Conference Session

Early Engineering Design Experiences

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shawn S Jordan, Purdue University; Nielsen Pereira, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Mwangi, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Craig Baltimore, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

graduation on designingthese types of projects.IntroductionMasonry construction dates back as early as man’s civilization when cut stone was used to buildpyramids. Burned clay bricks have been in use for a long time and use of grouted brick masonrydates in the U.S.A. as far back as in the 1860’s. Laws governing construction with masonry goesback to the 18th century with the Code of Hammurabi; “If a house collapses and kills the owner’sson, the son of the builder shall be put to death”. To date, design and construction requirementsfor masonry structures are specified in the International Building Code which references the Page 14.718.2MSJC.In

Conference Session

Design Communications

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Ekwaro-Osire, Texas Tech; Peter Orono, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

(two prospective freshmen females, two freshman minority student, one juniorminority student, and one sophomore). The duration of the study was eight weeks. A rubric forresearch notebooks was developed and discussed. The rubric has a potential for usage as aneffective tool to map creativity instances during team activities in a research project on design.Acknowledgement The first author would like to acknowledge the grant from the ?? program at ?? University. Page 14.1304.4Bibliography1. Ekwaro-Osire S, Orono PO, "Design notebooks as indicators of student participation in team activities," in Proceedings of 2007 Frontiers in Education

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie-Pierre Huguet, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Frank Wright, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

the course being taught? (level of blend, delivery mode, teaching style, …) • And most importantly, Why? Why use the technology or the tool? Why teach the course? Why select this specific objective? … Trying to answer the “why?” of everything is often the most effective, albeit challenging, tool in course design.At the heart of the constructivist instructional design is the instructor, the “i" in our formula. Ourresearch showed us that s/he is the most critical, integral part of effective instruction, just as thestudent is the most critical, integral part of constructivist instruction. The instructors mustconsider their teaching style29 and teaching methods, and as they do, map them against theirstudents’ learning styles.Create a design

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Scott Johnson, University of Illinois

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

students’ design performance. Although there arenumerous existing studies that investigate how metacognition impacts performance, similarstudies may focus on the investigation about how each of the components of the self-appraisaland self-management from various groups of engineering students relate to design performance.A standard method of assessing students’ design performance needs to be formulated to increasethe validity of the data.References1. Chan, L. K. S., and Moore, P. J. 2006. Development of attributional beliefs and strategic knowledge in years 5 to 9: A longitudinal analysis. Educational Psychology 26(2): 161-185.2. Graves, D. H. 1983. Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.3

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renee Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Kay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Glen Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

effort into the design project, will not be proud of the results of the project.As shown in the correlation analysis, this will also result in a lower perceived quality of learningin senior design, which is independent of the efforts of the instructor!Table 1. Evaluation items correlated with “Taking this course is helping me make thetransition from being a student to being a professional.”Evaluation Items Quarter Correlation Coefficient(s)*Rate the quality of your learning in this course Fall 0.572Rate the instructor’s overall performance in this Fall

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Ron Lasser, Tufts University; Katie Su, Smith College; Sarah Pedicini, Smith College

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

survey link were asked, in addition to completing the surveythemselves, to send a link with the survey to their students encouraging them to take the studentsurvey too. Hence, respondent pairings of faculty and students were expected. Figure 6 showsthe numbers of students associated with a given faculty member or a group of faculty from thesame department, for those faculty and students who clearly reported their discipline; each circleon the chart represents one set of students with its respective faculty member(s). As is clear fromthe figure, the majority of faculty responses are connected with 0-4 student responses, though afew faculty members had 19 or more students from their class(es) respond

Conference Session

Design Communications

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharad Oberoi, Carnegie Mellon University; Susan Finger, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

bigger corpus, but also extend their hypotheses to see how connections betweendifferent ideas in an engineering project evolve with time.AcknowledgmentsThis research was supported in part by National Science Foundation grant EEC-0203448.Bibliography1. Mabogunje, A., Carrizosa, K., Sheppard, S., and Leifer, L., Towards a science of engineering design teams, International Conference on Engineering Design ICED’01, Glasgow, August 21-23, 2001.2. Krsul, I. V., Software Vulnerability Analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, 1998.3. Dym, C. L., Representing designed artifacts: The languages of engineering design, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1(1), pp. 75-108, 1994.4. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Problem-Based Learning: What and

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oscar Nespoli, University of Waterloo; William Owen, University of Waterloo; Colin Campbell, University of Waterloo; Steve Lambert, University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

specific course topics”Q7. “The case study, and its activities, consistently provided sufficient background informationand data for the activities (e.g. calculations, discussions, etc.)”Q8. “The graphics or multimedia content of this case study, and its activities, consistentlyhelped me to understand these specific course topics”Q9. “Are there sections of this case study, and its activities, where your understanding of thecase material could be enhanced by adding graphics and/or multimedia?Q10. “In addition to reading this case study, what case-related activities (e.g. calculations,discussions, etc.) did your class carry out to help you understand these specific course topics?Q11.”Small group discussion(s) of the case, its activities, etc., helped

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Fleisig, McMaster University; Harry Mahler, Ontario College of Art and Design; Vladimir Mahalec, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, “Are Designers The Enemy Of Design?”, BusinessWeek, March 18, 2007.7 A Tan and TC McAloone, “Understanding and Developing Innovative Products and Services: The EssentialElements”, International Design Conference – Design 2006, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 15-18, 2006.8 W Buxton, “Innovation vs. Invention”, Rotman Magazine, University of Toronto, Fall 2005, pp. 52-53.9 Ibid.10 C Owen, “Design Thinking: Notes on its Nature and Use”, Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 2007, pp. 16-27.11 Ibid.12 N Cross, “Expertise in design: an overview”, Design Studies, 25(5), 2004, pp. 427-441.13 K Kazerounian and S Foley, “Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors andStudents’ Perceptions”, ASME Journal of Engineering Design

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University; Samuel T Hunter, Pennsylvania State University; Gul Kremer, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Active Learning: A Study of its Impact on Freshman Engineering Students,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1051-1061.5. Liu, Z. and Schonwetter, D. (2004), “Teaching Creativity in Engineering,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20, No.5, 2004, pp. 801-808. Page 14.419.106. Okudan, G., Ogot, M., Zappe, S., and Gupta, S. (2007), “Assessment of Learning and its Retention in the Engineering Design Classroom Part A: Instrument Development,” (CD) Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition, 2007.7. Okudan, G. Ogot, M. and Gupta, S. (2007), “Assessment of

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University; Steven Welch, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Page 14.1224.5overall project grade. A summative examination is given to teams over their block diagrams;this is discussed in detail later in the manuscript.After the teams create a block diagram of their project, individual students research how toimplement the function of the block(s) assigned to them. This research phase asks students toexplore alternative implementations as well as model their circuits using electronic CADsoftware; This stage represents the research and modeling phases of the design cycle shown inFigure 1. A short, circa two page, written report is submitted by students when they meetindividually with TA’s at the completion of the research phase. As with each stage of the projectif students are unable to demonstrate

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Hitt, United States Military Academy; Daisie Boettner, United States Military Academy; Stephen Suhr, United States Military Academy; Joel Dillon, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

continued to utilize a common theme (design of a portable illuminationdevice) to provide context for new course material and design tools; however, a more open-ended approach was used to stimulate student creativity and emphasize the importance offunction over form in the early stages of conceptual design. Delaying the selection of aflashlight as the illumination device helped illustrate a more comprehensive application of thedesign process – better preparing students for their out-of-class and capstone design efforts. The individual design project (design a device to store a West Point class ring) continued asthe framework for out-of-class homework assignments, but it underwent several changes aimedat streamlining the course‟s transition to

