in healthcare teams: a systematic review and meta- analysis." BMJ open 9.9 (2019): e028280. 6. Khawam, Ashley M., Toni DiDona, and Brenda S. Hernández. "Effectiveness of teamwork in the workplace." International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 32.3 (2017): 267- 286. 7. Kørnøv, L., Johannsen, H.H.W. and Moesby E., Experiences with integrating individuality in Project- Oriented and Problem-Based Learning POPBL. Inter. J. of Engng. Educ., 23, 5, 947-953 (2007). 8. Kommula, Venkata P., Jacek Uziak, and M. Tunde Oladiran. "Peer and self-assessment in engineering students' group work." World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 8.1 (2010): 56-60. 9. Goodwin
, “The development and validation of a new multidimensional test anxiety scale (mtas),” European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2020.[23] R. Driscoll, “Westside test anxiety scale validation.” Online submission, 2007.[24] J. Taylor and F. P. Deane, “Development of a short form of the test anxiety inventory (tai),” The Journal of General Psychology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2002.[25] C. D. Spielberger, “Manual for the state-trait anxietry, inventory,” Consulting Psychologist, 1970.[26] E. S. Cerino, “Relationships between academic motivation, self-efficacy, and academic procrastination.” Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, vol. 19, no. 4, 2014.[27] P. Steel, “The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and
. 10.18260/1-2--4578 2. K. Reeves, B. Blank, V. Hernandez-Gantes, and M. Dickerson, “Using constructivist teaching strategies in probability and statistics,” in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2010, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--16660 3. D. Tougaw, “Integration of active learning exercises into a course on probability and statistics,” in 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2005, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--15579 4. N. S. Vidic, R. M. Clark, and E. G. Claypool, “Flipped classroom approach: probability and statistics course for engineers,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2015, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.241195. R. Al-Hammoud, “Molding the interactive
: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.(2006)[11] Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Kirkpatrick, J.D. “Evaluating: Part of a ten-step process”. In: Evaluating Training Programs; Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA, (2009), pp. 3–20[12] Praslova L . “Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education”. In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (2010), 22(3), pp.215-225[13] Yardley S , Dornan T . “Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’”. In: Medical Education (2012), 46(1), pp. 97-106[14] Praslova L . “Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning
). Maintaining Industry Partnerships In Integrated Product And Process Design Education. 7.826.1-7.826.13. 10.18260/1-2--10737.10. S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen and R. H. Todd, "Integrated product and process design: a capstone course in mechanical and manufacturing engineering," Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 1991, pp. 469-474, doi: 10.1109/FIE.1991.187527.11. Goldberg, Jay & Cariapa, Vikram & Corliss, George & Kaiser, Kate. (2014). The Benefits of Industry Involvement in the Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Course at Marquette University. 30.12. Howe, Susannah & Goldberg, Jay. (2019). Engineering Capstone Design
stress environment. Studentsimmediately reflected on the experience and shared profound learnings that they intended toimplement beyond the event.The event itself did not appear to alter the way students self-identify as team players, but manydid admit that they needed to work on their own communication and planning skills to be moreeffective team players.References[1] Stress Tolerance. Job requiring accepting criticism and dealing calmly with high-stress situations. ONET. Available: https://www.onetonline.org/find/descriptor/result/1.C.4.b[2] D. S. F. Chong, W. V. Eerde, K. H. Chai and C. G. Rutte, "A Double-Edged Sword: The Effects of Challenge and Hindrance Time Pressure on New Product Development Teams," in IEEE
the first semester, the instructors encouraged students to use “DesignThinking” to guide their efforts in defining the elements in the exhibit (which correspond tostudent projects). The Design Thinking steps are: empathizing with the customer (i.e., theparticipant, in the case of the exhibit), defining the elements in the exhibit, ideating about how torealize the elements, and next to make and test low fidelity prototypes (that is, prototypes madewith a relatively small investment in time and energy and just good enough to be able to tell ifthe current approach is good). Design Thinking was developed in the late 1950’s through acollaboration of faculty from the departments of Mechanical Engineering and Art andArchitecture at Stanford
andscience in their degree programs, connections with local artists and community members, andconnections with local, state and federal legislatures.Acknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by the University of New Mexico Grand Challengeon Sustainable Water Resources.References[1] D. Buffalari et al., “Integrating Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum: 1. Early Research Experiences and Training,” J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. A52–A63, Dec. 2020.[2] S. Pierszalowski, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, and L. Marlow, “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Accessing Undergraduate Research for STEM Students: Problematizing Under- Researched Factors for Students of Color,” Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 9, Art. no. 9
.[26] M. C. Jadud, “An exploration of novice compilation behaviour in BlueJ,” Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 15:1, pp. 25–40, 2005, doi: 10.1080/08993400500056530.[27] J. M. Allen, F. Vahid, A. Edgcomb, K. Downey, and K. Miller, “An Analysis of Using Many Small Programs in CS1,” in Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2019, pp. 585–591. doi: 10.1145/3287324.3287466.[28] “Stepik.” https://stepik.org/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[29] S. H. Edwards and K. P. Murali, “CodeWorkout: Short Programming Exercises with Built-in Data Collection,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2017, pp. 188–193. doi: 10.1145
, D. (2020). “Building Emotional Safety for Students in School Environments: Challenges and Opportunities.” In Health and Education Interdependence: Thriving from Birth to Adulthood, R. Midford, G. Nutton, B. Hyndman, and S. Silburn, Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 225–248. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-3959-6_12.[8] Wang, M.-T. & Degol, J.L. (2016). “School Climate: A Review of the Construct, Measurement, and Impact on Student Outcomes,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 315–352, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1.[9] Wright, C.J., Hargis, L.E., Usher, E.L., Hammer, J.H., Wilson, S.A., & Miller, M.E. (2021). “Identifying Engineering Students’ Beliefs About Seeking Help for Mental Health Concerns
institution is relatively small, these young scholars arealmost invisible when compared to students, staff, and faculty at an institution [2]. There is alsono one size fits all solution for postdocs to improve in all the ways needed to becomecompetitive candidates in the highly competitive market for the tenure-track jobs less than 20%of them will eventually obtain [3]. Nowell et al.’s [3] systematic review of professional development (PD) of postdocsthoroughly examined what was and was not working for post doctoral PD. One of the areas theyidentified as an important skill postdocs wanted to learn or further develop were “grant,manuscript, and proposal writing” and improving their presentation skills. Teaching skills sawthe greatest
School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State Uni- versity. Dr. Gambateseˆa C™s educational background includes Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of California aDr. Jake Smithwick, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Jake Smithwick is an associate professor at the University of North Carolina in Charlotte. His re- search focuses on organizational performance benchmarking within facility management, construction, and business services. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Identifying the “Static” and “Dynamic” Nature of Course Content: Focus on ConstructionAbstractThere is a variety of academic programs in the United
science professors: A large scale analysis on ratemyprofessor data. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 980–986, 2021.[14] Andrew S Rosen. Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching: a large-scale study of ratemyprofessors. com data. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1):31–44, 2018.[15] Yanan Fan, Laura J Shepherd, Eve Slavich, David Waters, M Stone, Rachel Abel, and Emma L Johnston. Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters. PloS one, 14(2):e0209749, 2019.[16] Kenneth M Cramer and Louise R Alexitch. Student Evaluations of College Professors
, checklists and other resources, and a HelpDesk.The hypothesis is that if first-time PIs feel less overwhelmed when implementing their firstgrant-funded projects, they will be able to attain better outcomes from those projects and will bemore likely to seek additional ATE grants in the future.References[1] S.1146 - Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act of 1992 102nd Congress (1991-1992)102 Congress (1991-1992): SATA legislation[2] https://nsf.gov, Awards, Award Search[3] https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?WT.z_pims_id=5464&ods_key=nsf21598,NSF Program Solicitation 21-598, Advanced Technological Education[4] Murrell, Audrey J, Forte-Trammell, Sheila and Bing, Diana A. (2009). Intelligent Mentoring:How IBM Creates Value Through People
of Maryland at College Park. Her research focus is on coupled aero-hydrodynamics of vehicle systems and novel vessel design.Dr. Paul H. Miller, P.E., United States Coast Guard Academy PAUL H. MILLER is a Professor in the Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Department at the USCGA and received a B. S. M. E. from Tufts University in 1985 and a M. E. in Ocean Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology in 1987. From 1987 to 1999 he worked in shipyards and design offices while attending the University of California at Berkeley part time and earning a M. E. in Naval Architecture and a D. Eng. in Civil Engineering. He is a licensed P.E. in Maryland and a Fellow in RINA and SNAME. His research includes marine
