British Columbia, where he serves as the program advisor for the Manufacturing Engineering undergraduate program. Casey’s research interests include multi-campus instruction and the development of open educational resources.Abbas Hosseini, University of British Columbia, Vancouver ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Reflections on Multi-campus Teaching in a New Manufacturing Engineering ProgramAbstractIn 2019, the University of British Columbia (UBC) initiated a new multi-campus manufacturingengineering program involving two campuses situated over 450 km apart. Each institution isresponsible for managing its own curriculum and specialization within manufacturing
six individual skillmodules covering skills such as dependability, responsibility, independence, persistence,integrity, and ethics. The main goal is to create multiple opportunities to teach and reinforcesoft skills within the regular technical curriculum in the high schools. This paper discussesthe integration of the soft skills modules into the technical curriculum developed viaexamples, and outlines its potential uses in this engineering department’s curriculumincluding its manufacturing engineering program. The paper concludes with a discussion ofthe implementation of this project and provides some preliminary feedback from theparticipating high schools and reflections of the authors. It also includes future workopportunities such as
Society of Phi Kappa Phi, placing her among the top 10% of Purdue Graduate students. Her academic journey reflects a commitment to advancing knowledge and contributing to technological innovation in XR control systems. Her professional aspirations include applying for an Assistant Professor position upon completing her Ph.D. This career trajectory aligns with her desire to leverage her accumulated experience and knowledge to mentor and guide emerging talents. A central component of her vision is inspiring and supporting aspiring scholars in pursuing academic and professional excellence, facilitating impactful change within our field.Dr. Farid Breidi, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Farid
program origin stories,” in ASEE annual conference & exposition, 2019.[3] Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute, “2018 Manufacturing Skills Gap Study,” Deloitte United States. Accessed: Jul. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/manufacturing/articles/future-of-manufacturing- skills-gap-study.html[4] L. Avendano, J. Renteria, S. Kwon, and K. Hamdan, “Bringing equity to underserved communities through STEM education: implications for leadership development,” Journal of Educational Administration and History, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 66–82, 2019.[5] D. Reider, K. Knestis, and J. Malyn-Smith, “Workforce education models for K-12 STEM education programs: Reflections on, and implications for, the
manufacturing under guidance of Dr. Fidan. He also works as student manager of iMakerSpace Innovation lab at Tennessee Technological University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Unique Instructional Delivery of Additive Manufacturing: A Holistic ReviewAbstractAdditive Manufacturing (AM), often referred to as 3D Printing (3DP), has emerged as atransformative technology compared to traditional manufacturing across industries such asaerospace, healthcare, and automotive. With this evolution, the demand for specialized educationand training in AM is growing. This brief concept paper provides a condensed review ofdistinctive instructional delivery methods in the field of AM, reflecting the dynamic nature
to comprise anAdditive Manufacturing Skills sub-scale. The content reflects the specific skills identified in theproject design. Students respond using a 6-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Completely Uncertain)to 6 (Completely Certain).Cronbach's coefficient alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency of each scale. TheEngineering Skills Self-Efficacy sub-scale values were good and consistent with those reportedin previous research. The value was borderline for the newly developed Additive ManufacturingSkills scale, suggesting that the number or content of the items may need to be reviewed.The means for all the scales were above the mid-point, suggesting that students had confidencein their abilities. As more data is collected in
studies to develop; 4) create more case studies; and 5) evaluate transfer oflearning by varying the sequence of operations in the case study.6. AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Improving UndergraduateSTEM Education (IUSE) Program (award no. 2044449). Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Hsieh, S. and Pedersen, S. “Design and evaluation of modules to teach PLC Interfacing Concepts,” Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference, June 25-28, 2023, Baltimore, MD.2. Hsi, S. and Agogino, A.M. “The impact and instructional benefit of using
components involves strategic utilization ofBlender and SolidWorks software. Blender's “. blend" file format seamlessly integrates into Unity'sassets for designing the fan. SolidWorks-generated components are reimagined in Blender forcompatibility with Unity as shown in Figure 2. The wind turbine model is sourced from the Unity3D Asset Store, providing a pre-built foundation [3].Within Unity 3D, the design process continues with the creation of essential elements, leveragingmesh colliders and scripting for user interaction as shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6. The additionof reflections enhances visual appeal, contributing to a more immersive and realistic userexperience. The design process seamlessly integrates Blender, SolidWorks, and Unity 3D
bemulti-axis and must be completed in less than four hours including machine setup and cleanup.The designs created by the students are amazing – both in creativity and in challenge. A small setof the final projects are shown in Figure 8.Changing Curriculum Outcomes and Skills DevelopmentTo meet the changes brought on by incorporating the described technologies, the course outcomesfor MFGE 332 have evolved to suit. These are shown in Table 2. Notably, outcome 1 has beenchanged from “Generate programs for CNC machining using manual part programmingtechniques” to reflect the move away from manual programming to CAM programming. Inaddition, outcome 5 has been added to reflect the increased role that inspection plays in the courseto help students
powermeasurements, and the NI 9211 can be integrated for thermocouples. The power and temperature,as well as the aforementioned force and vibration measurements, are desired for monitoring thefriction stir welding process.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the NSF under Grant No.1818655 and Department of Engineering atVSU. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF and VSU. The hard workfrom the VSU senior project group on “Design of a Monitoring System for ManufacturingProcesses” in 2021-2022 is thankfully acknowledged.Reference[1] Devarshi Shah, Jin Wang, Q. Peter He, Austin Hancock, Anthony Skjellum, “IoT