Conference Session

Early Engineering Design Experiences

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University; David Hall, Louisiana Tech University; Mark Barker, Louisiana Tech University; Patricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, which of the “Ten Faces” do you think best describes you? Why?This assignment is completed and turned in during the next class period and is designed to startthe students thinking about the role(s) where they feel they can contribute in a team environment.Official team roles are not assigned, but effective team management techniques are discussed.Project Selection: At the end of the first three weeks of the course, each team of four studentshave developed an extensive list of “bugs”, approximately 28 total bugs per team. The teamsthen choose one of their bugs (or a variant thereof) to explore further. The teams write a memo tothe instructor describing the bug, but are encouraged to remain open to the actual solution totheir bug. It is

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joel Dillon, United States Military Academy; Jill Cheney, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

personality-based teams outperformed the C Hour self-selected teams in bothhang time and accuracy (as measured by the average distance their rockets landed from thetarget) as can be seen below: B Hour C Hour Instructor Assigned Teams Self Selected Teams Avg Rocket Hang Time Avg Rocket Hang Time 6.20 s 5.82 s Avg Distance to Target Avg Distance to Target 47.8 ft 60.6 ft   Figure 7: Section Performance on EDP 2The personality-based

Conference Session

Design Methodology

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary; Carla Gould, Ontario College of Art and Design; Casey Wong, Ontario College of Art and Design; Michael Helms, Georgia Institute of Technology; Djordje Zegarac, University of Calgary; Sean Gibbons, University of Montana; Carl Hastrich, Ontario College of Art and Design; Jeannette Yen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Bruce Hinds, Ontario College of Art and Design; Denise DeLuca, Biomimicry Institute; jessica ching, Ontario College of Art and Design

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Hamilton, T., Sustainability by design: a reflection on the suitability of pedagogicpractice in design and engineering courses in the teaching of sustainable design. European Journal of EngineeringEducation, 32:2, 135–142, 2007.5. Helms, M., Vattam, S., & Goel, A. (2008) Compound Analogical Design, or How to Make a SurfboardDisappear. In B.C. Love, K. McRae, & V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of theCognitive Science Society (pp. 781 – 786), Washington D.C.:Cognitive Science Society6. Vattam, S., Helms, M., Goel, A., Yen, J., & Weissburg, M. (2008) Learning About and Through BiologicallyInspired Design. To appear in Proceeding from the 2nd Design Creativity Workshop Atlanta, GA.7. Vattam, S., Helms, M

Conference Session

Design Cognition

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Jensen, United States Air Force Academy; Jason Weaver, University of Texas, Austin; Kristin Wood, University of Texas, Austin; Julie Linsey, Texas A&M University; John Wood, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

5 3 3 4 7 6 6 TIPS 0 27 0 9 4 10 6 7 TOTAL # CONCEPTS 96 71 100 89Note from the table that the students were also asked to rate the “innovativeness” of each of theCG techniques. While this is quite subjective, it is interesting to note that each team chose adifferent CG method as most innovative (red 10’s in the table). There are some observabletrends in the innovation data. The 6-3-5/Morphological Analysis, Design by Analogy/WordTrees and Far-Field Analogies ranked high while Transformational Design/Mind maps rankedlower. However, the relative dissimilarity of the ranking

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaobo Peng, Prairie View A&M University; Katie Grantham Lough, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Benjamin Dow, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. 39.3. Clark, J., 2000, “Collaboration Tools in Online Learning Environments,” ALN Magazine, 4(1).4. Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., Turoff, M., and Benbunan-Fich, R., 2000, “Measuring the Importance ofCollaborative Learning for the Effectiveness of ALN: A Multi-measure Multi-method Approach,” ALN Journal,5(2).5. Lowyck, L. and Poysa, J., 2001, “Design of Collaborative Learning Environments,” Computers in HumanBehavior, 17(5-6), pp. 507-516.6. Hughes, S. C., Wichersham, L., Ryan-Jones, D. L., and Smith, S. A., 2002, “Overcoming Social andPsychological Barriers to Effective On-line Collaboration,” Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), pp. 86-92.7. Bishop, P., Cox, B., Fothergill, R., Kyle, J., Lawson, D., Mitchell, M., Rathbone, J

