. "Online Collaborative Design Projects: Overcoming Barriers toCommunication." International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2001, 189-196.9 Paulik, M. and M. Krishnan. "A Competition-Motivated Capstone Design Course: The Result of a Fifteen-YearEvolution." IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2001, 67-7510 McMasters, J. and S. Ford. "An Industry View of Enhancing Design Education." Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. No. 79, No. 3, 1990, 526-529.11 Culver, R., Woods, D. and Peggy Fitch. "Gaining Professional Expertise Through Design Activities." Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 79, No. 3, 1990, 533-536.12 Ernst, E., and J.R. Lohman. "Designing Undergraduate Curricula." Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 79
Alumni Weekly, vol. 109, no. 2, 2008, retrieved on 02/05/09 at http://paw.princeton.edu/issues/2008/10/08/pages/1822/.2. S. Peters, “Friend Center is dedicated; Building is a testament to an eternal friendship,” E-Quad News, vol. 1, no. 1, 2001.3. Y. Liao, et al., “Information-Seeking Behavior of International Graduate Students vs. American Graduate Students: A User Study at Virginia Tech 2005,” College & Research Libraries, vol. 68, no. 1, 2007, pp. 5- 25.4. Leslie Haas and Jan Robertson, “The Information Commons,” ARL SPEC Kit 281, 2004, retrieved on 02/05/2009 at http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec281web.pdf .5. M. Noden, “A New Chapter for Libraries: Humanists ponder what will become of libraries in the digital
of Texas at Austin and several students who have participated in our surveyand learning module testing.Bibliography 1. Wiggins, G., McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA. 2. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). A Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, Longmans, Green, 1956. 3. Instructional Consulting Center (2009). Active Learning Strategies. School of Education, Idiana University Bloomington. Retrieved on Feb 3rd, 2009. URL: Page 14.1171.16 http://www.indiana.edu/~icy/document
purchases and maintains oil spill response equipment, which will allows it tocontain and clean up a spill up to 25,000 tons of persistent oil. If a large oil spill is beyondMalaysia’s own resources, the DOE will seek and coordinate an international response2. Figure1 shows the three-tiered approach to Malaysia’s national oil spill contingency plan1.Spill Notification and ReportingWhen a spill occurs, it must be reported to local DOE officers or the Marine Department officenearest to the incident site. The report should have the following information2: ≠ location of incident; ≠ type and size of spill(s); Page 14.922.4 ≠ date
for the foreseeable future. EETprograms that continue to teach electronics from a “component perspective” will behandicapping their graduates in this newer, systems based, paradigm.So what has been the reaction to declining enrollments? As pointed out elsewhere[3], in theUnited States, government policy setting organizations like the NSB have been busy attemptingto advance the agenda of increased enrollment in the engineering technologies under theumbrella discipline know as “science and engineering” (S&E). The major thrust of thisundertaking has been through the efforts of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and inparticular the Advanced Technology Education (ATE) program and its ATE Centers[4] at thepost-secondary school level and
makingrecommendations for future EU harmonization regarding virtual learning environment usage.Virtual learning environments and networked learning will increasingly become key factors inthe delivery of training and education in the 21st century.Bibliography1. Atwell, R.: New roles for vocational education and training teachers and trainers in Europe: a new framework or their education. Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 31, Number 5, 1999, p190-2002. Calderhead, J. – Shorrock, S. B.: Understanding Teacher Education: Case Studies in the Professional Development of Beginning Teachers. Falmer Press, London, 1997, p1653. Collaborative software, definitions on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_software4. Pentelényi, P. – Tóth, Á.: Development
; Exposition Copyright 2009, American Society for Engineering Education”and keep asking until you get an answer. The second is suggested by the NSPE and is known asthe “P-L-U-S” Framework. The individual should consider whether the action is consistent with:Policy/Regulations, Laws/Regulations, Universal societal/organizational values, andself/personal values.AssessmentTo demonstrate that students have a basic understanding of the importance of ethics, I usedseveral methods. At the end of the class session, I asked students to write down what were thetwo most important things they learned in the class. A number of students were surprised athow wide spread the misconduct was at Enron. Several noted that it involved financial
Labor by the National Center for O*NET Development.[5] www.transana.org[6] Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2005.[7] Educating Engineers: Designing for the future of the field. The Carneige Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 2008.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0722221. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF
Kuldip S. Rattan is a Professor of Electrical Engineering and Frederick A. White Distinguished Professor of Professional Service at Wright State University. He is a Co-PI on WSU's National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education. He conducts research in the area of electrical control systems, and is active in engineering education reform. He has been the recipient of the CECS Excellence in Teaching Award in both 1985 and 1992, and of the CECS Excellence in Service Award in 1991, 1996 and 2003.Michael Raymer, Wright State University Michael L. Raymer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering at Wright State University. He is a Co-PI on WSU's National