from Harvard University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Adaptive Scaffolding Approach Based on Team Dynamics in anIntegrated Masters and Undergraduate Bioengineering Capstone Design CourseIntroduction Capstone courses in undergraduate engineering programs serve useful roles for bothstudents and faculty. ABET criterion 5 essentially requires a summative project, which is oftendelivered through a capstone course [28]. For students, these courses represent an opportunity toapply their training and skills to a problem relevant to the domain of their studies. It could beargued that a capstone course is one of the most effective courses by design, given that
all engineering projects consisting of conceptual designs,computer models, simulations, and physical implementations essential elements of learning. Forundergraduate engineering education, capstone projects are exceptionally important. Howe andGoldberg [3] analyze current practices, trends, and strategies. Furthermore, since this workaddresses a multiyear design project, the pedagogical value of project-based learning (PBL) as apart of experiential learning, is also well documented [4]-[6]. In addition, since students work inteams, some of the peer learning (PL) practices are implemented. PL is extensively addressed ineducation and psychology literature [7]-[11].Teams undertaking multiyear projects can be either replacing some members each
Engineering ini ated the implementa on of PBL concepts across courses in general engineering, 98 mathema cs, science and English [17]. They presented a model for a PBL-focused first-year curriculum, 99 while poin ng at the fact that most universi es (at that me) were not suitably structured to implement100 PBL prac ces straigh orwardly; and noted that it will take some effort to add PBL prac ces to their101 course material and curriculum ac vi es. They also pointed out that students can handle about 2102 projects per semester efficiently and a er that they might lose the ability to connect project objec ves103 with course material [17]. Courses such as capstone design for senior Engineering students should104 inherently follow a PBL format
Paper ID #42934Integrating a Design Project to Bridge Experiment for Statics learning inGeneral Engineering EducationDr. Yingxiao Song, Muskingum University Assistant Professor in Physics and Engineering Department of Muskingum University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Integrating a Design Project to Bridge Experiment for Statics learning inGeneral Engineering EducationAbstractEngineering Statics, a foundational course for most engineering students, is typically undertakenearly in their academic careers. Integrating hands-on experiments, such as the classic bridgeexperiment, is essential not only for a
solve real-world engineering problems. These courses often involve complex 2projects requiring teamwork, communication, problem-solving, critical thinking, and timemanagement. Students also learn to present their work effectively and defend their solutions in aprofessional setting. Capstone courses are project-based and faculty guided and will often requirea multidisciplinary approach to problem-solving and team collaboration to leverage each other'sstrengths. Project management skills, critical thinking and team collaboration are keycharacteristics of the capstone.A large volume of literature exists that describes lab and project activities in engineering andscience courses and how it helped in
inthe Introduction to Feedback Control course for several different projects, including linefollowing robot, ball levitator, ball balancer, and inverted pendulum self-balancing robot.Without learning Arduino in Digital Circuits Fundamentals, they would not be able to completethese course projects in just a few weeks. They have also used Arduino in their capstone seniordesign projects to build line following tennis ball shooter, remote controlled mobile trebuchet,robotic cat, robotic dog, Rubik’s cube solving machine, hovercraft, submarine, etc. Prior tolearning Arduino in Digital Circuits Fundamentals, students had to learn Arduino themselveswhile doing capstone senior design. As a result, they often could not build the working prototypeuntil
generallydo not gain experience in open-ended design or entrepreneurial innovation – skills which may behighly valued by future employers or graduate schools, and even in upper-level project-basedcourses such as capstone design.Biofabrication Lab is an upper-level elective laboratory course offering students hands-onexperience in advanced cell culture, computer aided design, additive manufacturing, andprototyping related to translational bioengineering. Quantitative Physiology Lab is a requiredlaboratory course in which third-year bioengineering students conduct experiments to measureand model human physiological systems, while gaining experience in data analysis andpresentation. To expand the breadth of knowledge and experience gained by students, a
senior capstone projects, there's a demand to integratedesign across students' academic journey. The technical intensity of engineering curricula poseschallenges in dedicating courses exclusively to design thinking or applying the design process.An alternative approach is to reimagine laboratory courses by incorporating engineering design.This pilot study explored the integration of engineering design principles in a required 14-week'engineering analysis and design' laboratory course for second-year mechanical engineeringstudents. The course combines lectures with hands-on laboratory sessions, covering topics suchas gears, motors, dynamics, hydraulics, and engines. The course also introduces Ulrich andEppinger's engineering design process and
initial use as a learning platform.Subsequently the IoT toolkit can serve as a prototype environment for the students as they designand implement their IoT solutions.Pre- and post-project surveys will be used to gather data on the efficacy of the learning toolkitsin teaching students about IoT concepts and technology. Questions will also be included toassess the impact of the IoT toolkits on students’ ability to recognize opportunities for exploitingIoT related technology in their capstone projects.ConclusionA collection of exercises has been developed to support remote engaged student learning of IoTconcepts and technology. The exercises are intended to support students that are utilizing anadvanced IoT toolkit to learn about IoT concepts and to
. Overall Course and Laboratory Evaluations based on Question No. 1 and Question No. 2Educational Institution No. 2 - Jacksonville University in Jacksonville, FLThe lead author was faculty at this institution from Fall 2015 to Spring 2019. She taught multiplecourses which had both laboratory and theory components here. She also taught some courseswhich were only laboratory based and had no theory component, such as capstone project 5courses. All the courses taught at this institution were taught in-person format at undergraduatelevel.This institution had an anonymous end of semester evaluation system till spring 2016, whichcollected student comments on various questions including,“What were the
,” Proceedings of the2020 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #30221, 2020.[15] Tally, K., “Lights, Camera, Action! Peer-to-Peer Learning through Graduate StudentVideos,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #59900, 2013.[16] Demoret, K., “Students Teaching Students: An approach to improving Capstone design,”Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #34707, 2021.[17] Cummings, M., Darbeheshti, M., Simon, G., Schupbach, Jocobson, M., Altman, T.,Goodman, K., “Comparing Student Outcomes from Four Iterations of an Engineering LearningCommunity,” Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #33192, 2021.[18] Dennis, N., “Experiential Learning Exercised Through Project Based Instruction,”Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual