, 2023 Robotics Empowered Convergence Engineering Education He Shen, Aren Petrossian, Joseph Vizcarra, Eva Schiorring, Mark TufenkjianAbstract: This paper presents the design and first-time offering of a convergence engineering course,“Introduction to Autonomous Robotic Systems,” where students from four engineering majors worked ininterdisciplinary teams to create submarine robots and accomplish complex autonomous missions. Thetechnical knowledge covered in the course included: robot design, mechanical analysis, sensing andactuation, electrical system design, guidance, navigation, control, robot operating system, computer vision,object recognition, and mission planning. The students are engaged in a whole project cycle within
bachelordegree program within the four year timeframe and a lower likelihood of taking more than fouryears to complete the degree, female minority STEM students had the highest percentage of dropor stop attending rates. These findings offer some initial insight into the challenges faced by female minoritystudents in STEM fields in terms of degree completion and retention. This analysis marks thebeginning of a journey to understand their experiences, and plans are in progress for the nextphase of this study, which is scheduled for the fall 2023 semester. The next phase will focus onidentifying the barriers that these students face and will include activities aimed at improvingtheir confidence, preparedness and sense of belonging. Section 6.0
parallel with the new program presented here.As a liberal arts college, an engineering degree would need to have some flexibility to fit theoverall college culture. Initially planned to fit within the college’s BA footprint, a degree neededto provide some formal engineering training while still pursuing external interests such as varsitysports and musical ensembles. Many students come into college still exploring their interests, soa program with flexibility to discover engineering while in college would serve them better thanprograms at other institutions in the greater geographic area that provide specialized engineeringdegrees.Pilot ProgramThe engineering program started in the physics department, with a proposal for an EngineeringScience major
’ assessment of the climatewithin the first-year engineering experience. In this paper, findings from the second year ofpiloting our workshops are described. In this second iteration of training, new teaching assistantsparticipated in our foundational training in GIDBEA, and returning ones built on theirintroductory knowledge to learn about social justice and principles of inclusive leadership. Thedata shows that most of the teaching assistants found the workshop content and activitiesrelevant to them as peer educators. Several teaching assistants shared inclusive leadershipstrategies that they planned to implement in the coming semester. The goal of this study is toinform plans for implementing solutions into training that address deficiencies
presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3317Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edstrom, K. (2007). Rethinking engineering education. The CDIO approach, 302(2), 60-62.cDettman, M. A. (2000, June), Industrial Partnerships At Western Kentucky University Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8453Dobrowski, T. (2008, June), Building Industry Relationships Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3797Foltz, L. G., Gannon, S., & Kirschmann, S. L. (2014). Factors that contribute to the persistence of minority students in STEM Fields. Planning
resultsshowed higher student success with writing-intensive courses in developing critical writing skillsin a construction management course [2]. Challenges of developing writing skills amongundergraduate STEM curricula are addressed by Mayo and Wheaton [3] who state that writingassignments can be developed such that they assist students in connecting their technical work toreal-world applications. In their lesson plan, the students were expected to post their work on apublic platform encouraging students to produce quality work. Richards and Milanovicestablished partnerships with professional writing faculty, industry members and technicalcourse instructors to mentor senior design project students in effective writing through pairedteaching [4]. In a
Technical Managers2023 ASEE Engineering Management Division (EMD) Abstract This work in progress (WIP) paper aims at demonstrating the innovative design ofintegrating a communication course with the Capstone course, which is part of the Master ofEngineering Technical Management (METM), a 21-month online graduate program for workingprofessionals in the engineering technical management fields. As the culmination of theirgraduate study, students must identify an organizational/technical challenge, formulate a feasibleproject plan to address the issue to bring impact to the organization. During this process, theywill conduct research, create a strong business case for their industry sponsors
accrediting agencies, institutional influences of college missionsand resources, and unit-level influences of faculty, discipline, and student characteristics. Starkalso created the Contextual Filters Model that provides an overview of the various contexts thatinfluence course planning for college faculty (Lattuca & Stark, 2011; Stark, 2000; Stark et al.,1988). A study by Lund and Stains examines unique environments and contexts of departmentsin influencing STEM faculty’s teaching practices and finds that disciplinary differences exist andhave shown potential associations to level of adoption of evidence-based instructional practices(2015). Another study shows similar findings where faculty’s teaching practices differ based onthe contexts they
