sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical consciousness in engineering practice, and the development and imple- mentation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated En- gineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineer- ing is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture
conflict while avoiding falling into an echo chamber.4.0 Course Alumni InsightsAlumni of the course were invited to contribute to this paper as co-authors to share their insightson the class and how it fit into the traditional engineering curriculum. Their perspectives areincluded in the subsections that follow.4.1 Kevin KuckMy name is Kevin Kuck (pronounced 'cook'). At the time of writing this, I am a 5th-year senior atGeorge Mason University pursuing an undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering. Before Iexplain this class's profound impact on me, I need to provide context as to why. Until Spring 2022,I had no real intention or desire to be more involved at Mason. I knew very few people within thedepartment and even fewer people in my
experience and belongingness8 16C o N E C D 2 0 2 4Here is how we got here…• An overview of significant event at the University-level • 2016 – Tigers ADVANCE grant activities begin supporting women in STEM • 2016 – Clemson achieves R1 status • 2016 – Clemson hires first Chief Diversity Officer (CDO) and special assistant to the president for inclusive excellence • 2018 – University implements Grad 360 curriculum • 2023 – New VP Diversity and Inclusive Excellence (Dr. Felicia Benton-Johnson)• An overview of significant events within CECAS that directly
Paper ID #40688Faculty Perceptions of Key Concepts in Degree Curriculum: Identifyingthe Role of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and JusticeApril Townson, Rowan UniversityDr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship.Dr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Associate Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University
Paper ID #40726Mycorrhiza Framework: towards an Engineering Education framework forSocial and Environmental JusticeJorge A Cristancho, Purdue Engineering Education Jorge A. Cristancho studied Electronic and Computer Engineering and using bioinspired methods, he received a master’s in Electronic Engineering and Computers on Control and Automation at Los Andes University. Curious about teaching, he formally started as a teaching assistant in 2011 and continued as a teacher at three different universities in Colombia. He is a second-year Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He keeps a balanced life
range of available services, resources are frequently under-utilized (especially amongthose who would benefit most) [20]. Even though some degree of siloing occurs in most collegesand universities, research suggests that institutions can improve coordination and communicationby integrating services and collaborating to support student success through a more horizontal,holistic, and coordinated approach [16]. An important part of this change is addressing campusculture and how leaders support and work towards equity and incorporate collaborative strategies[21]. Holcombe and Kezar [14] call for creating a "unified community of support" that will worktogether to break down barriers and support students. Our research empirically examines the
Scholarshipii. Demonstrated financial neediii. Leadership, scholastic engagement, and community engagementiv. Engagement with Penn Statev. Personal and social responsibilityvi. High achievement in high school courses 4Once selected as a finalist, students are then asked tosubmit a nomination from a mentor, counselor or teacherbased on the following prompts:i. Please describe how the nominee embodies the values of effort, integrity, ingenuity, and/or servant leadership.ii. Please describe how the nominee has contributed to fostering an inclusive and diverse community and plans to continue in these efforts at Penn State and in their future career as
sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical consciousness in engineering practice, and the development and imple- mentation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated En- gineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineer- ing is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture
establishing their own internal engineering goal [15],[39]. As an example, Micari & Pazos [42], in their study, discussed the importance of engagingstudents in relevant course work to students’ perception of curriculum and their success. Thiswas found again in Gasman et al’s. study [55], which also discusses the importance ofconnecting students with STEM capital, including STEM related opportunities and resources.Discovering that engineering faculty viewed their role in broadening participation as closelyconnected to how they support, encourage, and engage undergraduate students provides apotentially emerging engineering faculty perspective. Existing literature captures STEM facultyvoice in discussing their role in attracting more students into
Paper ID #40679The Pink Paradox: Tensions in How STEM Toys are Marketed Toward GirlsDr. Theresa Green, Purdue University Dr. Theresa Green is a postdoctoral researcher at Purdue University with a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation. Her research interests include K-12 STEM integration, curriculum development, and improving diversity and inclusion in engineering.Mr. Artre Reginald Turner, Purdue University at West Lafayette Artre Turner is a dedicated graduate student deeply invested in advancing the field of engineering edu- cation. With a methodical and inquisitive approach to his studies, he’s pioneering research that
during her interview as Founding Chair.Vision for the CurriculumAlthough an internal task force had drafted an engineering curriculum spring 2016 to get the newdepartment approved in the College, the Founding Chair was allowed to start the curriculumdesign process from scratch to ensure ABET compliance and alignment with shared visioning.As a point of reference, Figure 9 shows the originally proposed WFU BS Engineeringcurriculum, which showcases what most would describe as a traditional engineering curricularmodel. Eventually, as will be visible in upcoming sections of this paper, the WFU Engineeringwould reflect a model that is more interdisciplinary, integrated, and holistic. Proposed WFU BS
of how cultural norms affect engineering design and the adoption of engineeringinnovations. Specifically, participants will: Increase their self-knowledge of interculturalcompetence, and explore and adopt strategies for developing their own interculturaleffectiveness; Explore and evaluate engineering innovations within a framework of communitywellbeing and sustainable development; Integrate cultural knowledge, ideas and concepts intoSTEM curriculum and pedagogy. Therefore this paper will focus on the research question:“Does participation in the NSF RET Global STEM program positively impact participants'intercultural competence?"In an effort to address this research question, a convergent parallel mixed method evaluationdesign (Creswell &