engineering is often the best teacher. While this research was done in anaerospace engineering experimental projects capstone sequence, many design capstonesequences in other engineering majors incorporate the experiential learning component aerospaceoften lacks, so many of the lessons learned here should transfer well to those capstones.References[1] KEEN Framework, https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework[2] Grzybowski, D. M., & Tang, X., & Park, E., & Leonard, A., & DeLano, J., & Zhao, K.(2020, June), Integration of Entrepreneurial-minded Learning. Paper presented at 2020 ASEEVirtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2--34852[3] Carnasciali, M., & Harichandran, R. S., & Erdil, N. O., &
completes tasks like welding that could be dangerous to bystanders. Similar to the interlocked barrier guard, a fixed barrier guard will physically restrict accessto an area from all directions [11]. However, fixed guards require tools to remove. A fixed guardacts as a shield between the robot and the operators(s) or bystanders. They are a permanent part ofthe machine. For this reason, they are constructed of materials that can withstand the impacts ofprolonged usage. It is the simplest type of guard, but the least flexible. They do not allow for quickmodifications to the robotic technology and greatly limit collaboration prospects, so they arereserved for the most dangerous robotic operations. The last type of physical guard is the
interventions could be a useful considerationfor similar first-year introductions. The limitations of this study include the lack of a controlsemester before the interventions were introduced. Future research on additional coursesperforming the pre and post surveys in a semester with and without the design interventionwould help to identify the direct impact of the design interventions. References[1] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, (2010). “Measuring Engineering Design Self-efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01043.x[2] Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., and Leifer, L. J. (2005). “Engineering design
postgraduate students [J]. Degrees and Graduate Education, 2016(2):12 -- 17.15 Zhang Donghai. Research on the Cultivation System of Practical Ability of Professional DegreePostgraduates and its Effectiveness -- Based on the survey of traditional graduate schools [J]. ChinaHigher Education Research, 2017(6):82 -- 89.16 Pan Mianzhen&Mao Jiye (2009). Rethinking the normative issues of case studies - China EnterpriseManagement Case Forum (2008) summary and model analysis Management World (02), 92-100+169.17 Edmondson, A. C. , & Mcmanus, S. E. . (2007). Methodological fit in management field research.The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155-1179.18 Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy
Look at the Employment and Educational Experiences of College Graduates, 1 Year Later. First Look. NCES 2019- 241.,” Washington, DC, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019241[7] J. Bound, M. F. Lovenheim, and S. Turner, “Why have college completion rates declined? an analysis of changing student preparation and collegiate resources,” Am Econ J Appl Econ, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–157, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1257/app.2.3.129.[8] Florida International University (FIU), “Accountability Dashboards.” https://aim.fiu.edu/dash/index.html (accessed Mar. 31, 2023).[9] Y. Chen, A. Johri, and H. Rangwala, “Running out of STEM: A Comparative Study across STEM Majors of
." National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, 2009, pp2 -7.2. J. M. Cruz, C. Hampton, S. G. Adams, and N. Hosseinichimeh, (2019, June), “A System Approach to Instructional Change in Academia” Paper presented ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, (Florida), USA: 2019. https://peer.asee.org/320053. M. C. Wright, “Measuring teaching effectiveness” in Advancing the Culture of Teaching on Campus: How a Teaching Center Can Make a Difference, ed. C. Cook and M. Kaplan, Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2011, ch. 2, pp34-42.4. C. E. Cook and M. Marincovich. "Effective practices at research universities: the productive pairing of research and teaching," in A Guide to Faculty Development. 2nd ed. K. J. Gillespie and D. L. Robertson, San
informationabout CREATE/STS activities as they unfold.References[1] Seabrook, B. E., & Neeley, K. A., & Zacharias, K., & Caron, B. R., Teaching STS toEngineers: A Comparative Study of Embedded STS Programs ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2020.[2] Marshall, W., & Tang, M., & Durham, S. A. Integration of Science, Technology, and Society(STS) Courses into the Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, 2012.[3] Tomblin, D., & Mogul, N. “STS Postures: Changing How Undergraduate EngineeringStudents Move Through the World “Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,2022.[4] ABET, Accreditation Criteria 2023-2024 https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria
; Jaugietis, Z., Developing peer mentoring through evaluation. Innovative HigherEducation, 36(1). 41-52 (2011).[8] Astin, A. W., Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of CollegeStudent Development, 40(5), 518-529 (1999).[9] Chester, A., Burton, L. J., Xenos, S., & Elgar, K. Peer mentoring: Supporting successful transition forfirst year undergraduate psychology students. Australian Journal Of Psychology, 65(1), 30-37 (2013).
