presented in a separate paper1, buta glimpse is provided below. The project participants worked with 5 mentors from chemicalengineering, mechanical engineering and industrial engineering. The overall management of thesummer research institute was the responsibility of the principal investigator while the follow upactivities and assessment of the implementation is the responsibility of the co-principalinvestigator.The RET program2 was designed such that the teachers have a significant understanding of theresearch process. The teachers were asked with the help from their mentors and project directorsto formulate a research question based on the mentors’ ongoing research. The teachers designedand carried out the research plan and adapted it, as
and retained the Multidisciplinary degree as well 5. Programs at research universities 6. Programs at liberal arts colleges 7. Programs that merge engineering and management.”A petition to become a Constituent Committee of ASEE, prepared by Dr. Gosink, was edited andthen signed by 17 attendees. The group decided to plan a program, with both a technical sessionand a business meeting, for the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference scheduled for Nashville, TN.Two areas of focus for technical session papers were suggested: multidisciplinary engineeringprogram curricula and multidisciplinary engineering program visibility. Those assembledelected Dr. Gosink as chair, Dr. Jim Farison, Baylor University, as vice chair (and
engineeringstudents at U.S. institutions, it was not feasible to randomly sample individual students. Instead,sampling was done by institution using a stratified approach based on institutionalcharacteristics. Once the institutions were selected, the student population at each school wasdivided into subpopulations (or strata) for recruitment (see Donaldson & Sheppard (2008)6 for adetailed description of the APPLES2 sampling plan). Partnership with North Carolina A&TInstitutional recruitment for the national APPLES research began in mid-2007 with invitationletters sent to each institution’s dean as well as a special session held at the annual meeting of theAmerican Society of Engineering Education in June of 2007. As part of the
≠ Constructing electronic circuits and verifying performance characteristics experimentally. ≠ Writing a PCB test plan with verification test procedures.III. Schematic CaptureThe goal of the laboratory experience was to design a PCB for a simplified discrete transistorversion of the 741 operational amplifier. The design chosen is shown in Figure 1. The designalso allowed exploration of the operation of the different segments of the operational amplifierdesign. Figure 1. 741 Operational Amplifier Equivalent CircuitWhile the schematic is complete, capturing the schematic requires that: ≠ Component geometries must be included in the captured schematic to allow seamless interface to the PCB layout software ≠ Inputs to and
determine where a change is needed andcommunicate it to team members and other stakeholders. The leader and his or her teamformulate a strategic plan to implement a vision, create metrics and enable the team to self-assesstheir progress1, 7, 8, 11, 15-17. During the implementation a leader deals with technological,economic, political and regulatory risks. He or she needs self-confidence and self-efficacygained through a depth and breadth of knowledge in addition to past experiences7.Leadership requires lifelong learning because the implementation of a vision often requiresknowledge or skills that the team, including the leader, may not possess7, 13, 18. The leader’s jobis to identify the skills that are lacking and find a way to acquire them. In
our project by selecting two high schools, Silver Creek and Mount Pleasant, in theEast Side Union High School District to participate in our program. We held community forumsat both high schools to meet with the parents and answer any questions they had. Research showsthat students are more likely to pursue computing disciplines if they are encouraged by theirparents13 14. One of the co-PIs for this project, Dr. Julio Garcia, is a native Spanish speaker. Hetook the lead in presenting this project to Hispanic parents and community members. The ProjectDirector also attended the meeting in addition to the high school club advisors. Figure 1. Timeline for the SVCC Completion Date Planning Tasks January 2009 ≠ Select two high
roomassistants (TAs) staff the lab in the afternoonsand early evenings, as well as on weekends to coincide with student’s needs.This laboratory includes a separate, locked machining room with controlled access (figure 2).The room has a fusion deposition modeler (FDM, Stratasys Dimension) and laser cutter(Universal Laser Systems). We plan to add a computer numerical controlled (CNC) mill in thenear future. Students only have access to this room under supervision of a TA or facultymember.In the rare case that these machining tools are not sufficient, students have limited access tomachining equipment in a BME research lab, which is professionally staffed, as well as a fee-for-service machine shop in the Department of Physics and Astronomy.Courses A. BME
