A Systematized Literature Review on Workforce Development Programs for Engineering Graduate Students

Isabella Victoria; Laura Melissa Cruz Castro; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 2: Graduate Student Pipeline and Workforce Development
Tagged Division: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/46500

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Isabella Victoria University of Florida

visit author page

Isabella Victoria is a Ph.D student in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida

visit author page

biography

Laura Melissa Cruz Castro University of Florida

visit author page

Dr. Laura Cruz is an instructional assistant professor in the engineering education department at University of Florida.

visit author page

biography

Idalis Villanueva Alarcón University of Florida orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-2576

visit author page

Dr. Villanueva is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for underrepresented groups.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Ph.D. graduate students in engineering are being hired in industry at higher rates compared to institutions of higher education. Yet, workforce preparedness, typically occurring within these institutions of higher education, are not equipped to help Ph.D. engineering students to transition into the workforce. Therefore, to better prepare our engineering graduate students, we must start by understanding the current state of Ph.D. professional preparation programs in both industry and academia. This exploratory study's purpose was to scope existing peer-reviewed and published articles describing the focus and target audience of engineering workforce training programs for graduate students in industry and academia. The study aimed to explore what existing workforce trainings exist for graduate engineering students and then, to see what skills they are teaching students. The objective was to, using the information from the scoping review, to begin to outline workplace reading skills and criteria for a future development of a theory of workplace readiness for Ph.D. engineering graduate students. This exploratory study used the Virginia Workplace Readiness skills framework to classify the skills provided to participants of these workforce development programs. The research questions (RQs) for this study were: (RQ1) What training programs exist in the literature for workforce development for engineering Ph.D. students? (sub-RQ1) How are Ph.D. workforce training programs for engineering graduate students in the literature being described? (RQ2) What workforce readiness skills do these training programs have for engineering Ph.D. students and how do they align with the type of skills described in the Virginia Workplace Readiness skills framework? To address these research questions and sub-research questions, we performed a systematized literature review utilizing three databases: SCOPUS, Engineering Village and ERIC. The selection of the databases was based on our goal to synthesize education-related literature within engineering by structuring a search that yields multidisciplinary results. The systematized literature review included an initial screening of 567 abstracts and resulted in the synthesis of 23 papers. We identified the characteristics and common goals of these programs. The workforce training programs were classified into three themes: (1) personal qualities and abilities, (2) interpersonal skills, and (3) professional competencies.

The findings shed light into: (1) the need to prepare engineering Ph.D. students in professional skills, given its lack of mention in workforce training programs; (2) the efforts that have gone into preparing engineering Ph.D. students in cutting-edge technical topics; and (3) highlighting the need to increase participation of industry in professional training of graduate students.

Citation
Format

Victoria, I., & Cruz Castro, L. M., & Villanueva Alarcón, I. (2024, June), A Systematized Literature Review on Workforce Development Programs for Engineering Graduate Students Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/46500

TY - CPAPER
AB - Ph.D. graduate students in engineering are being hired in industry at higher rates compared to institutions of higher education. Yet, workforce preparedness, typically occurring within these institutions of higher education, are not equipped to help Ph.D. engineering students to transition into the workforce. Therefore, to better prepare our engineering graduate students, we must start by understanding the current state of Ph.D. professional preparation programs in both industry and academia. This exploratory study&#39;s purpose was to scope existing peer-reviewed and published articles describing the focus and target audience of engineering workforce training programs for graduate students in industry and academia. The study aimed to explore what existing workforce trainings exist for graduate engineering students and then, to see what skills they are teaching students. The objective was to, using the information from the scoping review, to begin to outline workplace reading skills and criteria for a future development of a theory of workplace readiness for Ph.D. engineering graduate students. This exploratory study used the Virginia Workplace Readiness skills framework to classify the skills provided to participants of these workforce development programs. The research questions (RQs) for this study were: (RQ1) What training programs exist in the literature for workforce development for engineering Ph.D. students? (sub-RQ1) How are Ph.D. workforce training programs for engineering graduate students in the literature being described? (RQ2) What workforce readiness skills do these training programs have for engineering Ph.D. students and how do they align with the type of skills described in the Virginia Workplace Readiness skills framework? To address these research questions and sub-research questions, we performed a systematized literature review utilizing three databases: SCOPUS, Engineering Village and ERIC. The selection of the databases was based on our goal to synthesize education-related literature within engineering by structuring a search that yields multidisciplinary results. The systematized literature review included an initial screening of 567 abstracts and resulted in the synthesis of 23 papers. We identified the characteristics and common goals of these programs. The workforce training programs were classified into three themes: (1) personal qualities and abilities, (2) interpersonal skills, and (3) professional competencies.

The findings shed light into: (1) the need to prepare engineering Ph.D. students in professional skills, given its lack of mention in workforce training programs; (2) the efforts that have gone into preparing engineering Ph.D. students in cutting-edge technical topics; and (3) highlighting the need to increase participation of industry in professional training of graduate students.

AU - Isabella Victoria
AU - Laura Melissa Cruz Castro
AU - Idalis Villanueva Alarcón
CY - Portland, Oregon
DA - 2024/06/23
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - A Systematized Literature Review on Workforce Development Programs for Engineering Graduate Students
UR - https://peer.asee.org/46500
ER -