back the first cohort, COVID moved both introductory courses online in their firstiterations. Cohorts of students taking introduction to data science, for example, were learningonline in a pandemic, and although we didn’t study COVID-19's impact expressly, it would beeasy to see how outcomes and experiences of students would be much different in on campuslearning environments. Additionally, we struggled to recruit students into the data science micro-credential, and although we have a number of plans to address this difficulty, the effects of thepandemic on students’ willingness to adopt new lines of study is assumed.Recruitment of Students & Finding Room in CurriculumDue to COVID-19, student recruitment was through virtual informational
the civilian rotary-wing industry. This program and others like itwill be vital to meet the needs of the nation’s civilian helicopter workforce.References:[1] B. Champ, "What’s Causing the Pilot Shortage and How to Solve It," 23 August 2022.[Online]. Available: https://www.driveresearch.com/market-research-company- blog/solving-pilot-shortage/. [Accessed 9 February 2023].[2] T. Rucinski, "U.S. Airlines Tap Army Helicopter Pilots to Ease Shortage," Reuters, 23January 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-aviation- shortage-insight/u-s-airlines-tap-army-helicopter-pilots-to-ease-shortage- idUSKCN1PH0CO. [Accessed 10February 2023].[3] M. Buczyner, "Pilot shortage Leads to Grounding of Second Palm Beach
doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4-33.Sheets, D. E. (2016). Transformative Initiatives: How iFoundry reimagines STEM education for the 21st century. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress (Eds.), Transforming institutions: undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century (pp. 235-244). Purdue University Press.The Boyer 2030 Commission (2022). The equity excellence imperative: A 2030 blueprint for undergraduate education at U.S. research universities. The Association for Undergraduate Education at Research Universities.Thorne, S., Strimel, G. J., Mentzer, N., & Sears, D. (2022) The facilitator model: Investigating a novel
., Foreman, C., Alpay, E. (2020). 3D Printers in EngineeringEducation. In: Gravett, K., Yakovchuk, N., Kinchin, I. (eds) Enhancing Student-CentredTeaching in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_7[7] F. Akasheh, M. Ndoye, D. Shannon, R. Pippins, E. Thompson, A. Carter, S. Baker, and B.Guiseppi. "Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Modular Drone Design Development byMultidisciplinary Engineering Student Team." In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.2022, Paper ID #38111[8] Drone market outlook in 2023: industry growth trends, market stats and forecast. BusinessInsider. https://www.businessinsider.com/drone-industry-analysis-market-trends-growth-forecasts.[9] Bronz, Murat, Ezra Tal, Federico Favalli
allows the researchers to assess thefeasibility of the work and to understand the ease in which participants were able to answer thequestions generated for the survey. Additionally, with the initial examination of qualitativeresponses, researchers will be able to ascertain whether students’ perspectives could lead to alarger conversation about familiarity and feelings towards the terms and the usage by variousgroups of people.Using Yin’s [15] definition of a case, the exploration of a phenomenon in its contemporary,real-life context, in which researcher(s) have little to no control of, this study enables theunderstanding of the how and why of engineering students’ perceptions of the language they useto describe and identify themselves [16
Champaign 2019 - presentUniversity of Denver Engineering (General) BS 1997- 2007 (Discontinued?)Loyola University Maryland Engineering Science(s) BS 1989 - 2010 Engineering BSE 2011 - presentLoyola University Chicago Engineering Science BS 2018 - 2021 Engineering BS, 2021 - presentSouthern Utah University Integrated Engineering BS 2003 - 2011 Engineering BS 2011 - presentA new movement is emerging around the name Integrated Engineering with sessions held at theAmerican Society for Engineering Education and Frontiers in Education conferences [20], [21].Southern Utah University offered an Integrated Engineering degree [22], [23] from 2003