. Projects start early in the course and are expected to beworked on in teams within and outside of the class time with formal, more organized coverage oftopics such as team behavior/management, project planning, and technical content within theclass time. Mentoring outside the classroom is accomplished not only by office hours but also byupper class students hired as lab assistants and teaching assistants (TA’s). Usually, the processof successfully completing a project is more important than the project itself with a strongemphasis on creativity and critical thinking. This methodology is repeated in several courseswithin each of the phases of the program which provides several opportunities for the student tobe involved in the integrating
a graphically representation of systems engineering process. It involves conceptual design phase, where system requirements are developed in consultation with the stake holders, long range plan for system development, manufacture, support services and training needs and system engineering management plan are developed. This is the most important phase where about 60% of the project resources are committed. During the preliminary design (topdown) phase, the overall system is broken down to lowest possible level or component level and requirements are allocated to each component. Next during the detailed design (bottomup) phase, subsystems are designed, tested and integrated to the
aspossible for the best outcomes; therefore, several STEM initiatives are targeting elementarystudents.1 - 3A signature outreach program at the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and AppliedScience (UVa SEAS), the Virginia Middle School Engineering Education Initiative (VSMEEI),was created to address the need to engage students as early as possible in effective, empoweringinstructional activities introducing them to the engineering design process in order to motivatethem to study science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM).4 – 6 VMSEEI’s primaryintervention instrument is the Engineering Teaching Kit (ETK). An ETK is a set of standards-based lesson plans designed to teach math and science concepts within the context of
implies several aspects such as the: qualityof classrooms, labs, libraries, communication systems etc; students ' services, qualification ofhuman resources; pedagogical scientific quality, credibility as a good institution. Good programshave good motivated teachers in addition to modern installations and dynamic planning. TheFaculty of any Institution of Education is one of the most important element, which provides ornot its qualification of excellence [02].In order to fulfill a lack of engineering educators for high education for engineering andtechnological fields in the country COPEC - Council of Researches in Education and Scienceseducation team has designed a new program in graduation level: the Port Engineering Program.The goal is to
the camp and how it differs from othercollege freshmen camps. The paper also presents the logistical challenges of planning andexecuting a camp for over 700 freshmen as well as the role of undergraduate student mentors andtheir recruitment and training. Since the successful camp experience also depends onengineering faculty involvement, the paper will describe the creation and deployment of theFreshmen Teaching Academy.Finally the paper will describe detailed assessment results from two years of camp experience.The paper will also detail data regarding student retention and the first year experience for thefreshmen population as a whole as well as for female and underrepresented minorities.BenchmarkingThe notion of a freshmen engineering camp
Page 15.45.9plans to improve and enhance IVLPs’ features.1. By design, IVLP allows only one user to have control over the application modules. In the future we plan to add a time-out feature to limit user access to IVLP to eliminate long idle connections.2. In this phase of the project we focused on development of IVLP using a central server. In the distributed IVLP design, we plan to support multiple seamless experiments from different sites. This is particularly useful when different institutions are collaborating together and each institution has limited test equipments.3. A major area of improvement in the future will be adding security features to the client database. For example, we plan to add permissions to user profiles so
Carolina. Dr. Conrad is a Senior Member of the IEEE and a Certified Project Management Professional (PMP). He is also a member of ASEE, Eta Kappa Nu, the Project Management Institute, and the IEEE Computer Society. He is the author of numerous books, book chapters, journal articles, and conference papers in the areas of robotics, parallel processing, artificial intelligence, and engineering education.Bruce Gehrig, University of North Carolina, Charlotte G. Bruce Gehrig is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Contruction Management. His areas of interest/specialization are: Water Resources Planning and Management, Design and Construction Integration, and
demographic research d. Research Environmental requirements e. Prepare a preliminary estimate and then revise the estimate in the second semester based on project progress f. Prepare a site logistics plan and site work layout plan (in phases as necessary) g. Prepare a preliminary schedule using Primavera, and revise the schedule according to work progress in the second semester h. Construct a 3-D Revit drawing of the project (or other project appropriate 3-D virtual model) i. Prepare a “green” analysis of the project.Milestones are given for each task which helps students schedule their time and stay on trackwith their project. A
