- Conference Session
- Programmatic Issues in Physics or Engineering Phys
- Collection
- 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Chih-Hsiung Ku, National Dong-Hwa University, Taiwan(R.O.C.); Wen-Cheng Chen, National Dong-Hwa University, Taiwan(R.O.C.)
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
students.Table3: the performance of students’ self-efficacy toward physics learning group Mean SD F p-value Scheffe EMG 2.60 .334 IEG 2.56 .349 3.742 .01** (EMG, IEG) OEG 2.58 .354 total 2.57 .346Conclusion and SuggestionIn this study, we presented the reality of physics curriculum/learning in the universities oftechnology in Taiwan. Based on our finding, four of these finding and one potential researchissue are depicted bellow:Physics course should be integrated with life world and practical affairsThe students in universities of technology
- Conference Session
- Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics
- Collection
- 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jian Peng, Southeast Missouri State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
microcontroller course has a broad rangeof sophomore-level prerequisites, it can serve as an integration point of these prerequisites andshow students how these prerequisites are inter-related so that students will hopefully organizetheir previous compartmentalized knowledge into a coherent structure. This course alsoimproves the progression of the students’ laboratory experiences. In particular, theprogramming, instrumentation, component, and circuit experiments of their sophomore andfreshmen years are now followed by the system- and design-oriented experiments. We also hopethat, by engaging students from distinctive backgrounds, students will communicate with eachother and appreciate the diversity and merits of each other’s disciplines.IV
- Conference Session
- Programmatic Issues in Physics or Engineering Phys
- Collection
- 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Evan Lemley, University of Central Oklahoma; Baha Jassemnejad, University of Central Oklahoma; Matthew Mounce, US Navy; Jamie Weber, Parsons; Sudarshan Rai, Unknown; Willy Duffle, University of Central Oklahoma; Jesse Haubrich, University of Central Oklahoma
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
, John Jonides, and Biren A. Nagda. “Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Student Retention.” The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 1998, pp. 55-72.7. Mahbub Uddin and A. Raj Chowdhury. “Integration of Nanotechnology into the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum.” International Conference on Engineering Education, August 6-10, 2001, Oslo Norway, Session 8B2.8. Beena Sukumaran, Kauser Jahan, Dianne Dorland, Jess Everett, Jennifer Kadlowec, Zenaida Gephardt and Steven Chin. “Engineering Clinics: An Integration of Research into the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum Rowan University.” Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, March 2006, 26(3), pp. 115-121.9. Cristina Gonzalez
- Conference Session
- Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics
- Collection
- 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Radian Belu, Drexel University; Alexandru Belu, Case Western Research University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
. 127 (1), 6 (2000).5. H. Gould, J. Tobochnik, and W. Christian, An Introduction to Computer Simulation:Applications to Physical Systems, third edition, Addison-Wesley (2006).6. J. Tobochnik and H. Gould, “Teaching computational physics to undergraduates," inAnnual Reviews of Computational Physics IX, edited by D. Stau_er, World-Scienti_c(2001), p. 275.7. H. Gould and J. Tobochnik, “Integrating computational science into the physicscurriculum," in Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2074, Part I, 1031, Springer(2001).8. H. Gould and J. Tobochnik, “Using simulations to teach statistical physics," inComputer Simulation Studies in Condensed Matter Physics XVI, edited by D. Landau,Steven P Lewis, and Heinz-Bernd Schuttler, Springer (2004).9