. He's the PI on two NSF S-STEM grants providing academic and career guidance to students in CSEM fields. He's a Professor of Electrical Engineering within the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at ASU. Prior to joining ASU, he worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has authored over 190 technical papers and three engineering texts. He has given more than 60 invited presentations - including 13 plenaries. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research program that has served over 300 students. He's an AT&T Bell Labs Fellow, Boeing A.D
the two instruments, the Mathematics Applications Inventory (MAI) and theEngineering and Mathematics Perceptions Survey (EMPS). The project is funded by theNational Science Foundation, Directorate of Education and Human Resources, Course,Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Program, Grant # DUE-0837757.The paper will also report the preliminary results of the pilot administration of both instrumentsin Fall 2009. A sample of first-year engineering students responded to the online EMPSinstrument, completed an initial open-ended version of the MAI, and participated in in-depthinterviews about their responses to the MAI. The paper will include preliminary analyses of theresulting data, including associations between EMPS responses and
Robinson14 concluded that women were more successful in theclassroom than in the laboratory which coincides with findings from Brainard, Metz andGilmore15 that indicated women were less comfortable using lab equipment than were men.Based on data from 400 undergraduate engineering students at the University of California atDavis, Sax16 found both men and women believed their professors to be fair and were equallycomfortable requesting help from instructors outside of class. Thirty percent of women but only15 percent of men, however, indicated they were uncomfortable participating in class and alsoconcerned with whether or not they would complete their engineering degrees.Since the 1982 report “The Campus Climate: A Chilly One for Women?”, study after
became a featuredand touted part of the program, even to the extent of being presented to the Dean as part of thedepartment’s annual assessment presentation. The overwhelmingly positive response of othersconfirmed that something significant may be taking place and should be shared.Several years ago one of the students wrote up a tongue in cheek course description worthy ofthe college catalog and sent it out to his classmates to solicit interest. From that time on, theHB101 course was an “official” part of the CE program at West Point. Hombrewing 101 (HB101) -This course will provide a life skill you can take with you for the rest of your life. The course will include both informational and laboratory portions. We will learn all
AC 2010-862: DEVELOPING THE AEROSPACE WORKFORCE: A BOEINGEXPERIENCEKenneth Van Treuren, Baylor University Dr. Van Treuren is a professor on the faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Baylor University. He teaches the capstone Mechanical Engineering Laboratory course as well as courses in heat transfer, aerospace engineering, gas turbines, fluid mechanics, and wind power. His research interests include energy education and gas turbine heat transfer. He can be contacted at Kenneth_Van_Treuren@baylor.edu.Daniel Kirk, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Daniel Kirk is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at the Florida Institute of
as a technical elective. The electrical engineeringstudents are primarily of junior standing while the mechanical engineering students primarilyhave senior standing. The course emphasizes theory and spends the majority of its time onmodeling and analysis tools. Actual control system design techniques are introduced for PIDcontrol, but it is not the focus of the course. The students with junior standing also typicallyenroll concurrently in the 1 credit professional preparation course mentioned previously.The students at UFMG are upper division students majoring in a control and automation degree.This course is primarily a laboratory course where students gain experience applying thetheoretical tools they have learned in prior coursework. The
example. (f) I would also like to have the updated version, if available. (g) if you have any other material mainly on : - CLINICAL ENGINEERING - BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING INSTRUMENTATION- LABORATORY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT - DENTAL MEDICAL EQUIPMENT- MEDICAL GASES AND MEDICAL NETWORKS - OPHTHALMOLOGY EQUIPMENT- STERILIZATION EQUIPMENT OR ANY OTHERS please send it to me (h) I would suggest trying to find a publisher to market your text. The marketing channels of large publishers will bring your text into wider usage. (i) Quite a few typos exist. Please check them. It was the main textbook for the class. It was a great book and it was used for an Introductory course to Medical Imaging by Biomedical Engineering
Page 15.1331.3ball [31. A frame-by-frame study of the pictures of bouncing tennis balls obtained using high-speedcameras (2000 frames per second) in our laboratory demonstrated that this process consists of fourseparate and distinct phases: initial contact, deformation of the original shape, restitution andrecovery of the shape of the ball, and separation and takeoff.Phase 1: Contact. Initial contact between the ball and the surface occurs at one point.Phase 2: Deformation. Although the lowest point on the ball has been forced to stop movingduring initial contact, other parts of the ball continue to move downward. Consequently, a periodof continued contact is observed during which the ball is in contact with the surface over an areathat
on experiential learning through properly designed laboratory experiments to teach engineering principles and verify theoretical work raised in the classroom; ≠ Stress on: life-long learning, systems thinking, organizational management, teamwork and group problem–solving skills, and cultivation of leadership skills; ≠ Focus on design issues of relevance to the Region, involving life-cycle economics, environmental impact, utilization of locally available resources, maintainability, and conformity with standards (local and international); ≠ Start a joint initiative between engineering faculty and their colleagues in other disciplines( science, mathematics
Page 15.1054.9seemed to know that engineers weren’t just workers who build things, but was unclear on whatelse they did.Half of the participants made a clear distinction between scientists and engineers. Many phrasedthis in terms of the real world and the laboratory, like Tim, who said, “I think scientists are morein labs, and engineers are a more ‘open-world’ kind of thing. Like, they do more stuff besidesinside their office and what-not.” Taylor represented this trend neatly, saying, “Scientists areindoors, engineers are out.” Similarly, Cory said that an engineer is “somebody who studies alot,” so the interviewer asked “So, are most engineers at universities?” Cory seemed to agreewith this logic, but was hesitant to counter her previous
has lead a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task specific approaches to problem solving. Over the last decade, Dr. Sticklen has pursued engineering education research focused on early engineering; his current research is supported by NSF/DUE and NSF/CISE.Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory
engineering technology (MET) students in our college are required to take threewriting courses, Technical Communications 111, 241, and 481, scheduled for the first, fourth,and seventh semesters, respectively.TC 111: Expository Communication. Extensive practice in expository writing, emphasizingobjective, clear, concise form, with most readings from nonfiction prose. Provides experience inorganizing and presenting individual oral and laboratory reports. Introduces library usage andresearch techniques. Prepares students for technical writing and oral communication in TCII.TC 241: Technical Communication. Introduction to technical communication, including writtenand oral skills. The course emphasizes basic structures used in recording and reporting
in bothtechnical and philosophical fields. We find that we are all engineers, if our aim is toproduce change.Bibliography:1. Graff, R.W., “Electrical Engineering for Freshmen,”IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. E-15, NO 3,Aug. 1972.2. Graff, R.W., and Paul R. Leiffer, “Student Observations over the Last 25 Years”, Proc. ASEE, June.2005. Page 15.1367.133. Graff, R.W., “Forty Years of Teaching Circuits I: A Tribute to Dr. Hayt” Proc. ASEE, June. 2004.4. Graff, R.W., Leiffer, P.R., Niemi, J., and Vaughan, M., “A Hydraulic Circuits Laboratory – to ImproveStudent Understanding of Basic Electricity”, ASEE Proceedings, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 24
invited a guest speaker to demonstrate a MATLAB program estimated the electrical conductivity in layers of the skin. This helped the students understand the practical applications of using a mathematical model. The students have also directly benefited from the graduate mentees knowledge of research opportunities on campus. One graduate mentee allowed the EF students to tour some of the research laboratories in her department. She also introduced her EF students to undergraduates who have performed cutting edge research, Page 15.1384.8 publish journal articles, and present at conferences around the nation. This
issues and requirestudents to undertake higher order thinking in order to synthesize the relevant issues. The casestudy products of this research project will help civil engineering educators improve theirteaching of specific technical topics within the discipline. As an example, the learning framework of Professor Brady’s application of case studiesin a Steel Building Design Laboratory will employ the learning cycle instructional model. Thethree stages of exploration, concept introduction, concept application will be employed. Initialexploration is designed to engage and recall knowledge that is applicable to the new concept.Links are then drawn between the new concept and previous knowledge and the students explorethis concept in detail
engineering societies, scientific and technical associations, universities, laboratories and research institutions, government agencies, and industrial organizations. Approximately 30% of the titles covered represent papers from conferences, colloquia, and symposia. Technical reports, books, and monographs are also considered for inclusion. During 1977, more than 95,000 abstracts and citations were published. Grattidge and Creps.16In an article published in the journal Production Engineering, November 1978 issue17, theprofessional engineers of the time recognized the state-of-the-art of this publication: …the latest developments in the use of computers to provide better flow of technology
