(GAPS) program and received funding support from the NSF IGE program as the lead investigator. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Crossing the threshold: Improving STEM graduate student education through project management skills trainingAbstractGraduates Advancing Professional Skills (GAPS), a National Science Foundation-fundedprogram, aims to bridge the professional skills gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) graduate education. GAPS is a one-credit course offered since the Fall of2020, and it prepared 72 graduate STEM students to implement project management (PM)techniques to enhance their research competencies and adaptation to their future
Paper ID #42435Applied Capstone Project for Working Professionals: A Decade of Experiencesin Design, Execution, and Creating Value for EmployersDr. Bharani Nagarathnam, Texas A&M University Dr. Bharani Nagarathnam is an Associate Professor of Instruction and Associate Director of Master of Industrial Distribution program at the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. He is the co-founder of the Talent Development Council that works with Distributions on Talent acquisition, management, and development practices. He teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in
Paper ID #42677ConGrad: A Graduate Education Framework for Convergence Research andExperiential LearningMs. Tess Bisbee Meier, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Tess Meier is a PhD Candidate in Robotics Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Her research there focuses on wearable assistive and rehabilitation robotics but has a newfound interest in teaching & scholarship, and education research. As a Future of Robots in the Workplace – Research and Development NRT Fellow, Tess is being trained in designing, advising, and executing convergence research projects. She is interested in educating the next
Flexibility IP SCAFFOLDING Zone of Learner Assistance Learner Assistance Towards Independence OF Proximal Instructor Active Learning Peer Learning PLP Project or Exam INSTRUCTION Development Weeks 1-4 Weeks 1-4 Week 5 Student: Faculty ASSESSMENT OF • Non-technical core competency • Formative & summative feedback on model PERFORMANCE AND • Improved understanding of • Feedback on student interactions
science doctoral students? 2) Specifically, how do such interactions predict skill development (associated with primary funding mechanism) for the following career-related skills: a) research, b) teamwork and project management, c) peer training and mentoring, and d) communication?We administered the Graduate Student Funding Survey to engineering and physical sciencedoctoral programs in the United States, with focused sampling of institutions that produce a highnumber of doctorates and that have highly ranked programs. We developed the survey, includingsurvey items on demographics, funding mechanism, skill development, and climate (i.e.,interactions with others). Data collection occurred in Fall 2019 (n = 615). We did not
, he is a co-principal investigator of the STEP-1B CASCADE program.Prof. Kai Jin, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Kai Jin is a Professor of Industrial Engineering and Co-PI of the MERIT project. Her research interests include Sustainable Energy, Green Manufacturing, Quality Control, and Multi Objective Decision Making and Optimization as well as Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Rapid ethnographic assessment of workshops on transdisciplinary intercultural competence,community engaged practice, and mixed research methodsABSTRACTThis paper is a rapid ethnographic assessment of six workshops on intercultural competence,community-engaged practice, and
proposed course plan, includingthe topic of the research they would like to perform with the SPECTRA scholars or examples ofpotential research projects. Four ACE Fellows were working in the program at the time of ourstudy; all four Fellows had had the opportunity to lead a research project, but at the time ofinterviews only two had had the chance to teach at a partnered technical college. During theresearch course, the students and ACE Fellows work closely together to produce and implementstudent-led research projects facilitated by the ACE Fellow. The relationship between the ACEfellow and the SPECTRA scholars resembles a near-peer mentoring relationship. This paper aims to observe the relationship between the students and the ACE
Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He earned his PhD in Engineering Education Systems & Design at Arizona State University and has a BS/MS in Biomedical Engineering. His research focuses on exploring and understanding engineering learning environments. He harnesses these insights to propose solutions that encourage the creation of safe and inclusive educational environments conducive to learning, professional development, and innovation. His research interests include graduate student mentorship, faculty development, mental health and well-being, teamwork and group dynamics, and the design of project-based learning classes. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
through novel environmental biotechnology for a sustainable and green biorefinery. Dr. Parameswaran also has active research grants through the NSF and industry partners.Prof. Matthew R. Sanderson Matthew R. Sanderson is the Randall C. Hill Distinguished Professor of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work and Professor of Geography and Geospatial Sciences at Kansas State University. Currently, he is working on several projects that examine co-evoDr. Melanie Derby, Kansas State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Insights from a Five-Year National Science Foundation Research Traineeshipat our University: Program Description, Evaluation, Outcomes and LessonsLearnedAbstractThe
,graduate students excel academically and become well-equipped for seamless transitions intotheir prosperous careers in the professional setting.Scientific communication is emphasized in undergraduate engineering programs but receives lessattention in graduate programs. Undergraduate engineering curricula prioritize the developmentof technical writing and presentation skills. These skills are integrated into coursework likecapstone projects and senior design and are standard across engineering disciplines in almost allinstitutions. In contrast, resources for developing communication skills in graduate programs areoften limited [2,3,4] and need to be more structured than the undergraduate level [5], making itchallenging for students to convey
usually expect a level oforganization, especially in the case of the in-class or summer research experience. A plan ofaction will be put into place, whether at the beginning or at each subsequent meeting betweenmentee and mentor or the group of mentees and mentor. For example, in a paper comparingmentor/mentee perspectives in an REU, Annie, a sophomore Engineering student says, “In thefirst couple of meetings, we met and discussed our project goals, objectives, and we formulated ahypothesis for our research.” [4, p. 4]. Of course, in the case of the extracurricular/personalexperience, it should not be expected that a mentor will provide organization to theundergraduate researcher, but may advise a possible plan of action without further
advanced degrees in science andengineering from prestigious American universities, and they trained me for academic successfrom a young age. I went to regular school during the day, but nights and weekends were dedi-cated to family school, a school in which my parents pushed me beyond any public curriculum.They tutored me personally, never outsourcing my education to teachers or private tutors, and Ireaped the fruit of their labor. I graduated from one of the best public high schools in the countryat the time and from the best engineering undergraduate program in the world. I also completedmultiple research projects during my undergraduate program, and I had stellar letters of recom-mendation from both course instructors and research advisors. I
-edge technical topics; and (3) highlighting theneed to increase participation of industry in professional training of graduate students.Introduction and background:Workforce development for graduate students is a subject of considerable research, yet preparinggraduate engineering students for workplace success remains a challenge for universities.According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 188,000 openings for architecture andengineering occupations and 377,500 openings for computer and information technologyoccupations are projected from 2022 to 2032, with little information as to whether these positionswill be filled by then [1][2]. In order to contribute to students’ individual career success andbroader societal advancement, workforce
Society, and Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award by the National Science Foundation.Prof. Andrea Paola Arguelles, Pennsylvania State University ˜ Dr. Andrea P. ArgA¼elles is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Science and Mechanics at the Pennsylvania State University. She was born and raised in Venezuela, where she lived until 2007 when she moved to south Texas to pursue higher education. She ob ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessing a seminar series designed to help prepare doctoral engineering graduates for the academic job marketAbstractThe goal of this project was to obtain an assessment of the effectiveness of a
physical and material characteristics”[55](p. 227). In graduate school, the different settings students operate within as they develop contain microsystems that can include interactions with advisors and peers, departments, as well as activities like coursework, research projects, and extracurricular projects related or unrelated to their field of study; they can also include students’ relationships with family members within their home, as well as with coworkers and a supervisor within a place of employment[50], [53], [56], [57]. These different interacting settings (andtheir microsystems) contain various patterns of or expected, appropriate kinds of activities, roles, and
the Summer Academy ensure ongoing guidance and feedback.Certification: • Upon completing the program, fellows receive a certificate from a nationally recognized organization, affirming their participation and achievement in this innovative educational initiative.This structured approach to implementing the project ensures a blend of rigor and engagingcontent aimed at fostering interest in STEM fields among younger students. Throughprofessional development activities and expert-led workshops, graduate students are equipped todeliver high-quality educational experiences, contributing to the broader goal of promotingSTEM education.2.4. Sample Program Descriptions developed and created by graduate students.The initial Cohort in
to transition into a new field [9]. Therefore,rather than switching undergraduate majors from chemistry to chemical engineering, a morenatural choice would be pursuing a graduate degree in engineering to maximize earning potentialand employment opportunities.According to the National Association of Colleges and Employers [10], a master’s degree canlead to a 20% increase in earnings compared to a bachelor’s degree. The national median salary,national projected growth rate, and state mean annual salary estimates for mechanical, electrical,biomedical, and computer engineering are given in Table 1 below. All engineering majors have aprojected growth rate higher than the national average of 3%, indicating a healthy demand fordegreed engineers
project that primarilyfocused on two specific groups of students within graduate engineering education. One group isdenoted as Returners, who are defined within this study as those students who have completedtheir undergraduate degrees five or more years before returning to obtain a master’s inengineering. They may have completed other training or another master’s but have waited thislength of time before enrolling in a graduate engineering program. Direct Pathway students arethose who have elected to enroll in graduate school for a master’s in engineering or who havecompleted a joint bachelor/master program concurrent to or less than five years from when theycompleted their undergraduate degree.Research QuestionsThe focus of the overarching
, particularly for international students. He aims to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by interventions, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection to promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group. He served as the ASEE Purdue Student Chapter President from 2022-2023, the Program Chair of ASEE Student Division, and Purdue ENE Graduate Committee Junior Chair.Dr. Moses Olayemi, University of Oklahoma Moses Olayemi is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Pathways at the
a multi-year, mixed-methods research project funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to understand factors contributing to the attrition and retention of studentsfrom racially minoritized and marginalized groups in engineering doctoral programs, wedeveloped a survey to assess engineering doctoral students’ experience of department-levelorganizational climate. We aimed to survey engineering doctoral students using a valid andreliable instrument that focuses on the climate constructs that contribute to the retention orattrition of students from historically excluded or underrepresented groups. Here, climateconstructs, in general, refer to the theoretical concepts or dimensions as organization members’shared perceptions of climates
