©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Implementation and Assessment of the Effectiveness of Peer Teaching Instructional Technique in Lecture and Laboratory CoursesIntroductionPeer teaching is based on Bandura’s social learning theory, Piaget’s cognitive development, andVygotsky’s social constructivist learning theory [1-2], in which knowledge is sociallyconstructed by consensus among peers. The basic principle of peer teaching is that teachingsomething to others is an effective way to learn it [2-3]. Peer teaching involves students acting asboth teachers and learners, assisting each other in gaining knowledge and understanding throughinterdependence [4]. By teaching others, students
Paper ID #42124Impact of Learning Transfer-focused Lab Writing Modules to the WritingInstructional Materials by Engineering Lab InstructorsDr. Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In particular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his
great importancefor students across a wide array of disciplines, including civil, mechanical, and aerospaceengineering, among others [5]. This field is dedicated to analyzing bodies that are either at rest orin a state of equilibrium, where the net forces and moments are balanced. The pedagogicalapproach to teaching statics commonly encompasses both lectures and laboratory sessions,providing a comprehensive learning experience. Typically introduced at the sophomore level orfirst year engineering projects, this course builds upon the foundational knowledge acquired inintroductory engineering courses i.e. CAD. At this stage, most students may not have delved intomechanical design. However, towards the conclusion of the statics course, an
create thecourse, determine what to study, and then work one-on-one or group of students to earnacademic credit. A study conducted by Zaka et al.[2] in flipped class room teaching found thatstudents universally enjoyed learning independently and appreciated the increased collaborationinduced by the flipped approach. The flexibility of the approach enabled a range of independentlearning and collaboration, and students were able to find learning styles that suited them.Several studies [3] [4] [5] indicated that more benefits include the opportunity to cover morematerial over a short period of time and freeing up more time for active learning, collaboration,critical thinking, problem solving, and deeper understanding of the content. An
. PhD. Civil Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS , May 2008. Dr. Palomo is currently a Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona). In this position, Dr. Palomo is responsible for teaching courses such as Introduction to Civil Engineering; Hydraulics; Water and Wastewater Treatment; Groundwater Mechanics; Research Experience of Undergraduate Students; and Engineering Outreach Service Learning courses, among others. She is also a faculty advisor for the California Water Environment Association (CWEA), and Engineers Without Boarders (EWB) student chapters. Additionally, Dr. Palomo is the CE Water Analysis laboratory director and
Paper ID #42337Optimizing Co-Teaching Strategies for Success in a Neuroinclusive LargeMechanics of Materials ClassDr. Sarira Motaref, University of Connecticut Sarira Motaref is a Professor in residence in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. She is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Connecticut. She received her PhD in 2011 from the University of Nevada, Reno. She has been teaching junior and senior-level design courses, as well as several large-enrollment classes. Sarira is currently serving as Assistant Director of Faculty Development at the School of
, hydrostatics forces,pressurized pipe flow, water distribution, open channel flow, hydrology, surface runoff, rainfall,and risk. Computer modeling and laboratory exercises are used to emphasize principles. Thecourse meets three days a week for 65 minutes each session. Several lab activities are used as in-class activities while others that require more intensive calculations and reporting are assignedoutside of class. Additional course components include homework problems, a researchpresentation, and unit tests.Adjustments were made to the schedule and assignments to improve student learning andincorporate three teaching practices as described below. Throughout the course planning, carewas taken to rearrange the student workload, not increase it. Table
. The time spent comparing numerical methodsalways seemed less valuable than giving students time to use the methods, particularly whencomparing to a measured structural response. Thus, the inquiry-based approach to teaching blastloads was developed and is described here.Assessment of the impact of this innovation was performed by scrutinizing performance on anexam question involving blast load response of a hypothetical steel frame structure during thisyear, when the blast loading lab was performed, and a prior year when a different lab wasincluded. Student laboratory reports for this year, when the lab was conducted, were examinedqualitatively for the intervention group, but no control group was available since a blast loadinglaboratory had
predictor of student success”[3, p. 2]. This sense of belonging is pertinent when facilitating an inclusive and equitableclassroom environment and is of particular importance for students of marginalized groups inengineering education [4]. Instilling learning community presence encourages academic andpersonal development and social success and is linked to greater feelings of inclusivity in thelearning environment [4].Effects of Emergency Remote Teaching on Instructor-Student CommunicationThere has been a profound discourse about the effects of a rapid switch to online learning onstudents’ connection to their learning communities and general isolation. This modal shift hasoccurred in history for many reasons, including threats of violence, natural
years on the faculty at the US Military Academy at West Point teaching civil engineering. He also served as the Director, Graduate Professional Development at Northeastern University’s College of Engineering. He is the recipient of the 2021 NSPE Engineering Education Excellence Award and the 2019 ASCE Thomas A Lenox ExCEEd Leadership Award.Dr. Camilla M. Saviz P.E., University of the Pacific Camilla Saviz is Professor and Chair of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an M.B.A. from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California
Paper ID #41095Sticking Points: Reasons Why Civil Engineering Students Make Errors SolvingEngineering Mechanics ProblemsMajor Brett Rocha, United States Military Academy MAJ Brett Rocha is a third year instructor at the US Military Academy in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA in 2012, her M.S. in Engineering Management from Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2016, and her M.S. in Civil Engineering from University of Central Florida in 2021. She teaches mechanics of materials, design of steel structures, and design of concrete
these projects. Furthermore, survey resultsshowed that capstone design instructors provided most of the evaluation of student work, followedby project coaches, and industry liaisons. The capstone final reports, presentations, and producthad the largest role in the student work evaluation, but the process and design reviews were alsoimportant. Recently Mintz [5] recognized that the students’ needs and goals are changing and calledon faculty to transform teaching and assessment approaches to the new reality. There has been ashift from relatively homogeneous to highly diverse classrooms and recognize that a one-size-fits-all teaching pedagogy won’t work. Therefore, it is essential for faculty to continuously monitorstudent learning and diagnosing
, Gulf Coast Center for Addressing Microplastic Pollution (GC-CAM), and the founding faculty advisor for the Society of Sustainable Engineering. He teaches a mixture of undergraduate and graduate engineering courses. Dr. Wu is a committee member for Transportation Research Board (TRB) AJE35 and AKM 90, a member of American Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and Academy of Pavement Science and Engineering (APSE), as well as an editorial member for Journal of Testing and Evaluation and International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. He serves panel member for several NCHRP and ACRP projects. He is also a registered professional engineer in Alabama and LEED
) conference paper [3] authors spoke about anew education space that would have flexible laboratory modules that would allow for futuremodification. The authors spoke that these new spaces would be utilized for clinic projects,multiple disciplines courses, for teaching / research, and be able to accommodate multiplecourses of instruction. In the field of Civil Engineering, space was constructed to providetechnology focused courses and research, discipline courses and research, and student teamprojects. More specifically it was made with three contiguous modules that form a 66 x 40ft openarea with one half dedicated to environmental engineering and the other half dedicated toinfrastructure engineering with a classroom centrally located in the center
is not an ABET requirement.Traditionally, surveying courses have emphasized lecture sessions covering surveying principlesand methodologies, complemented by laboratory exercises particular to various surveyingmethods and utilizing surveying instruments [5]. However, alongside this conventional approach,PBL is being introduced, offering students hands-on experience in applying theoreticalknowledge to real-world scenarios [4]. PBL encourages critical thinking, interdisciplinarycollaboration, and the development of essential professional skills such as problem-solving,communication, and project management. Prince and Felder present strong evidence thatinductive teaching methods are more effective than traditional deductive teaching methods
Paper ID #41567Re-designing a Technical Communications Course to Address Scaling ChallengesDr. Jennifer Retherford, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Dr. Retherford is an alumna of the University of Nebraska, Omaha, and received her graduate degrees from Vanderbilt University. She currently teaches a variety of courses supporting the department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University ofDr. Sarah Mobley, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Sarah J. Mobley is a Lecturer in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
