of a sciencecommunication fellowship to engage early-stage undergraduate students in research. We createdthe Grand Challenge Water Science Communication Fellowship, in which students work withmentors (faculty, research scientists, graduate students) to create a communication project
member with pedagogical and engineering education expertiseutilized participatory design in constructing a meaningful lived teaching experience of the authorfrom which new faculty can benefit. This took the form of semi-structured conversation andquestioning investigating other evidence-based pedagogical practices the instructor hassuccessfully implemented in the classroom.MethodologyThis article can be characterized as an autoethnographic study. In autoethnography, theresearcher relates their lived experiences[4], and provides “highly personalized accounts thatdraw upon the experiences of the author/researcher to extend sociological understanding”[5, p.21]. Autoethnography, otherwise known as critical autobiography, is based on two assumptions
; McDonald, D. “Learning And Practicing The Design Review Process”, In Proceedings of presented at 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, 2004, 10.18260/1-2--12974.[10] Vollaro, M. “More Than Science Fair Fun: Poster Session As An Experiential Learning Activity In The Classroom” In Proceedings of 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005. 10.18260/1-2--14662[11] D. B. Hamidreza & K. Knight, “Exploring Student Academic Motivation and Perceptions of Teamwork and Communication” In Proceedings of 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021 https://strategy.asee.org/37146[12] M. F. Ercan and R. Khan, "Teamwork as a fundamental skill for engineering graduates," In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on
that I was able to come up with my own design limits. If that makes sense.Multiple facets of engineering identity such as self-recognition and performance are shownthrough Dylan’s recount of his processes. Self-recognition is shown when he says that he wasproud of his work and how he felt smart even before working with his group members. Hisability to perform was shown when he said that he had accurately made his assumptions whichthen allowed him to have an easier time completing the problem.DiscussionTo compare Dylan’s and Cristina’s experiences, we examine the evidence that we found in theorder that it occurred for the students. Both Dylan and Cristina expressed that they were initiallyunsure where to start on the individual
during transfer process • DemographicsThe survey data (n=11 for pre-transfer survey, n=33 for post-transfer survey) were anonymized bytwo of the non-faculty project members. Survey responses from different sections were separatedand randomized so that demographic variables could not be connected with other responses. Forthe post-transfer survey, students came from a variety of 2-year colleges including but not limitedto Highline. Many students have taken classes at multiple 2-year colleges. For this paper we willshare some findings related to our initial focus areas on advising, and recruitment and enrollmentincluding influences on students’ decisions to pursue engineering as a major, whether studentshad an advisor-verified academic plan
: 1.95-23.80). In contrast, males who had at least one parent with an undergraduate degree had fewerstart- and end-of-semester concerns than females (regardless of their first-generation status). Wehypothesize that the intersectionality of female and first-generation identities resulted in thispopulation experiencing more negative outcomes compared to females with at least one college-graduate parent, who benefitted from a stronger personal background, or to male first-generationstudents in the gender majority.Role of Pre-Matriculation Credits on Attitudes and Academic OutcomesTo further explore the impact of a student’s pre-college academic preparation, which wepreviously found affected the retention of pre-pandemic engineering students [7], we
section first describes the omnidirectional mentorship program as an interventiondesigned to support faculty at career transitions in which they complete a year-long programaimed to provide mentorship opportunities for participants. Second, we describe the focus groupmethodology used to explore the participant’s experiences in the program to illustrate themeaning-making, impacts, and strengths and weaknesses of this program.Our approach to mentorship was designed with three key elements in mind: 1) catalyst, 2)affirmation, and 3) negotiation. Chiefly, catalyst introduces and sparks engagement amongparticipants; affirmations support professional and personal development and growth; andnegotiations reconcile individuals’ sense of self and belonging
positionality statements; discussing project findings with their mentorsand research team; sharing project findings with their peers; collaborating with otherundergraduate and graduate researchers, faculty members, and preparing final deliverables suchas individual research posters and reports.Each student worked on a specific project of their choosing as a part of on of the REU site’sfaculty member’s labs (located across various institutions). Some of the research topics included,exploring the experiences of women in STEM, Black students in engineering, and communitycollege engineering students. Students were guided by initial literature and research questions ontheir selected topic but were given the freedom to explore and present their findings
recognition of one faculty or staff member per year who serves as an advocate for diversity in engineering. Prior to joining Auburn University, Jessica spent 4.5 years as an Assistant Director for Pre-Health and Law Advising at the University of Virginia. Prior to UVA, she provided academic advising at the University of Tennessee - Knoxville where she also completed her master of science in college student personnel. Jessica holds a bachelor of arts in organizational communications and psychology from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 GIFTS: Framing Understanding Implicit Bias as a Professional Skill to
Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Con- trol, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award and a UCI Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research Mentorship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Time Management and Self Efficacy in Different Learning
enrolled in at least threeundergraduate courses each semester during the 2022/2023 academic year. Each of the studentswere part of a privately funded program that allowed them to participate in undergraduateresearch in collaboration with faculty members of the department of Mechanical and MaterialsEngineering. The students were paid for 10 hours of research per week throughout the academicyear. Due to budget constraint, the program is only able to fund 16 students in an academic yearafter a competitive selection process, of which 12 of these students consented to participate inthis study. The goal of the undergraduate research program is to enhance student outcomes,including retention, academic success, and the likelihood of pursuing graduate
volunteerstudents using a list of 18 semi-structured questions with the following themes: 1) influentialexperiences during FERL that had an impact on students selecting civil engineering as a careerchoice while in the Air Force, 2) perceptions about how their faculty and tradesperson mentorsinfluenced their engagement, learning, personal and professional development during FERL and3) their perceptions of the climate during FERL that contributed to their experiences of inclusion,community and sense of belonging. From the responses to the questions, insights were drawnthat were deemed applicable to the development of the new first-year course. Nine students wereinterviewed, three of whom identified as female and five were non-white.FindingsOne question asked
mechanics and bioprocess engineering. She began her position as Director of Community Programs and Diversity Outreach at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences in 2003. In partnership with faculty, postdoctoral fellows, and graduate students, she develops and implements programs for K-12 students, teachers, un- dergraduates, and families that are designed to increase scientific and engineering literacy, and to inspire people with diverse backgrounds to pursue science and engineering careers. At the undergraduate level, she directs a Research Experiences for Undergraduates program that brings students to Harvard for 10 weeks to work in research laboratories. This program hosts between 45-70
. Figure 1. Logic Model of the NSF HSI ProgramFirst Year ImplementationThe project started on Oct. 1, 2021. During over one year of implementation, we put the focus onestablishing three main components of the program, namely the Engineering Success Center, theSummer Research Internship Program, and the Summer Faculty Teaching Workshop. In thefollowing, a brief introduction to these components is provided, followed by a summary of theevaluation results.Engineering Success Center (ESC): Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, an ESC was established toprovide academic support and career development services to students. The center is aimed atincreasing student retention, graduation rates, and career development. At SFSU, there was still asignificant
and experience to make these decisions. Thoseconsidering pursuing a Ph.D. often do not know what their future will look like if they pursue acareer in academia. Engineering students, who can experience industry careers through internships,have no avenue to explore if a faculty position is right for them. As such, students frequently viewthe Ph.D. profession as just being a teacher and do not consider it due to this impression. Being afaculty member encompasses much more than students see through their university experience,from teaching requirements to scholarship and service.This paper posits the need for a shadowing program mimicking the structure of job shadowingprograms found in industry or commonly experienced in medical domains. A job
to choose from. Students who have yet to decide on a major areadvised to complete the “major exploration” project where they meet faculty, connect with peermentors, and interview an industry member (often an alumni). On the other hand, studentswishing to learn more about the connection of social justice to engineering are encouraged tojoin a discussion group focused on a book or podcast (examples of past book selections includeInvisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado Perez and ToxicCommunities: Environmental Racism, Industrial Pollution, and Residential Mobility by DorcetaTaylor).Table 2: ENGR 101 Course Assignment Categories Course Assignment Categories Examples Reflections/Discussions
. Historically, amajor deterrent for women considering STEM has been lower levels of math self-assessment [8],though recent studies suggest that this is becoming less important for persistence [12], [13]. Forinstance, researchers found that students’ have broadened their perception of the skills required inCS [13] with more awareness of the non-technical or “soft” skills, such as reliability and teamwork,that are sought by employers [29]. This shift suggests a need to explore how students perceive thefield of ML/AI and highlights the importance of studying other factors contributing to persistence.Professional role confidence, comprised of expertise confidence and career-fit confidence, is thedegree to which a person feels confident in their competence
Paper ID #38656WIP: Institutional Agents’ Awareness and Perceptions of MilitaryStudents in Undergraduate Engineering Programs at Public Institutions inthe Western United StatesHannah Wilkinson, Utah State University Hannah Wilkinson is a graduate student in Engineering Education at Utah State University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in from the University of Utah.Dr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is a US Army veteran, a registered professional mechanical engineer, and an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research
