most promise were explored further via carefully designedhands-on experiments in lab, the partnering plant which also prompted the team to create a smallpilot plant operation that mimics the industrial process but also allows to test for alternativeapproaches and solutions. Furthermore, the students were also trained in skills such as projectorganization, record keeping, professional conduct, laboratory functions and laboratory safety,design and execution of project plan, technical awareness, process design, process control,process optimization, application of modern engineering tools, interpretation of results, andawareness of impact of project in societal/global context.5. Application of Fundamentals from Relevant CourseworkThrough multiple
-strain curves from materialsamples upon which the remainder of the course content is built. The global pandemic forcedengineering students online, challenging materials laboratory instructors to adapt instructionaldelivery to remote learners.There currently exist no ABET-accredited undergraduate mechanical engineering programs taughtfully online.i Moreover, while many other college disciplines have extensive histories of successfulremote and online instruction, the engineering education community has limited experienceteaching lab classes online. Affordable, small, and easily mailed experimental educational lab kitshave emerged as a key advancement in hands-on undergraduate engineering instruction. ii,iii Asmall, inexpensive, and safe benchtop
achievement, retention and leadership in science and engi- neering among students of color. She is currently in partnership with a number of institutions, including the University of Washington Tacoma. Dr. Lewis is affiliated with the Meyerhoff Scholars Program, where she has lectured incoming cohorts on race, science, and social Justice.Dr. Heather Dillon, University of Washington Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education. Before joining academia, she worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research
Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Con- trol, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award and a UCI Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research Mentorship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Time Management and Self Efficacy in Different Learning
Education, 2023 US-Sweden Bioinformatics IRES Year 2: Improving Student PreparednessAbstractThis National Science Foundation (NSF) International Research Experience for Students (IRES)site centers around a common theme of bioinformatics. Students selected for this program spend10 weeks at the Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) in Stockholm, Sweden using anddeveloping bioinformatics tools to analyze ‘-omics’ (i.e. genomic, transcriptomic, andproteomic) data generated from human subjects. Since the program’s inception, a significantamount of effort has been made developing programming to prepare students for their researchprojects. Specifically, technical training sessions focused on coding languages and
professional ethics; 8. and explain the importance of professional licensure.In this paper, we discuss several connections, not just with these SDG connections and CivilEngineering. Still, we especially believe that the case studies of edge computing and machinelearning give direct connections to applying probability, analyzing and solving problems,conducting experiments, and designing a process in civil engineering contexts, all discussedabove.Environmental Engineering CurriculumFor emerging environmental engineers to meet the SDGs, students will need to: 1. Have hands-on laboratory experiments; 2. Analyze and interpret data from their experiments in more than one central environmental engineering focus area, e.g., air, water, land, and
ofthe Program. Along with the 45 hours of engineering course work, students must complete 9hours of upper division physics courses includes 6 hours of advanced electricity and magnetism.To prepare students for the capstone sequence their senior year they complete the engineeringand sciences courses in Table 1. The Program from the outset has been developed with noincrease in operating budget. While funds were provided for faculty lines associated with theProgram, no new operating funds have been identified. Laboratory equipment has been providedin conjunction with the construction of new space dedicated to the Program. The Program hasbeen designed to use only open-source software for instruction. This provides a cost savings forthe University
University to redefinethe way engineering mathematics is taught, with the goal of increasing student retention,motivation and success in engineering.First implemented in 2004, the Wright State Model involves the introduction of a first-yearengineering mathematics course, EGR 101 Introductory Mathematics for EngineeringApplications (now running under semester course number EGR 1010) [1]. Taught byengineering faculty, the EGR 101 course includes lecture, laboratory and recitationcomponents. Using an application-based, hands-on approach, the EGR 101 course addressesonly the salient math topics actually used in the core first and second-year engineering courses.These include the traditional physics, engineering mechanics, electric circuits and
Paper ID #38872Work in Progress: Self-Starter Faculty Learning Community to ImplementEntrepreneurially-Minded Learning (EML) Micromoment ActivitiesDr. Erick S. Vasquez, University of Dayton Erick S. Vasquez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Dayton. He received his B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering at UCA in El Salvador. He obtained his M.S. from Clemson University and his Ph.D. from Mississippi State University, both in Chemical Engineering. His laboratory research involves nanotechnology in chemical and biological pro- cesses. His educational research
author: mselsaad@uark.eduIntroductionImmersive virtual reality (VR) based laboratory demonstrations have been gaining traction inSTEM education. VR may serve as a valuable tool not just for remote learning but also tobroaden outreach, reduce waste, enhance safety, generate increased interest, and modernizeeducation. VR holds great potential to complement existing education strategies [1, 2]. However,to ensure better utilization of VR-based education, it is pivotal to perform optimizations of VRimplementation, in-depth analyses of advantages and trade-offs of the technology, andassessment of receptivity of modern techniques in STEM education [1, 3, 4].There have been several studies that tested the effectiveness of VR in the educational field
, et al. [2]. The study examined models ofexperiential learning from six pioneering experiential engineering programs including theUniversity of Cincinnati Professional Practice Program; the Harvey Mudd College Clinic; theKansas State University Mechanical Engineering Design Laboratory; the Worcester PolytechnicInstitute PLAN; the West Virginia University PRIDE (Professional Reasoning Integrated withDesign Experience); and the University of Massachusetts ESIC (Engineering Services forIndustry and Community). Over the last forty years, the use of experiential learning inundergraduate engineering education has increased exponentially; concurrently a significantbody of pedagogical research has been presented in the literature. The present article
regarding active experimentation[7]. Open-ended laboratory courses or even traditional classes with experimentation exposure have shownto provide greater learning value as compared to the traditional lecture only focus [2,8]. Such coursesemploy an approach to learning science that are backed by a significant body of work on research-basedand active pedagogies in various engineering disciplines as well as have demonstrated superior levels ofstudent engagement and learning. Introduction of real-world problems not only allows students to masterappropriate techniques and technologies, but also allows the students to design strategies for solvingproblems and practice an overall process of inquiry [9-10]. Since experimentation is so critical to
STEM educationkeeps students engaged and results in improved retention of knowledge on topics taught [2], [4].While traditional lectures are still the most common way of teaching, many universities arefocusing more attention on more student-centered activities.Engineering education highly relies on practical applications. Laboratories are the most commonway of practicing engineering theory. Knowledge gained from engineering laboratories is beingused for applying engineering applications to real life design of processes and development ofproducts [5]. Building bridges to transfer theoretical skills to industry applications is important interms of improving future employee quality for [6]. However, the most common pedagogicalmethod is to use
Paper ID #37470The Impact of a 16-Week Preparation Course on the TechnologicalPedagogical Content Knowledge of Graduate Teaching Assistants inEngineeringDr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Saadeddine Shehab is currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He works with a group of under- graduate and graduate SCD scholars at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates the practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and in- formal
well aware of these novel technologies, we need to update our curriculum andcourse design. In this paper, I present some laboratories (labs) that the students conducted as apart of a course project in the ubiquitous computing class. This course is an elective forundergraduate Computer and Information Sciences or Information technology students. Thestudents who take this course are either juniors or seniors. Covid-19 has taught us how remoteteaching is useful to ensure proper education during the time of the pandemic. This project aimsto design different lab modules that the students can conduct without purchasing hardware. Idesigned this course at the time of covid pandemic to ensure student learning and success in aneconomical way. I devised
