, Fort Wayne Metals, Alcoa, Group Dekko, BAE Systems, DePuy, Zimmer, Biomet, and 39 other manufacturing companies as shown by the survey conducted by the department in April 2007.BibliographyDeryn M. Watson, “A curriculum development team under the challenge of change”, Educationand Computing, Volume 5, Issues 1-2, 1989, Pages 21-27Rodrigo Lozano, “ Diffusion of sustainable development in universities’ curricula: an empiricalexample from Cardiff University” Journal of Cleaner Production, In Press, Corrected Proof,Available online 17 July 2009 Page 15.377.11 10
AC 2010-219: A HANDS-ON COURSE CURRICULUM FOR SUPPORTINGDESIGN EDUCATION FOR MANUFACTURING STUDENTSPriya Manohar, Robert Morris University Dr. Priyadarshan Manohar is an Assistant Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, PA. He has a Ph. D. in Materials Engineering (1998) and Graduate Diploma in Computer Science (1999) from University of Wollongong, Australia and holds Bachelor of Engineering (Metallurgical Engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a post-doctoral fellow at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2001 – 2003) and BHP Institute for Steel Processing and Products, Australia (1998 – 2001). Dr. Manohar held the
’ leadership forums during 2008 and 2009. The paper will conclude with an outline of one possible step towards incorporating advanced manufacturing technologies into an undergraduate curriculum, without displacing instruction on timeless fundamentals.Historical Perspective for Introduction of New Technologies: For at least the past threedecades, the face of manufacturing has been in flux. The workplace in 2010 looks very muchdifferent than its counterpart in 1980. Tools and practices have evolved enormously. Inresponse, so has been the need for definition of manufacturing engineering education1 and thedesign of both undergraduate and graduate curricula. 74
engine along with his measurements to restore an antique windmill1.Kellogg and Jenison’s students explored the engineering design process by dissecting a fabricshaver, a Dremel Free Wheeler, and a Kodak camera2. Jahan and Dusseau used water Page 15.1187.2purification units to introduce concepts of reverse engineering to a multidisciplinary freshmanclass. The student teams of four to five studied the engineering principles behind the functions ofthe units as well as intellectual property rights, safety, ethics, ergonomics, and environmentalissues in engineering design3. Newstetter and McCracken differentiated between the terms ofreverse
43 55%A crude conclusion that can be drawn from the data suggests that the respondents feel as if theywill have an impact but are inconsistently receiving support or encouragement from outside themanufacturing community.4. Curriculum ContentIt is the authors experience that there are multiple opinions about what should be taught in theManufacturing Curriculum. Ideally all of these topics would be included in a program. Howeverthe reality is that given the current time limitations adding new content requires the reduction/ Page 15.946.4removal of other content, development of new teaching methods, increase of degree time, post
courses in which engineering design is included. These courses are: • ENGR 200-Engineering Graphics, • MANE 310-CAD/CAM, • MANE 315-Manufacturing Automation, • MANE 420-Simulation, • ENGR 430-Quality Control, and • MANE 450-Manufacturing Design Implementation. Page 15.352.3These six major courses and some other courses distributed throughout the curriculum include elementsof design that adequately defines an integrated design experience for students in the manufacturingengineering program. During the senior year, students also may gain additional design experience in theirchosen ENGR/MANE elective
nanotechnology education and research. He is a member of ASEE, IEEE, SME, and MRS. Page 15.1183.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching PLCs using the Kolb Learning CycleAbstractThis work describes an integral approach in teaching programmable logic controllers (PLCs)using the Kolb learning cycle. PLCs represent a module in a computer-integrated manufacturingcourse in two engineering programs at our institution. The two main learning objectives of thismodule are to demonstrate practical knowledge of PLCs by being able to program them and todevelop a sufficient increase in problem solving skills using
AC 2010-57: IMMERSIVE LEARNING USING LEAN SIX SIGMAMETHODOLOGY IN THE MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYCAPSTONE COURSEAlan Leduc, Ball State University Alan Leduc is an Associate Professor at Ball State University where he has taught in the TAC/ABET accredited Manufacturing Engineering Technology program since 1990. He also coordinates the Minor in Process Improvement (MIPI) which provides students with Lean Six Sigma Black Belt body of knowledge education and the opportunity to engage in professional level projects. Alan worked closely with Dr. Mikel Harry, Ball State University alumnus and co-creator of Six Sigma in developing the MIPI. Prior to his teaching career, Alan spent 20 years
AC 2010-2343: MARRYING MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS WITHBIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING FIELDSArif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris UniversityJohn Mativo, The University of Georgia Page 15.854.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Marrying Manufacturing Programs with Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering Fields and MoreIntroductionThis paper focuses on program and curriculum development in order to sustain and enhancemanufacturing engineering programs. The idea of emphasizing product design and developmentor integration of micro- or nano-manufacturing into manufacturing curriculum is attractive andimportant for the survival of the discipline. On
encompassing issues. The first of these great issues is the definition of a body of knowledgefor manufacturing engineering -- and of a curriculum to convey such knowledge toundergraduate students. The second primary challenge was the crafting of an articulateddifferentiation in terms of outcome objectives between and amongst the various educationaldegree levels that contribute to the professional discipline. The third great challenge has beenthe crafting of a strategic framework that enables individual programs to incorporate newly-emerging transformational technologies into a cohesive corpus of manufacturing engineering. These great issues have been accompanied by continual concerns about the identity, healthand vitality of the manufacturing
sequence.This curriculum has benefited our program in many ways: Incorporation of several industrial technology applications into these classes: 1. 3-D solid modeling and data translation 2. Robotics construction, kinematics, robot programming 3. Ergonomics analysis 4. Assembly sequencing 5. Production layout & material flow optimization 6. Formal multi-media presentations to industrial professionals 7. Creation of personal portfolio and CD General benefits and opportunities for our students and our program: 1. Practical application of an advanced technology 2. Generates student enthusiasm for manufacturing 3. Excellent project coordination tool for concurrent engineering 4. Teamwork activities 5. Project planning 6
AC 2010-312: EXTENDING LEAN MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS THROUGHIMPLEMENTING MOBILITY (A CASE STUDY)Mohamed Gadalla, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Gadalla is currently an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Central Connecticut State University. Dr. Gadalla has a Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Western Ontario in Canada. He graduated with honor from Cairo University with B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering followed by a Master degree (M. Sc.) from the same university. He served as a research engineer and visiting scholar in several universities in USA, Canada, Germany, and Egypt. He also severed as a program coordinator for the computer Integrated
bodily-kinesthetic intelligence”3 to name a few. Gardener views intelligence as an individual’s abilityto solve problems or create products that are valued by society. The implication for teachingand learning is that instructors need to vary the inputs and have a repertoire of strategies forfacilitating learning. The more ways we find to process material, the stronger learningbecomes. We need to recognize there’s no “one best way.”Learning is enhanced in an enriched environment. The physical environment of the classroomis certainly important (aesthetics, climate, etc.), but so too is the learning environment that wecreate to get students to use their minds well. An enriched learning environment is a settingwhere students are actively engaged in
. The results of this assessment should be useful toany program that incorporates metal part fabrication techniques into an engineering course. Page 15.954.2 “Just as one cannot learn to drive without getting behind the wheel; or to swim without getting wet; entry into the profession of engineering, particularly in the area of design, requires far more than sitting in a lecture hall.”1IntroductionManufacturing processes are an important part of the curriculum for mechanical engineeringmajors. Industrial employers have long called for newly-graduated engineers to have bothknowledge and proficiency in manufacturing, and they