research on workload assess- ment. Dr. Pennathur has also been recently awarded two grants from the National Science Foundation in Engineering Education. In one of the grants, he is modeling how engineering faculty plan for their instruction. In a second grant, he is developing a model for institutional transformation in engineering which balances access and excellence. Dr. Pennathur is the author/co-author of over 100 publications in industrial engineering and human factors engineering. He is on the editorial board of the International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, among other journals.Priyadarshini PennathurProf. Nicholas A Bowman, University of Iowa Nicholas A. Bowman is the Mary Louise Petersen Chair in Higher
to the stages of self-regulated learning,i.e., planning, performance, and self-reflection.Results: Results indicate that students had prior knowledge of project management but lackedfamiliarity with the research process. Students encountered project management challenges, buteffective communication and clear goal setting were key strategies in meeting deadlines andcompleting coursework. Students valued collaboration and continuous mentoring, and the coursehad a positive impact on students' understanding and interest in research, as well as theirdevelopment of transferable skills for future practice. Overall, this study highlights theimportance of project management skills and mentorship in promoting self-regulated learningand research skills
the first-year experience.Backward Design and the CAP modelThe backward design of curricular development starts with the basic idea of starting from the end, wherewe envision our students to be after the learning experience we are designing [4]. Its central premise isthat once the educational purposes (i.e., the learning outcomes) of a learning experience areconscientiously selected, the rest of the elements of the experience (i.e., the pedagogical activities, andcorresponding assessments) should be designed toward the achievement of those identified outcomes [5].Therefore, the three main stages of backward design are: (1) identifying desired results, (2) determiningacceptable evidence, and (3) planning learning experiences and instruction
twenty-eight undergraduateagricultural and biological engineering students’ self-ratings of their proficiency level withlearning objectives following weekly assignments in a process engineering course. Theseresponses, in conjunction with results from the learning-objective based grading of students’work by the teaching assistant were analyzed to determine patterns in students’ learning needs asthe semester progressed. Examples of inferences about students’ struggles that the instructordrew from the results of students' self-ratings and actions that the instructor made or plans to takeare discussed.I. IntroductionUniversity instructors write course learning objectives, and they may even use these as a guide todesigning their instruction as
test board served as key component in making hands-on experiments of the course in a remote setting possible. The remote experiments, testing, and evaluations were done following a formal and methodic approach, instead of ad hoc practices. In general, this approach led to effective and efficient experiments, and also served as a model to think creatively and methodically for solving engineering problems and planning prototype development. Overall, the design and use of the test board proved instrumental in the successful remote delivery of our digital laboratory course such that all the previous in person course experiments were completed in the online course without any limitations and the course’s educational outcomes were
Undergraduate Programs in the Depart- ment of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She has been active in improving undergraduate education including developing laboratories to enhance experimental design skills and mentoring and guiding student teams through the capstone design and a translational course following capstone design. In her Director role, she works closely with the departmental leadership to manage the undergraduate program including: developing course offering plan, chairing the undergrad- uate curriculum committee, reviewing and approving course articulations for study abroad, serving as Chief Advisor, and representing the department at the college level meetings. She is
second, morein-depth, course to the curriculum. This response reveals a need for further investigation intodifferent aspects of transportation engineering curricula, specifically looking into the degree towhich secondary courses are present in civil engineering programs seven years down the road.Aside from course structure, specific concepts covered in transportation engineering is anothertopic of interest among researchers. Transportation engineering is a large field encompassingmany different sub-fields; e.g., transportation planning, roadway design, travel behavior, policy,and traffic operations, among others. Recent work aimed to uncover how different professionalsprioritize what topics students cover in their transportation engineering