in the 21st century thanin the preceding timeframes. Engineering technology and the requirements from the globalworkforce are in constant evolution. This behooves engineering programs at universities acrossthe world to adapt their curricula to prepare the graduates for the challenges in the engineeringindustry. The engineering curriculum which adopts integrated projects on a centralizedengineering project platform [1] enables the student to become an active, intentional, and goal-oriented learner through problem-solving [2]-[3] in a project-based [4]-[6] and project-enhancedlearning [7] environment. Traditionally, core lecture and laboratory courses have been taught inrelative isolation of each other. This approach does not effectively
live and video recorded). This paper describes a new classroom observationprotocol intended to monitor the focus (e.g., solo, pair, team, or whole class) and action (e.g.,discuss, speak/present, watch/listen, or distracted) of both students and teachers (instructors).The paper summarizes relevant background on evidence-based learning, student engagement,and classroom observation protocols, describes the development and structure of FASTOP,presents results from different pedagogies (e.g., lecture, laboratory, POGIL), and describeslessons learned and future directions. Results show distinctive patterns of student and teacherbehaviors for different pedagogies.1. IntroductionThe ICAP model describes the benefits of interactive (I), constructive (C
Point he has continued his research on unmanned systems under ARL’s Campaign for Maneuver as the Associate Director of Special Programs. Throughout his career he has continued to teach at a variety of colleges and universities. For the last 4 years he has been a part time instructor and collaborator with researchers at the University of Maryland Baltimore County (http://me.umbc.edu/directory/). He is currently an Assistant Professor at York College PA.Dr. Stephen Andrew Gadsden, McMaster University Dr. S. Andrew Gadsden is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Mc- Master University and is Director of the Intelligent and Cognitive Engineering (ICE) Laboratory. His research area includes
, effectiveness, and pedagogical value ofstudent-generated stories in a fluid mechanics course part of the mechanical engineeringtechnology curriculum. This application, which addressed Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET)’s Criterion 3 and Criterion 5c, was implemented in a four-credit hour(ch) senior-level applied fluid mechanics course, with a 3ch lecture and 1ch laboratorycomponent. The course is the second in fluid mechanics’ sequence and covers topics likepipeline systems design, pump selection, flow of air in ducts, lift and drag, etc. The originalinstructional design used a blend of traditional in-class lectures and problem-based learningfocused on project-based and other laboratory exercises.To further improve the students
engineering courses.Approximately 75 students take the course annually. Most are civil engineering majors atUSAFA, but approximately one-third of the students come from other military colleges andReserve Officer Training Corps programs from around the country. The course includes fieldtrips, lab exercises, and hands-on activities intended to give students a practical frame-of-reference that is helpful in subsequent analysis and design courses.Most activities consist of some pre-reading, a short classroom lesson, the hands-on portion, andfinally a quiz or laboratory practical exercise. Both the quizzes and practical exercises serve aslow stakes assessments. Faculty develop the course materials and teach the classroom lesson,but to execute the hands-on
use appropriate techniques utilized for microgrid state estimation. ▪ Outline various methods used for microgrid optimization.The MOOC designed by the authors of this paper is divided into several modules (Introductionto Electrical Microgrids, Cybersecurity, State Estimation, Optimization and CommunityMicrogrids) and designed for undergraduate and graduate engineering students. An issueencountered when designing this MOOC is the difficulty to find real datasets to include as part ofthe different simulations or laboratories that the MOOC can cover. The theory is presented in thedifferent modules and students interact with assignments and simulations associated withCybsersecurity, Optimization and State Estimation. Algorithms are created
createmore integrated and impactful laboratory experiences in undergraduate physics [42], [43], weintegrated CT and ED into a traditional introductory undergraduate physics lab for engineeringand science majors. The goal of this multidisciplinary approach to teaching physics was topromote students’ conceptual understanding of physics while fostering scientific inquiry,mathematical modeling, ED skills, and CT. In this context, we proposed the following researchquestion to better understand the undergraduate students’ learning of CT in a multidisciplinarySTEM environment:To what extent does engaging students in integrated engineering design and physics labs impacttheir development of computational thinking
Implementedthe Implementedthe Implemented the course virtual laboratory virtual laboratory virtual laboratory virtual laboratory curriculumand for all the listed for 50% the listed for 25% the listed for 10% thelisted implemented practical’s of a practical’s of a practical’s of a practical’s ofa virtual course and course and course and assessed course and laboratoryfor assessed the assessed the the development of assessed the laboratory development of developmentof the the practical development of teaching. the