approach that embraces diversity and fosters globalunderstanding [13].Chen and Shaurette [14] explore the learning experiences of international graduate students inconstruction programs to focus on the use of job-shadowing as a learning method and found thatlanguage barriers, cultural differences, and lack of contextual knowledge made it difficult for thestudents to understand and participate in professional discussions and daily conversations fully.However, according to Chen and Shaurette's [14] study, the students who had longer job-shadowing experiences had more time to learn and understand the project and build relationshipswith team members, highlighting the importance of acculturation and relationship building in thelearning process. Chen
Paper ID #43552Harnessing the Strengths of Neurodiverse Students in Graduate STEM Fields:The Central Role of Advisor-Advisee CommunicationMs. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Syharat is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) ”Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity
investigate this as theexperiment was to observe if the critical reading of the paper resulted in students suspecting this.In this section, we will describe the fake paper experience in both 2018 and 2021.2018 - Fake Paper ClassIn 2018, we used the work by SCIgen project(https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/) to create a fake paper purelywith the tool. The paper is titled ”Exploring Routing Using Optimal Architectures”, and theauthor was Moshe Krieger (a tribute to my undergraduate advisor). The citations in this paper areall made up using researchers’ names in the FPGA research space. Additionally, there are notables or figures in this generated publication. The fake publication can be viewed athttp://drpeterjamieson.com/html_papers
, collaboration, time management, ethics andresearch integrity, analytics (e.g., data science/statistics), project management, and criticalthinking — faculty members were asked to rate from 'very important' to 'not important at all.'The results showed that 'very important' is the largest proportion for all qualities or skills.Additionally, faculty members mentioned various skills that they also consider important,including writing, marketing, hands-on experiences, entrepreneurial skills, networking, self-assessment, and independent research skills.When asked if they would like to encourage collaborative research between their PhD studentsand non-academic partners (e.g., an industrial lab), 78% of the participants provided a positiveanswer (see Fig. 8
Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Louisiana Tech University. She is also the Co-Director of the Office for Women in Science and Engineering at Louisiana Tech.Mr. Casey Kidd, Louisiana Tech University Casey Kidd is a graduate student in the College of Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. His focus is on project-based learning. He earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Louisiana Tech University in Spring of 2004.Mrs. Lindsay K. Gouedy, Louisiana Tech University Lindsay Gouedy is pursuing her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, serving as a National Security Fellow at Air Force Global Strike Command, specializing in virtual reality (VR) training methodologies. Concurrently
to get patents done, and people are always really excited about trying to get this to commercialization.Students continue to pursue publications of their work, though the primary focus is on the patentas their capstone experience. As the feedback from one completer (above) suggests, studentsmay be involved in more than one research project with more than one leading to patentproposals.Additionally, candidates have specific opportunities to develop entrepreneurial skills such asenrollment in courses offered by the College of Business with a focus on entrepreneurship andinnovation including Entrepreneurial Decisions, Entrepreneurial Strategy, Innovation Analytics,Evaluating Entrepreneurial Opportunities, Entrepreneurial
challenges, this study amplifies the clarioncall for fostering participation and inclusivity in engineering doctoral programs.IntroductionPromoting diversity within the engineering workforce is a critical national priority, underscoringthe need for broader participation and the cultivation of inclusivity [1]. The infusion of diversityinto the field of civil engineering in the United States yields numerous advantages, including amultifaceted project perspective, heightened project value, the enrichment of knowledge, talent,and ideas, access to expansive networks, and the production of superior final products necessaryfor global competitiveness in infrastructure [2]. Consequently, achieving this imperative requiresa comprehensive examination of the
Learning and Adult Education with a minor in Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies from The Pennsylvania State University. Her research interests are at the intersection of race and learning in adult education, DesiCrit (theorizing the racialized experiences of South Asian Americans using Critical Race Theory), Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) as a framework to analyze learning, and qualitative research. She is currently working on the following research projects: Environmental racism, Racialized experience of South Asian Americans, and Mothering during the pandemic. Her selected publications include ”Learning to teach about race: The racialized experience of a South Asian American feminist educator” in Adult
ofengineering PhD students, and what type of training mode is suitable for differentengineering PhD students?3. Research design3.1 Research tools and variable settingsTo gain a comprehensive understanding of the current training experience of Chinesedoctoral students, the China Doctoral Education Research Center launched by PekingUniversity, commissioned by the Ministry of Education's Department of DegreeAdministration and Graduate Education, has been conducting the NationalPostgraduate Training Quality Feedback Survey Project since 2016. This nationalsurvey focuses on recent doctoral graduates. The team developed the NationalDoctoral Graduates Survey Questionnaire as a survey tool, drawing from existingsurvey questionnaires. The questionnaire uses a
were several statements expressing an increased sense ofcontrol over students' unique career development path. ● " ...after taking this course, I can identify specific areas of computational science which interest me (e.g. machine learning, high-performance computing), as well as possible opportunities within a number of projects and industries that would benefit from a computational scientist’s skills and background. Not only do I feel far more confident about my decision to get a Ph.D. in such a subject, I know that I will have a variety of career opportunities that will both fulfill and challenge me."; ● "found it interesting that most panelists had taken indirect paths to their current position. This helped to