University, Nigeria. Adebayo has taught courses in Transportation and Chemistry at Morgan State University as part of his commitment to the STEM profession. He has attended conferences across the Transportation engineering field.Mr. Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University Pelumi Abiodun is a current doctoral student and research assistant at the department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland. Pelumi got his BSc and MSc degree in Physics from Obafemi Awolowo University, where he also served as a research assistant at the Environmental Pollution Research unit, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. As part of his contribution to science and engineering, Pelumi has taught as a teaching assistant both at
. This falls in linewith what Ken Bain discusses in his book, What the Best College Teachers Do, where he statesthat, “highly effective teachers design better learning experiences for their students in partbecause they conceive of teaching as fostering learning” [8]. The goal is to leverage somethingfamiliar within the classroom, like a home’s energy system, in order to create a relatableexperience that helps build upon course concepts. The new power demonstrator board isspecifically designed to function in any classroom, office, or laboratory space, utilizing 120Vsingle phase power instead of three-phase power as in the original version. This allowsinstructors more flexibility in where the lesson is presented, significantly increasing the
load conditions. These effects have complex dependencies with the geometry, shape,configuration, and material properties of the systems under study and the types, magnitudes,and mechanisms of the loads applied. Understanding and learning these relationships requiresa strong combination of spatial imagination, physical perception, and structural mechanicslaws. Traditional models for course delivery in structural mechanics rely on lectures describingthese behaviors and the underlying structural mechanics concepts using classroom illustrationsand demonstrations of members under loads in a structural laboratory. While conductinglaboratory experiments is often considered an essential method for teaching structuralmechanics theory [1], substantial
Paper ID #42559Exploring Educational Needs and Practices in Structural AnalysisDr. Joel Lanning, University of California, Irvine Dr. Joel Lanning, an Associate Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine, specializes in seismic design for civil structures, including bridges and buildings. His research revolves around advancing tools and techniques for improving the cyclic resilience of structural components. Dr. Lanning is passionate about teaching and is dedicated to developing strategies and tools for effective learning. His teaching philosophy emphasizes the creation of strong learning communities
Paper ID #42582Board 31: Case Study: Reimagining a Design Project with 3D-printed ConcreteAfeefa Rahman, University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignCasey J Rodgers, University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignProf. Jacob Henschen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Professor Henschen completed his B.S., M.S., and PhD. at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2007, 2009, and 2018 respectively. He was an Assistant Professor at Valparaiso University until he moved to the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign as a Teaching Assistant Professor in June 2020. He serves as the co-chair for the Teaching Methods and Education
Paper ID #42261How Do We Take Full Advantage of the Academic Benefits of Student CompetitionsCarly Woelfel, United States Military AcademyMajor Brett Rocha P.E., United States Military Academy MAJ Brett Rocha is a third year instructor at the US Military Academy in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA in 2012, her M.S. in Engineering Management from Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2016, and her M.S. in Civil Engineering from University of Central Florida in 2021. She teaches mechanics of materials, design of steel structures, and design of
then test their proposed experiment in a wet-chemistry laboratory, record dataon findings, and have an opportunity to iterate on their materials list and try the experimentagain. Outside of the lab, students research a community in New Mexico that could be impactedby AMD and apply empathy perspectives to consider all stakeholders who may be involved(community members, farmers, government employees, etc.). The final proposed solution fortreatment integrates both the lab experiment and the community stakeholder needs assessment.Design Challenge 2: Concrete CanoeThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) holds an annual concrete canoe competitionwhere student groups from universities across the U.S. design, build and race a canoe made