. However, in recent years, many of the manufacturing-related machines haveevolved to be non-hands-on. Consequently, more time is spend planning the process, for instancein CAD/CAM environments. The analysis of data is becoming more important in recent years aswell. Not just since the rise of Industry 4.0 is the number of sensors steadily increasing,generating an ever bigger amount of data. Along with this trend, the learning goals of laboratorycourses shift accordingly – from manual operation of machines towards process planning,observation and data analysis. This enables to use of so-called remote laboratories as part offlipped laboratory concepts, given their shifted focus of achievable learning outcomes [2], [6].Such remote laboratories are
interactive digital environment in which users try to solve fundamentalproblems in the domain of construction planning and scheduling presented in realistic scenariosthrough guided active explorations. Figure 1 shows a snapshot of the game. The scenario-basedproblems facilitate sense-making and engage students in understanding, analyzing, and solvingopen-ended problems in that field. During the active explorations to solve these fundamentalproblems, the users are exposed to fundamental engineering problems and try to discoversystematic solutions to solve them. The game and the proposed gamified pedagogy are designedbased on the Constructivism learning theory and a framework that consists of six essentialelements: (1) modeling; (2) reflection; (3
in2YCs [1]. The "Capacity Building Workshops for Competitive S-STEM Proposals from Two-Year Colleges in the Western U.S." goal has been to support preparation and submission ofproposals to the NSF S-STEM program from two-year colleges (2YCs).The workshop has been offered during the summers of 2019 (in person), 2020 and 2021 (virtual)and focused on several aspects of proposal preparation, including addressing the NSF MeritReview Criteria, developing, and justifying proposed budgets, incorporating appropriate andmeaningful evidence-based strategies, and evaluation and dissemination plans. A completedescription and evaluation analysis of this project is currently being submitted for publication[2]. The workshop facilitators who were carefully
of recent graduates. We complementour review of literature by adding papers from other domains that have explored a similarmethod of analysis.Technical, Technological and Soft Skills in ConstructionIn the present paper, technical skills are defined as the fundamental knowledge of a specificfield. Some key technical skills previous research has identified include interpretation of plans,knowledge of construction operations, general computer proficiency, knowledge of green andsustainable construction, scheduling, estimating, and safety, among others [2, 5]. Technical skillshave found to be extremely important for construction students’ job readiness by both industryprofessionals and students [5]. In their research, Bhattacharjee et al. [5
engineering faculty from AGEP populations at CMU,JHU, and NYU. The goal of this NSF AGEP Faculty Career Pathways Alliance Model (FCPAM)is to develop, implement, self-study, and institutionalize a career pathway model that can beadapted for use at other similar institutions for advancing early career engineering faculty whoare: African Americans, Hispanic Americans, American Indians, Alaska Natives, NativeHawaiians, and Native Pacific Islanders.3. Project Descriptiona. Participating Institutions In 2017, after the College of Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) lostsome of its URM1 faculty, the college developed its first diversity strategic plan. Theimplementation of this plan strengthened existing partnerships with engineering
to adapt to shock quickly to wherecapacity is recovered efficiently. The Natural Resource Council (NRC) defines resilience as “theability [of individuals, groups, communities] to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from, ormore successfully adapt to [actual or potential] adverse events” (Amadei, 2020; NRC, 2012). Avisual depiction of resilience and its relationship to capacity is shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1. Resilience after a disaster or crisis or viewing resilience as variations in community capacity over time following a disaster or crisis (Amadei, 2020).Engineers such as Amadei (2020) and Bouabid & Louis (2015) (henceforth referred to as theABL model) have formed models to assess the capacity of communities to
solutions.The entry courses along with the collaborative courses build a learning sequence that leads to a minordegree in design and innovation. While minor degrees are not novel, it was found that the programminghad to be linked to something of recognizable/tangible value to students. Through student and advisorinterviews, it was found that advising programs are automated to direct students toward “checking boxes”for a plan of study without consideration of the nuances of different types of learning opportunities. Themain goal of pursuing higher education for students is to essentially receive credentials that have value forfuture careers. So, it is important to understand the degree planning systems and use them to enablestudents to get more out of
virtual meetings and workshops, includinga virtual Kickoff Workshop, a hybrid Writers Retreat, and 1:1 coaching with the ProjectCoordinator and other writing mentors. By the end of the AWP, 27 authors had drafted 71activities in 17 areas of CS. Fifty-eight activities were revised and approved by the programas ready for classroom testing. Almost all of the authors planned to use the developed activitiesin their classes (88%) and share them with others (78%), while 75% planned to develop moreactivities. Almost all (88%) felt that the writing process impacted how they teach with POGILactivities. Thus, the AWP is an effective model to support faculty and produce quality activities.1. IntroductionCollaborative learning activities benefit student