Polytechnic Institute and State University. In 1987 he joined the Department Electrical and Computer Engineering at UMASS Lowell as its Analog Devices Career Development Professor. Dr. Thompson has served on the executive boards of the Cooperative Research Fellowship program of Bell Laboratories (1991-1999) and the AT&T Labs Fellowship Program (1996-2006). At Bell Laboratories Dr. Thompson created with the Vice President of Research and Nobel laureate, Arno Penizas, the W. Lincoln Hawkins Mentoring Excellence Award (1994). This award is given to a member of the research staff for fostering the career growth of Bell Labs students and associates. This award is ResearchAˆ¨ os highest honor for mentoring contributions. In
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #39169 for administrative, budgetary, hiring, and tenure decisions, and for leading the faculty and staff in the development of research, teaching, and public service programs. Oversees administrative and research expenditures of about $75M per year. Oversees and participates in extensive advancement activities as head, including managing and increasing the Dept. endowment of approximately $75M. Leads aggressive faculty hiring campaign that has hired 35 new tenure-track, 8 teaching, and 5 research faculty since Jan. 2014. Director, Coordinated Science Laboratory
(CWEA), and Engineers Without Boarders (EWB) student chapters. Additionally, Dr. Palomo is the CE Water Analysis laboratory director and coordinates all teaching, research and safety training activities in the engineering laboratory. Dr. Palomo conducts research in surface water quality improvement via natural treatment systems, water and wastewater treatment processes, and water education. She is involved in outreach programs for K-12 students to increase the participation of Hispanic female students in STEM fieldsDr. Erika Robb Larkins Associate Professor of Anthropology and SociologyNatalie MladenovDr. Matthew E. Verbyla, San Diego State University Dr. Matthew E. Verbyla is an Assistant Professor of Environmental
data collected for accreditation.Methodology:ESG 201: “Learning from Engineering Disaster”, a 3 credit asynchronous online undergraduatecourse taught to both engineering and non-engineering majors by the presenter at Stony BrookUniversity for the past 12 years, has proved to be a successful method for teaching ethics as wellas the broader societal implications of engineering processes and technological design (10). Acombination of lectures, case studies, laboratory demonstrations, interviews, video site visits andteam-based collaborative analysis of engineering failures and their implications (societal,environmental, economic, legal, psychological) has proved successful in teaching the role ofengineers and engineering in society, as well as
recycled to perform casting.Background & Theory Sand casting is associated with a limited number of Capstone senior design programs offeringbachelor’s degrees in Materials Science and Engineering [i]. However, the technique is absent inthe mechanical engineering Capstone literature; presumably because it is not used elsewhere tosupport ME senior design. Some casting examples do exist in ME manufacturing laboratoryclasses [ii,iii], but predominantly simulation is used in leu of the physical casting process to aidstudent learning and understanding of underlying phenomena. [iv,v] To incorporate sand casting applications in an ME Capstone senior design course, we deployedthe “Energy Engineering Laboratory Module” (EELM) pedagogy. EELM
work closely with national labs and industry to maintain course projects with real ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 AFRL Career STREAM implementation at NMT (Work in Progress)AbstractThe New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (NMT) partnered with the Air ForceResearch Laboratory (AFRL) to provide a STEM experience for late-year high school students.This paper will evaluate the program in terms of implementation, results of apprentice growth,and lessons learned. The AFRL NM Career STREAM program aims to provide an industrialenvironment on a college campus, demonstrating what a career would be like, to apprenticescoming from rural New Mexico and other underserved groups. The paid
course description for Numerical Computing for Chemical Engineers course at MissouriUniversity of Science and Technology states that students will “add to their programming skillsby exploring numerical computational techniques for … chemical engineering processes.” Thechallenge is that the course is taught early in the curriculum before the students know what thosechemical engineering processes are. The course has been structured as a flipped class with classtime devoted to solving problems with the numerical tools. To provide relevance for the material,an experimental component has been added to the course. In the laboratory sessions, the studentsconduct a brief experiment or activity and then analyze that process using the