professors who are teaching mathematicallyintensive engineering subjects are seeking effective pedagogical approaches to motivate students [15].2.2 Current Approaches for Motivating Engineering StudentsKEEN is a US nationwide network of more than 30 undergraduate engineering programs that are committedto the mission of graduating engineers with an entrepreneurial mindset (curiosity, connections, and creatingvalue-3Cs) so they can create personal, economic, and societal value through a lifetime of meaningful work[16][17].KEEN has organized numerous workshops/seminars to teach engineering faculty members fundamentalpedagogical techniques of Entrepreneurial Minded Learning (EML), Active/cooperative Learning (ACL),and Problem/project-based learning (PBL
belongingwithin the school and the profession. One metric of the success of this outcome is to evaluatestudent retention within CEE. Historically, approximately 50% of the students who matriculate asfirst-year students in CEE end up changing their major before graduation. For this cohort of 60students who took Exploring CEE in fall 2022, only five have changed their major. While this isstill early since this cohort has completed the course, this is still a decrease rate of attrition from asimilar point in previous years. In addition, their personal reflections at the end of each moduleallowed the students to articulate how the course and the associated activities were impacting thebeginning of their academic journey. Even those students who did change
University of Cambridge and was Visiting Fellow at Harvard University to explore design education in interdisciplinary fields. Before joining King’s, she conducted academic research and teaching in the UK, US and China. She worked as a faculty member at Cambridge Judge Business School as well as practiced leadership as Assistant Dean at Tongji University and Director of Design Research Group at Aston University. Wei was founding director of several interdisciplinary degree programmes such as MSci Design, Enterprise and Innovation, the first degree programme of its kind in the UK to teach Engineering, Design and Business to trigger students’ creativity and entrepreneurship for solving real-world problems. She has won
incubating international programming, virtual engagements, intra-institutional grants,research projects, faculty and staff exchanges, and international recruitment graduate;demonstrated increasing inclusion; evidence of the enhanced reputation of the College.The inclusion of this outcome in the university and college’s strategic plans further highlightedthe expectation to make global awareness and competency a priority and an attainable outcome.Methods and ModulesThis pre-departure course for undergraduate students majoring in a college of engineering at alarge land-grant university prepares students for participation in a global engagement experience(e.g., study abroad or international research program) by introducing global competencies suchas
construction careers, this factor has notbeen studied in any depth in the Chilean context. Thus, it is important to examine the factors thatfacilitate a more detailed understanding of the sense of belonging of women in the nationalconstruction industry. Furthermore, there are not many studies exploring the experiences ofwomen at different stages of their career in CE to see how their perceptions of sense ofbelonging changes as they graduate from the program and incorporate in the field ofconstruction.This research analyzes the perspectives of women related to a construction engineering program,as students, alumni working in the field, and faculty in a construction program, regarding theirsense of belonging. We categorize their experiences and their
, especially in a quantitative way, is near impossible without astrong collaboration with key faculty at the institution. In future, we hope to develop these typesof collaborations in order to have this type of result to share with the wider community. For now,we rely on our own experience and qualitative student and faculty feedback to guide ourinitiatives.ConclusionIt’s clear from both the literature and our own experience in industry at Ansys that the industry-academia gap is an ongoing issue for new graduates. Extracurricular activities, such asinvolvement in student team competitions, have been highlighted as a way to reduce this gap andhelp students gain the skills they need to start their careers. At Ansys, we look to supportacademia in a wide
for the camp in early April, with 18 names on the waiting list. This waiting listserved us in the event another camper needed to pull out due to after registration conflicts.Organization and Camp Leadership This camp was developed with the coordinated help of Penn State AE graduate students, faculty,and staff, and was organized by the department’s outreach specialist, whose purpose was to increase K-12interest and understanding of AE. For our experience, the outreach specialist acted as the camp’s director,organizing all aspects of the project and was the point person for communication to families, training forcamp employees, and following all university regulations when working with youth. The outreach specialistcreated an oversight
Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Homero is the leader of the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Inclusive Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab where he leads a team focused on doing research on contemporary, cultur- ally relevant, and inclusive pedagogical practices, emotions in engineering, competency development, and understanding the experiences of traditionally marginalized engineering students from an asset-based perspective. Homero’s goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that tra- ditionally marginalized students, bring into the field, and to train graduate students and faculty members with the tool to promote effective and