. Teamwork skills areshown at the very top as the most common attribute. However, it is a frequent observation byprofessors that students usually limit the teamwork strategy to an initial distribution of tasks(generally predetermined by the structure of the projects) and occasional meetings to assemblethe contributions in reports or presentations (“divide and conquer” strategy). Experiences withsenior students have proved that they rarely rely on effective planning, revisions, and updates ofa general plan. Team identity is taken for granted as defined exclusively by the expectation ofgetting a good grade. Techniques learned in the short first-year training, like the team contract,are hardly followed. No records of progressive work are taken
, withone phase finished by one group and handed off to another group for continuation. Students thenprepare a brief written proposal, and a memorandum of understanding (MOU) is signed by boththe faculty advisor(s) and student(s). A second one-credit course is taken in the spring semester of the junior year when studentsdo a deeper dive into the relevant literature, develop a detailed plan for executing the projectduring their senior year, and prepare a poster on their project that is presented at a symposium.Two faculty members co-taught this course, with the symposium poster and written proposalcounting for 50 percent of their grade. This grade is given by the faculty advisor(s) who havesigned the MOU with students. In the senior year
required undergraduate course followed by adesign laboratory with a cumulative project where students prepare a calculation and drawingpackage for a simple multi-story timber structure. This process starts with determining theconfiguration of gravity and lateral systems, followed by calculations for sizing and analysis ofmembers as well as the production of construction documents for the framing plans andconnection details.When transitioning from the timber materials lecture to the subsequent design laboratory (or todesign in the industry setting) it is critical students understand the context of isolated timbermembers within the entire structure system. Past studies have shown that by interacting withphysical and digital models, students are
undergraduate education including developing laboratories to enhance experimental design skills and mentoring and guiding student teams through the capstone design and a translational course following capstone design. In her Director role, she works closely with the departmental leadership to manage the undergraduate program including: developing course offering plan, chairing the undergrad- uate curriculum committee, reviewing and approving course articulations for study abroad, serving as Chief Advisor, and representing the department at the college level meetings. She is also engaged with college recruiting and outreach; she coordinates three summer experiences for high school students visit- ing Bioengineering and co
created an introductory journal to support incoming first-year students. The journal incorporated organizational tools, information about the university,and available student resources. The journal’s intention was not only to help students hone theirorganizational skills but also to improve learning, prioritize responsibilities, and assist studentsin allocating time to connect with each other.Project ApproachThroughout the planning stages of the journal, the research team, comprising a faculty member,a staff member, and three undergraduate researchers, considered three main features: ● Provide organizational tools such as weekly calendars to help students track their assignment deadlines and other important dates ● Inspire healthy habits
stakeholders. Students who are in theprogram are surveyed and interviewed, and students not in the program are invited to participatein surveys. Interviews and initial survey results have been published elsewhere [12].Launch InitiativesDuring the first two years of the PAtENT project, primary activities have centered onrecruitment, marketing, and investigating student and faculty perceptions about the program.The year one focus was on relationship building with campus resources and community, andestablishment of data measurements and collection plan. The management team collectedresponses from faculty about project status for potential doctoral candidates, and finalizedstudent cohort one. Additionally, the team connected with the Ventureprise and the
chemical reactions that are taught within the course. The usage of AR/VR tovisualize these difficult concepts and structures is thought to be an effective tool to implementand enhance the learning experience.This exposure and usage are depicted through a hands-on laboratory session within the coursewhich is provided for instructors in the next page. This activity entails a short lesson whichintroduces the concepts of AR/VR to the students with some built-in small discussion points toreflect upon how these technologies can be applied to the real world. Next, the students then getto experience VR through the Merge Headset and lesson plans (e.g., “Make Carbonic acid”). Forthe AR sections, students use the Merge Object Viewer app to project molecules