Paper ID #40775Creating Pathways to Engineering through Sponsored Summer CampsDr. Racheida S Lewis, University of Georgia Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Ed- ucation Transformations Institute (EETI) and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Lewis believes in creating a diverse engineering field and strives to do so through connecting with teaching, and mentoring future engineers. She has devoted her life to this mission through her leadership and lifetime membership in the National Society of Black Engineers. Ultimately, Dr. Lewis
process which emphasizes on open-ended problem solving to createinnovative solutions to challenges in any subjects impacting society.Nowadays, the Faculty of Engineering at the Université de Sherbrooke (UdeS), Canada, aims tointegrate EDI concepts into its undergraduate program curricula. This objective aligns with theintention of the Canadian engineering accreditation board (CEAB) to integrate EDI throughaccreditation requirements for engineering programs in Canada.CEAB, an instance related to Engineers Canada, regulates engineering education in Canada andis responsible for accrediting undergraduate engineering programs. Program accreditation isrequired to issue permits for professional regulatory bodies in each province of Canada. In theUnited
Paper ID #40715Beyond Math Readiness: Understanding Why Some Women Pursue Engi-neeringOlivia Ryan, Virginia Tech Engineering Education Olivia Ryan is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and a Master’s student in Engineering Mechanics at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. in engineering with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include understanding curriculum barriers in engineering related to mathematics.Dr. Susan Sajadi, Virginia Tech Susan Sajadi is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the department of engineering education. She has a BSE and MS
whetherstudents found material in the individual sessions relevant to their goals, contained newknowledge, and presented in a manner conducive to learning. The survey of activitiesspanned departments in engineering. The focus group protocol attempted to explore thestudents’ journey in engineering and science and any thoughts related to theiridentification with engineering and their various cultural backgrounds. The focus groupsaim to ascertain how participation in DISTINCTION shapes young Black/AfricanAmerican students’ perceptions of engineering. An initial data matrix below shows thealignment of some of the sources of data as a starting place for the co-author’s continuedwork. The surveys and focus groups were integrated sources of data in other pre
CISD 2023 • Topic-based vs. Cohort-based LCs Borrego et al 2011, Whittaker et al 2014, Cox 2004, Hord 2008 10Sources: Borrego et al 2011, Whittaker et al 2014, Cox 2004, Hord 2008LCs sit at the integration of research and teachingParticipation in faculty LCs have promoted productive outcomes and sustainedfaculty commitment as well (Borrego 2011, Cox 2004)Cohort-based LCs focus on addressing the teaching, learning, anddevelopmental needs of a group of instructors impacted by something in theacademy and the participants shape the LC curriculumTopic-based LCs have a curriculum designed to address a specified campusteaching and learning need, issue, or opportunity and offer membership acrossdepartments and instructor
Northwestern University. She has also served as an Associate Dean for curriculum, instruction, and advising in the College of Science, Associate Department Head of Economics and Undergraduate Program Director for Economics. She is Associate Editor at Economic Modeling. As a woman in STEM Dr. Ball has presented work on active learning and research, as well as women in science and is actively involved with mentoring for Committee for the Status of Women in the Economics Profession.Walid Saad, Walid Saad received his Ph.D degree from the University of Oslo in 2010. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor and the Steven O. Lane Junior Faculty Fellow at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech
Paper ID #40685On the Importance of Spatiality and Intersectionality: Transgender andGender Nonconforming Undergraduate Engineering Experiences ThroughCritical Collaborative Ethnographic Site VisitsFinn Johnson M.A., Oregon State University Finn Johnson, M.A., is a transgender and queer doctoral student in women, gender, and sexuality studies at Oregon State University. Finn has extensive experience in transgender and queer research methodologies, legal studies, and feminist research ethics and is currently working on an engineering education NSF- funded study with the College of Chemical, Environmental, and Biological
Office of Diversity Programs and Student DevelopmentIn this slide, we will explain how our program is structured. The five pillars of our programpromote the holistic development of our students. Taking this approach, we want to giveour students an idea of the performance of engineers in labor work; therefore, they willstart to construct an identity and engage with engineering as a profession and our campus.We will discuss what integrates each core and the skills they will gain by participating in theprogram.Bridge Bonding: This pillar helps students relate to each other's experiences andchallenges, making it easier for them to empathize and offer support
towards a fuller understanding of self as an engineer within society, we can thinkabout scaffolding understanding in ways that integrate all aspects of self within classroom contexts. Wenote here that Enola’s own viewpoint on engineering education is less integrative of identity at themoment, so even if her professors asked her how they could change the curriculum to be more culturallyresponsive to her, she may not have a clear answer. Once again, we suggest thinking about this not as ablame for specific professors involved, but as a responsibility professors have to try to understand,scaffold, and structure class to support her development as an Indigenous student within engineering andall that entails.Implications for Broadening Participation
Success (ROPES):Mitigating and Expanding Students’ Learning OpportunitiesAbstractR.O.P.E.S. is a dual enrollment initiative that was funded by the U.S. Department of Educationand aligned with the New Jersey Governor's Emergency Education Relief Fund II and the CRRSAAct. It aimed to create pathways to college for high school juniors in South Jersey, focusing onfive select fields that included teacher education, music business, social services, computer scienceand engineering. The program exposed students to five career pathways, employed targetedstrategies to support underrepresented communities, and integrated social and emotional learning.This paper showcases the program's objectives, student participation, impact on South Jerseystudents, and
Brianna is the Teaching and Learning librarian at the Colorado School of Mines. She collaborates with faculty to design and implement information literacy throughout the curriculum. Prior to her work at the School of Mines, she was the Engineering and Computer Science Librarian at the US Naval Academy and a contract Reference Librarian assigned to the National Defense University. She earned her MLIS at the University of Denver in 2011.Ms. Jamie Marie Regan, Colorado School of Mines Jamie Regan is an undergraduate student in Electrical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Her academic journey is intertwined with a personal and passionate dedication to advancing accessibility within STEM fields. Inspired by her