Conference Session

Design Methodology

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saeed Monemi, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Weicong Pan, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Edward Varnado, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

due dates. The EGR 481 syllabus is as follows:Course Syllabus: EGR 481 - Fall 08 Project Design Principles and ApplicationsProfessor’s name: Dr. S. MonemiOffice location & phone: 9-527, 909-869-2520Email: ssmonemi@csupomona.eduClass time and location: MW 1:00-1:50 PM, Room 9-329Course prerequisites: Upper division standingOffice Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday 8:00 - 10:00 AMTextbook: Class notes and handoutsCourse Description: Completion of a capstone senior design team project under faculty supervision. Results are presented in a formal report.Course Coverage: Learn how to design, develop, and analyze

Conference Session

Design in Freshman and Sophomore Courses

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University; William Riddell, Rowan University; Krishan Bhatia, Rowan University; Leigh Weiss, Rowan University; Kevin Dahm, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Cp ? (1) 1 τAU ♣3 2To assess the rotors, the performance curves (i.e., Cp versus rotational speeds of completedturbines) were measured at distinct load points for two different wind speeds (5 m/s and 3 m/s).The score that a design received was calculated as the average of the maximum Cp valuesdetermined from the two performance curves.A numerical grade was assigned to the technical performance based on the turbine’s averagemaximum Cp value. Initially, the following algorithm was proposed: An unoptimized wind

Conference Session

Assessing Design Course Work

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oliver Platts-Mills, University of Virginia; Reid Bailey, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

important results within the framework it is necessary tocontinue to build a comprehensive set of assessments which can be used to facilitateunderstanding of the role that variability plays in capstone courses. As the field ofengineering education strives to understand capstone programs, it is important to continueto address the innate challenges associated with assessing such a complex class.Bibliography 1. Bailey, R and Szabo, Z (2006). “Assessing engineering design process knowledge,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, Number 3, pp 508-518(11). 2. Dutson, A. J., R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby and C. D. Sorensen, 1997. A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project- Oriented Capstone

Conference Session

Design for Society and the Environment

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Williams, Virginia Tech; Richard Goff, Virginia Tech; Janis Terpenny, Virginia Tech; Jenny Lo, Virginia Tech; Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech; Karen Gilbert, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

). Page 14.2.9 Figure 1. Design “Tools” Covered in ENGE 1114Table 2. The Phases of the Design Methodology and of the ROXIE Project Design Phase Project Components • Partner with community service group • Serve community group in order to better understand their needsIdentify the problem • Meet with community group leader(s) to identify specific needs and begin project planning • Draft project proposal (must be approved by instructor) Clarify the design • Develop project plan (Gantt chart, Linear Responsibility Chart, Work Breakdown task

Conference Session

Design Methodology

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Rinehart, NIOSH; Donna Heidel, NIOSH; Andrea Okun, NIOSH; Michael Barsan, NIOSH

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

andthe Steel Erectors Association of America that identifies the specific decisions structuralengineers can make to improve the safety constructability of their designs.21 Page 14.489.11 10Bibliography1. Cosman, M. and Pfahlert, J. 2006. Safety in Design in Construction Research Report. April, 2006. New Zealand Construction Industry Council.2. ORC WorldwideTM (ORC) EH&S Executive Business Issues Forum [Personal communication, April 12, 2007]. The ORC EH&S Business Issues Forum is a network for executives or directors with overall authority for environmental, health, and safety

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Llewellyn Mann, Central Queensland University; Shanna Daly, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

experiences, so that practitioner may be able to develop the ability to work with anew approach.The frameworks presented in this paper were aimed to serve as supports to guide interactionswith professional practitioners. They come from our own experiences and our own goals to carryout the implications suggested by our work. In the future a wider exploration and development ofthe framework is needed, particularly due to the apparent disconnect between the results of Page 14.420.9design research and changes in practice.Bibliography1. DALY, S., MANN, L. & ADAMS, R.S., (2008) A New Direction for Engineering Education Research: Unique