used for 3D dynamic construction process simulations toeffectively manage complex construction operation processes in 3D virtualenvironments. In addition, 3D computer models have been used to increase thespeed and quality of design review. Simultaneously, 4D computer-aided designmodels as a construction tool have been developed to create more flexible anddynamic 4D simulation environments of construction progress. 4D modelingprovides a mechanism to visualize elements of 3D computer-aided design modelsbased on associated schedule intervals34. Through 4D simulation environments,project teams can virtually practice the construction of a unique artifact beforebuilding it in reality for the purpose of detailed work planning and coordination
plan in a specified format - A two-minute “elevator speech” demonstration for their peers, teachers and science center staff - Feedback on the project day from the elementary school students and science center staff as well as from course instructor and graduate student instructors - A write-up which detailed the project development, evaluation and lessons learned - Team members’ evaluations.The undergraduate students were asked to think about their exhibits from the point of view of the5th graders. Each group was asked to develop their learning objectives, explain their “hook” (how Page 15.236.6they planned to draw
Engineering Education, 2010 Promoting Effective Communication in Global Engineering ProjectsAbstractEffective communication plays a key role in the success of engineering teams. However,achieving a high level of communication when developing projects globally can be challenging.An organization’s learning capacity, its familiarity with the cultural diversity of its teammembers, and its information technology support for project planning, data management, groupcommunication and collaboration among geographically distributed teams, are some key factorsthat can help overcome this challenge.IntroductionThrough a study conducted in 2008 by NASA, communication was identified as one of the fivetop level themes their highly valued Systems Engineers
explanation (short essay)of a scenario regarding a particular course concept.Quantification of Participation – a measure of contribution to course discussions. Students aregiven specific instructions on the discussion board topics including the timeframe ofparticipation and the number of expected contributions. Student grades are dependent onmeeting these participation expectations.Personal Development Plan – serves as the final assignment. Students are required to submit aplan that describes how they intend to continue to develop interpersonal skills. The plans arespecific to the skills they have identified as important to their professional development.Interpersonal Skill DevelopmentOne of the initial assignments requires students to consider
goal actions. The support for this category comes fromcooperative learning theories (Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1991) and “how people learn”literature (Bransford,& Donovan, 2005) that describe goal-setting and self-monitoring as criticalcomponents of learning. Examples of goal-oriented actions are clarifying assignments,monitoring time, and suggesting a project plan. The second category is relationship actions.This category is driven by the social cognitive theory indicating that supportive socialinteractions and persuasions can affect behaviors and achievement through the mediation of self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997). Examples of relationship-oriented actions include acknowledginggroup members’ contributions and asking for others
number of questionsneed to be asked, perhaps three to six, and therefore the time spent on the survey is minimal.Carefully crafting each question of the survey and the possible responses is fundamental inempowering the students but also limiting their opinions to a reasonable range. As a rule, thestudents should only be surveyed on course policies that the instructor is amenable to changing,otherwise the students may resent the survey as a waste of time. As an example, assume that theinstructor for a course has planned for the midterm exam to count toward 30 percent of the finalgrade. To gauge whether or not the students agree with this policy, the following Likert
Transportation Engineering. Duringthis session, six graduate students facilitated the three abovementioned activities. Severalimportant lessons were learned during the first implementation of the activities. First off, whenusing them in rotation it was determined that Activity 3 was shorter than the other two activities.Thus, to compensate, that lesson was expanded on by letting students make an original plan forhow everyone gets to their destinations and then posing questions that made some change theiroriginal plan. For example, students were questioned on whether or not the direction they hadtheir car traveling would be affected by rush hour traffic. By posing this and similar questions,students got to explore more factors that go into logistics
