Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Reisel P.E., University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

where the university could provide more support to the faculty. If a faculty member isfound to be performing very well, units are encouraged to positively recognize that performance.If a faculty member is found to be not performing satisfactorily, an action plan is to bedeveloped. Absent from the policy is discussion of employment termination. While such anoutcome might be able to be implied if an action plan is not successfully completed, it isnoteworthy in comparison to other policies that employment termination is not stated explicitly.The collective bargaining agreement between the California Faculty Association and theCalifornia State University system [5] outlines a comprehensive post-tenure review process thatwill occur every five years

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebekah Riddle, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Todd Schenk, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lucas Michael Goodman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

Paper ID #43147Combating the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance Negotiation Simulation: UsingSerious Games to Simulate Policy DeliberationMrs. Rebekah Riddle, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University REBEKAH RIDDLE is a doctoral student in the Planning, Governance, and Globalization program and is a member of the SPI (Science-Policy Interface Lab) at Virginia Tech. She works closely with scientists and engineers to bridge the gap between science and policy using serious games. She holds an M.Eng. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of Virginia and a B.S. in Biological Systems Engineering from

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Centers, The MITRE Corporation; Michael A Balazs; Titilayo Ogunyale

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

(STEM) education in order to remain aglobal leader in discovery and innovation. For this reason, the National Science and TechnologyCouncil’s (NSTC) Committee on STEM Education (CoSTEM) released a five-year strategic planin 2018 describing nation-wide goals surrounding STEM education and the strategic pathwaysthrough which these goals could be achieved. It is this strategic plan that recognizes that eventhough increased financial support is helpful, collaboration, purposeful program development,and investment transparency are also key to achieving the goals set forth in the plan. Through ananalysis of the Federal STEM ecosystem, the work reported by interagency working groupswithin CoSTEM, and the Federal STEM Investments Inventory data, which

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trina L. Fletcher, Florida International University; Simone Nicholson, Florida International University; Christopher Alexander Carr, George Mason University; Tina Fletcher; Brittany Boyd

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

obtaining R1 status a top priority for theirorganization, with many embedding the goal in their critical strategic plans or key initiativeswithin their leadership teams’ organizational priorities. Despite such efforts, an integralingredient to achieving R1 status – leadership – is under-researched in the field. Thus, our studyaims to acknowledge the vital role of transformational and distributed leadership within HBCUsand their broader stakeholder community in achieving their goal of reaching R1 status.The goal of this research study is to (1) conduct an analysis of data available within the CarnegieClassification®, (2) provide a thorough review of the literature surrounding this phenomenon,(3) explain the role of engineering-related expenditures