emphasize societal relevance of the discipline.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from her experience as a researcher and General Manager at Honeywell Inc. She has developed new assessments to reveal and address student misconceptions in introductory materials engineering classes. She is currently working on an NSF IEECI grant to bring engineering service learning activities to middle school students.B.L
engineering through the development of computational and laboratory skills. The course is open to non-majors who typically fill 5% of the class. The course emphasizes programming and coupling math concepts with measurements and data. The second required, 1 credit course is Introduction to Engineering Modeling. This is an introduction to mathematical modeling of physical and chemical systems; verification of mathematical models by experiment; development and interpretation of engineering drawings, process flow diagrams (PFDs), and piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs); use of a drawing program, such as Visiotec; and an introduction to the process simulator AspenPlus. Other courses include a required, 2 credit
anything just because. The thing that I was very frustrated with my physics education was that I wasn’t really allowed to put any of myself into it I was just mimicking the professor. All of my labs are open and creative and sometimes my laboratories are just about experiencing.” “The women, they’re a lot more open to working on projects collaboratively. I do try to be somewhat aware of my classroom demographics. For instance, I’ve got a class this quarter that’s all male so we’ve been able to do lots of car things and guy things but if I Page 15.436.11 had women in the class I’d kind of shy away from those
classproduced the same result; MST grades for individual assignments were on par, or better, thanT/PrEE students. This result was counterintuitive because MST majors start the program withclearly weaker skills and lower comfort with laboratory tools. However, MST students tendnot to hesitate in asking for help in understanding a process. A T/PrEE student is often theone providing the help, which also benefits the T/PrEE students since he/she gatherseducational experiences in providing this help.In summary, MST students are not simply passing T&E courses but are actually performingon par or better than the TE students. This is a strong indication that MST students arelearning substantial T&E content. (iii) Technology Education PraxisTM
thehorizontal alignment is explained). The remaining part of this paper details the steps takentowards restructuring the material for highway alignment design covered under the mandatoryTransportation Engineering course offered to civil engineering undergraduate students at a majorMidwest engineering school. This course laboratory covers highway design activities as part of aclass project.Research Questions and MethodThe overall objective of this study was to explore to what degree the use of the framework Page 15.1034.5proposed by the model of threshold concepts can help to improve the learning process in adesign-focused Transportation Engineering
Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from her experience as a researcher and General Manager at Honeywell Inc. She is currently working to develop new assessments to reveal and address student misconceptions in introductory materials engineering classes.Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and
teaches courses in science curricula, teaching and learning, and assessment courses with an emphasis on constructivist theory and issues of equity. Her research focuses on issues of gender, science, and science teaching. She has won two awards for her research in these areas. In this work she is responsible for developing assessments and overseeing data collection, analysis, and feedback to the project.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new
, Senior Capstone: Production Laboratory, and Senior Project courses, along with theIndustrial Internship Program.This integration has occurred in various components of these courses. The textbook readings,lectures, and discussions were revised in order to emphasize the findings from the study. Inaddition homework assignments, case studies, and real world experiences derived from the studywere included as individual or group exercises.Homework assignments and case studies related to performance measurements were developedand implemented for the aforementioned senior courses. In each case, the students are to applytheir knowledge of performance monitoring techniques to the particular problem and analyzetheir effectiveness, suggest improvements, and
usable MEAs to differentengineering disciplines; and extending the MEA approach to identifying and repairingmisconceptions, using laboratory experiments as an integrated component, and introducing anethical decision-making dimension [1].Our overall research goal is to enhance problem solving and modeling skills and conceptuallearning of engineering students through the use of model eliciting activities. In order toaccomplish this goal at the University of Pittsburgh, we are pursuing two main research routes:MEAs as teaching tools and MEA as learning assessment tools. Under the first – using MEAs asa teaching tool – we are focused on three main activities: 1. Development of effective model eliciting activities: The creation of MEAs for upper