earlier. The biggest mismatch seems to bein understanding the importance of learning good proposal-writing skills and also inunderstanding the importance of managing one's career and learning the unwritten rulesof the institution where one is employed.Thus, although the survey is not yet complete, we already have some good pointers forhow to improve our program as we adjust to the changes in the UC Engineering academicstructure. We will need to add more panels to program, where faculty and students caninteract and where the importance of having five- or ten-year career plans is stressed.And we will probably start requiring attendance at UC's day-long grant-writing workshopfor all participants. More practice in teaching should also be easier to
feedback. Thelecture and lab topics covered in order during the 30 weeks of the course are as follows:Lecture LabDesign Process and Methodology Background Research/Requirements/SpecificationsTeamwork: Theory, Skills, Practice Team Building ActivitySystems Engineering QFD – House of QualityCreativity and Idea Generation Creative Problem Solving ExperienceConceptual Modeling Shop Orientation/Hand Tools ExperienceIdea Selection/Decision Schemes Teamwork Revisited: Personalities, CommunicationProject Planning Engineering EconomicsSafety and Risk Basic
coursework or through extracurricular activities(e.g., participation in a business plan competition, creating a written business plan, givingan elevator pitch to an audience, or completing an internship in a start-up company).Modules and Extracurricular Experiences. While the approach described here focusedon examining the more visible and formal entrepreneurship learning experiences such ascourses and programs, many students gain experiences in other ways. Some engineeringschools, rather than offer a stand alone course in entrepreneurship, integrate modules inone or more existing engineering courses. This approach allows entrepreneurship to beintroduced repeatedly and in the context of a specific engineering topic area. Otherapproaches at larger
’ advices. Evaluation plan/strategy and the measurementinstruments are aimed at measuring the effect of the project on knowledge, skills and attitudes ofstudents and trainees. We present the design and implementation of this project for severalcourses that will be used by different students of various matters in several European countries.IntroductionThere is an old adage in distance education research which states ‘It is not technologies withinherent pedagogical advantages which are successful in distance education, but technologieswhich are generally available to citizens’. This is nowadays closely related with mobiletelephony technologies. It is not an outrageous statement to say that every student in everyprogram in every institution possesses
as it is similar to our college structure with comparable departments,research and teaching activities. The trip consisted of a half day poster presentations, a group dinner anda full day of research seminars. Faculty from each institute presented their posters in an informalenvironment to allow for discussions of research interests. Formal research presentations were alsoprovided by faculty of each institute. These were provided in two simultaneous tracks during the dayarranged by areas of interest. A follow up workshop is planned for the Spring 2010 time frame in whichthe DIT faculty will visit Purdue University. Germany – The CoT at Purdue University has an ongoing Atlantis Grant to provide variousinternational activities to
: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ058.109.pdf, accessed January 2010. 2. Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan: Planned Program Activities for 2005-2015, Technical Plan – Education, April 2009, available online at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/mypp/pdfs/education.pdf, accessed January 2010. 3. D. Stone, S. Sorby, M. Plichta, and M. Raber, “The Enterprise Program at Michigan Technological University,” International Journal of Engineering Education (2003). 4. M. Plichta, M. Raber, “The Enterprise Program at Michigan Technological University: Results and Assessment to Date,” ASEE Conference Proceedings
major.Accordingly, all cadets at the academy are required to take one of two Electrical Engineeringcourses. One course is offered for those cadets pursuing an Engineering or Physics degree andthe other is for those cadets in non-engineering disciplines.Over the past several years, the senior leadership at the academy has developed a forward-looking strategic plan that was used to restructure the core curriculum to achieve a set ofdesirable outcomes for cadets who graduate and join the officer ranks of the US Air Force.These 19 outcomes are grouped under three main categories--responsibilities, skills, andknowledge--and serve a dual purpose of preparing cadets for officership as well as providing aguide for a premier college education.As a result of this
more demanding.The priority of topics covered has also shifted slightly away from written and oralcommunication; although communication remains important, engineering ethics and projectplanning are now the most prevalent topics taught (Figure 7, Table 1). Additionally, conceptgeneration has replaced decision making in the top five topics addressed in the course. Thepercentage of programs that taught concept generation in 2005 is about the same as it is today,but in 2005 concept generation was not among the top 10 topics. Page 15.1217.7 Oral Communications Teamwork Project Planning