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ding Yuan, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Nebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Jane Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

fortheir professional development. All responses to the question “Is this course helping you preparefor your future career” were positive, except the following two neutral or partially negativecomments: - “Yes, but it is hard to tell since I already have a job.” - “No, the course has no bearing on my lack of career direction.”As for the comments on the overall course, one student suggested “work in more group activitiesand group discussion,” and another wanted to get a regular grade instead of an “S/U” grade; allother comments were positive. Some answers were - “The ethics section was done well.” - “Everything was great. Thank you very much! “ - “Overall if I was to have had this class before my design project, I would not have

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibibia Dabipi, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Christopher Hartman, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; James B. Burrows-Mcelwain, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

performance,… technology, or discipline(s), must be much more highlyintegrated than in the past” [1] Students partaking in the engineering exercise are forcedto confront concepts outside of their normal field of expertise in the short span of asemester and make decisions on a cost and design schedule.ENGAGING STUDENTS WITHIN THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PRINCIPLESStudents in the Spring 2008 Engineering Design course were given a written designproblem statement and presentations by two of the Aviation Sciences faculty in theirDepartment. Students were asked to design and build a deployable parachute system fora model aircraft. The initial meeting included a question and answer period wherestudent could ask key design questions to the faculty members playing

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Baker, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Mark Yoder, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Bruce Black, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Robert Throne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; William Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Page 14.1043.9 2. They provide concise clear views of key metrics associated with project execution. 3. They help drive progress toward chosen milestones and encourage chosen behaviors. 4. The scorecards provide ‘early warning’ of projects in trouble allowing students and faculty time to take corrective action. 5. Care must be taken in selecting the metrics as the student teams will tend to focus on those activities and may neglect others. 6. The number of metrics monitored must be kept manageable to encourage use. 7. Successful implementation requires buy-in by all the members of each project team and considerable planning in advance.References 1. Chen, S. Yang, C., and Shiau, J., ‘The Application of Balanced

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Watkins, California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

considered for implementation at other institutions, it is expected that, whilethe list of actual responsibilities and other documents may look somewhat different, the processitself would produce similar positive results in other programs.1. Somerton, C. W., Thompson, B. S., Gunn, C., The Role of the Faculty Advisor in the Capstone Design Experience: The Importance of Technical Expertise, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition2. Taylor, D. G., Magleby, S. P., Todd, R. H., & Parkinson, A. R.). Training Faculty to Coach Capstone Design Teams., International Journal of Engineering Education, 17 (4-5) 20013. Gantt, L., Work, Wages and Profit, The Engineering Magazine

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yogesh Velankar, Purdue University; Sean Brophy, Purdue University; Masataka Okutsu, Purdue University; Daniel Delaurentis, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Educational Technology, 30(4), 311-321. 6. Munz, U., Schumm, P., Wiesebrock, A., & Allgower, F. (2007). Motivation and Learning Progress Through Educational Games. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 54(6), 3141- Page 14.1052.14 3144. 7. Barab, S., Thomas, M., et al. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1): 86-107.8. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., & Donovan, M. S. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.9. Westera

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Design in the Classroom

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa McNair, Virginia Tech; Chad Newswander, Virginia Tech; Eloise Coupey, Virginia Tech; Ed Dorsa, Virginia Tech; Tom Martin, Virginia Tech; Marie Paretti, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Researchable Questions," The Review of Higher Education, 28[1] 23-48 (2004).6 V.B. Mansilla, "Assessing Student Work at Disciplinary Crossroads," Change 37[1] 19 (2005).7 V.B. Mansilla and E.D. Duraising, "Targeted Assessment of Students' Interdisciplinary Work: An Empirically Grounded Framework Proposed," Journal of Higher Education, 78[2] 215-23 (2007).8 M. Borrego and L. Newswander, "Characteristics of Successful Cross-Disciplinary Engineering Education Collaborations," Journal of Engineering Education, 97[2] 123-34 (2007).9 S.G. Cohen and D.E. Bailey, "What Makes Teams Works: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite," Journal of Management, 23[3] 239-290 (1997).10 D. Makin, S