, with examples in writing tutors (Kim, 2023) and software tutors (Prather, 2023).Whether tutoring provides a desired tool or is deployed well remains up for debate (Engle,2023). The overall risk-benefit analysis affects policy making (Office of Ed Tech, 2024), butthere is promise for increasing educational equity (Sylvestre, 2023).Human-Computer Interaction: The general area of best practices for interacting with a chatbot istermed “prompt engineering” (Reynolds, 2021). Prompt engineering entails users tailoring theirquestions to the chatbot to task-specific domains, such as medicine (Heston, 2023), engineering(Velásquez-Henao, 2023), science education (Cooper, 2023) and image generation (Liu, 2022).Overall, prompt engineering provides another
curriculum has been informed by research on student, faculty, and employerperceptions. Despite the response from the university officials to these studies and theirfindings, employers continue to find newly hired engineers lacking in the capacity to lead(Armin et al., 2022; Knight & Novoselich, 2017; Kotnour et al., 2014; Rose & Flateby, 2022).In response to graduates’ lack of professional skills indicated by employers (Armin et al.,2022; Knight & Novoselich, 2017; Kotnour et al., 2014; Rose & Flateby, 2022), this studyprovided early career engineers’ perspectives on the expectations of leadership their employersplaced on them and their readiness and competence to lead along with how important theirundergraduate education was in
, we arespecifically interested in studying differences in adaptiveness between students with and withoutlimited-income status. We are also interested in studying differences in adaptiveness betweenmen and women.MethodsAll first-year students at Stevens Institute of Technology are required to participate in subjectpool activities as a part of their core humanities courses. Starting in Fall 2021, the adaptiveexpertise survey by Fisher and Peterson was offered as an option to fulfill this requirement. Atotal of n=645 participated in this survey in Fall 2021 and n=620 in Fall 2022. Only students inSTEM majors are included in this study. Demographic information of the survey participants isprovided in Table 1 below. As seen in Figure 1, the
resale price.Analyzing students' work from Fall 2022 class revealed concerning results. While students drewthe cash flow diagrams correctly, the following issues were observed: 1) 25.8% failed in PI #2 (i.e. could not calculate the EAOC) 2) 84.4% failed in PI # 3 (i.e., students estimate the resale price)Their work also revealed some patterns of mistakes that needed further analysis to realize if therewere any potential misconceptions. Two anonymous examples of students’ work are presented in 3Figure 1 that shows: (i) lack of understanding of the reference time pf cash flows, and (ii) lack ofunderstanding of cost of service or
collegestudents to conduct research at NASA. It set the stage for our community college to be a partnerin a large Department of Education grant for open textbooks. That funded creation of over 60additional free and open textbooks now housed in the college commons on LibreTexts [43]. ByFall 2022, these OER books were used in over 1,000-course sections, impacting over 15,000students.Among the OER textbooks built are Introduction to Engineering for Engineers and Scientists[44], General Physics [45, 46] and Calculus [47]. To improve them we are currently buildingonline formative and summative assessment into the textbooks. Figure 3. General Chemistry for Engineers daily pageviews from Google Analytics.Following on the principles used in creating the
-world problems, fostering a deeperunderstanding of the subjects (Stohlmann et al., 2012)[7]. This integration not only enhancesstudents' academic performance but also promotes their entrepreneurial mindset and skills(Benek & Akçay, 2022)[8]. Additionally, a study by Zhang et al.(2013)[9] reviewed empiricalresearch on entrepreneurship education and identified the elements of entrepreneurshipcompetencies that are addressed in the literature, and their key findings suggest thatentrepreneurship education can indeed nurture students' ability to think creatively, identifyopportunities, and develop innovative solutions.Furthermore, entrepreneurship education has been linked to the development of 21st centuryskills such as critical thinking
, mini-lecture and experiential learning activity Sage Publications. [2] na. (2022) Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool. U.S. Department of Energy. • Learning reinforcement can be achieved https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/en/#14.92/38.83097/-76.99577 Accessed
Conducting Risk Assessments Revision 1," Gaithersburg, 2012.[4] L. A. Cox Jr, "What's Wrong with Risk Matrices?," Risk Analysis, pp. 497-512, 2008.[5] Y. Y. Haimes, "Total Risk Management," Risk Analysis, pp. 169-171, 1991.[6] National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations - A system Life Cycle Approach for Security and Privacy NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2," Gaithersburg, 2018.[7] Committee on National Security Systems Glossary, "CNSSI-4009 Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) Glossary," Ft. Meade, 2022.[8] A. Shostack, Threat Modeling: Designing for Security, Germany: Wiley, 2014.[9] J. D. Weiss, "A System Security Engineering Process," in 14th National Computer
micro-credential and trialing it with students to assess its efficacy. In suitablefuture projects, further exploration of co-creation approaches should be explored to identify ifmore amenable approaches are available. An early hypothesis, however, is that co-creation modelpartialities are likely to vary widely with individual projects and participants’ personalities andpreferences.ReferencesABET. (2021.) Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2021-2022. https://www.abet.org/ accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021- 2022/Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79, 1023-1037. https
-usa.org/s/article/Guideline-to-Remote-Work-for-International-Proje cts[17] D. Leege, D. McMillan, “Building More Robust NGO–University Partnerships in Development: Lessons Learned from Catholic Relief Services,” Journal of Poverty Alleviation and International Development, vol. 7, no. 2, 2016.[18] W. Oakes, J. Duffy, T. Jacobius, P. Linos, S. Lord, W.W. Schultz, A. Smith, “Service-learning in Engineering” in 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, Boston, MA, USA, November 6-9, 2002, 2003.[19] T. Larson, Z. Dulanya, E. Mwathunga, “Borehole siting and construction in rural Malawi: A sociotechnical process?,” Geophysics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 39-47, 2022.[20] J. Truslove, A. Coulson, E. Mbalame, R. Kalin, “Behaviors
." International Journal of Production Research 54, no. 23 (2016): 6917-6935.5. Lu, Yuqian, Hao Zheng, Saahil Chand, Wanqing Xia, Zengkun Liu, Xun Xu, Lihui Wang, Zhaojun Qin, and Jinsong Bao. "Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards Industry 5.0." Journal of Manufacturing Systems 62 (2022): 612-627.6. Zhang, Chao, Zenghui Wang, Guanghui Zhou, Fengtian Chang, Dongxu Ma, Yanzhen Jing, Wei Cheng, Kai Ding, and Dan Zhao. "Towards new-generation human-centric smart manufacturing in Industry 5.0: A systematic review." Advanced Engineering Informatics 57 (2023): 102121.7. Ngo, Tuan D., Alireza Kashani, Gabriele Imbalzano, Kate TQ Nguyen, and David Hui. "Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and
teaching ethics,” Commun. ACM, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 27–29, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1145/2835957.[5] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2019-2020,” Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criterion 3, 2020. Accessed: Feb. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/[6] T. Hoke, “ASCE Adopts New Code of Ethics: Part 2,” Civ. Eng. Mag., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 26–27, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1061/ciegag.0001547.[7] NSPE, “History of the Code of Ethics for Engineers | National Society of Professional Engineers.” Accessed: Feb. 10, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code-ethics
wayspracticing engineers interact with computational tools and techniques that facilitate their work; and, ii.)considering how traditional professional judgments can be reified in common design practices such asstandards, safety factors, or policies and regulations. In later work, Francis et al. ((2022), p.81)emphasized the inter-professional aspect of judgment processes in teams and extended their work todefine engineering judgment as a holistic participatory capacity integrating the technical and socialcontext of engineering work, the cultural and discursive production of professional identities, andnaturalistic decision-making processes. Moreover, the ambiguity and uncertainty that is often present indesign or analytical situations requires
Morgantown, Pennsylvania as a Quality Engineer. Then in 2017, she joined the New Jersey Department of Transportation as a Mechanical Engineer Trainee. Within her five-year tenure there, she was promoted to Assistant Mechanical Engineer (2018), Principal Mechanical Engineer (2019) and Program Specialist 3 (2022). Pooja is certified in Sustainable Fleet Management as well as Six Sigma Lean Green, and Black Belts. She has served as a panelist for two Transportation Research Board projects and served as the Secretary of the Northeast Partnership in the Equipment Management Technical Services Program (EMTSP). Pooja is currently a Program Manager at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Strate- gic
the Black Belt. BBUWP is currently looking for fundingopportunities to continue its work of improving access to WASH for individuals and improvecommunity involvement as it solves WASH challenges.References-[1]C. Foundation, “Increasing Access to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) in the UnitedStates,” CDC Foundation, Oct. 2022. Available: https://www.cdcfoundation.org/US-WASH-RFP?inline[2]DIG DEEP and US Water Foundation, “Closing the Water Access Gap in the United States - ANational Action Plan,” Dig Deep. Available: https://www.digdeep.org/close-the-water-gap[3]DIG DEEP and US Water Foundation, “Closing the Water Access Gap in the United States - ANational Action Plan,” Dig Deep. Available: https://www.digdeep.org/close-the-water-gap[4
Education Theory & Practice, vol. 21, no. 9, 2021.[2] S. Kulturel-Konak, "Overview of Student Innovation Competitions and Their Roles in STEM Education," in 2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/38445.[3] D. Smith, J. Muldoon, and G. S. Lakshmikanth, "The need for modification: The impact of COVID-19 on pitch competitions," Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 686-702, 2022.[4] A. Konak, S. Kulturel-Konak, D. R. Schneider, and K. Mehta, "Best Practices for Cultivating Innovative Thinking Skills in Innovation Competitions and Programs," in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), College Station, TX, USA
development of trustworthy AI systems that are not onlytechnologically advanced but also ethically sound and socially responsible.By applying these recommendations, institutions can enhance their ability to prepare the nextgeneration of engineers and computer scientists for the challenges of designing AI systems thatare both innovative and trustworthy.[1] “Trustworthy and Responsible AI,” NIST, Jul. 2022, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/trustworthy-and-responsible-ai[2] National Science Foundation, Award Number 2125677.[3] National Science Foundation, [Online]. Available: https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/national-science-foundation-research-traineeship[4] K. Martin, “Ethical Implications and
scores are statistically significant (p-values <0.0001).Table 5. Course and teacher survey data 2018 through 2023. Fall 2018 Fall 2019 Fall 2020 Fall 2021 Fall 2022 Fall 2023 Section All SB All SB All SB All SB All SB All SB Requires 4.1 4.7 4.2 4.7 4.2 4.5 4.1 4.9 4.1 4.6 4.0 4.6 hard work Intellectually stimulating 4.2 4.7 4.2 4.7 4.2 4.5 4.2 4.9 4.1 4.7 4.1 4.6 class Learned a 4.1 4.6 4.3 4.7 4.2 4.5 4.1 4.8 4.2 4.7 4.0 4.6 great deal Overall value 4.2 4.6